Final Exam: Evolution and Ecology Flashcards
Great Chain of Being
aka scala naturae; an idea of a universal hiercharchy
metaphysical concept with gods tiered at the top, humans in the middle, and animals underneath
Nicholas Steno
- studied genealogy from theological point of view
- Provided insight into fossil record: “tongue stones” were sharks teeth, realizes that it must’ve represented something that lived and died
- Law of Superposition: lower levels of stratification are older than upper layers
Age of Discovery
Age of the Earth: Ussher
Age of Discovery happened in 15-17th century.
Age of the Earth: Ussher used Bible to say that Oct 6, 4004 BC, 9:00AM was the start of the Earth.
Darwin thought that the age of the Earth that people thought at the time was too young; ppl thought it was 6000 years old
Natural Theology
- Carl Linneaus
school of thought to prove the existence of God and divine purpose through observation of nature and the use of human reason; not dependent on revelations
Carl Linnaeus: created system of binomial nomenclature in Latin; transcended scientific category for all languages → now called taxonomy: inventory of life
Argument from Design
William Paley: organisms exist and function well therefore they were created by a being of high intelligence
Watch example: if you go outside and find a watch, you would think that someone had made it because it functions well; same with organisms
Adaptation vs Gradualism
ADAPTATION: form fits function
Bird beak example: osprey, tern, yellowlegs, loon, gull, night-heron, etc.
GRADUALISM: James Hutton; earth changes slowly but incrementally, thereby creating large changes with time
e.g. Grand Canyon
Extinction
Georges Cuvier: realized that some species die off without branching out to other forms of life
Jean Lamarck – Lamarckism (2)
no longer true
Principle of use and disuse: parts of an organism’s body that are used become more developed; parts that are not used become smaller and may disappear
Inheritance of acquired characteristics (mechanism of evolution): Changes achieved over an organism’s lifetime are passed on to its offspring
Uniformitarianism
Charles Lyell: says that we can’t assume anything that we can’t see, therefore he pushed for concrete evidence to prove theories; follows Hutton’s gradualism
Current laws of nature is the same as laws of nature in the past → Pushing theological ideas out of evolutionary biology (no miracles)
Alexander von Humboldt
Climbed Chimborazo volcano (S. Am) and recorded plants, discovered biological changes in altitude → origins of modern ecology / biogeography thru looking at the distribution of plants and animals across geographic zones / climates
Charles Darwin – HMS Beagle
five year contract; discovered many things; read Lyell and Humboldt; collected fossils and specimens through hunting expeditions; saw world in comparison framework
Charles Darwin – Law of Succession of Types
finding that living species generally resembled fossil forms of species from their same location
Charles Darwin – Galapagos Islands
endemic fauna; volcanically created chain of islands that was a good distance from South American coastline, preventing most species from traversing the coast; created an insular habitat and exclusive species with differences in form and behavior
Charles Darwin – Subsidence of Land Hypothesis
refers to the creation of coral atolls (eg. Mo’ orea in the Southern Pacific)
coral grows upward and outwards as the inner island disappears → Volcanic island - fringing reef - barrier reef - coral atoll
Morphological convergence
observed similarities across species in similar but distant environments
e.g. sugar glider and flying squirrel
Alfred Russel Wallace
unsung hero who collected specimen in the Amazon and worked with Darwin that came up with same ideas but in a different area; working class naturalist who published The Geographical Distribution of Animals
Charles Darwin – Pattern of Evolution
continuous, slow, gradual; change by “insensible degrees”
E. g. Darwinian giraffes: natural selection favors longer neck (better chance to get higher
Fecundity
large amount of offspring but only a few survive → AKA surplus production of offspring
e.g. pomegranate seeds, fish eggs
Individual Variation vs. Inheritance
INDIVIDUAL VARIATION: Genetic differences that are usually heritable; lead them to survive better in the wild (natural selection) or be chosen for animal husbandry (artificial selection)
INHERITANCE: Preservation of favored traits thru process of genetic transmission of characteristics from parent or ancestor to offspring
