Fiscal Policy And Supply Side Policy Flashcards
1
Q
What is fiscal policy?
A
A government policy to influence AD by government spending and taxation.
2
Q
What are macroeconomic functions of fiscal policy?
A
- Economic Growth – Increased government spending (e.g., on infrastructure) can boost aggregate demand and long-run productivity.
- Unemployment Reduction – Expansionary fiscal policy (higher spending, lower taxes) can stimulate demand, creating jobs.
- Inflation Control – Contractionary fiscal policy (higher taxes, lower spending) can reduce inflation by lowering aggregate demand.
- Stabilizing Economic Cycles – Counter-cyclical fiscal policy smooths out booms and recessions (e.g., increasing spending during recessions, reducing deficits in booms).
- Public Debt Management – Fiscal policy affects national debt through budget surpluses or deficits.
3
Q
What are microeconomic functions of fiscal policy?
A
- Resource Allocation – Government spending influences the distribution of resources (e.g., subsidies for green energy, infrastructure investment).
- Income Redistribution – Progressive taxation and welfare benefits help reduce income inequality.
- Correcting Market Failures – Taxes (e.g., carbon tax) and subsidies (e.g., education grants) help internalize externalities.
- Supply-Side Policies – Investment in education, healthcare, and infrastructure enhances productivity and economic potential.
4
Q
How fiscal policy influences AD?
A
- Expansionary Fiscal Policy (Increase AD)
Increase in government spending (G): More investment in infrastructure, healthcare, or education directly raises AD.
Tax cuts: Lower income taxes increase disposable income, boosting consumption (C). Lower corporate taxes encourage business investment (I).
Higher transfer payments: Welfare payments or unemployment benefits increase disposable income, raising consumer spending. - Contractionary Fiscal Policy (Decrease AD)
Decrease in government spending (G): Reducing spending on public services and infrastructure lowers AD.
Tax increases (T): Higher income and corporate taxes reduce consumption and investment.
Reducing transfer payments: Less social security or unemployment benefits lower household disposable income, reducing consumption.
5
Q
How fiscal police influences AS?
A
- Government Spending on Productivity
Education & Training: Increases human capital, improving labor productivity.
Infrastructure Investment: Better roads, transport, and digital networks reduce business costs and increase efficiency.
Healthcare Spending: A healthier workforce is more productive and reduces absenteeism. - Taxation Policies Affecting AS
Lower Corporation Tax: Encourages investment in capital and R&D, shifting AS rightward.
Incentives for Work (Lower Income Tax): Encourages labor market participation and reduces unemployment.
Reducing Welfare Dependency: Stricter welfare policies encourage employment.
6
Q
How government spending and taxation affect the pattern of economic activity?
A
- Sectoral Impact
• Higher government spending on renewable energy shifts resources towards green industries.
• Increased defense spending benefits military-related industries but diverts resources from social programs. - Regional Impact
• Infrastructure projects in deprived regions can reduce geographical economic disparities.
• Tax incentives for businesses in specific areas encourage regional development. - Income Distribution
• Progressive taxation & social spending reduce inequality.
• Regressive taxation (e.g., VAT) disproportionately affects lower-income groups. - Consumer & Business Behavior
• High corporate taxes may discourage investment.
• Generous welfare benefits may reduce the incentive to work, affecting labor supply.
7
Q
What are types of public expenditure?
A
- Current Expenditure
Day-to-day spending on goods and services needed to run the government.
Examples: Salaries of public sector workers (e.g., teachers, doctors), maintenance of roads, and welfare payments. - Capital Expenditure
Long-term investment spending that improves productive capacity.
Examples: Infrastructure projects (e.g., new roads, railways, hospitals), investment in education and research. - Transfer Payments
Payments made by the government without receiving goods or services in return.
Examples: Welfare benefits (e.g., unemployment benefits, pensions, housing benefits), subsidies to industries.
8
Q
Why we need public expenditures?
A
- Provision of Public Goods
Public goods (e.g., defense, street lighting) are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning the private sector may underprovide them. - Provision of Merit Goods
Goods that have positive externalities (e.g., healthcare, education) are often under-consumed if left to the free market. - Redistribution of Income
Welfare payments, free healthcare, and progressive taxation reduce income inequality. - Macroeconomic Stabilization
Government spending helps manage economic fluctuations (e.g., increasing spending during recessions to boost demand). - Supply-Side Policies
Investment in infrastructure, education, and innovation boosts long-term economic growth.
9
Q
Why governments levy taxes?
A
- Revenue Generation
To finance public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. - Redistribution of Income
Progressive taxation reduces income inequality by taxing higher earners more. - Correcting Market Failures
Taxes on demerit goods (e.g., cigarettes, alcohol) reduce negative externalities.
Carbon taxes encourage firms to reduce pollution. - Managing Aggregate Demand
Raising taxes can help control inflation by reducing disposable income.
Cutting taxes can stimulate economic activity in downturns. - Encouraging or Discouraging Behaviour
Tax incentives (e.g., tax relief on R&D) encourage investment.
