Final LING 201 Flashcards

1
Q

Mutual intelligibility

A

Speakers on average can understand each other, so speak different dialects // if not, they speak different language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Politics & Orthography

A

Intelligible varities can be labelled as different languages (SW VS NO, Azeri VS Turkish, Serbian VS Croatian) or unintelligible as dialects (okinawan and JAP, catalan and spanish)

Intelligible can have different orthographic systems (ser VS croa, hindi VS urdu)
Unitelligible may have same orthographic system (cantonese VS mandarin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dialect continuum

A

Gradual transition between two non-mutually intelligible varieties

Conundrum: some speakers might not understand each other, but most nearby speakers can. Not clear where to place boundary.

Ex: Arabic, East slavic, Turkic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Language death

A

when the last native speaker of a language dies (once every 3 months, ubykh, mank, sumer)

language change: latin & romance languages, sanskrit & indic languages, ancient egyptian as coptic

speakers are not evenly distributed : total around 7000, 5000 by less than 100k, 3000 by less than 10k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Language universals

A

Talk more generally about possible and impossible languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Absolute universal

A

Something true for all languages

All languages exhibit linguistic creativity, have stops, vowels, stress, morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Universal tendency

A

Is usually but not always true

Syllable structure obeys the sonority principle (rising sonority towards the nucleus and falling sonority away from the nucleus EXCEPT Russian [mgla] ‘mist’

The most common stop phonemes are /p, t, k/ EXCEPT Hawaiian lacks /t/

Most languages have fricatives EXCEPT Hawaiian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Implicational universal

A

Something has to be true if something else is true (presence of marked structure implies presence of unmarked structure)

The presence of front rounded vowels implies the presence of front unrounded vowels

The presence of nasal vowel phonemes implies the presence of oral vowel phonemes

The presence of inflectional affixes implies the presence of derivational affixes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Unmarked

A

linguistic structures or elements that are basic, easy to learn, and cross-linguistically expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marked

A

linguistics structures or elements that are complex, difficult to learn, and cross-linguistically rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

History of English

A

Proto-germanic - 500-0, R
Proto-West-germanic - 0-500, R
Old English - 500-1100
Middle English - 1100-1500
Modern English - 1500-2000
Arbitrary and approximate divisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Language family

A

group of related languages derived from the same ancestor (proto-language)

can be contained in other LF

Linguistic community slips up and resulting halves continue to evolve separately, until MI is lost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indo-european

A

PIE, R, 5000-7000, UKR or TRK

Subfamilies :
Germanic = English, German, Icelandic, Yiddish
Romance = French, Romanian, Spanish, Portuguese
Balto-salvic = Russian, Polish, Serbo-Croatian, Latvian
indo-aryan = Hindi/Urdu, Farsi, Marathi, Punjabi, Bengali
Greek
Albanian..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sound change

A

Phonological change that was once active in the language
- left mark on language
- Physiologically or psychologically motivated
- Same types of processes

Regular and systematic (for all languages and usually for all words)

Reduces intelligibility between varieties with change and those without

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assimilation (SC)

A

Nearby segments become more similar (properties passed to adjacent segment) extremely common, motivated by coarticulation (easier to pronounce similar segments)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dissimilation

A

nearby segments become less similar, uncommon, motivated by perceptual contrast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Lenition

A

Consonant weakening (C are shorter, more voiced or sonorant), common when next to vowel or sonorant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Rhotacism

A

Alveolar sibilants becoming rhotics, more common in intervocalic contexts (s->r)
ex: latin = appeared in classical latin orthography after -is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Deletion

A

Loss of a segment
ex= middle eng = a->//_#

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Epenthesis

A

Insertion of a segment
ex= middle english = /->d/n_r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Metathesis

A

Segments changing places
-phonotactics
-avoid undesirable combinations of segments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Great English Vowel Shift

A

Boundary of Middle E and Modern E

Chain shift = series of changes where a change leaves a gap to be filled by the other

Affected long vowels =
- high became vowels
- mid became high
- low became mid front

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Grimm’s law

A

Jacob Grimm, after split of PIE (before split of Proto-Germanic)
vl stops -> vs fricatives (p/f,t/th,k/x)
vc stops -> vs stops (b/p,d/t,g/k)
breathy vc stops -> voiced stops (bh/b, dh/d, gh/g)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Syntactic ungrammaticality

