Final Exam Flashcards
stare decisis
to stand by things decided (core of the common law system)
gamble v. U.S. (2019)
Supreme court held that dual sovereignty (tried for same crime in state & federal) doesn’t contradict double jeopardy
needed for the USSC to overrule a precedent:
-Workability of the standard
-Antiquity
-Reliance interests at stake
-Whether the original decision was well-reasoned
adversarial process
-Multiple parties in court (judge, defendant/attorney, prosecutor/victim)
-Judges oversee the interactions & enforce rules w/o imposing their will
inquisitorial process
-When these parties aren’t divided well
-Judge isn’t in the middle (ruins impartiality)
jurisdiction
territory in which a judge/court can rule (USSC has the largest)
types of courts
federal, state, state supreme, tribal
main functions of courts
-Enforcing norms
-Handling dispute processing for society
-Engage in policy-making (especially higher courts)
trial courts
try criminal cases
appellate courts
analyze legality of the cases, trials, & outcomes (hear appeals of lower courts’ decisions)
limited jurisdiction trial courts
only misdemeanors (only in state courts)
general jurisdiction trial courts
handle the full range of felony cases & all other civil lawsuits
intermediate appellate courts
between trial courts & state supreme courts (not all states have, but many do)
USSC role
-70-80 cases heard per year
-Can hear both federal & state cases
federal courts
district < circuit courts of appeals < U.S. Supreme Court
state courts
trial courts of limited jurisdiction < trial courts of general jurisdiction < intermediate courts of appeals < appellate court of last resort (supreme court)
partisan election
An election in which candidates openly affiliated with political parties are presented to voters for selection
nonpartisan election
An election in which candidates’ party affiliations are not listed on the ballot
gubernatorial appointment
state governor elects trial-court judges
legislative selection
state legislature elects trial-court judges
merit selection
A reform plan by which judges are nominated by a committee & appointed by the governor for a given period
federal court judge selection
Nominated by the president & confirmed by a majority vote of the U.S. Senate
diversity of judges
-Majority of state judges are white men
-Disproportionate percentages compared to actual pop. numbers
Moritz v. Commissioner (1970)
RBG asked the USSC to overturn Section 214 of the Internal Revenue Code (discriminatory against MEN)
administrative tasks of judges
Adjudicator => Applies the laws equally & fairly
Negotiator => Plea bargains, sentencing, & bail
Administrator => Managing courtroom, deals w/political power & legislators
judge in pre-arrest phase
Reviews requests for & issues/denies search/arrest warrants
judge in initial appearance
-Advises accused of rights
-Determines bail & pretrial release
-Decides if case should be dismissed or heard
judge in preliminary hearing
-Evaluates prosecution & defense claims w/regard to probable cause
-Decides whether evidence exists to hold accused for arraignment
-Rule on bail reduction requests
-Continues to advise accused as to rights
judge in arraignment
-Evaluates indictment/information
-Advises defendant as to plea
-Ensures defendant understand the impact of “guilty” or “no contest” with regard to waiver of some rights
judge in pretrial
-Rules on pretrial motions
-Answers requests for continuances
judge in trial
-Oversee jury selection
-Rule on evidence & other aspects of adversarial procedure
-Instruct jury as to legal rules affecting the case
-Charge the jury & receive report of deliberations
-If nonjury trial, determine guilt/innocence
judge in sentencing
-Evaluate presentence report
-Hear the opposing arguments of counsel w/regard to sentence
-Impose sentence
prosecuting attorney
Makes discretionary decisions on whether to pursue criminal charges (represents the government; pursues cases that violate state laws)
U.S. attorney
Prosecutes federal cases
state attorney general
Chief legal officer of a state (responsible for civil & criminal matters)
prosecutorial misconduct
Any improper or unethical conduct by a prosecutor while carrying out their duties in a criminal case
Brady v. Maryland (1963)
-Brady & Boblit were both found guilty of first-degree murder
-Brady claimed to participate in the robbery, but not the murder
-Later found out that Boblit had confessed to the murder, but the prosecution had suppressed this evidence for Brady’s trial
=> Supreme Court ruled that, even if not requested, prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence (The “Brady rule”)
prosecutor’s influence
Most decision-makers in the CJS are involved in only one part of the process, but prosecutors are involved in multiple stages
prosecutor’s roles
-“Lawyer for the state”
-Upholds the law
-Press charges against lawbreakers
-Enforcing the rules of due process
discretion of prosecutor in CHARGES
-Determine what charges to file
-One incident may violate multiple laws, but can choose to bring one charge or more
discretion of prosecutor in DISCOVERY
-Info in prosecutor’s case file must be available to the defense (Exchange information)
-A pretrial phase (During arraignment or initial appearance)
nolle prosequi
An entry made by a prosecutor on the record of a case & announced in court, indicating the charges specific will not be prosecuted (essentially, charges are dismissed)
prosecutor & police
-Depend on police to provide the suspects & evidence to convict the lawbreakers
-Cannot investigate crimes independently, so in command of the cases brought to them
