Final Flashcards
Prey can thwart the efforts of predators in 3 ways
maximizing search time, maximizing handling time, diluting nutrient effectiveness / toxic and noxious compounds
Prey maximizes search time by
hiding, crypsis, mimicry
Prey maximizes handling time by
defensive weaponry, armour, shapes
Prey signal that they are of low nutrient value / have toxic noxious compounds via
aposematic signalling
Grazers and Browsers (searchers)
mobile, feed on nutrient-poor foods, often possess specializations of the mouth to most efficiently feed on low quality foods, ecologically important
Coevolution between plants and insects: advantages and disadvantages
biological arms race
advantages: little competition for food source, incorporate defence mechanisms of prey into own defence system
disadvantages: threatened if food source compromised
3 ways to gain nutrient material from indigestible polymers like cellulose and lignin
symbiosis adaptations, mechanism disruption through morphological adaptation, use of specific enzyme activities
Pogonophoran worms display symbiosis adaptations
specialized symbiosis with chemosynthetic bacteria that thrive near thermal vents (high sulfur, no light) – do not possess gut or feeding structures, bacteria only source of nutrients
symbionts undergo photosynthetic activity
production of sugars (maltose and glycerol) that are energetically rich, production of oxygen (very reactive, and additional production of hydrogen peroxides which are also very reactive – both lead to the formation of free radicals)
stress and symbionts
symbionts under stress release these reactive compounds at a higher frequency and may be of detriment to the host (eg. result in coral bleaching)
specialized adaptation in the grazer/browser
overcome challenges of the prey item, and may allow the grazer/browser to use the challenge of the prey item to its own benefit
grazer browser incorporation in nudibranchs
nudibranchs incorporate prey (cnidarian) nematocysts into epidermal structure (cerata – part of digestive system)
grazer browser specialization in sea urchin
Aristotle’s lantern highly efficient jaw-like structure to bite through kelp
grazer browser symbiosis in termites
endosymbiosis between protist (Trichonympha) and bacteria (in protist) to break down cellulose in gut
terpenoids
hormone-like compounds produced by plant species like cedar and pine tress
insects and terpenoids
insects have evolved to detect terpenoids using receptors, incorporate into metamorphosis and moulting processes as powerful signalling molecules
sawfly larvae
release gas when heads lifts which contains a volatile compound incorporated from plant food source
monarch butterfly
overcome mechanical defence (latex glycosides – difficult to digest, tase aversion), overcome chemical defence (toxic alkaloids) of milkweed plants to make themselves unpalatable
predator insects like the monarch, tardigrade, cicada, and aphid possess
specialized feeding structure (stylets) to pierce the phloem (transport sugar) of plant food source directly
cicada and phloem
used for cooling, stylet specialized structure not just for nutrient material
High CO2 compromises
compromises calcification by reducing availability of carbonate ions and by dissolving existing calcium carbonate structures – energy is required to combat this problem
High CO2 disturbs
disturbs acid-base balance by increasing CO2 in body fluids and tissues – energy is required to combat this problem
minimize capture by hunters
by increasing predator foraging and/or capturing time
groups and minimizing capture by hunters
better capacity to ward off predators with the release of toxins, faster detection and response to predators, confuse predators
invertebrate feeding behavioural consideration summarized in
Optimal Foraging Theory
Optimal Foraging Theory is strongly influenced by
trade-offs in decision-making economics, but rationality ≠ fitness
Optimal Foraging Theory
maximize energy input to increase fitness
profitability (P) = energy intake (E) / time (T)
Profitability in Optimal Foraging Theory based on factors like
travel time, handling time, nutritional value, capacity, access
Optimal Foraging Theory and prey size
crabs: small mussels are less profitable, large mussels are more profitable but harder to open
in suboptimal conditions, crabs will feed on sub-optimal mussels under food-restricted conditions
Optimal Foraging Theory and travel time between prey
P1 • travel time, variable
P2 • foraging time, variable
shallower slope indicates longer travel time and/or handling time
saturation point • stop eating – impacted by efficiency of food handling, nutrition, etc.
