Firemen's Cottages Flashcards

1
Q

At what stage was this cost estimate?

A

The first cost plan I did. After the Feasibility Report - RIBA Stage 1 (Preparation and Brief).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Was it based on GIFA/Functional Unit/Elemental?

A

A mixture of:
i) Elemental Breakdown based on high level elemental measures;
ii) approximate quantities eg brickwork repairs
iii) GIFA eg services.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the ‘format’ of the estimate?

A

Contents:
Executive Summary;
Introduction;
Design Basis of Report;
Financial Basis of Report;
Schedule of Accommodation;
Exclusions and Qualifications;
Estimate Analysis;
Appendices: Breakdown;
Document Register.

Breakdown:
Facilitating works;
substructure;
superstrucure;
internal finishes;
ffe;
services;
complete buildings and building untis;
work to existing building;
external works;

prelims;
OHP;

Project/design team fees;
other development/project costs;

risk allowance;
inflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What changes were requested?
Did it change, and how?

A

Changes:
requested that I make changes to the Executive Summary section
Incorporated the same format and information of their internal reporting summary forms for ease of transfer of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Was the discussion over the phone/on-line meeting?
How was it arranged?

A

First a telephone call, then over a Teams meeting where I shared the document and went through each page.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In what way does this demonstrate client care?

A

Rather than send out the standard Ridge template I wanted to be sure that the Client could easily understand the document, if there were any difficulties, I wanted to make the document as presentable as possible so that any key information the client wanted could stand out.

Looking after client’s best interests and level of service that satisfies the client’s needs and ahieves VfM by: professionalism; competence; punctuality; trust; reliability; presentation; regular communication; review of services provided and standard; KPI; client performance feedback.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were these ‘cracks’/how did they manifest themselves? (Feasibility Report)

A

Substantial cracks observed in flats 1-4 and internal walls.
Front elevation affected; no cracks noted in the rear elevation.
Signs of movement in northwest corner foundations.
Various types of cracks observed: horizontal, vertical, diagonal.
Additional issues: missing vertical tiles, cracks near stairs, entrance lobby, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How was it suspected the cracks were due to ‘subsidence’/who raised this?

A

Haringey Council notes structural damage at Firemen’s Dwellings over 5/6 years.
Suspected cause: trees in front of the building, now removed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did the Feasibility Report come about?

A

Ridge and Partners hired by Haringey for surveys on subsidence and building stabilization methods.
Surveys include structural investigation and condition assessments for flats and communal areas.
Surveys provide descriptions and recommendations for repairs or replacements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What exactly was surveyed, and what was included in the corresponding Estimate?

A

The elements surveyed included:
building services,
roofs, chimneys, fascia’s, soffits, bargeboards, rainwater goods,
external walls,
walkways, external steps,
windows,
external decorations, external doors, communal and front entrance doors, external lighting,
internal staircases, internal common parts, internal communal decorations, internal communal lighting, communal electrical installations,
landscaping, boundary walls, fencing, footpaths, paving, external drainage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is ‘subsidence’?

A

Soil can’t support building weight.
Leads to settlement or sinking.
Causes: poor soil, design, construction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why was it important to know the type of foundation for the property?

A

Various types of foundations and sizes
The necessary repairs can’t be made until the foundations are known.
Analysis of the existing foundation will lead to understanding of insufficiencies and to make up for these.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does ‘high plasticity’ and ‘subsoil’ mean?

A

Plasticity: Soil’s ability to deform without fracturing.
High plasticity: Greater capacity to deform under stress.
High plasticity indicates significant fine particles, like clay.
Fine particles bind together forming a plastic matrix in water.
Subsoil: Layer beneath topsoil, supporting plant growth and water infiltration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who carried out the investigation of the type of foundation and ground conditions?

A

Site investigation conducted by Ridge Structural Team
Trial pits and boreholes revealed made ground to depths of 0.6-1.0m.
Natural soils of London clay formation found underneath to a depth of 5.0m in boreholes.
Building foundations exposed at front elevation, consisting of concrete strip foundations.
Foundations located approximately 0.45 - 0.6m below ground level and 0.36 - 0.5m deep.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who recommended the ‘rectification works’?