prosecutors & victims/witnesses
Can pursue a case whether or not a victim wants to press charges (however, many won’t when the critical testimony & other evidence must come from the victim)
prosecutors & judges/courts
Sentencing histories of judges give prosecutors an idea of how the case may be treated in the courtroom
prosecutors & the community
Public opinion & the media play a crucial role in creating an environment that either supports or scrutinizes the prosecutor
prosecutor in investigation/arrest
-Assist police w/prep of search/arrest warrants
-Receive case file & screen to determine if the prosecution should proceed
-Advise police on evidence needed
prosecutor in initial appearance
-Inform court & accused of charges
-Usually seek high bail
-May drop case (enter nolle prosequi)
prosecutor in preliminary hearing
-Establish prima facie case
-May nolle prosequi
-Oppose bail reduction
-Discuss the case w/the defense
prosecutor in arraignment
-Present charges against accused through indictment or information
-Acknowledge the defendant’s plea
-Continue plea bargain discussions
prosecutor in pretrial
-Prepare case for trial by gathering evidence & interviewing witnesses
-Oppose pretrial motions filed by the defense
-Accept plea bargains
prosecutor in trial
-Respond to court in defendant’s change of plea to guilty by reducing charges (plea bargain)
-Taking an adversarial stance in jury selection & proving the state’s case beyond reasonable doubt
prosecutor in sentencing
recommends & justifies sentences
prosecutor in appeals
prepares argument to counter appeals filed by the defense
defense attorney
The lawyer representing accused offenders & convicted offenders in their dealing with criminal justice
presumption of innocence
-Criminal defense attorneys work on behalf of people accused of crimes–and under the American criminal justice systems, defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty
-Not guaranteed in the Constitution, but statutes & the Supreme Court has recognized it as one of the most basic requirements of a fair trial
DA in police station
-Advice during interrogation
-Ensuring constitutional rights aren’t violated
-Counsel during booking
-Seek pretrial release
-Determine facts of case from police records
DA in initial appearance
-Appear with accused before judge
-Seek pretrial release (or release on recognizance or bail)
-Challenge basis of arrest
DA in preliminary hearing
-Challenge prosecutor’s stand that probable cause exists
-Seek bail reduction if client not released
-Discover evidence held by prosecutor
-Counsel defendant as to nature of case
-Discuss case with prosecutor
DA in arraignment
-Learn charges listed in indictment or information
-Advise client as to plea
-Discuss plea bargain with prosecutor
DA in pretrial
-Continue plea negotiations
-File pretrial motions challenging evidence & procedural errors
DA in trial
Change plea from not guilty to guilty as result of bargain or assume adversarial stance in jury selection & presentation of defense
DA in sentencing
-Prepare client for expected outcome
-Urge lenient sentence
DA in appeals
-Develop appropriate basis for appeal
-Request that client be released pending appeal
right to an attorney
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) => Free attorneys to low-income defendants
Miranda’s rule => Prior to ANY custodial interrogation, law enforcement officials must provide a person with a clear warning of Miranda’s rights
assigned counsel
An attorney to private practice assigned by a court to represent an indigent
-Frequently used in small towns & rural regions
-Usually structures in an ad hoc or a coordinated basis
-Judge either selects an attorney from a prearranged rotation list or chooses a lawyer who is present in the courtroom & has a reputation for providing competent representation
-Fees paid to assigned counsel are typically lower to what a lawyer may usually charge
contract counsel
An attorney to private practice who contacts with the government to represent all indigent defendants in a county during a set period
-Government contracts with an attorney, nonprofit org, or a private law firm to manage indigent cases
-Jurisdictions that rely on public defenders for most cases may use contracted services in situations involving multiple defendants or complex cases that present conflicts of interest
-May use contracted services for cases that require more time than the government-employed lawyers can allocate
public defender
An attorney employed on a full-time, salaried basis
-The emergence of public defenders was in response to the legal requirements of impoverished defendants
-Rapidly expanding & implemented in 43/50 of the most populous counties & major cities
-Many professionals & individuals consider the public defender system superior to the assigned counsel system (Mostly bc public defenders are experts in criminal law)
-Full-time government staff (Prioritize their clients’ cases over their financial interests; However, may have overwhelming caseloads & responsibilities may decrease as governments cuts could affect funding)
bail
Amount of money paid as a condition of pretrial release to ensure the accused appears in court (often set by the judge)
bond
Refers to a set of conditions that must be met by the accused to retain their freedom while awaiting trial
bail agents
Private business people who are paid fees by defendants who lack the money to make bail (licensed by state & can choose their own clients)
Clients pay a portion of their bail to the agent, and don’t get it back. The agent can get them back to court by any means necessary.
