Final Exam Flashcards

1
Q

Overview of a Speech:

A

1 Analyze Audience
2 Select Topic
3 Determine Purpose
4 Compose Thesis
5 Develop Main points
6 Intro, Body, Conclusion- structure and separate
7 Outline the Speech: Coordination and Subordination- organizing by their relative importance/ relationship
8 Consider Presentation Aids
9 Practice Delivering the Speech (time/ video/ audience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mandatory components of Outline:

A

Topic- clearly stated
General Purpose (Commemorative Speech)
Specific Purpose (topic/ purpose)
Thesis Statement (should be mirrored / tied in to your conclusion
Coordination/ Subordination Organization:
I. Intro
II. Body
A. Point #1
1.
(transition- reference when we brought him as a puppy
2.
B. Point #2
1.
2.
C. Point #3
III. Conclusion
Transition statements noted between each component

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Logos

A

Appeals to Reason - example: “Should college tuition be free?” Audience looks to
you for evidence and reasons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pathos

A

Appeals to Emotions- Vivid Imagery, Shared Values; Repetition and parallelism,
stirs emotion, inspiring, has rhythm and build. Example Winston Churchill “Fight on the
Beaches “ to British House of Commons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethos

A

Appeal to character- Ethical character (Aristotle) ; Establish authority as a
speaker and person. Competence, moral character, goodwill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Motivation

A

Targeting audience members’ motives, Maslow’s Hierarchy, aligns with
pathos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mental Engagement

A

aligns with logos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Demonstrate Credibility

A

aligns with ethos, Initial credibility is important, often captured in
an introduction or bio introducing a speaker, body language/ confidence important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Structure of Persuasive Speeches

A
  1. Claim (Proposition) Asserts what you intend to prove (analogous to thesis)
  2. Evidence- Substantiates the claim (body)
  3. Warrant - Reasons / justifications Logical line of reasoning connecting why the evidence
    supports the claim
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Claims of Value

A

Issues of judgment. Examples: Is assisted suicide ethical?, Is the rare
painting really worth $100 million?, Is something right or wrong…worthy or unworthy?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Claims of Policy

A

Recommends course of action/ approval. Examples: legislation “This
should happen, this ought to happen”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Claims of Fact

A

Focus on whether something is true/ false or will/ won’t happen. Either
two competing answers or no answer as of yet (speculative claim) Examples: global
warming (two competing beliefs) or use of drones to deliver groceries (speculative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Motivational Warrant

A

Reasons targeted at listener’s needs. (Pathos) Claim: Donate to
hunger relief agency , evidence- statistics on how much price of 1 coffee can do to feed
the hungry, warrant- You don’t want to allow children to starve, so donating the price of
one coffee can fight hunger with impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Authoritative Warrant

A

Relies on credibility and source of evidence. Ethos and Logos. Success
counts on listener regarding authority figure as credible and sourced. Example- Reform
Alliance with parole founded by Jayz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Substantive Warrant

A

Listener’s faith in the factual evidence as justification (logos) Claim-
Stronger hurricanes linked to climate change. Hurricanes and tropical storms get their
energy from warmer water. Casual reasoning- hurricanes’ strength. Reason by analogy-
this happened in a similar, well - analogized scenario so it is likely to happen in this
scenario.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Monroe’s Motivated Sequence

A
  1. Attention
  2. Need- issue to be addressed
  3. Satisfaction- solution, offering a proposal, change attitudes or beliefs
  4. Visualization- anticipated outcomes of the solution, understanding the benefit
  5. Action- asks audience to accept the message, reconsider their present way of thinking,
    commit more fully to their belief, and/ or change their behavior
17
Q

Herbert Simmons- Persuasion scholar

A

4 types of audience- how to manage counter for credibility
Hostile - Raise the counter - focus on those the audience is most likely to disagree with and win
support
Critical/ Conflicted- address counters and refute them, introduce evidence
Sympathetic- If time permits, briefly address only the most important counters
Uninformed/ less interested/ apathetic- Briefly raise and refute only key, mainstream
counters

18
Q

Logical Fallacies
Begging the Question

A

Stated in a way as if it must be true, yet no evidence

19
Q

Logical Fallacies
Ad Hominem Argument

A

targets a person rather than the position/ issue

20
Q

Logical Fallacies
Bandwagoning

A

General opinion posed as basis for truth.

21
Q

Logical Fallacies
Either-Or-Fallacy

A

Setting up false dichotomy

22
Q

Logical Fallacies
Red Herring

A

introduces irrelevance as diversion

23
Q

Logical Fallacies
Hasty Generalization

A

uses isolated instance to draw a larger conclusion

24
Q

Logical Fallacies
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

A

Suggest causal relationship just to due to order of occurrence

25
Logical Fallacies Faulty Analogy
claiming two phenomena are alike when not similar enough
26
Logical Fallacies Non Sequitir
“Does not follow” Conclusion is not valid
27
Logical Fallacies Slippery Slope
Faulty assumption that 1 case will lead to series of events
28
Logical Fallacies Appeal to Tradition
bases acceptance on historical fact/ occurrence “always been this way”