Final Flashcards
(107 cards)
Themes of Sansom’s paper
- economies of Bantu tribes in Southern Africa can be classified into two types in the basis of different ecological adaptations (Eastern and Western adaptation)
- there are also historical reasons for economic differences in Southern Africa related to the evolution of a dual economy (a combination of market and subsistence economic sectors or spheres)
Southeastern Bantu
- comprises number of cultural groups predominantly settled in Zimbabwe, Botswana, and South Africa, with smaller numbers in Mozambique and Zambia
- paper focuses on South Africa: two major groups: Nguni and Tswana
Sansom’s Thesis:
- ecological realities require specific forms of economic adaptation (ecology primary determinant)
- Southern Africa can be divided into 2 broad ecological zones (east and west) and these zones correspond with two types of adaptation (A and B)
- Nguni exemplify type A adaptation and Tswana exemplify type B
Southeastern Bantu traditional economy
- subsistence based digging stick or hoe- cultivation of cereals (sorghum and millet) alongside husbandry (cattle herding) and gathering of wild foods
- activities occurred within tribal units with independent rules
- lack economic specialization
- trade between areas stimulated by unevenness of agricultural productivity (everybody produces same thing, but makes things equal)
- redistribution largely limited to politically defined tribal areas
- populations had some technologies, same knowledge of technologies and their use, and same plants
South eastern Bantu boundaries
chiefs determine spatial and temporal boundaries of economic activities:
- define area for pasture and lands for fields, and declares opening and closing of seasons (e.g. Tiling & harvest)
- served out land to people nut also monitored land and climate
- helped create concerted activity (people work on same tasks at same time; avoid competition land for different purposes)
- controlled access to means of production and thereby set bounds on individual action
South eastern Bantu: adaptive types and economic regulation
- regulation of resources differs between east and west
- east is well suited to decentralized administration while the west is best suited for a centralized form of administration (due to ecological conditions)
- differences between two areas and systems partly explained by need to spread out risk
Southeastern Bantu: how do East and west spread out risk?
East: people spread out risk by diversifying their labour and investment in small area
West: people diversify risk by investing time and energy over a broad area
Southerastern bantu adaptation type A
- east of drakensberg escarpment to the coast we find adaptation type A
- ## characterized by small localities and corporate economic groups, giving rise to an economy of concentrated investment
Southeastern Bantu type B
West Of escarpment
- populations spread.. *
Type A location and tribal groups
Eastern regional Nguni people’s. Some exception western areas
Type B location and tribal groups
Western region. Sotho people’s
Type A vs type B settlement patterns
A: dispersed kraal settlement
B: concentrates residence in large villages and towns
Type A vs Type B unit of exploitation
A: mainly the local district of ward under a headman
B: entire tribal territory under chief
Type A vs Type B regulation of access to resources
A: decentralized- headman prominent
B: centralized in person of the chief
Type A vs Type B modal strategy
A: territorial confinement of investments. Concerted economic relationships. Emphasis on herding corporation
B: dispersal of investments over tribal area. Dispersed economic relationships
Type A tribal territory
tribal territory country of small- scale repetitive configuration that contained a variety of natural resources
Type B tribal territory
people loved in large villages and towns
- concentrated populations moved between towns and countryside as part of their subsistence activities ( west characterized by large expanses of relatively uniform land: tribal area replaces district as unit of exploitation, increasing area exploitation spreads out risk)
- westerners establish social and subsistence relations over large distances (e.g. In Sotho territory, men could gain secondary rights to grazing areas through relations with others
Southeastern Bantu: apparatus for regulation
- both east and west, tribal territory administered as set of estates
- chief or paramount controlled a primary estate …
Southeastern Bantu: administrative estates
Admin heads did not own their estates:
- controlled access to resources, directed work pattern of follows, ensured collective and individual rights to resources
- hierarchy of estatesnreflectsndevolution of political authority
- each admin head estates presided over a specific court where he judges cases involving residents of his jurisdiction
- does not own resources (ie cattle) just controls access to them
Southeastern Bantu: estates of production
- headman also granted rights to estates of production (carved out from EoO from estates of Admin)
- EoP provided an individual claim “for the use of resources, not for regulation of access to resources”
- there was more delegation of rights in east: overseers at diff order within system in east preformed suites reserved to controllers of estates in west
Southeastern Bantu: east vs west admin
West: tribal territory administered as a single unit: resources making living existed in several localities spread across large area; in west estate administration not limited to a single locality
East: wards contained and compact: units could be and were limited to single localities that were controlled by headman
- headman in east were more like Chiefs than their western counterparts (e.g. Eastern head,an received tribute)
Southeastern Bantu: East vs west time
- Differences in regulation included temporal controls
- Throughout Southern Africa harvest and beginning of new tilling seasons major events of year
West: central time: created synchronism in activities of Sotho population
East: district time
Southeastern Bantu: east vs west trespass
Nguni: trespass was a matter Tribe settled by neighbours: rarely became matter for courts (herdboys generally got thrashed)
West: trespass was dealt with in formal courts: when individuals did collide (encroaching on each other’s fields) they were likely strangers
Southeastern Bantu: cattle as capital
Cattle creates greater differentiation in wealth and capital investment
- eastern environment allowed a closer integration of cattle into tribal economy: 1. Milk vied with grain as dietary staple (e.g. Among Zulu diet amasi: curds of milk, less constrained by agricultural food quest) 2. For Nguni cattle meant a dairy industry supported by compact ecological niches
- in west, ecology could not support a perennial dairy industry