A

Structural Engineer following Report:
Concrete strip foundations were also noted to be weak and easily fractured by hand tools used in the excavations.
It is likely that the foundations for Flats 1-4 will need to be strengthened to stop further movement of the building. Traditional underpinning will be needed in stages to include possible replacement of existing weak concrete foundation on the front and side elevation of the building.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is ‘underpinning’?

A

Underpinning strip foundations involves strengthening or stabilizing existing foundations that have become inadequate or compromised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did underpinning involve in this project?

A

For the external wall:
Break through hardstanding like concrete or paving.
Excavate pits or trenches beneath existing foundation in sections along the wall.
Provide temporary support to the structure above with props, shoring, or bracing systems.
Common underpinning methods: mass concrete, mini-piled, jet grouting, or screw piles.
Fill excavated voids with grout or concrete to support underpinning elements and distribute loads.
Ensure proper compaction and consolidation of backfilled materials to minimize settlement and ensure stability.

For the internal walls:
Take up carpetting
Remove floorboards/beak through screed and concrete slab,
Excavate and underpin (as external wall
Reinstate (as external wall) including ground concrete slab, floorboards, carpetting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How did you ‘estimate costs’ for this?

A

I knew the measures and dimensions from the Report
Broke down the works in accordance with NRM
Applied rates obtained from our benchmarking/spons/BCIS/quote for the underpinning procedure;
For taking up floorboards and reinstatement I used rates for floorboarding together with labour hours to undertake to remove and reinstate (benchmark, national rates?, SPONs ‘alteration works’ rates).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the composition/construction of the existing ‘external walls’?

A

Solid masonry (brickwork).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was the composition/construction of the existing ‘internal loadbearing walls’?

A

Solid masonry (brickwork).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Were decant costs included in your ‘allowances’ for the works?

A

Not for the building works but the client was informed (making an allowance of 2 weeks to complete the works) and we received approximate costs from them for temporary decantation and storage (furniture, etc) and housing for the residents, which we added to the ‘other costs’ section of the Estimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What RIBA Stage did you carry out this ‘order of cost estimate’?

A

Following Feasibility Report
[and FRA Reports - use this along with SE Report as ‘further information’ in developing Estimates?]
[and SH: 2nd OoCE or Cost Plan: Structural Report, Topographical survey, Retrofit Assessment Report, M&E Surveys]’.

This Project Estimate has been prepared in order to provide an estimate of the costs involved in the works ascertained as required by the Ridge Feasibility Report (refer to Appendix B. Register for list) to the internal, external elements and building services of the flats and communal area of 1-8 Firemen Dwellings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What format was this Estimate presented/nr of pages?

A

‘Project Estimate - Structural Repair & Cyclical Maintenance Works’:
Contents:
Executive summary;
Introduction;
Design basis of report;
Financial basis of report;
Schedule of accommodation;
Exclusions and qualifications,
Estimate analysis
Appendices: Breakdown; Document Register.

24
Q

The works?

A

Internal, external elements and building services of the flats and communal area of 1-8 Firemen Dwellings, Glebe Road, N8 7DD.
These works primarily relate to:
underpinning of existing foundations [Report to follow for next Estimate]
replacement of existing roof and associated fittings and structures [Report to follow for next Estimate]
window and door replacements,
fabric repairs,
external wall insulation,
external and internal redecoration,
repairs to existing boundary wall,
new door entry system, [Report to follow for next Estimate]
M&E upgrades, [Report to follow for next Estimate]
FRA works [Report to follow for next Estimate]

25
Q

What are ‘elemental rates at high level’

A

Budgets put in place for elements,
Not detailed information or measurements at this stage
Based on suspected works for certain elements: roof replacement; underpinning; FRA; M&E upgrades; door entry system
Rates based on ‘generic/composite’ elements of work obtained either from measured composite rates from price books or benchmark data; or GIFA rates obtained from benchmark data via BCIS or internal data.

At a high level, these rates provide a quick estimate of the costs involved in different aspects of the project without delving into very detailed or specific calculations. They serve as benchmarks or guidelines for estimating the overall cost of a construction project eg m2 for bricks, roofing, M&E, etc.