A

Infinite number of grammatical sentences (most are unattested)

Not all sentences are SG (not to do with resulting meaning)

Lan have rules about the combination of words into sentences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Noun

A

M= plural, possessive
D= with determiner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Verb

A

M= past, progressive, 3rd singular
D= with auxiliary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Adjective

A

M= comparative, superlative
D= with degree word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Adverb

A

M=n/a
D= with degree word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Preposition

A

M=n/a
D= with noun phrase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Determiner

A

M=n/a
D= with noun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Lexical categories

A

Transmit meaning (N, V, adj, adv), tend to be open, easy to update or expand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Functional categories

A

Required by the grammar of the language, usually closed, difficult to update or expand

  • det, degree words, propositions
  • complementizers = that, if, whether
  • conjunctions= and, but, nor
  • auxiliaries = must, might, can
  • pronouns = i, we, it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Constituency

A

Within a phrase, some words are more closely connected to each other, can vary in length, tells us something about the grammatical structure of the sentence, same string of words may exibit different structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Substitution Test

A

Constituents are syntactically interchangeable when same type

if replaced by words with same syntactic properties without effecting the grammaticality or syntactic properties = both are constituents

some single words can have same syntactic properties as entire phrases (they - noun phrases, do so - verb phrases)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Movement test

A

some phrases can be moved to a different part of the sentence (only constituents can, often at beginning), some contintuents cannot be moved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Coordination test

A

Constituents of the same type can be coordinated using a coordinating conjunction (and, or)
Not all syntactic categories can be coordinated (determiners)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Syntactic trees

A

Hierarchical structure that represents internal relations - binary
Node - a point and/or everything benearth a point in the tree (syntactic category, always a constituent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

X-bar theory

A

All phrases can be described with the same structure
XP = placeholder for any type of syntactic phrase

Phrase head = obligatory nucleus of the phrase, endocentric (head always contained within)

Specifier = function word at the edge of a phrase, sometimes required, not a phrase on its own

Complement = information about the head, sometimes not required, (may be required by the particular head), a phrase on its own

Complements are structurally closer to heads than specifiers, purpose of X’ node

Phrases may have any number of complements, but typically only one specifier (multiple X’nodes possible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Verb phrases

A

H= verb
S= particular types of adverbs, (never, almost, often..)
C= optional, varies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Noun phrases

A

H= noun
S= determiner
C= optional, varies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Adjective phrases

A

H= adj
S= degree word (very, quite, hardly)
C= optional, PP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Adverb phrase

A

H= adverb
S= degree word
No C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Prepositional phrase

A

H= preposition
C= NP
No specifier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Merge operation

A

Constituents can be nested in other constituents
must be in line with X-bar schema
Recursion?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Syntax tree shorthand

A

If internal structure not important, can be replaced with a shorthand triangle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Sentences

A

Also constituens, with X-bar schema
Tense phrase
H= Tense (Cover or modal)
S= NP
C= VP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Syntactic ambiguity

A

Same string of words can correspond to different syntactic structures, with different meaning that is related to the structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Clauses

A

Constituent that contains a subject and a verb

Matrix = entire sentence (multiple smaller clauses)

Complementizer = word signals that a clause follows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

CP structure

A

Complements = TPs
H= complementizer (if, whether, that)
Clauses introduced by a complementizer bear overt evidence of a CP tier
All TPs are contained in a CP tier (including matrix clauses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Yes-no questions

A

Only answered with yes or no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Inversion in English

A

Movement of T to C position in questions
Appears in Eng yes-no questions = T moves to C, so questions contain a +Q feature (needs to be satisfied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Movement

A

Can happen in different circumstances for different reasons (satisfy some sort of abstract feature)
Does not alter syntactic properties of the elements
Leaves a trace t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Deep VS surface structure

A

Deep = before movement
Surface = after movement
Implies two different levels of syntactic structure

54
Q

Wh-questions

A

Require another answer
Wh-word has same syntactic properties as the information saught in the answer
Always in front of the sentence

55
Q

Wh-movement

A

Difference in word order as result of movement = wh-words/phrases move to specifier of CP
Also exhibit inversion

56
Q

Head-complement condition

A

Head before complement (right-branching), modals precede verbs, verbs precede objects, prepositions, relative clauses follow referent)