Optimal Foraging Theory model assumes
assumes need to feed, but how motivated are they to feed?
parasites
special type of hunter, usually much smaller than host, develop inside or outside host (some life stages more closely associated than others)
microparasites
multiple within host, immune system of host regulates parasitic load eg. malaria, Giardia
macroparasites
multiple outside of host eg. ticks. flatworms, roundworms
endoparasites
live inside cells, ecologically specialized in reproduction (synced with host), resource exploitation (tap into mitochondria), usually not very mobile (rely on cell cycle to transmit themselves), high reproductive output (highly dispersed)
evolutionary arms race between host genotype and parasite genotype
evolution of resistance to parasite – immune system combats parasites, involves strong fitness consequences
evolution to overcome resistance of host – strong selection of rare alleles in parasite following host immune response
host immune response carries memories of antigens so
parasites must chance their surface properties – arms race on the level of the immune system
host survival reduced
directly dependent on parasite load
host sublethal effects
in which case host genes are propagated in the next generation to continue to fight parasitic infection – life history traits shaped by parasites: affects age at maturity, fecundity, population growth rate – because energy is invested in immune response
host serves as parasite ecosystem
density-dependent intra-species and inter-species parasite competition of resources often resulting in resource exploitation through specialization, immune response of host exerts bottom-up control
In order to understand flight you need to understand how flight
impacts the medium around them
forces involved in flight
weight, drag, lift (perpendicular to drag but not necessarily perpendicular to movement), thrust (produced by flight)
wings beat using
a spinning movement (more helicopter than flapping)
wings create
vortices which create a lift force on the leading edge of the wind
Reynold’s number depends less on ____ and more on how quickly ________
Reynold’s number depends less on speed and more on how quickly wings beat
Reynold’s number, size, flight.
Proportionately more energy is required the smaller an insect is to produce life and combat drag
direct flight muscles
paleoptera (dragonflies and mayflies), many extinct species • cannot fold wing over abdomen, muscle attachment directly to wings, synchronous contraction to AP
indirect flight muscles
all other living insect groups (derived feature) • can fold wings over abdomen, muscle attachment indirect to wings, muscles attached at thorax, asynchronous contraction to AP (consequence of indirect flight muscles (co-occurrence) perhaps as insects got smaller (given smaller Re)).
using a variety of markers for musculature to determine specific role in flight, fruit fly has how many pairs of steering muscles?
13 pairs of steering muscles
locusts fly long distances by using
low thrust and little lift (low energy) to maximize efficiency
halteres
mechanoreceptors to increase stability that oscillate during flight, modified hind wings
de-activate halteres to resort back to 4 wings
de-activate ultrabithorax (Hox gene) to resort back to 4 wings
hawkmoth
able to hover really well, possesses large antennae instead of halteres, removal study: unable to hover, once re-attached the nerves partially regenerate and some stability restored
not all legs are used equally, so how many legs do you really need?
3 - Tripod model - to optimize stability, keep one limb on the ground at all times.
walking – 2 traits decrease with speed
percent support phase per stride, percent stability
trade-off in walking between?
stability and speed – what trait is more important in the given habitat?
legged locomotion has evolved how many time in arthropods?
3 times – crustaceans, chelicerates, hexapods
ballistic phase
airborne for a brief period of time eg. cockroach
undulatory gate
use body musculature to increase speed by undulating eg. myriapod – solves constraint between speed and stability
locomotion with tube feet
sea stars and echinoderms • use hydrostatic pressure and longitudinal musculature
increased size of sea star doe not correspond to increased speed because
selection acts strongly on the tube feet themselves – cannot be faster by adding more tube feet, need to modify tube feet themselves
behavioural mechanism independent of biomechanics
octopus swimming vs walking vs on land
crawling locomotion
hydrostatic pressure changes, pumping of hemolymph pro-legs “inflatable” eg. leeches and caterpillars
super-contraction in invertebrates
perforated Z-line
70-80% overlap in myofilaments in invertebrates
50% overlap in myofilaments in vertebrates
insect muscles have more of what type of myofilament?
actin
power in insect muscle vs vertebrate
originally thought to be more power in insect muscle, but when scaled, not much difference
swimming • Re determines how much, Re is more relevant in water because
drag, because water is more viscous
4 forces in swimming
thrust, drag, lift/buoyancy, gravity
swimming in low Re
viscosity dominates • cilia and flagella, power and recovery strokes
in exception to ctenophores, cilia is used for feeding only in
larger organisms – based on Re number, ctenophores could use a different structure for locomotion but retain cilia – use combs or ctenes (bundles of coordinated cilia) to overcome physical constraints associated with using cilia at their larger size
swimming in high Re
inertia dominates • use momentum to limit energy expenditure
jet propulsion in molluscs like the squid
mantle contractions (via heavily innervated and muscular collar structure) expels water at a high velocity out of funnel – more efficient to have separate water in and water out structures – more efficient than flapping (fins for finer movements)
jet propulsion in young cephalopods (paralarvae)
in the planktonic stages use the same jet propulsion mechanisms but must pump water constantly because viscosity dominates in this life history stage, small and slow paralarvae, no metamorphosis, behavioural changes associated with life history stages
minimal mantle width is
inversely related to velocity
jet frequency is
directly related to velocity
jet propulsion in amphioxus (lancelets)
via propagating waves (wiggly) using differential muscle contractions – similar movement in fish and tetrapods so likely heavily contributed to the evolution of tetrapod movement