Final Flashcards
omnibalancing
- coined by SR David
- considers internal and external threat
- domestic political environment is as least as unstable and dangerous as the international one
- example: challenge posed by Putin when mercenaries went against him for a short time, the Wagner group
balance of power theory
- predicts that threats will be resisted
- creating alliances with other states and arming themselves, balancing against other states: so they balance
- States’ alignment is determined by the structure of the international system, particularly by actual and potential external threats
comparison between balance of power and omnibalancing
- balance of power: leaders of state will align with secondary adversaries so they can focus their resources on prime adversaries
- omnibalancing: Same holds true, but secondary threats are often other states. Primary threats are often domestic. Since the goal of Third World leaders is to stay in power, they will sometimes protect themselves at the expense of state interests
authoritarian leaders afraid of internal threats
- dictators scared of own army
- try to weaken their army like stalin did in weakening the ranks of the Red Army
elite security dilemma
- Authoritarian leaders in weak states are more constrained than other regime types
- Their militaries are useful mainly to repress civilians, not to fight foreign wars
- Military must be “coup-proof”- the leader deliberately weakens his own military to protect himself from getting overthrown
Theoretical Implications of Omnibalancing
- with realism, it argues that intl politics focuses on power, interests, and rationality
- but unlike realism, states are not unitary actors
- leader of the state rather than state itself is the level of analysis
Case Study: Uganda in East Africa
- Former british colony
- Early 1960s gained independence
- Had a bloody history mainly of internal repression by dictators
- Idi Amin was ugandan dictator from 1971-79
- seized power in military coup in 1971, sponsored by UK and Israel
- officer in the colonial army trained by UK
external allegiances: back and forth
- 1971: Amin first expelled Soviet military advisors who had been sent under the Obote regime, replacing them with a team of 700 Israelis
- 1972: Amin switched allegiances, expelling the Israelis and bringing the Soviets back, along with Libyan military and the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization)
Israel’s involvement in Uganda
- used militarity and agricultural expertise to expand relations with African countries, strengthen Israel’s intl legitimacy
- foreign policy of befriending non-arab
- many african states broke ties with Israel after 1973 war and Arab oil boycott
- Israel assisted Amin in 1971 coup
- soviets sold warplanes after Israel refused
Libya’s involvement in Uganda
- military support
- offered monetary compensation to any african country that would agree to sever its relations with Israel
USSR’s influence
- wanted to counter US influence
- supported coups by pro-soviet officers
- offered military support to client states
- major arms supplier to Amin regime
- upset regional balance of power by selling Uganda jets and tanks
superpower-client ties: Amin
- he owed soviets money for weapons
- played superpowers by threatening to turn to the west
- soviets forgave debt and sent more weapons
Amin’s Overthrow in 1979
- Oct 1978: amin’s forces launch incursions into Tanzanian territory, looting and shooting
- Uganda announces annex of Kagera salient from Tanzania
- Nov 1978 tanzania declares war
- march 1979 - uganda army loses, amin regime collapses
- april 1979 - amin flees to exile
Why was Tanzania able to defeat Amin if Uganda had so much Soviet weaponry?
- amin weakened army bc lack of trust
- purged best military units
- libyan and palestinian forces could not save him
- tanzanian united and determined
Nyerere’s Outrage vs Amin
- “We have one task only- and that is to hit him. We have the ability to hit him. We have a reason to hit him- and the determination to hit him… This man is a savage.”
endgame for uganda
- tanzanian forces take capital, Kampala and send Amin into exile
- reinstall former pres obete, no less murderous than amin, 1976-1986
- own reign of terror
- overthrown by current ugandan president
cold war in horn of africa: Somalia vs Ethiopia
- 1963 Somalia signs $30m in arms deal with soviets
- wished to counter Ethiopia, US client due to base at Kagnew
- Kennedy tried to win over Somalis
- Ethiopians threatened a chill in relations with US
- This imperiled ultra-strategic US listening station at Kagnew base in Ethiopia
- US backed off from supporting Somalia
classic example of containment in african context
- In the emerging post-colonial context, US and USSR competed for clients, regional influence
- African states could play the superpowers off each other for leverage
- Military assistance could win allies but also worsen domestic instability
roots of apartheid
- apartheid = separateness
- We can define it as state-sanctioned racism encoded in the laws and norms of state and society
- apartheid came into law in 1948
- foundation of Broederbon, secret society of Afrikaaans leaders, all except Mandela
apartheid gov and link to colonialism
- Mamdani argues that apartheid should be considered the blueprint of colonialism in Africa, not outlying case
- racism not codified the same way it was in SA
- threat of violence intrinsic to colonization
- gov was a securocracy, industrialization driven by golden mines were fused with spy mechanisms
- military-industrial complex
- Laager complex = mentality of constant seige
ANC
- founded in 1912 to promote African rights
- 1950s: protests, racist pass laws, africans needed to carry gov ID
- 1960: massacre at Sharpeville, ANC said peaceful resistance is futile
- Mandela said submit or fight
- MK armed wing of ANC, had to go abroad
Front Line states: ideology over pragmatism
- Front-Line States (Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Tanzania) housed MK, People’s Liberation Army of Namibia (PLAN), Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army (ZANLA) bases
- These impoverished African countries suffered enormously for challenging apartheid (by 1988, approx. $30Bn in lost development)
- Angola and Mozambique were targeted military by the apartheid regime
- did not bandwagon with the militarily stronger white-supremacist regimes but due to ideological convictions
- Challenges theories claiming that states act only out of self-interest
- Would have made more sense to bandwagon or stay out of the way
- Malawi covertly sided with apartheid
- Botswana didn’t side but refused to give shelter to the armed wings, stayed out of the way
apartheid and namibia
- SA had trusteeship of Namibia since 1920 from LoN
- served as a springboard for SA invasions and proxy wars in Angola
Total strategy of apartheid
- President Botha birthed this
- total militarization of SA domestic and foreign policies
- blacks fighting for quality but manipulated by communists
- parallel between black scheme with communists, FBI through civil rights movement was with Soviets and secretly infiltrated US
- destabilizing neighbors
- apartheid regime waged war in Angola and Mozambique; staged raids covertly
- over 2m killed in proxy wars
- SA specialized in surrogate forces, “plausible deniability and black on black violence