Head follow complement (left-branching), modals follow verbs, verbs follow objects, postpositions, relative clauses precede referent

Some languages exibit both types of structures

The position of the specifier with respect to the head is independent

57
Q

Wh-movement parameter

A

Wh-words move to specifier of CP (eng, spa, fr)

Wh-words do not move (mandarin)

58
Q

Verb raising parameter

A

Raise V to T (separate from inversion T to C)
Fr = toujours is a specifier

59
Q

French yes-no questions

A

Exhibit inversion and verb raising, so V ends up in head of C (like Eng modals)

60
Q

Meaning of sentences

A

Sentences can be T or F
Truth conditions = state of the world under which a sentence is true
Know meaning of a sentence = knowing TC (no requirement for the sentence to be true or TC compatible with real world)
TC of one sentence may have a logical relation to the TC of another

61
Q

Entailement

A

A sentence p entails a sentence q if when p is true q is also true = q follows from p, q does not introduce infos not contained in p

62
Q

Equivalence

A

p is equivalent to q if p entails q and q entails p
* p and q mean the same thing
* it is impossible to construct a scenario where p would be logically different from q

63
Q

Contradiction

A

contradicts q if when p is true q is false and when q is true p is false
* Both p and q being true would result in a paradox

64
Q

Contrariety

A

p is contrary to q if when p is true q is false
* Both cannot be true, though both can be false

65
Q

Subordination

A

LR between words
A is a subset of B

66
Q

Equivalence (between words)

A

A and B are the same set

67
Q

Complementarity (words)

A

A and B are non-overlapping and exhaustive subsets

68
Q

Incompatibility (words)

A

A and B are non-overlapping (but not necessarily exhaustive) subsets

69
Q

Presupposition

A

A sentence p presupposes q if p entails q regardless if p is true

Presuppositions are part of the common ground, the information shared by the speaker and listener
*Presuppositions are context-dependent
*Negating the presupposition does not negate the direction of entailment

70
Q

Homonyms

A

words with the same spelling or the same pronunciation (also both)

71
Q

Homographs

A

words with the same spelling but not (necessarily) the same pronunciation

72
Q

Homophones

A

words with the same pronunciation but not (necessarily) the same spelling

73
Q

Polysemes

A

words with more than one related meaning (almost always spelled the same)
- arise due to semantic change (one meaning is extended to refer to a related meaning)
- no vagueness (meaning partly defined by the context) = ex, adj or pronouns

74
Q

Synonyms

A

pairs of words with very similar meanings
* True synonymy is rare and, arguably, impossible

75
Q

Antonyms

A

pairs of words that are ‘opposite’ in some sense
*Often used informally
*Incompatible scalar adjectives: ‘tall’ vs ‘short’, ‘quick’ vs ‘slow’
*Complementary words: ‘dead’ vs ‘alive’, ‘day’ vs ‘night’

76
Q

Pronouns

A

Context-dependent by definition (refer to salient element in the conversation, new or previously mentioned)

Grammatical properties of the pronouns give us some info about the referent (person, number, gender)

77
Q

Context-dependent adjectives

A

Describe a value on a scale = scalar adjectives
The relevant portion of the scale depends on the noun

78
Q

Implicature

A

Derive meaning from a sentence that is neither entailed nor presupposed
Can be violated

79
Q

Cooperative principle

A

Contribution required by the goal of the conversation
4 maxims (Gricean)
Interpret utterance under the assumption that the speaker is being cooperative

80
Q

Maxim of relevance

A

Be relevant to the goal of the conversation
Assume that collocutor is providing information that is related to what we are talking about
If info appears irrelevant on the surface, we try to think of a scenario where it would be relevant

81
Q

Maxim of quantity

A

Say as much as is required by the goal of the conversation
Assume that speaker is not omitting important information
Everything that is said is construed to be relevant

82
Q

Maxim of quality

A

Do not say what you think is false and do not say what you lack evidence for
People lie and say unsubstantiated things = subverting principles = structure of the conversation rests on the assumption that people are honest
Not-jokes

83
Q

Maxim of manner

A

Make your contribution as clear as possible (avoid obscurity and ambiguity, bried and orderly)

84
Q

Newborns

A

Respond differently to humain voices, preference to their parent’s voices
Perceive all acoustic contrasts as equally different
At 8months, perception becomes attuned the phonological contrasts of their language specifically (lose ability to reliably distinguish between contrasts not found in their language)

