Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Trade Secrets and Unfair Practices > Final Review > Flashcards

Final Review Flashcards

1
Q

Who do fiduciary duties apply to

A

Directors and officers, shareholders, employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the potential sources for fiduciary duties

A

common law, statute, contractual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What fiduciary duties do directors and officers owe?

A

Duty of Loyalty and duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty of Loyalty

A

must act in **good faith **in a manner they reasonably belief to be the best interest of the corporation.

RB is both subjective and objective, best interest is discretionary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Actions prohibited by duty of loyalty

A
  • competing with corporation
  • taking business opportunities from corporations
  • voting in transactions with a C/I
  • Insider trading
  • profitting improperly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duty of Care

A

Must behave in a manner that a person in a similar position would behave in similar circumstances. Must take steps to inform themselves. Can rely on those who they have a reason to trust.

Negligence standard is objective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two types of Employment Relationships

A

At Will and Contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

At will employment

A

mutually volitional agreement of both parties. Either party can terminate at any point and for any reason*

*protected classes cannot be THE reason of termination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contractual Employment

A

durational term, outlines duties and responsibilities, stipulates compensaion, sets terms and conditions for cause of termination, consequences* for termination

employer* : severance package
employee* : Restrictive covenants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FD of Employees During Employment

A

common law duty of loyalty. Can prepare to compette but cannot:
* appropriate TS
* solicit employer’s customers while still working there
* solicit employees to leave while still working there
* carry away CI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Post Employment FD of employees

A

maintain CI, and absent a valid NC may seek and obtain employment with competitor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prima Facie Case of TS under UTSA

A
  1. establish the existence of a TS
  2. ∆ acquired knowlede of TS as a result of Confidental relationship
  3. ∆ made unauthorized use or disclosure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elements of a TS

A
  1. information
  2. independent economic value
  3. not generally known/readily ascertainable by improper means
  4. Subject of Reasonable efforts to protect

*tangible is helpful, not required.
*agreement defining it is helpful, not dispositive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What constitutes “information” when proving a TS

A

can be a compilation, generally not customer lists: must be something in addition to just names, can be affirmative (recipe or formula) or negative (what not to do)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of “not generally known”

A

done on a case by case basis based on the value, size, and sophistication of parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of reasonable efforts

A

evaluated under the circumstances, taken into account relationship and sophistication of parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What constitutes “misappropriation” of a TS

A

acquisition, disclosure, use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what constitutes acquisition of TS

A

MUST BE BY IMPROPER MEANS
- includes a breach or inducement of breach of FD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What constitutes disclosure or use of a TS

A
  • disclosure or use
  • without express or implied consent,
  • by a person who:
  • used improper means OR
  • knew or had reason to know it was:
  • from someone who had improper means OR
  • acquired from or through someone who had a duty of secrecy
  • derived from or through a person who owed duty

reverse engineering alone is not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Special Defenses under UTSA

A

basically disprove any PF + consent, disclosure
* generally known
* no reasonable efforts
* independently developed
* reverse engineered
* π disclosed it
* π implied consent
* no independent economic value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Generic/Equitable Defenses under UTSA

A
  • laches
  • estoppel
  • unclean hands
  • “memorization defense” (weak; someone who intenitonally memorizes a TS is likely still liable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Remedies under UTSA

A

injunctive relief
- mandatory or prohibatory
- TRO
- Prelim
- permanent
damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

UTSA vs DTSA

A
  • DTSA is more elaborate, broader but less specific.
  • DTSA grants FQJ without preempting state claims
  • DTSA prohibits injunctions that prohibit a person from obtaining employment
  • both allow for injunctive relief and damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Requirements for TRO

A
  • immediate irreparable loss
  • PF case of each claim
  • narrowly tailored
  • needs insurance policy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Attributes of TRO

A
  • only lasts for 14 days, can be renewed with sufficient reasoning
  • used when there is a real emergency needing immediate relief
  • can be given without notice in extreme situations, but need to explain why notice should not be given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Requirements of a Preliminary Injunction

A
  • inadequate remedy at law causing irreparable harm
  • reasonable likelihood of success at trial by establishing PF case
  • balancing of harms to parties
  • public interst disservice (imp. when large part of society or critical tech)
  • decided by individual judge
27
Q

What is the CFAA?

A

provides criminal and civil recourse for hacking. Used to use to go after employees who used computers to gather infor prior to departure

28
Q

What are the two theories of the CFAA

A
  • broad: breach of FD could give rise to CFAA claim
  • narrow: no violation without accessing areas of a computer without authorization
29
Q

Van Buren Gate theory of CFAA

A
  • to violate CFAA a person needs to avoid a “gate that is down”. They need to enter particular areas of the computer that are off limits. Key inquiry is whether the person was authorized at the time. Wrongful/malicious intent is irrelevant
30
Q

Policy of Non-Compete Agreements

A
  • they are restraines of trade and thereofre contracry to economic prinicples, so courts construe them against the beneficiary
  • promoters argue theat they promote honesty and fair dealing and allow employers to develop without concern that they will not be able to enforce their rights
31
Q

Requirements of a Non-Compete

A
  • protectable interst (good will, confidential information, trade secrets)
  • Reasonable restrictions (must have a relationship to protected interest):
  • time
  • space/area (nexxus to activity)
  • activity (determined by work with previous employer
32
Q

