FINAL 2 Flashcards

1
Q

A critical component of the research process that provides an in-depth analysis of recently published research findings in specifically identified areas of interest. The review informs the research question and guides development of the research plan.

A

Literature review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A traditional approach to research in which variables are identified and measured in a reliable and valid way.

A

Quantitative research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A naturalistic approach to research in which the focus is on understanding the meaning of an experience from the individual’s perspective.

A

Qualitative research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Study conducted by examining a single phenomenon across multiple populations at a single point in time w/ no intent for follow-up in the design.

A

Cross-sectional design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strengths of cross-sectional designs

A
  • practical and economical
  • no waiting for the outcome of interest to occur
  • enable the exploration of health conditions that are affected by human development
  • procedures are reasonably simple to design and carry out
  • data are collected at one point in time so results can be timely and relevant
  • large samples are relatively inexpensive to obtain
  • there is not loss of subjects due to attrition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Limitations of cross-sectional designs

A
  • transitory nature of data collection makes causal association difficult
  • don’t capture changes that occur as a result of environmental factors or other events that occur over time
  • may be difficult to locate individuals at varying stages of a disease or condition
  • impractical for the study of rare diseases or uncommon conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Study conducted by following subject’s over a period of time, with data collection occurring at prescribed intervals.

A

Longitudinal designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strengths of longitudinal designs

A
  • can capture historical trends and explore causal associations
  • cost-effective and cost-efficient
  • can document that a causal factor precedes an outcome, strengthening hypotheses about causality
  • provide the opportunity to measure characteristics and events accurately and do not rely on recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Limitations of longitudinal designs

A
  • attrition rates and potential loss of subjects over time are common
  • dependent on accurate, complete secondary data or the subject’s ability to recall past events
  • once begun, it cannot be changed w/out affecting the overall validity of the conclusions
  • expensive to conduct and require time and commitment from both parties
  • conclusions may be based on a limited number of observations
  • large sample sizes are expensive to access
  • systematic attrition of subjects is possible due to long-term commitment requirements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A design that involves the analysis of two variables to describe the strength and direction of the relationship between them.

A

Correlation study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strengths of a correlation study

A
  • relatively uncomplicated to plan and implement
  • researcher flexibility in exploring relationships among 2 or more variables
  • outcomes of correlation studies often have practical application in nursing practice
  • provide a framework for examining relationships between variables that cannot be manipulated for practical/ethical reasons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Limitations of a correlation study

A
  • researcher cannot manipulate variables of interest, so causality cannot be established
  • correlation designs lack control and randomization between variables
  • correlation measured may be the result of a suppressor value
  • demonstration of a correlation is not evidence of anything other than a linear association btw 2 variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A bell-shaped distribution in which the mean is set at 0 and a standard deviation of 1.

A

Standard normal distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The average; a measure of central tendency.

A

Mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A measure of central tendency that is the exact midpoint of the numbers of a data set.

A

Median

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A measure of central tendency that is the most frequently occurring value in the data set.

A

Mode

17
Q

A measure of variability that is the distance between the two most extreme values in the data set.

A

Range

18
Q

An outcome of interest that occurs after the introduction of an independent variable; the “effect” of cause and effect.

A

Dependent variable

19
Q

A factor that is artificially introduced into a study explicitly to measure an expected effect; the “cause” of cause and effect.

A

Independent variable

20
Q

Factors that exert an effect on the outcome but that are not part of the planned experiment and may confuse the interpretation of the results.

A

Extraneous variables

21
Q

Quantitative analyses

A
  • select tests a priori
  • run all tests identified
  • report all tests that were run
22
Q

The error that arises from the sampling procedure; it is directly affected by variability and indirectly affected by sample size.

A

Standard error

23
Q

Tells us the findings are real.
*When the p-value is very small, indicating that the probability the results were due to chance is also very small, then the test is said to have…

A

Statistical significance

24
Q

Tells us if the results are important for practice.

*The extent to which an intervention can make a real difference in patient’ lives.

A

Clinical significance

25
Q

The magnitude of the impact that the intervention or variable is expected to have on the outcome.

A

Effect size

26
Q

A way that you can analyze more than 2 groups; helps reduce the risk of error.

A

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)