Final section Flashcards
Galileo and the early days
Galileo saw individual stars in the milky way
–could everything that was seen though telescopes be part of the milky way? - was milky way actually the entire universe?
Nebula
Planetary nebula, supernova remnants, dark nebula, emission nebula, reflection nebula
In mid-1880s there was another class of nebula examined
Looked at a set of nebula catalogued by William Herschel
-these were strange objects with a spiral shape - became known as SPIRAL NEBULA
Two camps about spiral nebula
Lord rose
-followed Immanuel Kant’s idea of “island universe’ far beyond the Milky way - not very well accepted
Others
-spiral nebula were just another form of nebula in the milky way - more accepted view
caused a major division in astronomy
Debate into the 1920s
April 1920 - National academy of science in Washington DC held a meeting to settle the debate
- –known as the Shapley-curtis debate
- –two astronomers invited to debate the subject
Harlow Shapley
- –young astronomer
- –famous for his recent determination of the size of the milky way (100,000 lightyears)
- –thought spiral nebula were small objects scattered around inside the milky way
- -similar to globular clusters that he had studied
Heber Curtis
- –older, experience astronomer
- –believed in the island universe model
- –said the spiral nebula were large rotating systems of stars far away from the milky way
Entrance of Edwin Hubble
Hubble was a lawyer by trade
- -left his law practice to follow love of astronomy
- –studied in Chicago then Cali
- –1823 he examined the largest of the spiral nebula, the Andromeda Nebula
From two separate photographs he thought he had found a nova
- upon further examination he found that the object was actually a cepheid variable
- –over next few months he found several cepheids
- –knew of the work of Henrietta Leavitt on Cepheids in the SMC
- –discovery of Cepheids inM31
Distance of M31
Hubble used the period-luminosity relation to find the absolute magnitude of the cepheids
- today we know he used the wrong relation - Leavitt had only one relation for all cepheids
- but there are two separate period-luminosity relations
- -however his results were close enough
Current number put M31 at 2.2 million lightyears
- this was far beyond the size of the milky way determined by Shapley
- the debate was ended
Spiral nebula to spiral galaxies
Spiral nebula are now known as spiral galaxies
- Of which the milky way is just one
- there are now known to be billions of galaxies in the universe
The earth’s place in the milky way
What is earths place in the universe - as usual earth stars at the center of things
- –for a long time the sun was thought to be at the center of the milky way
- –story beings in 1780s with William Herschel (who discovered Uranus)
The earth’s place in the milky way
What is earths place in the universe - as usual earth stars at the center of things
—for a long time the sun was thought to be at the center of the milky way
Story beings in 1780s with William Herschel (who discovered Uranus)
- –to find center of Milky way Herschel counted stars in different directions
- –selected 683 regions around the sky
- –he believed that the highest concentration of stars would be toward the center
- –his date was almost completely constant over all 683 regions
- –therefore he concluded that the sun was the center of the milky way
Kapteyn’s attempt
Jacobus Kapteyn was dutch astronomer
- –he studied the brightness and proper motion of a large set of stars
- –he concluded that the milky way was 55,000 lightyears in size with the sun at the center
- –we now know BOTH men were WRONG
- the reason why didn’t become clear until 1930s
Trumpler’s discovery
1930 Robert Trumpler was studying star clusters
- –he noticed that some clusters appeared fainter than they should have
- –he rightly concluded that space is not a perfect vacuum and is filled was dust and gas which scatters light
- –this scattering called INTERSTELLAR EXTINCTION
- –this extinction meant that Herschel and Kapteyn were only seeing the local stars
The globular clusters
in 1910s Harlow Shapley looked out of the plane to see the globular clusters
Shapley and the globular clusters
in 1910s Harlow Shapley looked out of the plane to see the globular clusters
- -he found RR Lyrae variables which he felt were just another type of Cepheid
- -he used the absolute magnitude of stars on the horizontal branch to find the distance of 93 globular clusters
- -the clusters were not centered on the earth
Shapley found that the globular clusters were centered around a point in the direction of Sagittarius
- -this he correct concluded was the center of the milky way
- –some of the clusters were around 100,000 lightyears from the sun therefore he concluded this was the size of the milky way
- -now we need to examine the overall shape of the milky way
Infrared observations
Used to study the location of interstellar dust
- starlight heats the dust to 10 to 90 K
- a blackbody of this temp emits strongest in the far infrared