Formation Issues/Defenses of Non-Competes

A
  • Validity of K
  • no meeting of the minds or fraud in the inducement
  • consideration adequacy and timing

employment = consideration if signed in conjunction with emloyment

33
Q

Defenses Against Enforcement of Non-Compete

A
  • overbreadth
  • ambiguity of restrictions
  • lack of protectable interest
34
Q

Effect of Type of Termination on Enforceability on NC

A

involuntary termination may affect enforceabilty of Non-Compete
NY Rule: involunatry termination = per se invalid
Majority rule: involuntary termination is considered when determining validity
Minority rule: involuntary termiation is irrelevant when considerig validity

35
Q

Assignability and Enforceability of Non-Competes

A

an assignee cannot enforce a K against an anssignor
Common Law: K for services cannot be asisgned without permission of assigned without an assignment clause

36
Q

Standards of Judicial Scrutiny on Non-Competes

A
  • dependent on the level of bargaing power
  • highest level of scrutiny to employment agreements
  • mid level to stock redepmption
  • low level to business, franchise, or partnership
37
Q

3 Prong Analysis detmining enforeability of NC ancillary to sale

A
  1. covenant must be no broader in activity, time, and geography than necessary to protect interests
  2. must not unduly burden promisor
  3. must not necessairly compromise public interest in free competition
38
Q

Red Pencil

A

if restirctive covenant is overbroad, then unenforceable

39
Q

Blue Pencil

A

court can strike overbroad provisions, and leave enforeable, but cannot rewrite anything

40
Q

Rule of Reason

A

Courts have discretion to modify RC to reflect intent of the parties, including inseting language and restrictions

41
Q

Passive vs Active Non-Solicitation Agreement

A

passive vs active is relevant when considering whether something is a “solicitaion”

42
Q

NDA Duration Rule

A

you can have an indefinite NDA if you include the right language

43
Q

3 Common Law Business Torts

A
  1. Interference with Contract
  2. Interfence with Business Relations
  3. Interference with Potential Business Advantage
44
Q

PF for Tortious Interference with Contract

A
  1. existence of a valid K
  2. ∆ must have had knowledge of K
  3. ∆ must have shown purposeful intent to interfere w/ K
  4. Interference proximately causes damage
45
Q

PF for Tortious Interference with Business Relations

A
  1. existence fo a valid business relationship
  2. ∆ had knowledge of relationship
  3. ∆ must show purposeful intent to interfere w/ relationship
  4. interference PC damage
  5. pecuniary damages shown with reasonable certainty
46
Q

PF for Tortious Interference with Potential Business Advantage

A
  1. existence of a protespctive advantage sufficiently definite and speciic enough to be capable of acceptance or performance
  2. ∆ must have knowledge
  3. ∆ must have shown purposeful intent to interfere
  4. interference proximately causes damage
  5. pecuniary damages
47
Q

Defense for business torts

A

fair competition

48
Q

Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine

A

an individual is so intertwined w something CI that disclosure is ienvitable

49
Q

factors that weigh in favor of inevitablity

A
  1. highly competitive industry
  2. employee had intimate knowledge
  3. substantial overlap of duties
  4. lack of candor
  5. targeting
50
Q

2 theories for liability under inevitable disclosure doctrine

A

minority: independent cause of action
majority: theory under UTSA

51
Q

PF Common Law Defamation

A
  1. publication to a 3d party
  2. false or derogatory Statement
  3. understood to be about π
  4. proximate cause
  5. special/specific damages to reputatition
52
Q

Standard of Conduct for Defamation Claims

A
  • dependent on type of π
  • private: negligence
  • all purpose public figure: actual
  • limited purpose public figure: actual malice
  • in regard to the specific public controversy
53
Q

Defenses to Defamation

A
  • truth/substantial truth
  • opinion
  • privilieges (judicial, legislative, qualified)
54
Q

Remedies to defamation

A

Special Damages

55
Q

First Amendment and Defamation

A

we want to encourage open discourse and maintain freedom of speech. Public figures are inherently going to be the subject of the press, so we don’t want to elimate the possibility of speaking of them, but we don’t want to totally abandon their rights either

56
Q

PF of False Advertising

A
  1. false or misleading statement about product or services
  2. such statement EITHER
    - actually deceived OR
    - had the capacity to deceive a substantial portion of potential customers
  3. deception is material
  4. product or service is in interstate commerce
  5. π has been or is likely to be injured bc of the statement
57
Q

Remedies for False Advertising

A

injunctive relief or damages

58
Q

Defenses for false advertising

A

Opinion, and Puffery

59
Q

2 part test for standing for False Advertising under the Lanham Act

A
  1. can the party show economic or rep injury
  2. does injury occur when deception of customers causes them to withold trade from π
60
Q

How to prove deception/misleading under false advertising claim

A
  • if statement is actually false, then deception is presumed
  • if statement is alleged to be misleading then need to show evidence of actual deception
61
Q

PF for Right of Publicity

A
  • Π must show that “challenged use”:
    1. Expressly or implicitly identified the π
    2. Done w/o consent of π
    3. For advertising or other commercial uses of trade
62
Q

Defenses to Right of Publicity

A
  • Incidental use
    o Applicable to news in which they use NIL to promote itself
  • Newsworthiness
    o Exception on reporting on matters of public interest
  • Biography
    o RoP does not extend to literary work after death
  • parody
63
Q

4 part test for Puffery

A
  1. analyze the common usage or menaing of the allegedly defamatory words themselves
  2. consdier the dergee to which the statements are verificable
  3. examine the context in which the statement occurrs
  4. examin the broader socia context to which the statement fits

Trade Secrets and Unfair Practices (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions