Fine- Ten lies of Ethnography Flashcards
Classic Virtues (Morality):
A) the kindly Ethnographer
-we examine unpleasant lives, groups, organizations
-illusion: of being more sympathetic then we’re
-Aids research but is deceptive
-ex; fine research on victims of child abuse laws
-investigative presupposes limited informed consent
B) The Friendly Ethnographer
-“never met a man he didn’t like”
-illusion: managed affairs sweetly and well
-a) present ourselves as likable
-b)see animosities as irrelevant
-ex: punch (English private school)
-ex: Fine (little league)
C) The honest Ethnographer
-by not being honest we shade what we know
-gain acceptance
-construct web of justifications for lying
-ex; Humphreys tearoom trade
-why honesty is good?
Technical skills
A) precise ethnographer
-Assume fieldnotes reflect what really happened
-Illusion: A lie
-Scene did not happen as we announced
-Represent something close to what was said
B)The observant ethnographer
-We assume report of a scene is complete
-Picture will always lack of detail
-We neglect the five senses
C) The unobtrusive ethnographer (reserved, low-profile)
-Too great involvement can transform ethnography
-presence of observe; not to be too worrisome
—> if the impact is not excessively direct
The ethnographic self= presentation
A) The candid ethnographer
(Frank, outspoken, open)
-fully unobtrusive (not draw attention to self)
-journalism operates on this claim
-illusion: everything reported actually happened
-cannot escape reality:
-presentation of ones own role is excercise in tact
B) The Chaste Ethnographer
-Couplings, trysts, basically sex between ethnographers and subjects
-female ethnographers harassed by male subjects
-“go-native”
-ethnographers value/demand privacy
C) The Fair ethnographer
-Is fairness possible?
-a) objectivity
-b)balance (subjectivity also problematic)
-c)participant observation becomes participant intervention
-research is always “contaminated”
D) The literary Ethnographer
-Ethnography is nothing until inscribed
-Many writers write well
-but do so in language not easily translatable
-others so well readers taken by writing other than substance
-ex:Hochschild (1938) not richly ethnographic, not provide enough data
-writes too well and shares too little
Strategies of informed control
A) Deep cover
In really deep, not telling people what you’re doing
B) Explicit cover (Clearly stated)
Less cover
C) Shallow cover
Even less cover