- in 1983 the IRAS (infrared astronomical satellite) scanned the sky in the far infrared
- in 1990 the COBE satellite scanned the sky in the near-infrared to see the stars
Size of the Milky way (disk, central bulge, halo)
Parts of the milky way:
Disk
—between 100,000 and 160,00 lightyears in diameter
—up to 3000 lightyears thick
central bulge
- -around the nucleus
- –6500 lightyears in diameter
Halo
—the globular clusters trace out the halo population
The halo
This is the spherical distribution of older stars
- old, metal-poor, pop II stars
- cooler stars, so Halo is more reddish in color
- -globular clusters contain only 1% of halo stars
- -most of halo is individual stars - orbit in paths tilted at random angles - from our perspective they are moving at high speeds - therefore they are called high-velocity stars - in reality we are the high-velocity star
The bulge region
This is a region in the center of the milky way
- contains both Pop I and Pop II stars
- appears reddish bc it contains many red giants and red supergiants
- the bulge is slightly peanut shaped which might suggest that the milky way is a barred spiral
The disk
Home of the sun at about 26,000 lightyears from the nucleus
- these are all pop I stars
- this region appears blueish bc of the hot O and B stars that are found in the disk
- since we have O and B stars the disk must be a younger pop of stars
- there must also be current star formation occurring in the disk
More than one disk
The thick disk
- –more metal rich stars than halo
- -3000 lightyears thick
- -faster moving stars
the thin disk
- -most metal rich stars
- -1000 lightyears thick
A closer look at the disk
We know the disk has current star formation
- this implies clouds of hydrogen gas
- we can’t find this gas in the optical, but we can look to radio astronomy
- we use the 21 cm line to find cold clouds of hydrogen gas
- this 21 cm line is created by a spin flop of the electron in the hydrogen atom
- the slight diff in energy is emitted as 21 cm radiation
The spiral of arms
Traces of the 21 cm line show the milky way to be a spiral galaxy
we find four major spiral arms in the milky way
- –the sagittarius arm
- -the centaurus arm
- –the cygnys arm
- -the perseus arm
- ——side arm is called the Orion arm - sun is on a little extension of the orion arm
The spiral of arms
Traces of the 21 cm line show the milky way to be a spiral galaxy
we find four major spiral arms in the milky way
- –the sagittarius arm
- -the centaurus arm
- –the cygnys arm
- -the perseus arm
- ——side arm is called the Orion arm - sun is on a little extension of the orion arm
Galaxy rotation
In a solid body rotation the outer part rotates with a higher velocity than the inside
- for orbits that obey Kepler’s law the outside star orbit with a slow velocity
- -observations show that stars near the sun all orbit at the same velocity
- —–this means stars inside move around much quicker
Galaxy rotation
In a solid body rotation the outer part rotates with a higher velocity than the inside
- for orbits that obey Kepler’s law the outside star orbit with a slow velocity
- -observations show that stars near the sun all orbit at the same velocity
- —–this means stars inside move around much quicker
Orbit of the sun
Sun orbits the center of the galaxy in a nearly circular orbit
- -26,000 lightyears in radius - and a period of 220 million years
- –however, the sun isn’t orbiting one object like a planet orbiting the sun
- –all the mass inside the sun’s orbit effects the suns orbit
Kepler’s law
We can rearrange the equation to get an estimate of the mass inside the suns orbit
26,000 ly = 2.5 x 10^20 m
- –use this and 220 million years for the period
- –this gives 1.8 x 10^41 kg
- –or.. 9.0 x 10^10 solar masses
Mass inside the sun
We just found 9.0 x 10^10 solar masses inside the sun’s orbit
- –however, there is lot of material outside the suns orbit
- if we look at the orbits of stars further out than the sun, we can cont to get mass estimates
- eventually the mass should run out and orbital speeds slow down (like the solar system)
- however this is not what we see
Where is the edge?
We don’t seem to find the end of the milky way in terms of mass
- however we don’t see the luminous material like stars
- current estimates for the mass of the milky way could be as much as 6.0 x 10^11 solar mass or more
The missing mass
Since the velocities don’t drop off there must be a lot of mass to the outside of the sun
- –however, we can’t see the mass, its not int he form of stars
- –therefore the matter is dark of DARK MATTER
there are lots of theories
- -blackholes
- -MACHOS (massive compact halo objects)
- -WIMPs (weakly interacting particles)
- -dark energy
The heart of the milky way
Center of the milky way
—this is in the direction of the constellation of Sagittarius
Black hole lurking at the center
- -we now think that there is a massive black hole at the center of the milky way
- -3.7 x 10^6 solar mass black hole by current estimates of objects orbiting near the center
- this is not as active as galaxies we will see in later lessons
How was Shapley-curtis debate settled?
