Final LING 201 Flashcards
Mutual intelligibility
Speakers on average can understand each other, so speak different dialects // if not, they speak different language
Politics & Orthography
Intelligible varities can be labelled as different languages (SW VS NO, Azeri VS Turkish, Serbian VS Croatian) or unintelligible as dialects (okinawan and JAP, catalan and spanish)
Intelligible can have different orthographic systems (ser VS croa, hindi VS urdu)
Unitelligible may have same orthographic system (cantonese VS mandarin)
Dialect continuum
Gradual transition between two non-mutually intelligible varieties
Conundrum: some speakers might not understand each other, but most nearby speakers can. Not clear where to place boundary.
Ex: Arabic, East slavic, Turkic
Language death
when the last native speaker of a language dies (once every 3 months, ubykh, mank, sumer)
language change: latin & romance languages, sanskrit & indic languages, ancient egyptian as coptic
speakers are not evenly distributed : total around 7000, 5000 by less than 100k, 3000 by less than 10k
Language universals
Talk more generally about possible and impossible languages
Absolute universal
Something true for all languages
All languages exhibit linguistic creativity, have stops, vowels, stress, morphology
Universal tendency
Is usually but not always true
Syllable structure obeys the sonority principle (rising sonority towards the nucleus and falling sonority away from the nucleus EXCEPT Russian [mgla] ‘mist’
The most common stop phonemes are /p, t, k/ EXCEPT Hawaiian lacks /t/
Most languages have fricatives EXCEPT Hawaiian
Implicational universal
Something has to be true if something else is true (presence of marked structure implies presence of unmarked structure)
The presence of front rounded vowels implies the presence of front unrounded vowels
The presence of nasal vowel phonemes implies the presence of oral vowel phonemes
The presence of inflectional affixes implies the presence of derivational affixes
Unmarked
linguistic structures or elements that are basic, easy to learn, and cross-linguistically expected
Marked
linguistics structures or elements that are complex, difficult to learn, and cross-linguistically rare
History of English
Proto-germanic - 500-0, R
Proto-West-germanic - 0-500, R
Old English - 500-1100
Middle English - 1100-1500
Modern English - 1500-2000
Arbitrary and approximate divisions
Language family
group of related languages derived from the same ancestor (proto-language)
can be contained in other LF
Linguistic community slips up and resulting halves continue to evolve separately, until MI is lost
Indo-european
PIE, R, 5000-7000, UKR or TRK
Subfamilies :
Germanic = English, German, Icelandic, Yiddish
Romance = French, Romanian, Spanish, Portuguese
Balto-salvic = Russian, Polish, Serbo-Croatian, Latvian
indo-aryan = Hindi/Urdu, Farsi, Marathi, Punjabi, Bengali
Greek
Albanian..