pretrial detention (facts)
-15% of felony defendants wait for >1 year
-34% of deaths in the first week of pretrial detention => Suicide
-Contributes to a lot of the incarceration discrepancies btwn the U.S. & other countries
plea bargaining
-Quick resolution of cases by negotiated guilty pleas
-Advantages for defendants, prosecutors, defense attorneys, & judges
-Defendants can have their cases completed more quickly & know what the punishment will be
-Happens in about 90% of cases
Santobello v. New York
-Opinion emphasized that the plea bargaining process is crucial to the criminal justice system
-Agreements between prosecutors & defendants must be upheld (even with a new prosecutor)
most critical factor for whether cases go to trial
the seriousness of the crime (prosecutor less likely to offer plea, DA more likely to try the risk of a trial)
bench trials
Presided over by a judge & w/o a jury
In the federal system, the trial needs to be conducted by a jury, unless:
-Defendant waives jury trial in writing
-Government agrees with this
-Court approves of this
jury
A panel of citizens selected according to law & sworn to determine matters of fact in a criminal case & to deliver a guilty or noy guilty verdict
jury trial
-Jury evaluates the facts
-The judge referees & ensures jury impartiality
vital functions of the jury
-Prevent government oppression by safeguarding citizens against arbitrary law enforcement
-Determine whether the accused is guilty (or not)
-Represent diverse community interests
-Promote citizens’ knowledge about the CJS through the jury duty process
-Symbolize the rule of law
Williams v. FL (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court ruled that juries of fewer than 12 members are constitutional (but 12 is typical)
timeline of jury in the trial process
-Selection of the jury
-Opening statements by prosecution & defense
-Presentation of the prosecution’s evidence & witnesses
-Presentation of the defense’s evidence & witnesses
-Presentation of rebuttal witnesses
-Closing arguments by each side
-Instructions to the jury by the judge
-Decision by the jury
prosecutor goes first because:
Presumption of innocence
-Needs to show why that may not be the case
-Burden of proof is on prosecutor
Then, the defense can respond to the prosecution’s case
jury selection process
- Jury pool of 200-1000 citizens drawn each month from source list
- 30 people paneled (May return to pool if there is a guilty plea, or if the case is dismissed)
- 14 are selected for the jury, 16 are challenged or not used (Challenged & not used are returned to jury pool)
- Jury of 14 people (May return to pool if there is a guilty plea, or if the case is dismissed)
voir dire
Questioning prospective jurors to screen out people the attorneys think might be biased or incapable of delivering a fair verdict
challenge for cause
Removal of a prospective juror by showing they have some bias or legal disability
Unlimited
peremptory challenges
Removal of a prospective juror without giving a reason
Limited
Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
SC found that racial discrimination, due to an all-white jury, was a huge part of Batson’s conviction
Batson Challenge => When a prosecutor/attorney strikes a juror for racial reasons, their decision can be challenged
Issues with the Batson challenge?
Can use any non-racial, arbitrary reason to justify
opening statements
-The clerk reads the information/indictment (first)
-If they desire, the prosecutor & the defense attorney may make opening statements to the jury (summarizing the position)
presentation of evidence (prosecution)
-Real/Material evidence
-Demonstrative evidence
-Testimony
-Direct evidence
-Circumstantial evidence
demonstrative evidence
Not based on witness testimony
Demonstrates evidence relevant to the crime
testimony
Oral evidence provided by a legally competent witness
direct evidence
Eyewitness accounts
-Need to be neutral
-Don’t go to prove anything
-Simply giving facts from their experience/POV
circumstantial evidence
Evidence provided by a witness, from which a jury must infer a fact
presentation of evidence (defense)
Typically, one of the following occurs:
-Contrary evidence is introduced to rebut or case doubt on the state’s case
-An alibi is offered
-An affirmative defense is presented (Working on the penalty by giving an excuse or justification)
closing arguments
-When each side has completed their presentation of the evidence
-Prosecution & defense make closing arguments to the jury to review the evidence of the case for the jury
-Presenting interpretations of the evidence that favor their own side
judge’s instructions to jury
-Jury decides the facts
-Judge decides the law
-Judge instructs the jury on legal principles to guide their decision (One is reasonable doubt; The juror must be “satisfied to a moral certainty” rather than wavering or uncertain)
-Realistically, juries need help understanding many of these instructions
decision by the jury
-Jurors retire to a room where they have complete privacy
-May be sequestered throughout their deliberations–kept together day & night
hung/deadlocked jury
A judicial jury that cannot agree upon a verdict after extended deliberation & cannot reach the required unanimity or supermajority (usually results in the case being tried again)
suggested reforms to the jury system
-Allow jury to take notes
-Allow jury to submit questions to judge
-Allow jury to submit questions to witnesses
concurrent sentences
Sentences/Prison terms for multiple charge occur at the same time
consecutive sentences
Sentences/Prison terms for multiple charges occur one after the other
three assumptions associated with misdemeanors in the CJS:
-Any person appearing before the court is guilty because the police & prosecution have presumably filtered out doubtful cases
-The vast majority of defendants will plead guilty
-Those charged with minor offenses will be processed in volume, with dozens of cases being decided rapidly within an hour
An assembly style procedure
presentence report
Report prepared by a probation (or parole) officer that presents a convicted offender’s background & is used by the judge in selecting an appropriate sentence