Final Flashcards
Types of objective swallowing evaluations
Modified Barium Swallow Study (MBSS); Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS); Cookie Study (historical)
Limitations of clinical (bedside) swallow eval
correctly ids only 2/3rds of those who do and do not aspirate;
3 oz water test effectiveness
good screen but not comprehensive; sensitive 76% (extent to which people who have the disease test positive), specificity 59% (extent to which people who do not have the disease test negative)
3 ox water test effectiveness
good screen but not comprehensive; sensitive 76% (extent to which people who have the disease test positive), specificity 59% (extent to which people who do not have the disease test negative)
Clinical (bedside) eval: Wet vocal quality
variable definition between clinicians, NO STANDARD to compare to; no association w/ aspiration or penetration, potential use of id laryngeal dysfunction; “wet” label from SLP associated w/ LARGE amount of material on vocal folds
Clinical swallowing eval (bedside)
analyzes motor components of swallowing; only indirect sensory info re: the swallow; inadequate info on pharyngeal stage, inaccurate estimation of aspiration
Silent aspiration
2-25% stroke patients; central/local weakness & incoordination of pharyngeal muscles; reduces laryngopharyngeal sensation; impaired ability to produce reflexive cough
Unmanaged oropharyngeal dysphagia is increased risk for
airway obstruction; aspiration pneumonia; death; malnutrition; decreased quality of life
Materials needed for MBSS
Fluoroscopy suite or C-arm; barium sulfate; lead vest, gloves, thyroid shied, eye protection, dosimetry badge
MBSS provides what view of swallow?
lateral or anterior-posterior
Use MBSS in order to:
assess risk for aspiration; see phases of swallow, make dietary recommendations
Who does an MBSS?
a radiologist and an SLP; SLP determines progression of boluses and says “on/off” for flour
MBSS requires ____________ patient b/c __________
Medically stable patients for transportation to x-ray suite
Bolus consistencies
thin liquid, semi-thick liquid, thick liquid, puree, solids, multiple consistencies/textures
What you can see in MBSS
oral prep phase, swallow initiation, penetration, aspiration (before, during, & after swallow) and pharyngeal contraction; residue in valleculae, pyriform sinuses
What to look for in Oral Prep phase during MBSS
bolus formation; anterior oral spillage?; pocketing in sulci; bolus cohesiveness; mastication with solids?
What to look for in Oral Phase MBSS
Bolus location on tongue; method of poster movement (how tongue moves bolus); speed bolus movement; oral residue, location; posterior oral spillage?; location of pharyngeal trigger
What to look for in Initiation of Pharyngeal Phase MBSS
where is bolus when pharyngeal swallow initiated (when hyoid elevation begins?); is there delay in swallow initiation or is it posterior oral spillage?; is initiation timely (in seconds) regardless of bolus location?
What to look for during pharyngeal phase MBSS
hyo-laryngeal excursion (assess); pharyngeal wave (asses); is penetration present? does it remain, why occur; is aspiration present? silent or audible, when (before, during, after swallow) does it occur & why?; is there residue? where, why, does it clear w/ spontaneous subsequent swallows, does result in penetration/aspiration
Top-down assessment (MBSS)
palatal closure, superior constriction, BOT retraction sufficient for OPP; pharyngeal wave; laryngeal elevation; laryngeal excursion; UES relaxation and opening; UES closure
Pharyngeal to esophageal phase
UES- does it open adequately and for sufficient duration to allow bolus to pass from pharynx to esophagus? (if not, why- decreased hyolaryngeal excursion, UES spasm, etc); Does UES motility interfere w/ pharyngeal phase of swallowing?
Predictive risk factors for (severe) dysphagia
dysphonia, dysarthria, abnormal volitional cough, abnormal gag reflex, abnormal cough reflect, cough after swallow, and voice change (these suggest need instrumental examination)
Incidence of dysphagia by eval method low to high
screening (37-45%); clinical testing (55%); instrumental testing (64-78%)
Compensatory techniques (to try during MBSS)
chin tuck; head turn; head tilt; bolus size; textures; consistency
Considerations when recommending compensatory techniques during MBSS
KNOW WHY you’re trying physiologically; does it improve their swallowing efficiency?; will it fatigue patient?; can patient implement independently?