Higher taxes on unhealthy products discourage consumption.
10
Q
What is the difference between direct and indirect taxes?
A
Direct Tax
Levied directly on income, wealth, or profits
Income tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax
Cannot be shifted; paid by individuals or firms
More progressive, as it targets higher earners more
Indirect Tax
Levied on goods and services at the point of purchase
VAT, excise duties, customs duties
Can be shifted to consumers (e.g., businesses pass VAT onto buyers)
Can be regressive if lower-income groups spend a larger proportion of income on taxed goods
11
Q
What is the difference between progressive, proportional and regressive taxes?
A
Progressive
Tax rate increases as income rises
Reduces income inequality
UK Income Tax (higher earners pay higher rates)
Proportional
Same tax rate for all income levels
Neutral impact; no redistribution
A flat tax system (not used in the UK)
Regressive
Tax rate decreases as income rises
Increases income inequality
VAT and excise duties (lower-income earners pay a higher proportion of income)
12
Q
What is the principles of taxation?
A
- Equity – Taxes should be fair; wealthier individuals should contribute more (progressive taxation).
- Certainty – Taxpayers should know how much they need to pay and when.
- Convenience – Taxes should be easy to pay and collect (e.g., PAYE system).
- Efficiency – Tax collection should not be excessively costly or distort economic decisions.
Other modern principles include:
Flexibility – The tax system should adjust to changing economic conditions.
Simplicity – A complex tax system increases evasion and administration costs.
13
Q
What is the role of relative merits of different UK taxes?
A
- Income Tax (Direct, Progressive)
Main revenue source, funds public services
Progressive, redistributes income
High rates may discourage work and investment - National Insurance Contributions (NICs) (Direct, Partly Progressive)
Funds state pensions and benefits
Links contributions to benefits received
Lower rates for high earners make it less progressive - Corporation Tax (Direct, Proportional)
Tax on company profits
Revenue from businesses, can incentivize investment
High rates may discourage investment or cause tax avoidance - VAT (Value Added Tax) (Indirect, Regressive)
Tax on goods and services (20%)
Hard to avoid, raises significant revenue
Regressive, as lower-income households spend a larger proportion on consumption - Excise Duties (Indirect, Regressive)
Taxes on alcohol, tobacco, fuel
Reduces consumption of harmful goods
Hits lower-income households harder - Council Tax (Direct, Regressive)
Local government funding
Funds local services (e.g., waste collection, schools)
Based on property values, not income, making it regressive
14
Q
What is the relationship between budget balance and the national debt?
A
The budget balance refers to the difference between government revenue (mainly from taxation) and government expenditure.
• Budget surplus: Revenue > Expenditure
• Budget deficit: Expenditure > Revenue
The national debt is the cumulative total of past budget deficits minus any surpluses.
When the government runs a deficit, it borrows money, increasing the national debt.
When it runs a surplus, it can use the extra revenue to reduce the national debt.
15
Q
What is the difference between cyclical and structural budget deficits?
A
Cyclical Deficit
- A deficit that occurs due to the economic cycle (recession)
- Lower tax revenue, higher welfare spending in downturns
- UK’ s budget deficit increased after the 2008 financial crisis
Structural Deficit
- A long-term deficit even when the economy is at full employment
- High spending commitments, inefficient tax collection
- UK’ s persistent structural deficit due to ageing population and healthcare costs
16
Q
What is the difference between cyclical and structural budget surplus?
A
Cyclical Surplus
- A surplus that occurs due to an economic boom
- Higher tax revenue, lower welfare spending
- UK had budget surpluses in the late 1990s due to strong growth
Structural Surplus
- A long-term surplus independent of the economic cycle
- Sustainable public finances, low spending relative to revenue
- Countries like Norway (due to oil revenues) have structural surpluses
17
Q
What are the consequences of budget deficits for macroeconomic performance?
A
Short-term effects:
✅ Stimulates economic growth – Higher spending increases AD (especially useful during recessions).
✅ Reduces unemployment – Government spending on infrastructure and services creates jobs.
❌ Increases inflation – Higher AD can lead to demand-pull inflation.
❌ May lead to higher interest rates – Government borrowing competes with private sector borrowing (crowding out effect).
Long-term effects:
❌ Higher national debt – Future generations may face higher tax burdens.
❌ Loss of investor confidence – If debt grows too large, bond yields rise, increasing borrowing costs.
18
Q
What are the consequences of budget surpluses for macroeconomic performance?
A
✅ Debt Reduction – Surpluses allow governments to repay debt, reducing interest payments and freeing up resources for future spending.
✅ Lower Interest Rates – Reduced government borrowing can lead to lower bond yields, reducing borrowing costs for businesses and households.
✅ Increased Confidence – A surplus signals fiscal discipline, increasing investor confidence and strengthening the currency.
✅ Countering Inflation – If an economy is overheating, a surplus (through tax increases or spending cuts) can help reduce demand-pull inflation.