Edwin Hubble found the distance to M31 and it was far outside the size of the milky way as determined by Shapley
The time is takes the sun to orbit the center of the milky way
220 million years
The thickness of the thin disk
1000 lightyears
the diameter of the milky way
100,000 to 160,000 lightyears
the mass inside the suns orbit
9.0 x 10^10 solar masses
the distance from the sun to the center of the milky way
26,000 lightyears
the thickness of the thick disk
3000 lightyears
the estimated total mass of the milky way
6.0 x 10^11 solar masses
the mass of the central black hole of the milky way
3.7 x 10^6 solar masses
the distance to M31, the nearest large galaxy
2.2 million lightyears
What objects are used to determine the distance of M31
Cepheid variable
What do we believe to be in the middle of the milky way galaxy
a massive black hole
How many arms does the milky way have
4
T/F - The results of herschel and Kapteyn were both biased due the the existence of interstellar extinction
TRUE
What do we use to map the shape of the spiral arms of the milky way?
21 cm radiation from neutral hydrogen
What do we use to map the shape of the spiral arms of the milky way?
21 cm radiation from neutral hydrogen
Diff types of galaxies
Galaxies come in variety of shapes and sizes
-edwin hubble classified galaxies into 4 broad categories called Morphological types
system referred to as:
-the hubble classification scheme -or Hubble Fork
Elliptical Galaxies - E
Named for their elliptical shapes
- –have no spiral arms or other distinct features
- –hubble classified these galaxies based on how round they were - if they appeared sperical they are EO and if they are cigar shaped they are E7 - however this classification doesn’t necessarily mean that this is the true shape of the galaxy
- -projection effects - an E7 seen end on might look like an EO
- -therefore the Hubble Type for elliptical galaxies is completely based on how they appear in the sky
- -about 20% of the observed galaxies
Structure of elliptical galaxies
Elliptical galaxies have little or no interstellar gas and dust
- -therefore star formation has essentially stopped
- we see very few young stars in elliptical galaxies
- -they are composed mostly of old, red pop II stars
- -therefore elliptical galaxies generally appear redder than spiral galaxies
Spiral galaxies are more similar in size - however elliptical galaxies cover a large range of sizes
- -they range from - Giant elliptical galaxies with 10^13 solar masses to dwarf elliptical galaxies with 10^5 solar masses
- some ppl even consider globular clusters to be very small elliptical galaxies
Giant elliptical galaxies
These are the largest galaxies
- -200 kpc in diameter (double the milky way)
- -up to 100x more massive than the milky way
- -they are normally found int he centers of clusters of galaxies
- -current theory is that these galaxies have grown bc of cannibalism of smaller galaxies
Giant elliptical galaxies
These are the largest galaxies
- -200 kpc in diameter (double the milky way)
- -up to 100x more massive than the milky way
- -they are normally found int he centers of clusters of galaxies
- -current theory is that these galaxies have grown bc of cannibalism of smaller galaxies
Dwarf elliptical galaxies
Not much larger than a globular cluster
- -some as small as 1 kpc in diameter
- -smallest contain only about 10^5 solar masses
Dwarf elliptical galaxies
Not much larger than a globular cluster
- -some as small as 1 kpc in diameter
- -smallest contain only about 10^5 solar masses
- -most numerous in the universe but very hard to see
- –we only really see the local dwarf ellipticals
- -they have so few stars you can sometimes look through them without seeing them
What happens if we flatten a elliptical to a disk
These are no longer classified as an elliptical galaxy
–these are known as lenticular galaxies bc they are lens shaped
-in most regards they are more similar to spiral galaxies than elliptical
-they are size of spiral galaxies - however they don’t show arms
(S0)
Spiral galaxies
these were the spiral nebula
- they are galaxies like the milky way
- they make up 77% of the galaxies we currently observe
- like they milky way they have: a disk, a halo, and a bulge
Their stellar populations are similar to those found in the milky way
- -the arms are hot young stars of pop I
- they help light up and define the spiral arms of the galaxy
- they have the halo of older red stars
- in general spiral galaxies tend to be bluer than elliptical galaxies
- spirals were classified by hubble with an S
- but there are a lot of variety within the spiral galaxies
- most of this diff is based on - the size of the bulge and the tightness of the arms
- –we classify spirals as sa, sb, or sc
Spiral galaxies
these were the spiral nebula
- they are galaxies like the milky way
- they make up 77% of the galaxies we currently observe
- like they milky way they have: a disk, a halo, and a bulge
Their stellar populations are similar to those found in the milky way
- -the arms are hot young stars of pop I
- they help light up and define the spiral arms of the galaxy
- they have the halo of older red stars
- in general spiral galaxies tend to be bluer than elliptical galaxies
- spirals were classified by hubble with an S
- but there are a lot of variety within the spiral galaxies
- most of this diff is based on - the size of the bulge and the tightness of the arms
- –we classify spirals as sa, sb, or sc
Sa galaxies
These are spiral galaxies with:
- a large bulge
- tightly wound arms
Sb galaxies
Spiral galaxies with
- moderate bulge
- looser arms
Sc galaxies
Spiral galaxies with
- small bugle
- very loose arms
What are the arms?