26
Q

What is ‘Efficient use of resources’?

A

Budgets and Risk Allowances of the OoCE firmed up following several further surveys undertaken [refer to earlier flashcards] resulting in more monies to distribute to other areas of work.

Following Topographical survey, Retrofit Assessment Report, M&E Surveys, FRA Survey - Greater consideration could be given to:
Use of roof space ie partition and conversion into usable space,
Improvements to external works,
Upgrades to M&E systems
Improvements to internal areas and systems
FRA improvements

27
Q

How was the estimate broken down?

A

Refer to earlier flashcards

28
Q

Basis of cost information?

A

Basis for original estimate - as earlier flashcards.

Later estimates - scope more clearly defined identifying measures, dimensions, itemised works (M&E) - allowing for remaining GIFA based rates to be refined into itemised rates

29
Q

How allow for Mechanical and Electrical Installations?

A

Based on allowances for a typical development of similar size and complexity.
Pricing of works net and applied separate adjustments for Preliminaries, Contingencies and Price and Design risk.
The specific elemental analyses are included in Appendix A.

30
Q

Was procurement method and contract considered for the Estimates?

A

Tenders will be sought on a competitive single stage basis and that the contract will be awarded on an Intermediate form of building contract

31
Q

Was programme length considered for the Estimates?

A

An indicative programme of duration 29 weeks

32
Q

Was risk considered for the Estimates?

A

An allowance inserted for Contingency/Risk.
The estimate adopted the principles of the ‘RICS:NRM’ and seeks to start a process to proper management of risk on the project level.
Risk identified at early stages:
Underpinning
Roof replacement

33
Q

Basis of GIFA measurement?

A

‘Gross Internal Floor Area’ will be as defined by the ‘Code of Measuring Practice’ 6th edition, as published by the RICS/BCIS.
8 No apartments (Ground Floor to Second Floor) including communal areas (estimation) 860m2 (GIFA).

34
Q

How was the estimate broken down?

A

Facilitating works;
substructure; s
uperstrucure;
internal finishes;
ffe; services;
complete buildings and building units; work to existing buildings;
external works;
Sub total;
Preliminaries,
OHP,
Sub total;
Project/design team fees;
other development/project costs;
risk allowance estimate (design and construction risk);
inflation;
total (vat excluded).

35
Q

Was there any covering information with this document?

A

Executive Summary setion of OcE:
Based on;
summary of estimate costs (building works, preliminaries, OHP, then, project/design fees; other development/project costs; risk allowance estimates; inflation);
costs need reading in conjunction with the basis, assumptions and exclusions section;
measurements contained should not be relied upon for any purpose other than for this estimate.

36
Q

What were the ‘Next Steps’ after the OoCE was issued?

A

Following the approval of the Planning Application the next stages would be to:
consider potential procurement routes
any necessary funding requirements.
Consideration of the design development requirements to take the project to the next stage.

37
Q

What were the primary objectives/priorities of the client for these works?

A

Haringey employed Ridge and Partners to:
-undertake surveys led by the Ridge structures team to establish the cause of the subsidence and propose methods to stabilise the building.
-undertake condition surveys to the flats and communal areas. The condition surveys are to provide a description of each building element and recommendations for remedial works, either replacement or repairs.
-undertake a retrofit assessment to identify and propose potential improvement to the thermal efficiency of the building.

Following issue of this feasibility report [QS COMES IN HERE], once approval has been given, the commission is to:
design,
specify,
procure
oversee

a range of the required work.

38
Q

How was the order of cost estimate ‘further developed into more detailed cost plans’?

A

The template document used to produce the OCE is also that for producing the cost plan.
At OCE stages the document presents the information, sections (tabs) appropriate for the OCE,
Later when the project moves to cost planning, the same document is used and supplemented with the additional information required of the cost plan.

