Finals Review Deck 4 [Crimes Committed by Public Officers] Flashcards
Who are public officers?
Art. 203. Who are public officers. – For the purpose of applying the provisions of this and the preceding titles of this book, any person who, by direct provision of the law, popular election or appointment by competent authority, shall take part in the performance of public functions in the Government of the Philippine Islands, or shall perform in said Government or in any of its branches public duties as an employee, agent or subordinate official, of any rank or class, shall be deemed to be a public officer.
Elements of Art. 204 Knowingly rendering unjust judgment
“Elements of Art. 204. Knowingly rendering unjust judgment:
- That the offender is a judge;
- That he renders a judgment in a case submitted to him for decision;
- That the judgment is unjust;
- That the judge knows that his judgment is unjust”
What is an unjust judgment?
An unjust judgment is one which is contrary to law, or is not supported by the evidence, or both.
Elements of Art. 205. Judgment rendered through negligence
“Elements of Art. 205. Judgment rendered through negligence:
- That the offender is a judge;
- That he renders a judgment in a case submitted to him for decision;
- That the judgment is manifestly unjust;
- That it is due to his inexcusable negligence or ignorance.”
Elements of Art. 206. Unjust interlocutory order
“Elements of Art. 206. Unjust interlocutory order:
- That the offender is a judge;
- That he performs any of the following acts:
(a) knowingly renders unjust interlocutory order or decree; or
(b) renders a manifestly unjust interlocutory order or decree through inexcusable negligence or ignorance”
What is an interlocutory order
An interlocutory order is an order which is issued by the court between the commencement oand the end of a suit or action and which decides some point or matter, but which, however, is not a final decision of the matter in issue.
Elements of Art. 207. Malicious delay in the administration of justice
“Elements of Art. 207 Malicious delay in the administration of justice:
- That the offender is a judge;
- That there is a proceeding in his court;
- That he delays the administration of justice;
- That the delay is malicious, that is, the delay is caused by the judge with deliberate intent to inflict damage on either party in the case. “
Elements of Art. 208. Prosecution of offenses; negligence and tolerance
“Acts punishable under Art. 208 Prosecution of offenses; negligence and tolerance:
- By maliciously refraining from instituting prosecution against violator of the law;
- By maliciously tolerating the commission of offenses.
Elements of dereliction of duty in the prosecution of offenses:
- That the offender is a public officer or officer of the law who has a duty to cause the prosecution of, or to prosecute, offenses;
- That there is dereliction of duties of his office; that is, knowing the commission of the crime, he does not cause the prosecution of the criminal, or knowing that a crime is about to be committed, he tolerates its commission;
- That the offender acts with malice and deliberate intent to favor the violator of the law.”
Elements of Art. 209. Betrayal of trust by an attorney or solicitor.– Revelation of secrets.
“Acts punishable under Art. 209 Betrayal of trust by attorney:
- By causing damage to his client, either (1) by any malicious breach of professional duty, (2) by inexcusable negligence or ignorance. (Note: there must be damage to his client in both cases);
- By revealing any of the secrets of his client learned by him in his professional capacity. (Note: damage not necessary);
- By undertaking the defense of the opposing party in the same case, without the consent of his first client, after having undertaken the defense of said first client or after having received confidential information from said client. (Note: if there is consent, there is no crime).”
What are the acts punishable as Direct bribery (Art. 210)?
“Acts punishable in Direct bribery (Art. 210): A public officer commits direct bribery–
- By agreeing to perform, or by performing, in consideration of any officer, promise, gift or present– an act constituting a crime, in connection with the performance of his official duties;
- By accepting a gift in consideration of the execution of an act which does not constitute a crime, in connection with the performance of his official duty;
- By agreeing to refrain, or by refraining, from doing something which it is his official duty to do, in consideration of gift or promise.”
Elements of Art. 210. Direct bribery.