leads to differential survival / reproduction with successful traits as heritable and preserved due to the characteristics of nature → “Struggles for existence”
Explanatory power (6) A > C > H > V > E > F
used to support the pattern of evolution as proposed by Darwin
- Analogy: similarity of function and superficial resemblance of structures that have different origins e.g. wings in different organisms
- Convergence: organisms not closely related (not monophyletic), independently evolve similar traits as a result of having to adapt to similar environments or ecological niches
- Homology: shared descent from a common ancestor
Same organ in diff. Creatures
Ex: tail in whale and human - Vestigial structures: rudimentary organs
- Embryology
- Fossil record
“Difficulties on theory”
Missing links: fossil record does not show a continuous stream of evolution; there are chunks of species missing
That’s because organisms are very hard to preserve, we have a poor geological record that does not capture changes by insensible degrees; other factors: erosion, haven’t found them yet
Includes Ussher, organs of extreme perfection, and blending inheritance
Organs of extreme perfection
Evolution of eyes: critics asked how does a highly functioning organ come to be thru evolution → Darwin argues that the final form came about thru minor steps that have been perfected bc whole parts are developed in useful and gradual stages
The eye example: Shows convergence between the endpoints of the vertebrates (bird and human) and cephalopods (squid)
Blending inheritance
Offsprings uniformly blend the features of the parents
Eg. two extremes have offsprings who have offsprings… until offsprings “wash out” with no genetic variation
Gregor Mendel
Particulate inheritance: pea plants are bi-allelic (only 2 alleles are observable / important)
Used findings towards the genetic foundation of evolution
Genetic locus, gene, gene pool
Genetic locus: position on the chromosome
Gene: unit of heredity that is transferred from a parent to offspring and is held to determine some characteristic of the offspring
Gene pool: represents all the alleles at all loci in all individuals
Rules of probability: Multiplication vs Addition
Rule of multiplication: the probability that independent events A and B will occur simultaneously is the product of their individual probabilities
Rule of addition: the probability that event A or event B will occur is equal to the probability of A plus the probability of B
Hardy-Weinberg principle (5)
p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1
Microevolution based.
Population assumptions: under these assumptions, allele frequencies in the gene pool will not change aka evolution isn’t happening
- No mutations
- Large (infinite) population
- Isolated (no gene flow)
- Random mating
- No natural selection
Microevolution (Forces) – Modern Synthesis, and Mutation
MODERN SYNTHESIS: aka neo-darwinism; articulated a new field of biology where you can identify the driver of the evolutionary process
MUTATION: random change in DNA
Microevolution (Forces) – Genetic Drift
- founder effect
- bottleneck effect
drift to loss or fixation occurs faster and is more likely in smaller populations; occurs bc populations are not infinitely large → produces random changes in allele frequencies that may lead to a loss of genetic variation
Founder effect: higher incidence in population due to founding population having high frequency of the allele (lack of gene flow) e.g. Amish of Lancaster County, PA where Ellis-van Creveld syndrome allele frequency is, PA vs. World: 0.07 vs 0.01
Bottleneck effect: large population shrinks to smaller population which leads to diversity loss e.g. greater prairie chicken and northern elephant seal
Microevolution (Forces) – Gene Flow
the movement of genes among populations due to migration and interbreeding
e.g. copper tolerance in bent grass near a mine → wind carries copper-tolerant alleles to non copper-tolerant plants, resulting in the the spread of this tolerance as a result of reproduction (not adaptation)
Microevolution (Forces) – Non-random mating
can lead to changes in genotype frequencies
Assortative: individuals tend to mate with individuals that are phenotypically similar to them
Disassortative: individuals breed with individuals unlike themselves
Inbreeding coefficient
Has negative correlation with verbal IQ due to the probability that a person with two identical genes received both genes from one ancestor → eg. incest
