Final Flashcards
What is the contract balancing act
Contract law is a balancing act between freedom to contract as well as predictability and fairness to both businesses and their clients or customers
What are the components of valid contract
To create a “valid” contract you need to have an offer, acceptance of that offer, consideration, capacity, legality and intention and whenever possible, put things in writing
Explain contract formation
In order to form a contract, you need to have consensus, consideration, capacity, intention, legality, and in writing (but only rarely)
Contracts do not have to be in writing to be valid but written contracts have obvious advantages (clarity, do not have to find evidence elsewhere)
Explain contract language
when writing a contract, try to use plain language and avoid “legalese”
but there is a lot of language that is typically used in standard form contracts that does not sound very plain
this legalese is used because those who are writing the contracts (lawyers) know exactly how courts have interpreted these legalese expressions and are reluctant to use other language, even if more plain
Explain plain language (WRT contact language)
Title to property in the goods shall remain vested in the Company (notwithstanding the delivery of the same to the Customer) until the price of the Goods comprised in the contract and all other money due from the Customer to the Company or any other account has been paid in full
We shall retain ownership of the goods until you have finished paying for them
Explain consensus or how parties agree on a deal
Did the parties reach agreement on all important elements of the agreement such as parties/people, price, location, delivery times etc. through offer and acceptance?
clear and unambiguous terms even if not fully understood (one party cannot say did not read)
courts will “fill in the gaps” but NOT about important terms (What is important?)
agreeing to agree not consensus (text: Zynik Capital)
counter-offers not contracts (eg Grades for $)
offer must still be valid and not withdrawn or revoked (should include deadlines to respond)
What are the criteria for consideration (are both parties getting something)
Consideration must be:
legal (not drugs),
possible (not contract to sell mining rights on the moon),
of some value (court won’t judge too much if fair value),
specific (can’t just say “something” since imprecise),
new and not past consideration or existing obligation,
not gratuitous or free (something for nothing),
or under “seal” if no real consideration
What are the laws on capacity for contracts
Can you contract with this person or is society concerned that they may be taken advantage of?
Infants (minors): How old is old enough to enter into contract? 19 in BC unless ratify or agree after becoming 19
contracts binding on adults but not on “infant”
contracts with infants are “voidable” rather than void unless the contract is about “necessities” (unless BC where contact only enforceable if law says so e.g. student loans)
void means no valid contract and voidable means not valid unless the infant wants to go ahead
Explain legality for contracts
Is the subject of the contract something that is legal?
Examples of potentially illegal contracts: sale of illicit drugs, online gambling (unless ?), or a contract for an A grade in exchange for $ (or is it?)
Restrictive covenants: must be necessary and reasonable. Is it unreasonable?
What is unreasonable? (Example: There is a term in your employment contract that says that after you quit you cannot start a similar business for 5 years within BC)
legality differs from place to place, country to country, jurisdiction to jurisdiction (eg online gambling)
Explain intention for contracts
Intention is like consensus but focuses on whether parties intended to enter into a legally binding agreement based on an objective test
Objective test?: Would a reasonable person conclude that the parties intended to enter into a legally binding contract?
Example: You can’t say “just kidding” after the fact to get out of contract
Example: Entering into a contract is not like inviting someone to a party
Family situations: law presumes that family members do not intend to enter into legally binding contracts (unless explicitly mentioned otherwise)
When are exclusion clauses part of contract
Exclusion clauses form part of the contract if certain conditions are met and these allow businesses to manage their risk of liability
Explain Exclusion Clauses, Standard Forms and Consent Forms and what are the 3 conditions for validity
there are clauses or conditions used by one of the parties to the contract in order to control or limit liability, usually in a standard form contract ( a take it or leave it contract) and business can use the clauses as a risk management technique
can be called waivers, disclaimers, exculpatory or exclusion clauses, consent forms etc. but all of them do the same thing to limit liability of one of the parties in the contract
What does an exclusion clause look like? Or a consent form? (Example: Car rental, hockey game, taking a flight, consent forms to get credit check for credit card, no return policy on store receipt)
What is allowed? General principle is freedom of contract so parties can agree to exclusion clauses, unless they are unfair.
Conditions for validity: (1)does the exclusion clause apply to the situation (2) if it does apply was it unconscionable when it was created (3) are there public policy reasons to invalidate the exclusion clause (see Case: Tercon Contractors)
What should you do when making a contract and why
When you make a contract, be very specific and anticipate as many situations and problems as you can to avoid mistakes and disputes
What are disputes on contracts
Things impacting a valid contract other than rules
exemption clauses
mistakes
misrepresentation
duress and undue influence
What are mistakes and what are the 3 types (contract)
Mistakes typically occur about what was agreed to and what terms of contract mean
Types: shared or common mistake, misunderstanding or mutual mistake, one-sided or unilateral mistake
Shared or common mistake: In Grades for Cash, we both thought this was a permissible or legal contract
Misunderstanding: I thought I was clear that my offer was to give an A grade whereas you thought I was offering an A grade for the entire course
Unilateral mistake: You thought that any student who gave me the money was entitled to the offer
What is misrepresentation in contracts
What is misrepresentation? It is false and misleading statements (or omissions) that induce someone to enter contract but that are not part of the contract, and these statements are either innocent, negligent, fraudulent but they are not just opinions (unless experts give the opinion such as a mechanic about a car)
Grades for Cash: Was there misrepresentation? If so, what type of misrepresentation was it?