“Elements of Art. 210 Direct bribery:
- That the offender be a public officer within the scope of Art. 203;
- That the offender accepts an offer or a promise or receives a gift or present by himself or through another;
- That such offer or promise be accepted, or gift or present received by the public officer–
(a) with a view to committing some crime (malfeasance); or
(b) in consideration of the execution of an act which does not constitute a crime, but the act must be unjust (misfeasacne); or
(c) to refrain from doing something which it is his official duty to do (nonfeasance). - the act which the offender agrees to perform or which he executes be connected with the performance of his official duties.”
Elements of Art. 211. Indirect bribery.
“Elements of Art. 211. Indirect bribery:
- That the offender is a public officer;
- That he accepts gifts;
- That the said gifts are offered to him by reason of his office.”
Elements of Art. 211-A Qualified bribery.
“Elements of Art. 211-A Qualified bribery:
- That the offender is a public officer entrusted with law enforcement;
- That the offender refrains from arresting or prosecuting an offender who has committed a crime punishable by reclusion perpetua and/or death;
- That the offender refrains from arresting or prosecuting the offender in consideration of any promise, gift or present.”
Elements of Art. 212. Corruption of public officials.
“Elements of Art. 212. Corruption of public officials:
- That the offender makes offers or promises or gives gifts or presents to a public officer;
- That the offers or promises are made or the gifts or presents given to a public officer, under circumstances that will make the public officer liable for direct bribery or indirect bribery”
What are the acts punishable as frauds against public treasury and illegal exactions (Art. 213)?
“Acts punisahble as frauds against public treasury and illegal exactions:
- entering into an agreement with any interested party or speculator or making use of any other scheme, to defraud the Government, in dealing with any person with regard to furnishing supplies, the making of contracts, or the adjustment or settlement of accounts relating to public property or funds;
- demanding, directly or indirectly, the payment of sums different from or larger than those authorized by law, in collection of taxes, licenses, fees, and other imposts;
- failing voluntarily to issue a receipt, as provided by law, for any sum of money collected by him officially, in the collection of taxes, licenses, fees, and other imposts;
- collecting or receiving, directly or indirectly, by way of payment or otherwise, things or objects of a nature different from that provided by law, in the collection of taxes, licenses, fees, and other imposts.”
Elements of Art. 213. Frauds against the public treasury and similar offenses.
“Elements of frauds against public treasury (Art. 213, par.1)
- That the offender is a public officer;
- That he should have taken advantage of his office, that is, he intervened in the transaction in his official capacity;
- That he entered into an agreement with any interested party or speculator or made use of any other scheme with regard to (1) furnishing supplies; (2) making of contracts; or (3) adjustment or settlement of accounts relating to public property or funds;
- That the accused had intent to defraud the Government.
Elements of illegal exactions (Art. 213, par.2):
- That the offender is a public officer entrusted with the collection of taxes, licenses, fees and other imposts;
- That he is guilty of any of the following acts or omissions:
(a) Demanding, directly or indirectly, the payment of sums different from or larger than those authorized by law; or
(b) Failing voluntarily to issue a receipt, as provided by law, for any sum of money collected by him officially; or
(c) Collecting or receiving, directly or indirectly, by way of payment or otherwise, things or objects of a nature different from that provided by law.”
Elements of Art. 214. Other frauds.
“Elements of Art. 214 Other frauds:
- That the offender is a public officer;
- That he takes advantage of his official position;
- That he commits any of the frauds or deceits enumerated in Art. 315 to 318. “
Elements of Art. 215. Prohibited transactions.
“Elements of Art. 215 Prohibited transactions:
- That the offender is an appointive public officer;
- That he becomes interested, directly or indirectly, in any transaction of exchange or speculation;
- That the transaction takes place within the territory subject to his jurisdiction;
- That he becomes interested in the transaction during his incumbency.”
Who are liable under Art. 216 Possession of prohibited interest by a public officer
“Who are liable for possession of prohibited interest (Art. 216)?
- Public officer who, directly or indirectly, becomes interested in any contract or business in which it was his official duty to intervene.
- Experts, arbitrators, and private accountants who, in like manner, took part in any contract or transaction connected with the estte or property in the appraisal, distribution or adjudication of which they had acted;
- Guardains and executors with respect to the property belonging to their wards or the estate.”