For instance in the breakdown of costs for:
-the OCE, headline costs (level 1,m2 or functional unit rate) ie facilitating works, substructure, etc are,
-if broken down further (level 2, ,m2 or functional unit rate) only show a limited breakdown with composite estimates of works required, at cost planning stage,
-these level 1 or 2 breakdowns are broken down into further detail (level 3, appropriate NRM unit of measure) eg 1)Substructure; 2) standard foundations; 3) strip foundations, xxwide by xxdeep, kg/m3

When I received the further information as a result of the surveys undertaken:
the works could be broken down further from Level 1 down into Level 2 or Level 3.
Risk items could be firmed up
Resulting new estimates could be compared with the set budget and scope of works could be re-examined to allow for more efficiency/value for money ie including other works whilst scaffolding was up; whilst contractors were there (attic area refurb); improving efficiency of design (attic area refurb; energy efficiency; M&E).

39
Q

How did ‘design develop’ on this project?

A

Initial order of cost estimate based on Feasibility Report from colleague’s preliminary inspection.
Feasibility Report notes used to generate first OCE.
Further site visits by colleagues provided additional survey information on:
Structural conditions (foundations, roof structure).
Topographical survey.
Retrofit assessments.
OCE further developed to establish Cost Limit by removing identified risks.
Beyond RIBA Stage 2 (Concept Design), at Cost Planning:
Obtained more information on upgrading preferences and clarified scope.
Considered use of roof space, external works, and internal systems upgrade.
Retrofit assessment for thermal efficiency.
Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) for insulation to external walls.
Developed cost plan in elemental format based on refined survey information, including:
Structural report on entire building structure (roof main cost element).
Topographical survey for ground conditions and underpinning requirements.

40
Q

What design ‘developed’?

A

Facilitating works:
Diversion of drains and services.
Asbestos allowance.
Underpinning (general to detailed).
Roof structure:
Replace to repair.
External wall:
All same.
Windows and external doors:
All same.
Internal walls and partitions:
Reconfiguration of roof space now included.
Internal doors:
Reconfiguration of roof space now included.
Internal finishes:
Reconfiguration of roof space now included.
Electrical services:
Lighting.
Doorbells.
Fire and lighting protection.
Drainage (original list expanded to include additional items).
External works:
Garden clear-up.
Upgrade paths.
Landscaping and planting.
Boundary wall repairs.
Preliminaries:
Remained at 15%.
OHP (Overheads and Profit):
Remained at 8%.
Contingency/risk:
Remained at 10%.
Inflation:
Excluded.
Professional fees:
Remained at 15%.

41
Q

How did the cost plan document differ from the order of cost estimate document?

A

Refer to earlier flashcards

42
Q

What ‘drawings and specifications’ did you have?

A

Initial feasibility report:
Basic plan drawings.
High-level specifications.
Photos and descriptions provided.

Subsequent surveys:
Structural inspection.
Building services survey.
Condition survey.
Topographical survey.
Site investigations.
CCTV of drains.
Utility mapping.
‘Retrofit’ assessments.

Recommendations for works:
Provided in subsequent survey reports.

Additional documentation:
Drawings.
Diagrams.
Used by both project manager and designers for planning and specifications.

43
Q

How costs obtained ‘appropriate’ to the level of specification?

A

Whether high, medium, low quality in relation to typical building materials/products such as decoration,
or
based on the level of detail contained within the specification ie if a specific product was needed or just a general description.

44
Q

What a cost model

A

Refer to other flashcard decks

45
Q

What ‘specialist works’ costs for?

A

M&E such as …..new door entry system, M&E upgrades

46
Q

How update for location and inflation, and what mean ‘where applicable’

A

Location and inflation - BCIS factors

Where ‘applicable’:
-if I obtained a quote it would not be subject to adjustment;
-if I based a cost on standard item obtained from say benchmark rates, then updating from base date and location.

47
Q

How did you ‘apply additional costs’ for:
Preliminaries?
OHP?
PSUMs?
Risk Allowances?

A

Preliminaries - same % all way through.

OHP - same % all way through.

PSUMs - same % all way through.
Works that provide benefit to goals; identified but could not be fully defined eg asbestos; underground drainage repair; roof elements identified once scaffolding up; brickwork repairs once render taken down.

Risk Allowances - reduced following survey information (roof not replaced)
Provide no benefit to goals; possible perils; impediments; eg problems with underpinning;

48
Q

What ‘information available’ did you use when developing the order of cost estimate?