❌ Lower Economic Growth – If a surplus is achieved through spending cuts or tax hikes, aggregate demand (AD) may fall, slowing growth.
❌ Higher Unemployment – Reduced government spending (e.g., on infrastructure or welfare) may lead to job losses in public and private sectors.
❌ Underinvestment in Public Services – Persistent surpluses may mean essential services (education, healthcare, infrastructure) are underfunded, leading to long-term economic inefficiencies.
19
Q
Give some real world examples of budget deficits.
A
The U.S. Post-2008 Financial Crisis
After the 2008 recession, the U.S. government implemented a $831 billion stimulus package (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act).
This increased government spending on infrastructure, healthcare, and unemployment benefits, helping economic recovery.
However, it also contributed to a rising national debt, which exceeded 100% of GDP in later years.
Zimbabwe (2000s)
The Zimbabwean government ran high deficits, financed by printing money.
This led to hyperinflation (inflation reached 89.7 sextillion percent in 2008), wiping out savings and collapsing the economy.
Greece Debt Crisis (2010s)
Greece’s budget deficit exceeded 15% of GDP in 2009.
As investors lost confidence, borrowing costs soared, forcing Greece to accept bailouts from the EU and IMF.
The government had to implement austerity measures, leading to economic contraction and mass unemployment (peaking at 27% in 2013).
Japan’s High Debt Levels
Japan has run budget deficits for decades, leading to a national debt exceeding 260% of GDP (the highest globally).
However, because most debt is held domestically, Japan has avoided a debt crisis.
20
Q
Give some real world examples of budget surpluses.
A
Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund
Norway has run consistent budget surpluses due to oil revenues.
It saves surplus funds in its $1.5 trillion sovereign wealth fund, ensuring long-term economic stability and funding future pensions.
The UK’s Austerity Measures (2010s)
After the 2008 crisis, the UK implemented austerity policies to reduce deficits.
Public spending cuts slowed economic growth, and public sector wages stagnated.
GDP growth remained weak, and many argued austerity worsened income inequality.
Germany’s Fiscal Surplus (2010s)
Germany ran budget surpluses from 2014 to 2019, keeping spending tight despite calls for more investment.
Critics argued that the government should have invested in infrastructure and innovation, rather than maintaining a surplus, as economic growth slowed.
21
Q
What is the significance of th size of the national debt?
A
- Higher Interest Payments
A large debt means the government must spend more on interest payments, reducing funds available for public services (e.g., healthcare, education).
Example: The UK (2020s) – In 2023, UK government debt surpassed 100% of GDP, with annual interest payments exceeding £100 billion, making it one of the highest spending areas. - Crowding Out Private Investment
If the government borrows heavily, it competes with the private sector for funds, pushing up interest rates and discouraging private investment (crowding-out effect).
Example: Italy – High debt levels (around 140% of GDP) have made borrowing costly, limiting private sector investment. - Risk of Debt Crisis
If debt levels become unsustainable, investors may lose confidence, leading to higher borrowing costs or even a sovereign debt crisis.
Example: Greece (2010s) – Excessive borrowing led to a debt crisis, forcing Greece to accept EU bailouts in exchange for harsh austerity measures. - Intergenerational Burden
Future generations may face higher taxes or spending cuts if national debt keeps rising.
Example: Japan – National debt exceeds 260% of GDP, meaning future generations may face higher taxes or lower pensions. - Can Be Sustainable if Managed Well
If borrowing is used for productive investments (e.g., infrastructure, education), it can boost growth and keep debt manageable.
Example: The U.S. – Despite a high debt-to-GDP ratio (over 120%), strong economic growth and global demand for U.S. bonds keep borrowing sustainable.
22
Q
What is the functions of the office for budget responsibility?
A
- Economic and Fiscal Forecasting
Publishes forecasts on GDP growth, inflation, unemployment, government revenue, and spending.
Helps the government plan budgets and fiscal policy based on realistic economic conditions. - Evaluating the Government’s Fiscal Targets
Assesses whether the government is meeting its fiscal rules (e.g., debt reduction targets).
Ensures long-term fiscal sustainability. - Costing Policy Proposals
Analyzes the financial impact of government policies (e.g., tax cuts, spending plans).
Prevents unrealistic promises in budgets. - Monitoring National Debt and Deficit
Tracks government borrowing and debt levels, warning if they become unsustainable. - Providing Independent Analysis
Helps MPs, policymakers, and the public understand the real state of public finances.
23
Q
Why the OBR important?
A
Increases transparency – Reduces the risk of politically motivated economic forecasts.
Boosts investor confidence – Independent forecasts reassure financial markets.
Supports evidence-based policy – Helps ensure government policies are financially responsible.
24
Q
Assess the economic significance of changes in public expenditure and taxation.
How does public expenditure and taxation affects income distribution?
A
Public Expenditure
✅ Redistributive spending (e.g., welfare, pensions, and healthcare) reduces income inequality.
Example: Nordic Countries – High public spending on education, healthcare, and social welfare ensures lower inequality.
❌ Cuts in welfare spending can increase poverty and inequality.
