FL Evidence Distinctions Flashcards

1
Q

A judge may not summarize evidence or otherwise comment to the jury about

A
  • the weight of the evidence,
  • credibility of witnesses, or
  • guilt of the accused.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A Florida court may, at its discretion, take judicial notice of:

A
  1. Special, local, and private acts of the Florida Legislature and U.S. Congress;
  2. All other states’ and U.S. territories’ decisional, constitutional, and public statutory law;
  3. Contents of the Federal Register;
  4. Foreign nations’ and organizations of nations’ laws;
  5. Federal and state official legislative, executive, and judicial actions;
  6. Federal and state court rules and records;
  7. Florida municipal and county charter provisions, amendments, ordinances, and resolutions;
  8. Promulgated governmental rules that are published in the Florida Administrative Code or other bound written copies;
  9. Generally known facts within the territorial jurisdiction of the court;
  10. Generally known facts or facts capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned; and
  11. Governmental agencies and departments’ official seals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prior to requesting judicial notice, a party must..

A
  1. give adverse parties timely written notice of the request
  2. furnishes the court with sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice of the matter.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When deciding on judicial notice, the court must ..

A
  1. afford each party reasonable opportunity
  2. to present information relevant to the propriety of taking judicial notice and to the nature of the matter noticed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When deciding on judicial notice, the court MAY ..

A
  1. use any source of pertinent and reliable information, whether or not furnished by a party, without regard to any exclusionary rule
  2. except a valid claim of privilege and the Rule 403 exclusions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When the court denies judicial notice, it must …

A
  1. inform the parties at the earliest practicable time and
  2. must indicate for the record the denial of the request
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

May the court provide judicial notice to a jury?

A

Yes in civil

NO in criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is the appellate court bound by lower court’s decision on judicial notice?

A

NO

The court, in subsequent proceedings, is not required to give effect to an earlier court’s refusal or failure to take judicial notice of a matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What witnesses may not be excluded from the courtroom for testimony in a criminal proceeding?

A

in Florida a witness in a criminal case may not be excluded if

  1. the witness is the victim of the crime,
  2. the victim’s next of kin,
  3. the parent or guardian of a minor child victim, or
  4. a lawful representative of such person,

unless, upon motion of a party or the court, the court determines that the person’s presence would be prejudicial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A presumption is …

A

rebuttable

unless it is conclusive under the law from which it arises. Fla. Stat. § 90.301.

An example of a conclusive presumption is a statute that sets forth the age below which a person is deemed to be able to consent to sexual intercourse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In civil cases, every rebuttable presumption is either:

A

i) A presumption that affects the burden of producing evidence and requires the trier of fact to assume the existence of a presumed fact unless contrary credible evidence is introduced (at which point the presumption’s “bubble bursts”); or
ii) A more powerful presumption that affects the burden of proof—it places the burden of proof on the party it operates against to show the nonexistence of the presumed fact (meaning that the presumption doesn’t go away, i.e., the bubble doesn’t burst, merely because contrary evidence is produced).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can character evidence be in the form of an opinion?

A

NO

Contrary to the federal rule, in Florida, proof of character cannot be in the form of opinion testimony.

Only evidence in the form of reputation testimony is permitted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If a defendant offers evidence of a victim’s character, may the state rebut or show def’s character?

A

NO

  • the Florida rule does not allow the prosecution to rebut with the defendant’s character trait when the defendant offers a victim’s character trait
  • It may only rebut with evidence of victim’s character trait of peacefulness. See Fla. Stat. § 90.404.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts admissible?

A
  • when relevant
  • to prove a material fact
  • in issue

like identity, preparation, motive, intent, opportunity, plan, absence of mistake or accident, or knowledge (e.g., MIMIC evidence). Fla. Stat.

NOTE - A material fact is not at issue simply because it relates to an element of the charged crimes and the defendant has pled not guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If the purpose of introducing prior bad act evidence is to prove identity, then it must

A

must be “identifiable points of similarity” that establish, when also considering dissimilarities, a “sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When may prior bad acts of sexual battery or child molestation be introduced?

A

This evidence may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant,

but it is inadmissible when relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When must the state provide notice of intent to use prior bad acts evidence?

A

At least TEN (10) days before trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When providing notice of intent to use prior bad acts as evidence, what must the notice inculde?

A

This notice must describe the acts the state seeks to admit as evidence with particularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When is notice not required to use evidence of prior bad acts of a criminal defendant?

A

no notice is required for use of such evidence for

  1. impeachment or
  2. rebuttal of defendant’s character witnesses.
20
Q

In order for prior bad acts to be admissible, the state must prove that the bad acts are …

A
  1. supported by clear and convincing evidence
  2. the evidence must “be of such weight that it produces in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction, without hesitancy, as to the truth of the allegations sought to be established.”
21
Q

When may a civil or criminal defendant introduce evidence of other acts of a third party?

A

to at least suggest that the third party, rather than the defendant, committed the crime or tort.

22
Q

When may evidence of a person’s habit be introduced?

A
  1. admissible to corroborate other evidence that shows the habit occurred at a relevant time,
  2. it is not admissible as direct evidence without corroboration.
23
Q

A person is disqualified to testify as a witness if the court determines the person is:

A
  1. Incapable of expressing himself in such a way as to be understood directly or through interpretation by one who can understand him; or
  2. Incapable of understanding the duty to tell the truth.
24
Q

May a child testify without taking an oath?

