Final Exam Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

prosocial behaviour:

A

any behaviour with the goal of helping another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

bystander effect:

A

individuals are less likely to receive help in an emergency the more people there are present compared to when there is just one person bc:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

diffusion of responsibility

A

when each individual assumes that other people present for the situation will take responsibility and help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Five steps to helping in an emergency:

A
  1. noticing that something is unusual
  2. correctly interpreting the situation as an emergency
  3. Deciding it is up to you to help (personal responsibility)
  4. Deciding how to help
  5. carrying out the help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Barriers to step 2

A

the more ambiguous the situation, the more likely pluralistic ignorance is to occur
(each bystander thinks that no one is reacting bc it’s not an emergency but actually everyone is hesitant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

barriers to step 3

A

diffusion of responsibility

leaving it to authority figures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

barriers to step 1

A

being in a hurry, busy, texting, distracted, drunk, etc

urban overload hypothesis: (ppl in big cities get used to blocking out all kinds of stimulus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

barriers to step 4

A

lacking the competence to actually help or not feeling competent to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

barriers to step 5

A

audience inhibition: failure to help in front of others for fear of looking foolish if the person doesn’t need/want help
+ fear of a negative outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

tips for getting help

A

identify one person in the crowd (eliminate diffusion of responsibility)

  • label situation as emergency
  • give specific instructions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Other factors influencing helping

A
  • physical attractiveness
    *similarity
    gender
    *feeling guilty
    *being in a good mood (but alters our perception + we don’t want to ruin it)
    *rural vs urban
    *feeling excluded
  • feeling awe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

helpers tend to be

A

+ empathetic
+ in social responsibility (feelings that everyone should do what they can to help others)
- in geocentricism (not wrapped up own lives)
+ in internal locus of control, believe we can effect change + good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

models of prosocial behaviour

A
  1. empathy-altruism hypothesis
  2. negative state-relief hypothesis
  3. empathic joy hypothesis
  4. kin selection.
  5. reciprocity
    (+ competitive, defensive)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

aggression:

A

any form of behaviour intended to harm another living being who does not want to be harmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 main theories for aggression:

A
  1. aggression is innate
  2. aggression occurs in response to situational/external cues
  3. learned behaviour by observing others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 explanations for relationship between media violence and aggression

A

social learning theory
normative
desensitization

17
Q

personality factors influencing aggression

A

narcissism, hostile attributional bias, type A personality pattern

18
Q

group?

A

a collection of people who perceive themselves to be bonded together or connected to one another

19
Q

common-bond groups vs common-identity groups

A

regular ftf interactions vs linked by category not through relationship to each other

20
Q

entitativity

A

extent to which a group is perceived as being coherent unit

21
Q

characteristics of group high in entativity

A

high interactions, group is important, common goals, perceive themselves as similar

22
Q

social facilitation

A

ppl perform better on a task in the presence of others than when alone

23
Q

BUT: social inhibition:

A

people perform work on some tasks than when they are alone eg learning nonsense syllables

24
Q

3 explanations for facilitation/inhibition

A

Drive theory (mere presence explanation)
Evaluation Apprehension Theory
Distraction conflict theory

25
Q

explain drive theory

A

even the mere presence increases arousal, increases likelihood of dominant response (helpful if easy/practiced, unhelpful if new/difficult see pool study)

26
Q

explain evaluation apprehension theory

A

ppl expect that if audience is present, they will evaluate us, this thought process increases our arousal
- found no diff between alone and blindfold condition, so not mere presence that explains this

27
Q

Distraction conflict theory

A

presence of other ppl is distracting, period. we have to divide our attention = conflict = inc arousal
we can handle this for practiced tasks but not new

28
Q

social loafing:

A

reduction in effort when people work collectively in a group compared to working alone

29
Q

free rider effect

A

contributing less when we think someone else will make up for it

30
Q

sucker effect

A

contributing less when we think others are not putting in their fair share

31
Q

deindividuation

A

a reduced sense of individual identity + diminished self-regulation in a group setting

32
Q

Some factors contributing to deindividuation

A

energizing effect of others, stimulus overload, diffusion of responsibility, anonymity

33
Q

THM about

A

when anonymous, we become less self-aware, more open to cues in the enviro which can prompt positive or negative behaviour

34
Q

group polarization

A

tendency for group decisions to be more extreme than those made by individuals

35
Q

groupthink:

A

decision making style characterized by excessive tendency to seek cohesion over and above best decision

36
Q

some groupthink antecedents

A

highly cohesive group, isolation from outside influences, strong directive leader

37
Q

symptoms

A

illusion of invulnerability, illusion of morality, stereotyped view of enemy, self-censorship, pressure on dissenters to conform = illusion of unanimity

38
Q

mind guards

A

person whose role it is to protect leader from criticism or doubts

39
Q

protection against groupthink

A

outside experts, have leader remain impartial, hold second meeting, appoint devil’s advocate, encourage objections