Example: UK Austerity (2010s) – Spending cuts to welfare programs increased child poverty and food bank dependency.
Taxation
✅ Progressive taxation (higher tax rates on higher incomes) reduces inequality.
Example: Scandinavian Countries – High income taxes fund social programs, reducing wealth disparities.
❌ Regressive taxes (such as VAT) disproportionately affect lower-income groups, increasing inequality.
Example: UK VAT Increase (2011) – The rise from 17.5% to 20% hurt low-income households more than high earners.
25
How does public expenditure and taxation affects the employment?
✅ Public spending on infrastructure and public services creates jobs.
Example: U.S. Infrastructure Bill (2021) – Government investment in transportation and clean energy created millions of jobs.
❌ Cuts in public sector jobs reduce employment and may weaken economic confidence.
Example: UK Austerity (2010s) – Government job cuts in education and healthcare increased unemployment in some areas.
✅ Lower income tax encourages work participation.
❌ High corporate tax may reduce business hiring, leading to slower job growth.
26
How does public expenditure and taxation affects inflation?
✅ Higher government spending can drive inflation if demand outpaces supply.
Example: U.S. Stimulus Packages (2020-2021) – Large-scale public spending during COVID-19 contributed to inflation rising above 8% in 2022.
❌ Higher taxes can reduce inflationary pressures by slowing demand.
Example: UK Interest Rate and Tax Increases (2023) – Tax rises helped curb inflation but also slowed economic growth.
27
How does the public expenditure and taxation affects market efficiency and competitiveness?
✅ Well-targeted government spending (e.g., on research, education, and infrastructure) enhances long-term competitiveness.
Example: South Korea – Heavy investment in education and technology transformed the country into a global tech leader.
❌ Excessive taxation and government intervention can distort market efficiency.
Example: Venezuela – High government control of the economy led to inefficiencies, business closures, and economic decline.
28
discuss the issue of the budget balance and be able to evaluate the possible economic consequences of a government running a budgetcdeficit or budget surplus
The budget balance refers to the difference between government revenue (mainly taxation) and government expenditure over a given period. It can be:
• Balanced Budget: Government revenue = Government expenditure
• Budget Deficit: Government expenditure > Government revenue
• Budget Surplus: Government revenue > Government expenditure
Governments often adjust fiscal policy to stimulate or slow down the economy, leading to either deficits or surpluses. The economic consequences of these fiscal positions depend on their causes, duration, and how they are financed.
29
What are economic consequences of a budget deficits?
✅ Stimulates Economic Growth
Increased government spending on infrastructure, education, and healthcare raises aggregate demand (AD), boosting economic activity.
Example: U.S. Stimulus Packages (2020-2021) – Deficit spending during COVID-19 helped prevent a deep recession.
✅ Reduces Unemployment
Public sector job creation and spending on private sector contracts can lower unemployment.
Example: New Deal (1930s, USA) – Deficit spending on public works projects helped reduce unemployment during the Great Depression.
✅ Encourages Investment During Economic Downturns
Government borrowing can be justified during recessions to stabilize the economy and prevent a collapse in demand.
Example: UK (2008-09 Financial Crisis) – The government increased borrowing to support banks and fund welfare payments, preventing a deeper crisis.
❌ Higher National Debt and Interest Payments
Long-term deficits increase national debt, leading to higher interest payments that limit future spending on public services.
Example: UK (2023) – Debt exceeded 100% of GDP, with interest payments over £100 billion annually, reducing fiscal flexibility.
❌ Crowding Out Effect
If the government borrows excessively, it competes with the private sector for funds, raising interest rates and reducing business investment.
Example: Italy – High government debt led to higher borrowing costs for businesses, slowing growth.
❌ Risk of Inflation
If deficit spending increases AD beyond productive capacity, it may cause inflation.
Example: U.S. (2021-22) – COVID-19 stimulus packages contributed to inflation rising above 8%, forcing the Federal Reserve to increase interest rates.
❌ Exchange Rate Depreciation
Persistent deficits can weaken investor confidence, leading to currency depreciation.
Example: UK (2022 Mini-Budget Crisis) – Proposed unfunded tax cuts led to a fall in the pound, increasing import costs.
30
What are the economic consequences of a budget surplus?
✅ Debt Reduction and Lower Interest Payments
Surpluses allow governments to pay off debt, reducing future interest payments.
Example: UK (1999-2001) – Budget surpluses helped reduce national debt before the 2008 financial crisis.
✅ Improved Investor Confidence
Countries with budget surpluses are seen as fiscally responsible, attracting foreign investment.
Example: Germany (2010s) – Germany’s budget surpluses increased confidence in its economy, leading to lower borrowing costs.
✅ Inflation Control
Running a surplus reduces AD, helping control inflation.
Example: Sweden (1990s) – Fiscal surpluses helped stabilize inflation after a banking crisis.
❌ Lower Economic Growth
Reducing government spending or raising taxes reduces AD, slowing down growth.