A

Refer to early flashcards

49
Q

How did you ‘identify’ that the entire roof may need to be replaced/ and residents would need to be decanted?

A

Initial feasibility report:
Noted substantial cracking to external walls and internal features.
Suspected subsidence.
Structural damage to walls may affect roof structure.

Decanting residents:
Necessary due to extensive structural damage.
If replacing roof, decanting required.
Decanting residents would be a client cost, not a project cost.

50
Q

How did you ‘apportion these costs as necessary’?

A

Decanting residents:
Not a project cost.
Client notified it may be required.

Roof replacement risk:
Estimated costs for roof replacement calculated.
Presented estimate final costs “with risk” or “without risk”.
Roof replacement prominently featured as a risk item.

51
Q

How did you ‘reduce the scope of works and contingency allowances accordingly’?

A

Took out the costs for roof replacement

52
Q

How did you ‘receive this additional information’? (structural report)

A

It was always planned that structural survey would be undertaken - a report was issued to the design team and client identifying that the roof was sound.

53
Q

What ‘repair’ works were required to the roof? (and the loft area)

A

Allowance for external roof repairs:

Taking up patches of existing roof covering.
Replacement like for like (concrete tiling, insulation, membrane, batons, flashing, etc.).
Full replacement of existing fascias and soffits.
Full modification of existing eaves detail.
Inclusion of new eaves vents and mesh barrier netting.
Allowance for patch repairs to timber roof structure and loft:

Replacing missing floorboards.
Installing new walkways.
Replacing damaged/missing insulation.
Repairs to purlins.
Taking down and disposal of cracked plaster ceiling within habitable loft space.
Works for fire compartmentation in loft:

Supplying and fitting adequate fire compartmentation.
Take down, dispose, and replace existing roof guttering and downpipes (material: uPVC).
Repairing existing brick chimneys: brickwork, render, pointing, and flaunching repairs.

54
Q

What exactly did you ‘discuss with the design team’?

A

On going discussion with design team following receipt of the various survey reports: Retrofit, FRA, Structural, Topographical, M&E.

OCE at stage 1 (Preparation and Brief) for building works was £900k, reducing to £750k at stage 3 (Spatial Coordination)

NOTE: We did not get to the stage of Technical Design where specifications were put in place.

Iterative process between me and the design team:
-I would update costs based on the survey information (eg omit roof replacement)
-which informed the design team what other works could be included to stay within budget estimate.

55
Q

What ‘other elements of the building works’ were the savings allocated to/ and was this all of the savings?

A

1) reconfiguration of loft spaces - there were unused and abandoned rooms existing in the loft area which were in very poor condition and were proposed to be replaced with new inernal walls, ceilings, flooring, M&E, to become usable space again (1 person occupancy).
2) Upgrading quality of works - intercom system…..; landscaping - removing existing plants/trees, planting of new shrubs, tress, etc

Roof works were all of the savings - this was the primary risk, however in the course of the cost planning, categories of costs fluctuated, a remaining risk was exact underpinning requirements, ……earlier flashcard has a few more ideas

56
Q

What were the ‘objectives of the project’?

A

Refer to earlier flashcard

57
Q

What ‘improvements to ventilation’ were made?
What ‘fire compartmentation’ was made?
What ‘reconfiguration of existing loft spaces’ was made?
Were these all ‘the upgrades’ made/was there any money spare/what was done with this?

A

Ventilation - strip roof vents near roof/external wall junction.

Fire compartmentation - this was in relation to the roof void and the redundant room below (to be renovated) - involved Fire rated plasterboarding encapsulating attic floor, walls, ceiling/roof underside, fire barriers where required

Reconfiguration of loft space - refer to earlier flashcard

Upgrades - Refer to earlier (developing) flashcard. Loft; M&E???; intercom system; landscaping - removing existing plants/trees, planting of new shrubs, tress, etc

As estimates (OoCE (Stage 1- Prep and Brief); Cost Plan 1 (Stage 2 - Concept Design); Cost Plan 2 (Stage 3 - Spatial Coordination) developed and inputs obtained from the client and design team, it was settled all updates would be made, the original budget for building works was £900k reducing to £750k.