Financial Statement Audits Flashcards
define financial accounting
focueses primarily on preparation and distribution of general purpose, historical FS, which are representation of mgt
purpose of audit
to provide fs users with opinion by cpa on whether fs are presented fairly in all material respects, in accordance with applicable financial reporting framework. cpa’s opinion enhances the degree of confidence that intended users can place in fs
financial reporting framework
set of criteria used to determine measurement, recognition, presentation and disclosure of all material items appearing in fs
which particular accounting standards must be followed under the label of us gaap by - federal governmental entities
follow pronouncements of the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board FASAB
which particular accounting standards must be followed under the label of us gaap by - state and local governmental entities
follow pronouncements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board GASB
which particular accounting standards must be followed under the label of us gaap by other entities, such as corporation
follow pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB
standards applicable to evaluating auditor’s performance outside of the us
International Standards of auditing ISAs are issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, an audit related standard setting body within the International Federation of Accountant, IFAc
standards applicable to evaluating auditor's performance within the US for governmental entities public companies private companies
governmental entities - when required by law, regulation or agreement, Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards GAGAS issued by US government Accountability Office GAO are applicable
public companies - PCAOB
Private Companies - Standards of the AICPA’s aAuditing Standards Board are applicable, these pronouncements collectively are referred to by AICPA as GAAS
AICPA has replaced its SAS to be similar to
ISA issued by IFAC of IAASB
AICAP also replaced its use of 10 criteria formerly known as Generally accepted Auditing standards with
7 principles to provide a framework of understanding and explaining an audit
-are not requirements
-have no authoritative status
intended to be helpful framework for audit standard setting
the seven principles are organized around four primary themes
purpose/premise responsibilities performance reporting pr - pr
responsibilities principle
takes place of what previously was called general standards:
responsible for having appropriate competence and capabilities to perform audit;
complying with relevant ethical requirements;
maintaining professional skepticism
exercising professional judgment
throughout the planning and performance of audit
performance principle
takes place of what previously was called fieldwork standards governing cpa’s evidence gathering activities
-to express an opinion, cpa obtains reasonable assurance about whether FS as whole are free from material misstatemetns, whether due to fraud or error
-to obtain reasoanble assurance, which is a high, but not absolute level assurance , cpa:
- plans work and propely supervises any assistants
- determines and applies appropriate materiality level or levels throughout audit
- identifies and assesses risks of mm, whether due to fraud or error, based on understanding of entity’s and its environment, including entity’s IC
- obtains sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether mm exist, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to assessed risks
cpa is unable to obtain absolute assurance that the fs are free from mm because of inherent limitations, which arise from:
nature of fin reporting
nature of audit procedures
need for audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and so as to achieve balance between benefit and cost
based on evaluation of audit evidence obtained, auditor expresses, in form of a written report,
an opinion in accordance with auditor’s findings, or states that opinion cannot be expressed. the opinion states whether FS are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable financial reporting framework.
statements on auditing standards SAS
sas constitute gaas and must be followed by auditors when aicpa auditing standards are applicable (specifically the Rule of Conduct, Compliance with Standards, of AICPA code of professional conduct requires that auditors adhere to standards promulgated by Auditing Standards Board). Under clarified auditing standards, any reference to GAAS now specifically means this authoritative body of professional standards SAS issued by the Auditing Standards Board
- cpa is expected to have sufficient knowledge of SAS to identify those applicable to audit
- cpa should be prepared to justify any departures from SAS
- materiality and audit risk also underlie application of SAS, particularly those related to performing audit (evidence gathering) and reporting
categories of professional requirements
various aicpa standards (sas, ssae, ssars and sqcs) distinguish between two types of professional requirement:
- unconditional requirement - must comply with requirement without exception indicated by must
- presumptively mandatory requirement - in rare circumstances, cpa may depart from such requirement, but must document justification for departure of how alternate procedures performed were adequate to meet objective of requirement (should).
- explanatory material is descriptive guidance within body of standards that does not impose on requirement (indicated may, might, could) in applicable standards
relationship of gaas to sqcs
an individual audit engagement is governed by gaas, whereas cpa firm’s collective portfolio of accounting and auditing services (sometimes called the A&A practice, which involves entities FS and involves public interest) is governed by AICPAs SQCS. SQCS are issued by Aicpa’s auditing standards board. Relevant aicipa guidance applicable to an individual adult engagement is provided by AU220
focus of the system of quality control
cpa firm is required to have “system of quality control” for its accounting and auditing services (covering audit, attestation, compilation and review services; not applicable to tax or counseling services) to provide reasonable assurance that eng are performed in accordance with professional standards and applicable regulatory and legal requirements, and that the issuance of reports are appropriate in the circumstance
nature and scope
policies and procedures will vary with circumstances (firm size and number of offices, complexity of services offered, and level of experience of professional staff)
inherent limitations
similar to any internal control system, a quality control system provides “reasonable” (a high but not absolute) assurance, reflecting implicit cost-benefit trade off
six elements of quality control system
- leadership responsibilities for quality
- relevant ethical requirements
- acceptance and continuance of client relationships and engagements
- human resources
- engagement performance
- monitoring
leadership responsibilities for quality
element of quality control system
policies and procedures should promote an internal culture that emphasizes a commitment to quality (sometimes called “tone at the top) for an individual audit engagement, the engagement partner should take responsibility for overall audit quality, although performance of certain procedures may of course be delegated to other members of the engagement team
relevant ethical requirements
element of quality control system
policies and procedures should address independence of personnel as necessary (should obtain written confirmation of compliance with independence requirements from all appropriate personnel at least annually)
acceptance and continuance of client relationships and engagements
element of quality control system
policies and procedures should carefully assess risks associated with each engagement (including issues related to management integrity) and the firm should only undertake engagements that can be completed with professional competence
human resources
element of quality control system
policies and procedures should address important personnel issues (including hiring, assignments to engagements, professional development and cpe and promotion decisions)
what is the purpose of AU220 quality control for an engagement conducted with accordance with gaas is to assist cpa in
implementing firm’s quality control procedures specifically at engagement level. this pronouncements states that auditor’s objective is to implement quality control procedures at engagement level that provide reasonable assurance that the audit complies with professional standards and applicable requirements and auditor issues an appropriate report
engagement performance
element of quality control system
policies and procedures should focus on compliance with all applicable firm and professional standards and applicable regulatory requirements, and encourage personnel to consult as necessary with professional (or other) literature or other human resources within or outside the firm for appropriate guidance
monitoring
element of quality control system
policies and procedures should provide an ongoing assessment of the adequacy of the design and operating effectiveness of the system of quality control. controls that are effective at one point in time, may deteriorate over time owing to neglect or changed circumstances. it is important that controls are property monitored so that timely adjustments can be made as necessary to keep quality control policies and procedures working effectively over time
differences of opinion
the form should establish policies and procedures for dealing with and resolving differences of opinion within the engagement team, with those consulted, and between the engagement partner and the engagement quality control reviewer (including that the conclusions reached are documented and implemented and that the report is not released until the matter is received)
documentation of the operation of quality control policies and procedures
firms should establish policies and procedures requiring appropriate documentation of operation of each element of system of quality control