Example: UK Austerity (2010s) – Budget surplus targets led to spending cuts, slowing recovery after the financial crisis.
❌ Higher Unemployment
Government spending cuts may lead to public sector job losses and lower social benefits, reducing disposable income and demand.
Example: Greece (2010s) – Harsh fiscal surpluses due to bailout conditions caused deep unemployment and economic stagnation.
❌ Public Services Underfunding
Prioritizing a surplus may mean underinvestment in infrastructure, healthcare, or education, harming long-term productivity.
Example: Germany (2010s) – Despite budget surpluses, underinvestment in infrastructure led to declining transport and energy networks.
31
When should a government run a deficit or surplus? (Evaluation)
Deficit is Justified When:
The economy is in a recession or facing a crisis (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic).
Public investment is needed to boost long-term productivity.
Interest rates are low, making borrowing cheap and sustainable.
Surplus is Justified When:
The economy is at risk of overheating and inflation.
Debt levels are high, and reducing debt is necessary for long-term fiscal sustainability.
There is strong economic growth, allowing the government to save for future downturns.
Balanced Approach (Counter-Cyclical Policy)
Many economists argue for a balanced approach, where governments run deficits in downturns and surpluses in booms to maintain economic stability.
Example: Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund – Norway saves oil revenues during boom years, ensuring stability during downturns.
32
Assess the impact of measures used to rebalance the budget.
Rebalancing the budget typically involves adjusting government spending and taxation to address a budget deficit or public debt. Measures can range from austerity policies (spending cuts and tax hikes) to expansionary fiscal policies (stimulating growth to boost tax revenues). Rebalancing is aimed at achieving fiscal sustainability and maintaining macroeconomic stability. However, the economic impact of these measures depends on their type, timing, and the overall economic context.
33
What is the impact of spending cuts (austerity measures)?
✅ Reduces Budget Deficit
Direct Impact: Cutting government expenditure reduces the overall budget deficit, improving fiscal sustainability in the short term.
Example: UK (2010s) – The UK government implemented austerity measures post-2008 financial crisis, cutting welfare and public services, which reduced the budget deficit.
❌ Slower Economic Growth
Reduced Aggregate Demand (AD): Spending cuts lower government consumption and can reduce private sector activity, slowing overall economic growth.
Example: Greece (2010-2015) – The austerity measures demanded by the EU led to severe economic contraction and unemployment. Greek GDP shrank by 25% during austerity, deepening the recession.
❌ Increased Unemployment
Public Sector Job Losses: Cuts in government services often lead to layoffs in the public sector, leading to higher unemployment rates.
Example: Spain (2010s) – Government cuts resulted in public sector job losses, contributing to high youth unemployment.
❌ Social Unrest and Inequality
Welfare Reductions: Austerity can disproportionately affect low-income groups, leading to increased poverty and social unrest.
Example: France (2018-2019) – Protests against pension and tax reforms were driven by perceptions of inequality and government cuts to social services.
34
What is the impacts of tax increases?
✅ Increases Government Revenue
Direct Impact: Higher taxes increase government revenue, helping to close the budget gap.
Example: Sweden (1990s) – Sweden implemented tax increases to address fiscal imbalances and invested in social programs, leading to long-term economic stability.
❌ Decreases Disposable Income and Consumption
Reduced Private Spending: Higher income taxes reduce consumers’ disposable income, leading to reduced consumption, which could harm economic growth in the short run.
Example: France (2012-2014) – Tax hikes on the wealthy and businesses were unpopular and led to slower economic growth.
❌ Investment Deterrence
Higher Corporate Taxes: Increased taxes on businesses can reduce profitability and discourage investment, particularly if companies seek to relocate to lower-tax jurisdictions.
Example: Ireland vs. France – Higher corporate tax rates in France have contributed to some businesses relocating to lower-tax regions like Ireland.
35
What are the impacts of structural reforms?
✅ Improves Economic Growth Potential
Increased Productivity: Reforms such as labor market flexibility and education investment help improve long-term productivity, stimulating future economic growth.
Example: Germany (2000s) – Hartz reforms to labor markets improved employment flexibility, contributing to lower unemployment and sustained economic growth.
✅ Enhances Fiscal Sustainability
Long-Term Revenue Gains: Reforms aimed at reducing inefficiencies (e.g., pension reforms, tax compliance) can generate long-term fiscal gains.
Example: New Zealand (1980s) – New Zealand’s broad economic reforms (tax simplification, welfare reforms) led to sustained fiscal health and improved international competitiveness.
❌ Social Resistance and Inequality
Disruptive Short-Term Effects: Structural reforms often face political resistance, particularly when they involve pension cuts or labor market changes, leading to social unrest.
Example: France (2010) – Proposals to increase the retirement age led to nationwide strikes and protests, highlighting public resistance to structural reform.
36
What are the impacts of debt restructuring?
✅ Immediate Relief on Fiscal Position
Reduced Debt Service: By rescheduling or forgiving debt, governments can reduce interest payments, freeing up resources for public services.