NG tubes and objective swallow eval
no need to remove for eval; aspiration risk for puree food and liquid same across groups
NG Tube vs G tube placement recommendations
NG tube: Short term (acute onset dysphagia, good potential for recovery, medical status improving); G tube: Long term (progressive, end-stage disease, lack of cooperation w/ treatment (alertness/consciousness), large CVA, minimal medical status improvement, need nutritional support beyond current oral intake)
Alternative means of nutrition
nasogastric (NG) tube (small/large bore); Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube; Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)
What is FEES
flexible endoscope passed transversally to obtain superior view of pharynx, larynx, and portion of trachea to objectively eval pharyngeal swallowing function
MBSS cons
Requires radiation exposure; time limited (4 min); costly
MBSS pros
access in all hospitals, but patients must be able to go to the flour unit; time-tested
SLP FEES Scope of Practice
YES to (independently) evaluate (pharyngeal) swallow functioning, NO to making medical diagnosis (MD); need state liscence
Nasoendosopy (FEES) licensing recommendations
*vary by facility; class (10-16 hours), 5 FEES procedures w/ another clinician, 25 performance and interpretation of fees, knowledge of contraindications/adverse reactions
Adverse reactions to FEES
laryngospasm; vasospasm; epistaxis (RARE, no serious consequences)
FEES equipment
flexible endoscope, monitor, camera, recording mechanism
Why do FEES?
to assess for diet recommendations; need swallow eval that same day; need to test for fatigue; need repeat swallow exam to consider diet
Patients who may be good for FEES
patient to big for flour suite; ICU patient (ventilator, traction, cardiac monitors, etc); excess radiation concerns; fluoro contrast issues; if patient can’t be transported; patient on contact/respiratory isolation; need objective info secretion management; need visual feedback as teaching strategy; patients who refuse barium; patients who can’t afford MBSS; to visualize integrity of vocal fold closure; tx exam w/ time to try strategies; need more info from fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy Indications
endoscope not available/accepted by pt; need oral phase visual; visual coordination oral & pharyngeal stage; need to visualize hyolaryngeal excursion, epiglottic displacement, laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal wave, UES opening ; need to visualize aspiration during height of swallow; facial/nasal issues; need to screen esophageal phase; endoscopy doesn’t fully answer questions
FEES (endoscopy) Cons
limited to superior view; more difficult to learn (certify); uncomfortable for some patients; confused/agitated patients will not take scope; white out during swallow
FEES vs Fluro
similar outcomes from both; FEES equally sensitive; FEES > Fluoro (MBSS) for secretion management
FEES provides visual feedback for:
clearing penetration/aspiration, obtaining airway closure, minimizing premature oral spillage, purpose of compensatory strategy
Chronological FEES interpretation
Before swallow: initiation (spillage to valleculae, down lateral changes, over epiglottis, to pyriform sinuses, into laryngeal vestibule?), penetration?, aspiration?; After swallow: aspiration? penetration? residue (valleculae, pyriform sinuses, pharyngeal residue)? present, what happens to penetration/residue
FEES Protocol (Langmore)
Velopharyngeal closure, appearance of hypo pharynx and larynx at rest, handling of secretions respiration, airway protection, phonation, pharyngeal musculature (symmetry, shape) ; administration of food & liquid; hypopharyngeal/laryngeal sensory testing
FEES contraindications
Patients who are agitated, tacitly defensive, hyperactive gag reflex, bleeding disorder/blood thinner, history of fainting, significant acute cardiac problems
FEES risks
discomfort, gagging, nose bleed, allergic reaction (anesthetic, food), laryngospasm, vasovagal response
Endotracheal intubation
establishes temporary airway for pulmonary ventilation for surgery & life-saving situations; acute, crisis
Problems with Intubation (endotracheal intubation)
displaced arytenoid cartilage; parlayzed TVC; recurrent laryngeal nerve injury; reduced oropharyngeal sensation; laryngeal musculature deconditioning; upper airway edema; atelectasis; barotrauma; tracheal stenosis; trachealmalacia
Problems remaining post-intubation (endotracheal intubation)
dysphagia (aspiration, malnutrition); voice deficits (aphonia); communication deficit (low volume)
If patient is intubated, could expect _______
aspiration (check for presence), reduced sensation, severe reduction in frequency of swallow (due to muscular deconditioning)
______ & ______ travel through pharynx; goal to keep in respective channels
pulmonary air (trachea/lungs) & food and liquid (esophagus)
Respiratory/swallow sequence
expiration; cords close; pharyngeal phase; cords open; expiration
Indications for tracheostomy
prolonged intubation during course of critical illness; subglottic stenosis from prior trauma; obstruction from obesity for sleep apnea; congenital abnormality of larynx or trachea; severe neck/mouth injuries; inhalation of corrosive material/smoke/steam; presence of foreign body occluding airway; paralysis of muscles that affect swallowing causing aspiration danger; long term unconsciousness or coma
Cuffed trache
closes system & stabilizes breathing volume; prevents GROSS aspiration; easily ventilated
Cuffless trache
higher comfort level; easily changed; less build-up around cuff; less esophageal impingement; less likely to develop granulation or malaria
Cuffless trache
higher comfort level; easily changed; less build-up around cuff; less esophageal impingement; less likely to develop granulation or malacia
Do trach tubes cause swallowing problems?