Just know how closely related two organisms are; inbreeding humans → higher coefficient of breeding correlates with lower learning abilities (true for non-humans as well)
Sickle-cell anemia
- point mutation
- heterozygote advantage
brought questions as to why diversity existed if “lesser” traits were destined to die out
Point mutation: changed the shape of blood cell due to incomplete dominance (aka heterozygous)
Heterozygote advantage: aka heterozygosity; allowed for higher tolerance / immunity to malaria but can clog in bloodstream / lead to other health consequences
Fitness
The relative contribution an individual makes to the gene pool of the next generation
an individual’s ability to produce viable and fertile offspring; environmentally dependent
Normal vs. Bimodal Distribution
Phenotypic variation
Normal distribution: aka Gaussian distribution; bell shaped curve
Bimodal distribution: two distinct peaks
Phenotypic variation : bimodal because gender based → eg, men are typically taller than women
Directional Selection
select away from original ideal towards one phenotype better adapted to the environment; i.e. dark mice living on dark lava flow
Stabilizing Selection
individuals in the middle are most advantageous; select against extremes; actively maintains genetic diversity
Disruptive Selection
Select against intermediate phenotypes; extremes are favored while anything in between is not
Eg. seacracker birds → birds with heavy/large bills exploit large seeds and birds with small/fine bills exploits small seeds BUT middle bills can’t exploit either
Ends up favoring bimodal distribution
Frequency dependent selection
common phenotype at a disadvantage; rare phenotype selected for
Eg. scale eating cichlid → has individuals that are let and right mouthed; dominant population vs surviving populations shifts as prey fish adapt to react to the dominant population’s attack but not the (ultimately surviving) population
Sexual selection: Intra vs. Inter
- sexual dimorphism
- epigamic traits
- anisogamy
INTRASEXUAL: selection within the SAME sex
- Sexual dimorphism: difference in appearance (eg. size / shape / color) between the sexes
males compete among each other for access to females
INTERSEXUAL: females choose mates due to limited offspring / energy to raise them, therefore more invested in who her partner will be
- Epigamic traits: selected for by the opposite sex
Females choice → Eg. paradise birds: males show themselves to females and have females choose; i.e. bird makes nest really pretty
- Anisogamy: sexual reproduction by the fusion of dissimilar gametes → Eg. bowerbird female gamesters are larger in size than male gametes
“Good Genes” hypothesis
questioned whether displays were allowing poor survival fitness genes to be passed OR display showcase both plumage and fitness → eg. long vs short calling tadpoles
Species concepts
- morphological
- biological
- phylogenetic
analysis of variation within a species
Morphological (MSC): characterizes a species by body shape and other structural features and is applied to asexual and sexual organisms → useful when information on gene flow is unknown
Biological (BSC): species as a population (or a group of populations) whose members have the potential to interbreed in nature and produce viable, fertile offspring (emphasis on reproductive isolating mechanism)
Phylogenetic (PSC): apples phylogenetic systematics, cladistic analysis, and assessment of relationships of genealogy in order to determine what should be called a valid species based on evolutionary history
Polymorphism vs. Phenotypic Plasticity
POLYMORPHISM: many phenotypic variations between closely related organisms due to the presence of multiple alleles
PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY: Degree to which an organism’s phenotype changes depending upon its current or past environment
Reproductive isolation – Prezygotic (5)
H > T > B > M > G
locked in DNA before the zygote forms
- Habitat isolation: spatially separated
- Temporal isolation: different breeding times (eg. one species breeds in the spring; the other in the summer)
- Behavioral isolation: organisms can only recognize others of their species through a specific ritual → especially crucial in identifying potential mates
- Mechanical isolation: sexual organisms don’t “fit” together and physically cannot mate → eg. snails and their spirals
- Gametic isolation: not fusing at the gametic level even if copulation occurs
Reproductive isolation – Postzygotic (3)
V > F > B
prevents the formation of fertile offspring