Example: Greece (2012) – The Greek government restructured its debt through a Eurozone agreement, significantly reducing its debt burden in the short term.
❌ Loss of Investor Confidence
Increased Borrowing Costs: Debt restructuring can signal financial instability, leading to higher borrowing costs for the government in the future.
Example: Argentina (2001) – The country’s debt default led to severe financial turmoil, reducing its access to global capital markets.
37
Evaluation of the impact of rebalancing measures
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Effects
Austerity measures (spending cuts and tax increases) have short-term negative effects on growth and employment but can reduce debt in the medium to long term.
Structural reforms and debt restructuring may have disruptive short-term effects but are usually essential for long-term economic stability and growth.
Context Matters
Developed Economies: Developed countries with higher debt levels may need a combination of austerity and structural reforms to rebalance their budgets without hurting growth.
Developing Economies: Developing economies may face higher risks from austerity measures, as they often rely on government spending to address basic needs and reduce poverty.
Fiscal Multipliers
The effectiveness of rebalancing measures depends on the size of fiscal multipliers (the impact of fiscal measures on the overall economy). For example:
Government spending (especially on infrastructure) has a positive fiscal multiplier in recessions, meaning it can generate significant economic growth.
Tax increases or spending cuts may have negative fiscal multipliers, especially during periods of low growth.
38
What is the difference between supply side policies and supply side improvements in the economy?
Supply-Side Policies:
These are government measures aimed at improving the productive capacity of the economy by increasing aggregate supply (the total amount of goods and services produced). These policies target factors that influence the supply side of the economy, such as labor productivity, capital investment, technological advancements, and the overall efficiency of the economy.
• Goal: To increase the economy’s potential output by improving the efficiency and productivity of labor and capital.
• Examples:
• Tax cuts for businesses to incentivize investment.
• Deregulation to reduce unnecessary costs and encourage entrepreneurship.
• Labor market reforms to increase employment or make it more flexible.
• Investment in education and training to enhance human capital.
Supply-Side Improvements:
These refer to the actual outcomes or changes in the economy resulting from effective supply-side policies. These improvements occur when the economy’s productive capacity increases as a result of changes in factors like capital formation, labor quality, or technological advancement. Essentially, supply-side improvements are the positive results that follow from successful supply-side policies.
• Goal: To achieve economic growth and increased productivity in the long term.
• Examples:
• Higher levels of productivity in the labor force.
• Increased output from businesses due to better investment in technology.
• Higher employment levels due to labor market reforms.
• Technological innovations that reduce costs and improve efficiency.
39
How supply side policies can help achieve supply side improvements?
1. Increasing Incentives to Work, Save, and Invest
Tax cuts on income, profits, and capital gains encourage individuals and businesses to work harder, save more, and invest in capital. The result is higher investment in businesses, leading to more job creation, higher wages, and increased productivity.
Example: The UK (1980s) implemented tax cuts and deregulation, leading to increased private investment, job creation, and economic growth. The result was significant supply-side improvements, including higher output and efficiency in many sectors.
2. Deregulation of Markets
By reducing unnecessary regulations, governments can lower the costs of doing business, making it easier for firms to operate efficiently and enter new markets. This encourages innovation and competition, improving the overall supply of goods and services.
Example: Reagan’s deregulation policies in the U.S. in the 1980s reduced barriers for businesses, stimulating economic activity, improving the efficiency of firms, and contributing to long-term growth.
3. Enhancing Human Capital (Labor Market Reforms)
Education and training policies improve the quality of labor, increasing the skill levels of the workforce. A more skilled labor force contributes to higher productivity and innovative capacity in the economy.
Example: Germany’s vocational education system provides specialized training that enhances worker skills, contributing to a highly skilled labor force and boosting productivity.
4. Encouraging Technological Innovation
Supply-side policies can include subsidies for research and development (R&D), tax incentives for businesses investing in innovation, or public-private partnerships. These measures can spur technological advancements that enhance productivity and reduce production costs.
Example: In the U.S., tax incentives for R&D have helped foster technological advancements, particularly in the technology sector, which has seen high rates of innovation and productivity growth.
5. Improving Infrastructure
Government investment in infrastructure such as transportation, communication networks, and energy systems improves the efficiency of businesses and workers, contributing to higher overall productivity.
Example: China’s infrastructure development over the past few decades (e.g., building high-speed rail systems and modernizing ports) has played a key role in boosting economic output and improving supply-side efficiency.
6. Reducing Trade Barriers (Free Trade)
Trade liberalization and reducing tariffs encourage the efficient allocation of resources by allowing countries to specialize in areas where they have a comparative advantage, leading to increased productivity and lower prices.
Example: The European Union and NAFTA have encouraged member countries to engage in free trade, boosting competition, innovation, and efficiency within their economies.
40
How supply side policies such as tax changes designed to change personal incentives may increase the potential output of the economy and improve the underlying trend rate of economic growth?
1. Incentivizing Work and Investment through Tax Changes
Lower Income Taxes: Reducing taxes on income, particularly for high-income earners and businesses, can incentivize more labor participation (more people willing to work) and increased hours worked. This enhances labor supply and leads to greater output.