May only be cuffed w/ airflow cut-off; reconditioning of muscles, other illnesses/consciousness also factors
Swallowing problems as result of trach placement
Mechanical disturbance; sensory deficit (airflow deficit); uncoordinated laryngeal closure
Mechanical disturbance of trash placement
anchors larynx, prevents full elevation/excursion; traction of cuff rubbing against posterior tracheal wall (chondritis becoming malacia); possible esophageal narrowing at (overinflated) cuff
Aspiration is more likely with ________ cuff compared to ______
high pressure low volume cuff 87%; low pressure high volume cuff 15%
Passy-Muir Speaking Valve resortes subglottic air pressure, allowing
restoration normal apnea sequence, allows upper airway cough
Known aspirators who get passy muir speaking valve will
continue to aspirate
Attempt passy-muir valve application prior to all swallowing evals if possible in order to
re-establish upper airway airflow and clearance potential
Stimuli are needed to excite receptors w/in oral-pharyngeal mucous to repeat pharyngeal swallowing most effectively, as evidenced by ________ and suggesting what intervention?
local anesthetic impairs initiation of swallow; ice chip therapy
Lack of _______ may effect receptors oral and pharyngeal afferents
saliva –> mechanoreceptor stimulus and resulting afferent response; air could do same?, respiratory central pathway maintains patent airway as most important reflex in oral and pharyngeal areas
Patients with tracheostomies show coordination deficits in:
reduced swallow apnea sequences; decreased hyolaryngeal elevation AND rotation w/ decreased UES relaxation (for FEW patients)
Steps of swallow assessment w/ tracheostomy
position optimally; lower/deflate cuff; apply PMSV if possible; clear oral cavity; begin 5 cc water if patient not eating; go objective whenever possible (1st FEES for sensitive to secretion management)
Special considerations when assessing swallow w/ tracheostomy
many patients have sensory deficits (aspirate silently); may be difficult in distinguishing what airway sounds w/ swallow change, using CA
FEES pros and cons
pros: view TVC laryngeal vestibule directly; longer duration; done at bedside. cons: cannot see cervical esophagus; invasive
Fatigue & feeding routines
several small meals max nutrition and min fatigue; feed after resting periods (NEVER after PT); follow objective recommendation management strategies
Possible strategies for management w/ trache
effortful swallow (increase hylaryngeal excursion & UES diameter); mendelsohn maneuver; double swallow; super supraglottic w/ deflated cuff only; termal-tacticle sim if warranted; encourage secretion swallowing w/ less oral suctions (*note: Keep cuff deflated (try))
Tools for management
Biofeedback (SEMG, FEES); exercises for pharyngeal contraction and larynx elevation
Evaluation of swallow w/ trache
do while cuff deflated if tolerated; attempt to time swallow in exhalation if possible if aspiration problem detected objectively
Evaluation of Swallow w/ Vent dependent patients
Review settings (cuff deflation? high pressure support? breathing rate?); monitor PiP and O2 stats, trache tubing for potential larynx/trachea movement, HR (attn for decline, but don’t up FIO2 just for decrease and more work of breathing); low minute volume alarm
Advantages of in-line passy-muir placement
communication; upper airway clearance (supraglottic and immediate subglottic); work of breathing; breathing/speech coordination; re-establishment of upper airway sensory awareness