The arms cannot be made of anything material since that would wind-up
- in the 1940s Bertil Lindblad proposed that the arms might be like ripples in water
- as the wave crests, the water bunches up, but then dissipates as the crest passes
- you see this when driving on the highway and there is an accident
- the cars slow down and then spread out again on the other side
Density waves in the galaxies
If we have a density wave in a galaxy it will cause the material to compress
- this can trigger for star formation
- the hot stars which are formed heat up the surrounding gas and make it glow
- this is what we see as the spiral arms
- the wave continues to the next region while the O and B stars burn out
Problems with the density-wave model
(involves fast motion of interstellar gas and dust - this material is compressed within the spiral arm)
- –the first problem is how to keep the density wave going
- –the wave should run out of energy
- -a second problem deals with the fact that density waves should produce tight, well defined arms
- -not all spirals show tight arms
Grand design vs. Flocculent
Galaxies which show tight arms are called GRAND DESIGN SPIRALS
- other fluffy armed spirals are called FLOCCULENT SPIRALS
- -some people explain flocculent spirals with self-propagating star formation instead of density waves
- -we have mentioned the idea of one generation of stars starting the next generation
- -likely spiral arms are caused by a combination of these two effects
Final class of galaxies - irregular galaxies
They are irregular bc they have no fixed shape
- -they are commonly caused by the collision of two galaxies or by tidal forces from a large galaxy
- -two famous ones are the SMC and LMC
Edwin Hubble and Vesto Slipher
In
Edwin Hubble and Vesto Slipher
In the 1920s Edwin Hubble was working on the distance to nearby galaxies (100 degrees Mount Wilson)
- -he was using the cepheids to get distances to a larger sample
- -slipher (1910s, Lowell observatory)
- -taking spectra of nearby galaxies
- -he was finding shifts in spectral lines (mostly to redshift side)
Hubble expansion
Hubble and Humason used the larger telescope at mount Wilson to get redshifts for a larger and fainter sample of galaxies (all redshifts at this point)
- -these are the same ones for which they and the distance from the cepheids
- like good astronomers they plotted the distance vs. the redshift and found a linear relation
- –this is the famous Hubble law - the more distant the galaxy the larger the redshift
Hubble Law
Basically the law says that the further away an object is the faster it is moving away
–this universal recessional motion is known as the HUBBLE FLOW
it can be written as: v = Ho d v - recessional velocity Ho - Hubble constant d - distance
the problem is the value of Ho
Measurement of Ho in Hubble law
Hubble didn’t know about the two separate Cepheid relations or the local motion
- -his original number of Ho was a little off
- -the value of the Hubble constant was hotly debated for years
But we are settling onto a value near 72 km/sec/Mpc (but they could be changing a little)
–it is a critical problem which effects our understanding of Cosmology
Problems with the hubble law
If the galaxy has a motion other than its hubble flow motion the velocity measured is effected
- -this is most easily seen in clusters of galaxies
- -the galaxies orbit within the cluster, therefore each cluster member will have a unique redshift
- -therefore the hubble law doesn’t give the correct distance
- -this leads into a discussion of clusters of galaxies
Problems with the hubble law
If the galaxy has a motion other than its hubble flow motion the velocity measured is effected
- -this is most easily seen in clusters of galaxies
- -the galaxies orbit within the cluster, therefore each cluster member will have a unique redshift
- -therefore the hubble law doesn’t give the correct distance
- -this leads into a discussion of clusters of galaxies
Would you expect any structure larger than a galaxy?
The milky way’s group
The milky way is part of cluster known as the local group
- this group has about 50 total members
- it includes:
- –the milky way
- –the andromeda galaxy (M31)
- –M32 and M33
- –SMC and LMC
- –many dwarf elliptical galaxies
- –two new members discovered in 1993 and 1997
Large rich clusters
The nearest rich cluster is the virgo cluster
- -contains about 2000 visible members
- -may contain 10,000 members
- -50 million lightyears away
- -9 million lightyears in diameter
- -dominated by 3 giant elliptical galaxies
other nearby rich clusters
- -the coma cluster
- -the hercules cluster
- -the centaurus cluster
Is there anything larger than a cluster?
We must look at a large sample of galaxies to answer this question
- –from their redshifts and directions we can plot a map of the galaxies
- -what we find are clusters of clusters
- –these are called SUPERCLUSTERS - dozens of clusters - 100s of millions of lightyears across
- we also find VOIDS
Is there anything larger than a cluster?
We must look at a large sample of galaxies to answer this question
- –from their redshifts and directions we can plot a map of the galaxies
- -what we find are clusters of clusters
- –these are called SUPERCLUSTERS - dozens of clusters - 100s of millions of lightyears across
- we also find VOIDS
Voids
Voids are regions of few if any galaxies
- -there is a lot of debate just how empty these voids really are
- -this is Dr. Moody’s research here at BYU
- -the existence of voids and superclusters are important tools in our understanding of the origins of the universe
Other features seen in maps of galaxies
Due to internal motion within clusters, we see lines in the plots which point back to the earth - these are sometimes called the fingers of God
The great wall
- –250 x 750 million lightyears
- –voids on either side
the southern wall
—similar but smaller than the great wall
Missing mass again
Clusters of galaxies must be held together by gravity
- –however, the visible mass we see in clusters isn’t enough
- -therefore we have another missing mass problem
- -about 10% of this problem in clusters can be explained by intracluster gas, the remainder is dark matter
Missing mass again
Clusters of galaxies must be held together by gravity
- –however, the visible mass we see in clusters isn’t enough
- -therefore we have another missing mass problem
- -about 10% of this problem in clusters can be explained by intracluster gas, the remainder is dark matter
What are the largest galaxies we see?
Giant elliptical galaxies
How do we think giant elliptical galaxies got so large?
By galaxy cannibalism - they ate smaller galaxies
What are most commonly observed galaxies in the universe
Spiral galaxies
Which type of galaxies are most common?
dwarf galaxies
T/F we think the majority of irregular galaxies come from collisions
TRUE
T/F All galaxies start out as EO galaxies and proceed along the Hubble Fork over time
FALSE
T/F galaxies with tight, narrow arms are formed by self-propagating star formation
FALSE
-self propagating star formation tends to move in random directions and therefore wouldn’t produce tight, well defined spiral arms
Discuss the meaning of Hubble Law
The Hubble Law states that the more distant the galaxy the larger the redshift. This law explains that the further away the celestial object is, the faster it is moving away. It uses the Hubble Constant multiplied by the distance to find the recessional velocity. However, Hubble law is incorrect when it comes to clusters of galaxies because its motion differs where each member in the cluster has a different redshift.
Disucc the structures larger than a galaxy that we find in the universe
One group larger than a galaxy is the Local Group, which contains the Milky Way, Andromeda Galaxy, M32, M33, SMC, LMC, and many dwarf elliptical galaxies. Another rich cluster is the Virgo Cluster, which is dominated by three giant elliptical galaxies, as well as the Coma Cluster, Hercules Cluster, and Centaurus Cluster. There are also voids and superclusters in the Universe.
Disucc the structures larger than a galaxy that we find in the universe
One group larger than a galaxy is the Local Group, which contains the Milky Way, Andromeda Galaxy, M32, M33, SMC, LMC, and many dwarf elliptical galaxies. Another rich cluster is the Virgo Cluster, which is dominated by three giant elliptical galaxies, as well as the Coma Cluster, Hercules Cluster, and Centaurus Cluster. There are also voids and superclusters in the Universe
Theory of relativity
According to Newton (or classic physics) the universe is uniform and filled with a rigid frame work
–time passes as a constant at all times
In 1905 Albert Einstein revolutionized physics and astronomy with his Special Theory of relativity
–the first principle is: the fundamental laws of the universe do not depend on a person’s location or motion
Special theory of relativity
This is the first of two theories
- in 1865 James Maxwell had described the basics of electromagnetism
- the theories predicted effects based on the motion of electric charge
- this implies an absolute frame of reference
Einstein didn’t like absolute reference frames
- Einstein’s goal was to eliminate the assumption of absolute space
- -this primary conclusion was that everyone measured the same speed of light regardless of their motion
- -this goes against Newtonian theory
The second principle is: the speed of light is the same for all observers
Two principles of special theory of relativity
First: the fundamental laws of the universe do not depend on a person’s location or motion
second: the speed of light is the same for all observers
Newtonian motion
As seen by outfielder, ball is approaching her at (40 m/s + 10 m/s) = 40 m/s
Because batter hits ball at 30 m/s –>
and running outfielder catches ball at 10 m/s
Motion of light
Astronaut with flashlight:
light 3x10^8 m/s —>
Astronaut flying in spaceship
1 x 10^0 m/s
New way of thinking
The laws of physics can’t be changed by your individual motions
- this leads to space-time no longer being a fixed rigid object
- motion effects there ate at which clocks keep time, the length of objects which we measure, the mass of obejects
Lorentz transformations
Dutch Physicist Hendrik Lorentz formalized Einstein’s theory into equations
These equations show at high velocity:
- -time slows down
- -lengths get shorter
- -mass increases
is this all just theory?
Tests of special relativity
To test the theory two identical atomic clocks were used
- -one was flown on a high speed aircraft
- -the second stayed on ground
- -when the plane returned the clocks showed diff times
- -in particle physics many of the other predictions are seen
Other principles (relativity)
- -the speed of light is constant in a vacuum
- -nothing can go faster than the speed of light
- -no massive object can move at the speed of light
- -the special theory of relativity only applies to non-acceleration reference frames, in other words, at constant velocities
- -if we allow for accelerations we move on to the GENERAL theory of relativity
General theory of relativity
Published in 1915 by Einstein
General theory of relativity
Published in 1915 by Einstein
- -involves the effects of gravity - Einstein argued that gravity causes accelerations - therefore it must affect the shape of space-time itself
- –this allowed Einstein to think of gravity as a motion rather than a force
- -this is the PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE
Curved space-time
This (After principle of equivalence) led Einstein to the idea that gravity also effects clock, lengths, etc.
- -therefore he had a more general theory
- -in this view gravity can be viewed as a bending or warping of space itself
- -far from any massive object space is flat
- -near massive objects it is bent into a ‘well’
If i role a ball across flat space it moves in a straight-line
–if i role it on curved space its direction is changed
- massive object curves the space-time around us
- far from the object, space-time is nearly “flat”, close to the object, the curvature forms a “Well”
- in Einsten’s picture of gravity other objects sense the curvature and are drawn into the “well”
What can we predict from general relativity?
The motion of the planets
the blending of light
The precession of mercury
In mid-1800s Le Verrier noted that Newtonian mechanics didn’t predict the position of mercury very well
- -Einstein found that where gravity was weak relativity and newtonian mechanics matched
- -however, in a strong gravitational field general relativity predicted a diff orbit
- -general relativity predicted the correct orbit
The bending of light
Newtonian mechanics would say that light wouldn’t be bent bc it has no mass
- -general relativity predicts bending
- -to test this the positions of stars were examined during a solar eclipse in 1919
- -stars which should have been behind the sun were visible at the edge of the sun
- -this effect is also seen in clusters of galaxies and with quasars
The bending of light
Newtonian mechanics would say that light wouldn’t be bent bc it has no mass
- -general relativity predicts bending
- -to test this the positions of stars were examined during a solar eclipse in 1919
- -stars which should have been behind the sun were visible at the edge of the sun
- -this effect is also seen in clusters of galaxies and with quasars
Escape of light
If gravity effects light then what of light leaving a massive object
- -the effect of the gravity would be to shift the light to a longer wavelength
- this was seen in 1960 by Pound and Rebka
- -the effect called GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT
- the effect has since been seen from light escaping the surface of a white dwarf
Gravitational redshift
A. the gravitational slowing of time
—compared to a clock on the top floor, a clock on the ground floor is deeper in the earth’s gravitational field and so ticks more slowly
B. gravitational redshift
—as light wave climbs in a gravitational field, its frequency decreases and its wavelength increases
Gravitational waves
The fourth prediction of general relativity is gravitational waves
- -these occur when objects move, like a ship moving through water
- -this creates a wake that propagates through space
- -these waves are called gravitational waves or gravitational radiation
There has not been a direct measure of gravitational waves
- -however, Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor found indirect evidence from a binary pair of neutron stars
- -the pulses from one of the stars were monitored as the stars orbited
- -evidence is that gravitational waves exist
- -they won the Nobel Prize in 1993