Capital Gains Tax Cuts: By lowering taxes on capital gains, individuals and businesses may be more inclined to invest in stocks, bonds, or other business ventures. Higher investment leads to more capital formation, which increases the productive capacity of the economy.
Corporate Tax Cuts: Lowering corporate taxes encourages businesses to invest more in technology, capital, and labor, leading to greater productivity and economic output in the long run. It can also attract foreign direct investment (FDI).
Impact on Potential Output and Economic Growth:
By increasing investment and labor supply, these tax changes lead to a shift in the long-run aggregate supply curve to the right, which means the economy can produce more goods and services at every price level.
This increases the economy’s potential output and improves the underlying trend rate of economic growth because resources (labor and capital) are being used more efficiently.
2. Improving the Capital Stock and Human Capital
Investment in Education and Training: Tax incentives for businesses to invest in training programs or for individuals to pursue higher education increases the overall skill level of the workforce. A more educated and skilled workforce leads to greater productivity and higher potential output.
R&D Tax Credits: Encouraging businesses to invest in research and development through tax credits or subsidies leads to technological innovation. This enhances productivity and provides a long-term boost to economic growth.
41
How Supply-Side Policies Can Affect Unemployment?
1. Impact on Unemployment
- Tax Cuts and Employment: By lowering taxes on businesses and individuals, supply-side policies can make it more profitable for companies to hire more workers. Additionally, a more attractive tax environment may incentivize businesses to expand, creating new job opportunities.
- Labor Market Reforms: Policies that make it easier for firms to hire workers (e.g., reducing the minimum wage, cutting unemployment benefits, or relaxing labor laws) can reduce structural unemployment. Additionally, policies aimed at improving labor mobility (e.g., reducing barriers to job relocation) can also reduce frictional unemployment.
- Long-Term Unemployment Reduction: Supply-side reforms that focus on education and training can help reduce skills mismatch, leading to a reduction in structural unemployment and an overall increase in employment.
Impact: The result of these supply-side policies is a decrease in unemployment in the long term, as businesses expand and the workforce becomes better matched to market needs.
42
How supply-side policies can affect the rate of change of prices?
2. Impact on the Rate of Change of Prices (Inflation)
- Increased Productivity and Cost Reduction: Supply-side policies, such as reducing taxes on businesses and improving the workforce’s skill set, lead to higher productivity. With more efficient production, businesses can produce goods and services at a lower cost, which puts downward pressure on inflation.
- Increased Competition: Deregulation and tax cuts may also increase competition in markets. Increased competition tends to reduce prices as firms try to attract consumers by offering lower prices or better quality. This helps in reducing inflationary pressures.
- Cost-Push Inflation Control: By improving the supply side of the economy, firms can avoid the higher costs that typically lead to cost-push inflation. Lower taxes on production, fewer regulations, and more efficient labor markets reduce production costs.
Impact: In the long run, supply-side policies can lead to lower inflation or stable prices by increasing output and reducing production costs.
43
How supply-side policies can affect UK’s balance of payments on current account?
3. Impact on UK External Performance (Balance of Payments on Current Account)
- Improving Competitiveness: Tax cuts and deregulation can help improve the competitiveness of UK industries by lowering production costs. As firms become more competitive, they may increase exports, improving the current account balance. For example, lower corporate taxes may encourage firms to reinvest profits into expanding production or increasing exports.
- Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Lower taxes or incentives for businesses can also attract foreign investors. If the UK attracts more FDI, this may lead to more exports of goods and services produced by foreign-owned firms in the UK, improving the current account.
- Improved Productivity: Supply-side reforms that improve labor productivity and technological innovation also make the UK more competitive internationally, potentially leading to higher export levels and a better trade balance, which in turn improves the current account.
Impact: If supply-side policies lead to increased competitiveness, productivity, and FDI, the UK could experience a surplus in the balance of payments on the current account, or at least a reduction in the deficit. This would improve the country’s external performance.
44
How supply-side policies reduce the natural rate of unemployment?
The natural rate of unemployment refers to the long-term level of unemployment that exists when the economy is at full employment. It includes structural, frictional, and real wage unemployment. Supply-side policies aim to reduce the natural rate of unemployment by improving the efficiency and flexibility of labor markets, increasing productivity, and enhancing incentives to work and invest.
1. Reducing Structural Unemployment
- Education and Training: Government investment in skills development programs, vocational education, and apprenticeships helps workers gain the skills required for modern industries, reducing skills mismatch.
- Encouraging Geographic Mobility: Policies such as subsidies for relocation or improved transport infrastructure help workers move to areas where jobs are available, reducing regional unemployment.
- Incentivizing Research & Development (R&D): Encouraging innovation and technological progress creates new industries, generating demand for skilled workers and reducing structural unemployment.
2. Reducing Frictional Unemployment
- Improving Job Information: Creating online job portals or career advisory services helps workers find suitable job vacancies more quickly.