85
Q

Babbling stage

A

6mo-12mo
develop control over their articulators (necessary for linguistic development)
lot of cross-linguistic similarities between babnling in children of different ages (language independent, no linguistically marked structures (rare phenemes are absent even if these are present in the ambient language, simple syllable structure)

86
Q

Acquisition of phonemes

A

Vowels before C, stops are first C acquired
Labial > alveolars> velars>alveopalatals (diff from language universals)
Onsets before codas

87
Q

Early phonetic processes

A

Immature productions of particular words often reflect a child’s inability to produce certain sounds or certain phonological structures
Similar to phonological processes observed in adult grammar (underlying representation is modified by various processes, but different = ungrammatical even by children themselves, often sporadic (non-regular) in their application)

88
Q

Syllable deletion

A

Stressed syllables are more prosodically prominent than unstressed syllables, so deleted from the output (particularly in the middle of the word)

89
Q

Syllable simplification

A

CV is best syllable shape (complex onsets and codas are avoided, codas are avoided altogether)
Syllable structure repaires through deletion (the more sonorant element is deleted)

90
Q

Stopping

A

Affect properties of segements rather than individual segments
obstruent ->stops

91
Q

Fronting

A

consonant -> alveolar

92
Q

Gliding

A

liquid -> glide

93
Q

Denasalization

A

consonant ->oral

94
Q

Assmiliation (Children)

A

Common cross-linguistically (common in children’s speech)
Long distance place assimilation
Vc obstruents are more common in the speech of children than vs obstruents - due to assimilation in voicing to the following vowel/sonorant (lenition)

95
Q

Vocabulary development

A

18mo = around 50 words
between 1,5-6yo = vocabulary acquired rapidly (around 14k words by 6yo)
lot of variation between children
lot of similarity between languages
general trends = nouns first, words with concrete meanings before words with abstract meanings, lexical items before functional items

96
Q

Acquiring new words

A

Difficult task (world full to objects and properties, natural phenomena are gradient and not clearly delineated, many words are not observable phenomena)

several assumption that children tend to make when acquiring the meaning of a new word

97
Q

Overextension

A

the acquired meaning is more general than the intended meaning
*Overuse of type assumption or basic level assumption
-Some evidence that the child is aware of the mistake and that overextension is a strategy to compensate for limited vocabulary
*Once the child acquires the intended target, they modify the original meaning

98
Q

Underextension

A

the acquired meaning is more specific than the intended meaning
*Underuse of type assumption and basic level assumption

99
Q

Whole object assumption

A

the word refers to the whole object

100
Q

Type assumption

A

refers to a type of thing

101
Q

Basic level assumption

A

refers to objects that are alike in basic ways

102
Q

Morphological overgeneralization (3stages)

A

1- words are memorized whole (no evidence of morphology)
2- inflectional morphology overgeneralized (errors not found in adult speech, strong evidence of morphology, no irregular morphology yet)
3- adult-like morphology

103
Q

One word stage

A

1-1,5yo
one word used to convert an entire utterance, typically the most informative word in the utterance is used

104
Q

Two word stage

A

1.5-2yo
limited number of sentential patterns (N+V, N+N)
almost complete absence of functional items

105
Q

Telegraphic stage

A

2-2.5yo
longer sentences
some functional items and inflectional morphology still missing

Rapid development after the telegraphic stage = syntactic movement acquired later on

106
Q

When you speak about yourself

A

Speech to carry info about the meaning, but also information about the speaker (linguistic features as members of a particular speech community, called indexes)
Indexes are subconscious or used consciously to build speaker identity
Ex= creaky voice/vocal fry (danish for info, english for indexical information (young, female, lower level of education, friendly, casual..))

