Final Review Flashcards

1
Q

Superstition

A

“7 years bad luck for a broken mirror”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intuition

A

having that “gut” feeling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Authority

A

Something accepted solely on the basis of the credibility of source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tenacity

A

believing that something is real because you hear it repeatedly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rationalism

A

All humans are mortal. I am human. Therefore, I am mortal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Empiricism

A

“I can experience everything I believe” relies on the 5 sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the relationship between Empiricism and Rationalism?

A

Gaining knowledge via science involves a merger of rationalism and empiricism. Scientists collect data (make empirical observations) and test hypotheses with these data (assess them using rationalism).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Determinism

A

our event is preceded by other events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Order

A

the idea that there is a sequential pattern of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Discoverability

A

there isn’t anything that we can never know.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Systematic Empiricism

A

making a way to measure otherwise qualitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

objectivity

A

reliability validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

publicly verifiable

A

publishing research allows for other scientists to read, expound, and replicate the research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Empirically solvable

A

must have a falsifiable hypothesis (it must be stated in a way that it can be proven wrong) For example: null and alternative hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parsimony

A

if we have two explanations that are equal, then we accept the simpler explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-correcting

A

Researchers carefully replicate findings before committing their lab to future research. Research but be constantly replicated to be accepted as scientifically proven.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Control

A

unknown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Scientific Method

A
  1. Ask a question 2.Background Research
  2. Construct a hypothesis
  3. Test your hypothesis by doing an experiment
  4. Analyze your data and draw a conclusion
  5. Communicate your results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Basic

A

The study of psychological issues to seek knowledge for its own sake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Applied

A

the study of psychological issues that have practical significance and potential solutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Descriptive

Goals of science- methods of science

A

carefully observing behavior in order to describe it, Observational- making observations of human or animal behavior, Case study- an in-depth study of one or more individuals, survey- questioning individuals on a topic and then describing their responses, Naturalistic observation- observing the behavior of humans or animals in their natural habitat, Laboratory observation- observing the behavior of humans or animals in a more contrived and controlled situation, usually the laboratory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Predictive (relational) (goals of science- methods of science)

A

identifying the factors that indicate when an event or events occur. everything is a dependent variable (researcher does not manipulate the IV), Correlational- a method that assess the degree of relationship between two variables, quasi-experimental- research that compares naturally occurring groups of individuals; the variable of interest cannot be manipulated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Explanatory (goals of science- methods of science)

A

identifying the causes that determine when and why a behavior occurs, can only be explanatory if it’s an experiment, there has to be random assignment and control of extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Variable

A

an event or behavior that has at least two values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Independent variable
what the researcher manipulates
26
Dependent variable
what the researcher observes
27
Extraneous variable
Undesirable variables that influence the relationship between variables that an experimenter is examining
28
Participant variable
unknown
29
pseudoscience
claims that appear to be scientific but that actually violate the criteria of science
30
Nazi atrocities
(Ethical violation) Nuremberg code (1948) says that there are things that are unethical to do to the enemy even in times of war
31
Tuskegee study
Black men in Tuskegee, Alabama were told that they were being treated for syphilis but were not despite the fact that an effective treatment was known
32
Milgram study
participants were placed under extreme psychological stress and learned things about themselves that they would have preferred not to know
33
Zimbardo study
"prison study"
34
Deidrick stapel
fabricated results in his research
35
Principle A ( general principles of APA)
Beneficence and nonmaleficence psychologists seek to safeguard the welfare and rights of those with whom they interact professionally and other affected persons
36
Principle B
Fidelity and responsibility roles- professional conduct, adaptable methods, responsibility - self and colleagues, public communication one must publish his or her research
37
Principle C
Integrity honesty, fairness, and respectfulness prudent use of deception
38
Principle D
Justice availability of benefits of research and self competence
39
Principle E
Respect for people's rights and dignity privacy, confidentiality, self-determination, awareness of differences
40
Ten Ethical standard
1. Resolving ethical issues 2. competence 3. Human relations 4. Privacy and confidentiality 5. Advertising and other public statements 6. Record keeping and fees 7. Education and training 8. Research and publication 9. Assessment 10. Therapy
41
what are two important safeguards as far as ethics are concerned?
1. Informed consent form | 2. Institutional review board
42
The Hawthorne effect
participants are trying to figure out what the researcher is up to and do what they want. (the effect of participant's awareness of being observed by the researcher)
43
Internal validity
the degree of confidence that the IV have caused the DV
44
External validity
extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people
45
Construct validity
did the instructions create what the researcher intended them to create
46
Statistical validity
the degree to which conclusions about the relationship among variables based on the data are correct or 'reasonable'.
47
Threat to internal validity- Nonequivalent control groups-
problems in subject selection or assignment may lead to important difference between the subjects assigned to the experimental and control groups : solution- use random sampling and random assignment of subjects
48
Threat to internal validity- History
changes in the dependent variable may be due to outside events that take place during the course of study: solution- use an equivalent control group
49
Threat to internal validity-Maturation
changes in the dependent variable may be due to subjects maturing during the course of the study: solution- use an equivalent control group
50
Threat to internal validity Testing
changes in the dependent variable maybe due to participants being tested repeatedly and getting either better or worse because of these repeated testings: solution- use an equivalent control group
51
Threat to internal validity | Regression to the mean
subjects who are selected for a study because they are extreme on some variable may regress towards the mean and be less extreme at a later testing: solution- use an equivalent group of subjects with extreme scores
52
Threat to internal validity | mortality or attrition
differential attrition or dropout in the experimental and control groups may lead to inequality between the groups: solution-monitor for differential loss of subjects of experimental and control groups
53
Threat to internal validity | Diffusion of treatment
changes in the behaviors or responses of participants may be due to information they have received from others participating in the study: solution- attempt to minimize by testing subjects all at once or as close together in time as possible
54
Threat to internal validity | floor or ceiling effects
the measuring instrument used is not sensitive enough to detect differences: solution-ensure that measuring instrument is reliable and valid before beginning the study
55
Threat to internal validity | experimenter and subject effects
either experimenters or subjects consciously or unconsciously affect the results of the study: solution- use a double-blind or single blind procedure
56
Threat to internal validity | selection
the participants can make a group nonequivalent by their characteristics or experiences
57
Threat to external validity- Sampling
ex: a convenience sample wouldn't apply to the entire population, but a random or representative sample would
58
Threat to external validity- interaction of selection and treatment
If it is found that there are differences between the groups, you need to make sure one select group gets the IV
59
Threat to external validity- Interaction of testing and treatment
pretest sensitization- the pretest draws attention to the IV: solution- give the pretest without the treatment
60
Threat to external validity- Multiple treatment interaction
: When the same subjects receive two or more treatments as in a repeated measures design, there may be a carryover effect between treatments such the the results cannot be generalized to single treatments.
61
Threat to external validity- reactive arrangements
An effect that is due simply to the fact that subjects know that they are participating in an experiment and experiencing the novelty of it — the Hawthorne effect.
62
Threat to external validity- instrumentation
consistency of the dependent variable being measured by a machine or human, machine needs to be calibrated, humans need to be consistent
63
Predictive (relational) method- correlation
only attempts to determine if there is a relationship between 2 variables (problem: there is a lack of control on extraneous variable)
64
Predictive method- pearson r
used when the independent and dependent variables are numeric
65
Predictive method- | Point biserial
the correlation coefficient used when one of the variables is measured on a dichotomous nominal scale and the other is measured on an interval or ratio scale