- Reducing Barriers to Hiring and Firing: If employers can easily hire workers without excessive regulations, more short-term job opportunities will be available, reducing the time people spend unemployed between jobs.
3. Reducing Classical (Real-Wage) Unemployment
- Labour Market Reforms: Reducing minimum wage laws or cutting trade union power can make labor markets more flexible, ensuring wages are not artificially kept above equilibrium, which can cause unemployment.
- Tax Incentives for Employment: Cutting income tax or National Insurance contributions makes working more attractive compared to claiming benefits, increasing labour force participation.
45
What free market supply-side policies including?
1. Tax Cuts
- Lower Income Tax: Reducing marginal income tax rates increases the incentive to work, leading to higher labor force participation.
- Lower Corporate Tax: Encouraging firms to expand, invest in capital, and hire more workers.
- Example: In the US (2017), the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowered corporate taxes from 35% to 21%, encouraging businesses to invest and create jobs.
2. Privatisation
- Privatising state-owned enterprises leads to increased efficiency, reducing government mismanagement and creating more job opportunities in the private sector.
- Example: UK (1980s): The privatisation of British Airways, BT, and British Gas led to increased competition and greater employment in these sectors.
3. Deregulation
- Reducing unnecessary government regulations makes it easier for businesses to start and operate, leading to job creation.
- Example: India (1991 Economic Reforms): Liberalisation and deregulation led to a boom in IT and telecom sectors, creating millions of jobs.
4. Labour Market Reforms
- Weakening Trade Union Power: Making it easier to hire and fire workers encourages firms to take on more employees.
- Reducing Unemployment Benefits: Shortening benefit duration incentivizes people to seek work faster.
- Example: Germany (2003-2005): The Hartz Reforms reduced unemployment benefits and introduced mini-jobs, leading to a sharp decline in unemployment.
46
What are advantages and disadvantages of free market supply-side policies?
Advantages:
- Increases employment and productivity in the long run.
- Encourages innovation and investment.
- Reduces government spending on welfare.
Disadvantages:
- Can increase income inequality (e.g., tax cuts favor the rich).
- Deregulation may lead to lower job security.
- Weakening unions can lead to exploitation of workers.
47
What are interventionist supply-side policies?
Unlike free-market supply-side policies, interventionist supply-side policies involve active government involvement in the economy to boost productivity, innovation, and employment. These policies address market failures and aim to enhance the long-term growth potential of the economy.
48
What is the objective and impact of government spending on education and training policy (interventionist supply-side policies) ?
1. Government Spending on Education and Training
- Objective: Improve the quality of the workforce, reducing structural unemployment and increasing productivity.
- Examples:
- Investing in STEM education (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) to develop a highly skilled labor force.
- Apprenticeship programs to reduce youth unemployment and bridge the skills gap.
- Impact: Microeconomic: Increases individual human capital, leading to higher wages.
- Macroeconomic: Raises the productive capacity of the economy, shifting long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) to the right.
- Example: Finland’s education system is state-funded and has led to high productivity and low unemployment.
49
What is the objective and impact of industrial policy (interventionist supply-side policies) ?
2. Industrial Policy
- Objective: Support key industries (e.g., green energy, manufacturing) to increase competitiveness and innovation.
Examples:
- Subsidies for key sectors (e.g., electric vehicle production).
- Government funding for infrastructure (e.g., better transport networks to improve logistics and reduce business costs).
Impact:
- Microeconomic: Boosts firm efficiency and productivity in targeted industries.
- Macroeconomic: Leads to economic diversification and long-term growth.
- Example: South Korea’s industrial policy (1960s–1980s) focused on electronics and shipbuilding, transforming the country into an economic powerhouse.
50
What is the objective and impact of subsiding R&D (interventionist supply-side policies) ?
3. Subsidising Research & Development (R&D)
- Objective: Encourage innovation and technological advancements to enhance productivity and global competitiveness.
Examples:
- R&D tax credits for firms investing in new technology.
- Government-funded innovation hubs to promote start-ups.
Impact:
- Microeconomic: Lowers production costs, increases firm profitability.
- Macroeconomic: Improves global competitiveness, increases export potential, and raises long-run economic growth.
- Example: Germany’s Fraunhofer Institutes (government-funded research centers) have led to technological innovations in engineering and AI.
51
What are advantages and disadvantages of interventionist supply-side policies?
Advantages:
- Leads to long-term economic growth.
- Reduces market failures (e.g., skills shortages).
- Helps reduce income inequality by improving job opportunities.
Disadvantages:
- Requires high government spending, increasing budget deficits.
- Time lag before benefits are seen.
- May lead to government failure if subsidies are misallocated.
52
What microeconomic and macroeconomic effects of supply-side policies?
Education & Training
Raises worker skills, increases wages
Reduces structural unemployment, boosts LRAS
Industrial Policy
Lowers production costs, increases firm competitiveness
Supports economic growth, boosts exports
R&D Subsidies
Encourages innovation, improves firm efficiency
Increases total factor productivity, enhances global competitiveness