Sound change
Phonological change that was once active in the language
- left mark on language
- Physiologically or psychologically motivated
- Same types of processes
Regular and systematic (for all languages and usually for all words)
Reduces intelligibility between varieties with change and those without
Assimilation (SC)
Nearby segments become more similar (properties passed to adjacent segment) extremely common, motivated by coarticulation (easier to pronounce similar segments)
Dissimilation
nearby segments become less similar, uncommon, motivated by perceptual contrast
Lenition
Consonant weakening (C are shorter, more voiced or sonorant), common when next to vowel or sonorant
Rhotacism
Alveolar sibilants becoming rhotics, more common in intervocalic contexts (s->r)
ex: latin = appeared in classical latin orthography after -is
Deletion
Loss of a segment
ex= middle eng = a->//_#
Epenthesis
Insertion of a segment
ex= middle english = /->d/n_r
Metathesis
Segments changing places
-phonotactics
-avoid undesirable combinations of segments
Great English Vowel Shift
Boundary of Middle E and Modern E
Chain shift = series of changes where a change leaves a gap to be filled by the other
Affected long vowels =
- high became vowels
- mid became high
- low became mid front
Grimm’s law
Jacob Grimm, after split of PIE (before split of Proto-Germanic)
vl stops -> vs fricatives (p/f,t/th,k/x)
vc stops -> vs stops (b/p,d/t,g/k)
breathy vc stops -> voiced stops (bh/b, dh/d, gh/g)
Syntactic ungrammaticality
Infinite number of grammatical sentences (most are unattested)
Not all sentences are SG (not to do with resulting meaning)
Lan have rules about the combination of words into sentences
Noun
M= plural, possessive
D= with determiner
Verb
M= past, progressive, 3rd singular
D= with auxiliary
Adjective
M= comparative, superlative
D= with degree word
Adverb
M=n/a
D= with degree word
Preposition
M=n/a
D= with noun phrase
Determiner
M=n/a
D= with noun
Lexical categories
Transmit meaning (N, V, adj, adv), tend to be open, easy to update or expand
Functional categories
Required by the grammar of the language, usually closed, difficult to update or expand
- det, degree words, propositions
- complementizers = that, if, whether
- conjunctions= and, but, nor
- auxiliaries = must, might, can
- pronouns = i, we, it
Constituency
Within a phrase, some words are more closely connected to each other, can vary in length, tells us something about the grammatical structure of the sentence, same string of words may exibit different structures
Substitution Test
Constituents are syntactically interchangeable when same type
if replaced by words with same syntactic properties without effecting the grammaticality or syntactic properties = both are constituents
some single words can have same syntactic properties as entire phrases (they - noun phrases, do so - verb phrases)
Movement test
some phrases can be moved to a different part of the sentence (only constituents can, often at beginning), some contintuents cannot be moved
Coordination test
Constituents of the same type can be coordinated using a coordinating conjunction (and, or)
Not all syntactic categories can be coordinated (determiners)
Syntactic trees
Hierarchical structure that represents internal relations - binary
Node - a point and/or everything benearth a point in the tree (syntactic category, always a constituent)
X-bar theory
All phrases can be described with the same structure
XP = placeholder for any type of syntactic phrase
Phrase head = obligatory nucleus of the phrase, endocentric (head always contained within)
Specifier = function word at the edge of a phrase, sometimes required, not a phrase on its own
Complement = information about the head, sometimes not required, (may be required by the particular head), a phrase on its own
Complements are structurally closer to heads than specifiers, purpose of X’ node
Phrases may have any number of complements, but typically only one specifier (multiple X’nodes possible)
Verb phrases
H= verb
S= particular types of adverbs, (never, almost, often..)
C= optional, varies
Noun phrases
H= noun
S= determiner
C= optional, varies
Adjective phrases
H= adj
S= degree word (very, quite, hardly)
C= optional, PP
Adverb phrase
H= adverb
S= degree word
No C
Prepositional phrase
H= preposition
C= NP
No specifier
Merge operation
Constituents can be nested in other constituents
must be in line with X-bar schema
Recursion?
Syntax tree shorthand
If internal structure not important, can be replaced with a shorthand triangle
Sentences
Also constituens, with X-bar schema
Tense phrase
H= Tense (Cover or modal)
S= NP
C= VP
Syntactic ambiguity
Same string of words can correspond to different syntactic structures, with different meaning that is related to the structure
Clauses
Constituent that contains a subject and a verb
Matrix = entire sentence (multiple smaller clauses)
Complementizer = word signals that a clause follows
CP structure
Complements = TPs
H= complementizer (if, whether, that)
Clauses introduced by a complementizer bear overt evidence of a CP tier
All TPs are contained in a CP tier (including matrix clauses)
Yes-no questions
Only answered with yes or no
Inversion in English
Movement of T to C position in questions
Appears in Eng yes-no questions = T moves to C, so questions contain a +Q feature (needs to be satisfied)
Movement
Can happen in different circumstances for different reasons (satisfy some sort of abstract feature)
Does not alter syntactic properties of the elements
Leaves a trace t