107
Q

Free variation

A

allophony not conditioned by phonological
environment
* Random variation from the perspective of phonology
* No variation is truly free or random
* Sociolinguistic factors (variety, who, what is situation, mood, blood-alcohol level…)

108
Q

English unreleased stops

A

p¬, t¬,k¬ = no release following the stop, complete silence

in eng = vs stops in free-variation with unreleased stops in word-final position (otherwise, always released = sometimes released at the end, depends largely on sociolinguistic factors)

109
Q

Speech community

A

a group of speakers who share sociolinguistic norms about language use
* Speakers sound like the people they speak to
* Pockets of similar sounding speakers develop over time
* Speech communities form across several salient sociological dimensions: (Geography, Age, Socio-economic class, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual orientation
* Features that are prescriptively incorrect are often part of a stigmatized speech community
* Reminder: prescriptive norms are social in origin not linguistic
* Even within a speech community, the grammar of every speaker is unique
* Everyone speaks their own idiolect

110
Q

Dialect

A

geographically separate mutually intelligible speech variety
* Cockney, Newfie, Scots, New Zealand… all dialects of English

111
Q

Accent

A

phonetic component of a dialect
* Outside of linguistics: the pronunciation of a non-standard or non-local
variety
* In linguistics: all dialects are associated with an accent
* Everyone has an accent

Geographic separation is linguistic separation
* The farther someone is, the harder it is to communicate with them
* Dialects eventually become languages as mutual intelligibility decreases over
time

112
Q

Variation over time

A

Speakers of different ages belong to different speech communities
* Even in the same dialect, older speakers do not sound like younger speakers
* Assumption: individuals generally do not alter their speech over time
* Once you finish acquiring your native language as a teen, your speech variety
becomes less malleable
* 60 year-olds today roughly sound like 20 year-olds 40 years ago
* The assumption is mostly but not completely true
* The speech of older speakers is still a little bit malleable, but noticeably less so

113
Q

Real time study

A

Measuring the same variable at different
points in time
* Accurate but extremely time-consuming

114
Q

Apparent time study

A

Measuring the same variable at one
point in time across different age groups
* Some error
* Differences in age groups reflect past
(and future!) trends

  • Older speakers will eventually
    disappear
  • Replaced by young speakers
115
Q

Overt prestige

A

when linguistic features associate the speaker with
a high socio-economic class
* Often correlated with the standard dialect or prescriptive notions

116
Q

Covert prestige

A

when non-standard linguistic features associate the
speaker with a desired but non-standard speech community
* Dialectal features
* Makes one sound local and not foreign
* Features of non-standard varieties
* Makes one sound worldly and casual

117
Q

Variation and class

A

Linguistic prestige is correlated with
socioeconomic class
* Linguistic prestige is also correlated
with social situation
* Official situations or situations where the
feature is more salient
* Increased articulatory effort goes to
increasing linguistic prestige

  • Speakers just below the highest strata
    of society overcompensate
  • Use more prestigious features than those
    in the highest strata in official or salient
    situation
118
Q

Class and gender

A
119
Q

Algonquin

A

Grouped with Witot and Yurok languages as Algic

Cree, Ojibwe, Blackfoot, Mohican
Around 150k people across southern canada and US

120
Q

Na-Dene

A

Only one with relative in Eurasia (Dene-Yeniseian language family)

Navajo, Dogrib, Chipewyan

Around 20k speakers in NW canada and Southern UN

121
Q

Eskimo-Aleut

A

Inuktitut, Greenlandic, Aleut
Around 40k speakers in Nothern and NE Canada, Alaska and Greenland

122
Q

Siouan

A

Canadian prairies and US MidWest

123
Q

Salishan

A

British Columbia and Washington state

124
Q

Wakashan

A

Western BC and Vancouver Island

125
Q

Tsimshianic

A

N BC

126
Q

Iroquoian

A

Around Great Lakes region (heavily endangered)
And more in US, other parts in North America and in South America

127
Q

Language isolates of Canada

A

A language with no known relatives (Basque, Korean..)
Haida = in NBC
Ktunaxa = SE BC

128
Q

Lang of Canada Phonology

A

Algonquin = simple C and V inventories
West Coast = complex C inventories
Labial segments = less common in Indigenous lang of NA (some lack them, mostly rare)

129
Q

Clusivity

A

Pronouns/verbs inflected for clusivity

Inclusive we = speaker + listener + third parties

Exclusive we = speaker + third parties only

Marked by inflectional morphology (Algonquin, Iroquoian, Siouan, Wakashan)

Also in languages outside of the Americas (Georgian, Tagalog, Ainu)

130
Q

Proximate

A

Nearby of salient in the conversation

131
Q

Obviative

A

Distant or not salient in the convo, known as 4th person
Many Algonquin languages and Ktunaxa have a separate morpheme for the obviative