A
  1. YES -
  2. BUT ONLY if the court determines that the child understands the duty to tell the truth or the duty not to lie
25
Q

If a minor is a victim or a witness to child abuse or neglict, or sex crime, then the court must in criminal proceedings….

A
  1. must appoint a guardian ad litem or other advocate to represent a minor in any criminal proceeding
26
Q

May a person testify who has a financial interest in an estate subject to the proceeding?

A

YES - FL has no dead man statute …

27
Q

How may a witness’s character for truthfulness be attacked?

A

REPUTATION EVIDENCE ONLY

OPINION EVIDENCE IS NOT PERMITTED

28
Q

On cross examination, may a character witness be asked about prior specific instances of conduct?

A

NO. Florida has not adopted Fed. 608(b).

a witness may not be asked about specific instances of conduct, even though it is probative of the truthfulness or untruthfulness of the witness or another witness about whose character the witness being cross-examined has testified.

29
Q

What is the time limit for using criminal convictions as evidence?

A

NO TIME LIMIT on dishonestly or false statements!

30
Q

If a person is pardoned for a crime, may that prior bad act still be used as evidence?

A

YES

The granting of a pardon does not render evidence of the conviction inadmissible. Fla. Stat. § 90.610(2).

31
Q

What evidence is inadmissible to impeach a witness’ character for truthfulness?

A

Evidence of juvenile adjudications is inadmissible to impeach a witness’s character for truthfulness in Florida.

32
Q

The proper procedural approach to impeach the credibility of a witness is …

A

simply to ask the witness whether the witness has ever been convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty, rather than by specifically naming the crime.

33
Q

If a witness denies that he has been convicted of such a crime after being specifically asked, then the adverse party may…

A

may enter the record of any such conviction into evidence

34
Q

If the witness does not deny that he has been convicted of a crime after being directly asked for impeachment purposes, then adverse party must…

A

the inquiry must end and may not be pursued to the point of naming the crime for which he was convicted.

35
Q

What questions are impermissible for purposes of impeachment regarding prior convictions?

A

questioning a witness about the nature and underlying facts of the witness’s prior conviction for impeachment purposes generally is not allowed

36
Q

When is it permissible to introduce testimony of details of prior felony conviction?

A

During the penalty phase of a capital trial IF the prior felony conviction involved the use or threat of violence

37
Q

When must a witness statement be show or disclosed to the witness?

A

When a witness is examined

  • concerning the witness’s prior written statement or
  • concerning an oral statement that has been reduced to writing,

the court, on motion of the adverse party, must order the statement to be shown to the witness or its contents disclosed to the witness.

38
Q

When is extrinsic evidence of a non-[arty witness’ prior inconsistent statement admissible?

A

AFTER

  1. the witness first has an opportunity to explain or deny the prior statement
  2. and
  3. the opposing party has an opportunity to interrogate the witness on it,

or if the interests of justice otherwise require its admission

39
Q

After a non party witness has had an opportunity to deny or admit the inconsistent statement, when can extrinsic evidence of the statement be introduced?

A

If a witness denies making or does not distinctly admit making the prior inconsistent statement, extrinsic evidence of such statement is admissible.

40
Q

A lay witness may testify as to his inference or opinion if :

A
  1. he cannot readily, accurately, and adequately communicate his perception without testifying in terms of inferences or opinions,
  2. Such inferences and opinions do not require special knowledge, skill, experience, or training AND
  3. if doing so will not mislead the trier of fact or prejudice the objecting party.
    4.
41
Q

May an expert testify as to criminal defendant’s mental state?

A

YES - no FRE 704 restriction

However, while an expert can state an opinion regarding a defendant’s sanity, an expert cannot state an opinion as to a legal conclusion, such the existence of “criminal capacity” or the lack of a “depraved mind”.

42
Q

May an expert witness be questioned about the underlying facts or data?

A

YES

43
Q

If the party establishes prima facie evidence that the expert does not have a sufficient basis for the opinion, then…

A

the opinion will be inadmissible unless the offering party establishes such underlying facts or data.

44
Q

While on direct examination an expert witness cannot …

A

bolster their credibility by “testifying that a treatise agrees with their opinion”

HOWEVER, a writing on a subject of science, art, or other specialized knowledge may be used in cross-examining an expert witness if either the witness or the court recognizes the author or the writing as authoritative.

Note that, since there is no hearsay exception under the Florida rules for admission of information contained in a learned treatise, the writing is not admissible as substantive evidence

45
Q

In any prosecution for a crime involving the wrongful taking of property, a photograph of the property in question may be admissible if the photo includes :

A
  1. a written description of the property,
  2. the name of the property’s owner,
  3. the location where the alleged wrongful taking occurred,
  4. the name of the investigating law enforcement officer,
  5. the date the photograph was taken, and
  6. the name of the photographer.
  7. The writing must be made under oath by the investigating law enforcement officer.
  8. The photograph itself must also be signed by the photographer. Fla. Stat. § 90.91.
46
Q

If photograph evidence of stolen property does not comply with the statutory requirements, may it still be admitted?

A

YES

unless the objecting party demonstrates that prejudice results from the failure to comply with those requirements.