- Reduced hybrid viability: inability to form normal gametes during meiosis → Eg. ensatina salamanders that live in the same region / whatnot may attempt to hybridize but the majority will fail
- Reduced hybrid fertility: inability to breed, therefore infertile or sterile; usually a result of cross species offspring → Eg. mule as a result of crossing a horse and donkey, resulting in superior physical form
- Hybrid breakdown: aka hybrid lethality; some first generation hybrids may be fertile but subsequent generations eventually lose their fertility → Eg. wasps
Ring species
connected series of neighboring populations that can interbreed with relatively closely related populations but for which there exist at least two “end” populations (too distantly related to interbreed)
eg. Ensatina salamanders: ring distribution formed due to heat distribution
Hybrid Zones
- 3 Outcomes: RSF
population with high gene flow - barrier forms, creating divergent patterns - might hybridize and interbreed
THREE OUTCOMES:
Reinforcement: populations develop to divergently that hybridizing is no longer possible
Fusion: merging of divergent populations into a single population
Stability: existence of the divergent populations AND hybrid population concurrently
Speciation
- allopatric
- sympatric
aka Cladogenesis: refers to a lineage-splitting event that produces two or more separate species
ALLOPATRIC: different species in different areas (“allo” meaning other)
SYMPATRIC: different species in the same area → Polyploidy: containing more than two paired (homologous) chromosomes
Taxon (pl. taxa)
- node based approach
- stem based approach
- apomorphy based approach
A phylogenetic group
- Node based approach: includes extant taxa, common ancestor, and all descendants (crown group?)
- Stem based approach: includes extant taxa, common ancestor, all descendants, and all stem/extinct taxa → crown group + all stem/extinct taxa relating to crown group
- Apomorphy based approach: focus on synapomorphy
Sister Taxa
Paraphyly vs. Polyphyly vs. Monophyly
SISTER TAXA: two phylogenetic groups (clade or species) that are each other’s closest relatives
Paraphyly: includes an ancestor but not all descendents
Polyphyly: does not include the common ancestor of all members of the taxon
Monophyly: refers to a clade; consists of a single ancestral species and its descendants
Crown group vs. Stem group
Crown: regarding extant taxa, their common ancestor, and all descendants from that common ancestor ; includes extinct taxa but not extinct taxa
Stem: very closely related to crown group but are not included; therefore considered t o be paraphyletic to the crown group
Ingroup vs. Outgroup
In: specific division of taxa whose evolutionary relationship is being determined
Out: taxon chosen to help polarize the characteristics but similar enough to relate to ingroup, even if they don’t particularly belong in it
Character Matrix
choose characteristics (present in taxon) you’re interested in studying and then score taxa based on whether the characteristics are present → allows for easier construction of cladograms
Parsimony analysis
aka Occam’s Razor
simplest explanation that can explain the data is preferred; don’t make any more assumptions than necessary
DNA-DNA hybridization
Historical study;
Single strands of DNA taken from each of 2 species then hybridize their DNA strands into a new double helix
Then apply heat to separate the newly made strands; the more heat (energy) needed to separate the two strands, the stronger the DNA bonds (the closer the two species are to each other)
Genetic sequencing
Modern study
DNA alignment: sequencing each base pair and determining structure
Phylogenomics
refers to the study of whole genomes
Study individual genomes in animals - indicates certain characters
Deletion of certain genomes indicate something happened within the lineage (practiced in lab)
Phylogram
Different from cladogram since branch lengths are indicative of distance/relationship genetically or recency of evolutionary split
Rafflesia
Hyrax
RAFFLESIA: molecular analysis of floral gigantism
HYRAX: little thing that looks like a rat but elephants are closely related to it?? → Unresolved polytomy: we don’t know if they’re closer to manatee or elephant
Adaptive radiation
period of relatively rapid speciation that coincides with the evolution of beneficial phenotypes → as opposed to EVOLUTIONARY radiation (explosive evolution / diversification of a group of organisms into forms filling different ecological niche)