Innocent: I say that I am sure that most of your classmates will go ahead with the offer
Negligent: I say that if you fail this course, since it is mandatory, you will not be able to continue in the Business program (I believe it to be true but I never checked)
Fraudulent: I say you can deduct the $100 from your taxes and part of education expenses ( I know that is not true)
Why does it matter what type of misrepresentation? It impacts your possible remedies and what a court will do
Explain duress and undue influence for contracts
Duress: Free will to bargain lost due to coercion, threat of violence, imprisonment, scandal, damage to property, or inappropriate economic pressure
Undue influence: not threat of force or financial consequences but rather the abuse of a relationship of trust
Lawyers, doctors, trustees, guardians, parents have a presumption of undue influence against them unless the victim has obtained independent advice
Unconscionability: abuse of fairness (What about charging high interest rates? Is that unconscionable?)
Grades for $: You could argue that you felt undue influence from the professor to participate, or from other students. You could also argue enforcing this contract is unconscionable, even if legal.
Remedies: typically voidable contract (victim decides how to proceed)
Explain Unconscionability for contracts
Mandatory Arbitration Clauses: The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided that mandatory arbitration clauses that Uber requires drivers to sign and that require all disputes to be settled through arbitration (in the Netherlands, at the driver’s cost) are unconscionable and therefore invalid
When is a contract over
Performance: you do what the contract requires and this includes substantial performance (eg buy a car and order special wheels but the car comes with normal wheels, or you order 1000 cars and get 999, but this is no reason to end contract for breach, so this is substantial performance and the other party has opportunity to correct the problem)
Breach including incomplete performance (eg different model of car delivered) and repudiation (communicate you do not intend to follow contract)
Frustration: events are out of control of the parties (such as natural disaster and goods destroyed) unless one party creates the problem through self-induced frustration (Example: Getting SFU involved so contract cannot proceed) Parties anticipate these events using a force majeure clause in their contract
Agreement: including a new contract (start over)
Explain enforceability and material change and how they are used for COVID 19
Enforceability: Contracts can end and be therefore unenforceable when important material changes have occurred such as a “material change” but does COVID19 constitute a material change? (see Casebook on Contracts, COVID and Enforceability)
This issue has not yet been settled by a court so it currently represents a risk that businesses need to consider and try to resolve by clarifying the risk event in the contract
Explain remedies for contracts and what are the remedies for general problems and breach of contract
Purpose: put the parties back into the position that is fair i.e. if it is an invalid contract then puts parties back to beginning, but if valid contract then into position if contract had been properly performed
General Remedies when problems with contracts: (1) void or voidable (someone gets to decide whether to continue with contract) as is case with capacity issues or duress, (2)rectification (fix) so contract continues, (3) rescission (return parties to original position if possible), (4) damages
Specific Remedies for breach of contract: (1)damages (usually money through special and general damages and sometimes punitive), (2) specific performance (must do the thing in the contract), (3) injunction (stop something such as selling to someone else), (4) accounting (disclose financial records to determine damages), (5) quantum meruit (give reasonable payment for service already performed)
Strategy? Some businesses will choose to breach a contract if they calculate that even when damages for breach are imposed they are still further ahead ( Example: When the price of a product goes up significantly from the time that the contract was made until the time that the contract is supposed to be performed, it may be financially better for a business to breach the contract and accept the damages)
Explain insurance risk and contract
Insurance Contracts and Purpose: businesses can use insurance as a risk management technique to transfer risk to someone else (an insurer)
Types of Insurance contract: general liability insurance, car insurance and ICBC, life insurance, health insurance and disability, condo insurance, building insurance, flood, hurricane, earthquake insurance (insurance for both consumers and businesses)
Liability insurance: liability for employee or other business operations including negligence (but not wilful acts) (Insurance thereby helps deal with problem of vicarious liability and product liability)
New types of insurance: climate change, hacker insurance
Things to Consider: cost and premiums (fees), riders (specific terms for a client like bike insurance on home policy), policy coverage and terms including exclusion clauses
Insurance brokers can be liable for mistakes and misrepresentation about policy
Typical Problems?: Insurer won’t pay based on interpretation of provision of insurance contract (eg COVID) AND premiums increasing so may not make financial sense to get insurance coverage (may be better to avoid risk or accept risk)
Explain online contracts
Contract law also applies to online contracts BUT there are some specific problems that arise with online contracts:
What Rules Apply? Consensus occurs when “I Accept” communication reaches offeror’s office and therefore contract rules are those where offeror/seller’s business is located
Exclusion Clauses: Businesses can use embedded exclusions and waivers to manage liability through “Terms and Conditions” and “I Accept” but these clauses must still follow rules about exclusions, fairness and consumer protection laws
Capacity: Businesses must try to identify contracting party (and legal age) using various means of authentication
Legality: Businesses often move illegal operations to a country where it is not illegal (eg online gambling businesses)
Online payment: Businesses use online payment services such as PayPal and this also gives users recourse in the case of fraud
Explain risk management for contracts
Write things down and use clear language to manage risk
Know how to control and limit liability using risk management techniques (exemptions clauses and insurance and negotiating as many terms to anticipate as many situations as possible)
Understand the rules and limits to using exemptions clauses
Be very clear on the process you want to use when there is a dispute (and include this process in the contract)
Can use “Arbitration clauses” in contracts including choices about who will be the arbitrator, and what law will apply (example: rules in Canada or US or ? ) BUT these clauses must be fair and NOT unconscionable
Consider Online dispute resolution as part of your Strategy
Remedies: know what a court can and cannot give you and how to quantify your damages
what is the purpose of law on IP and how does it work
Purpose of Law on IP? Law balances your right to benefit financially from your ideas and creations with the right of others to use the ideas to create new ideas and products and inventions (society wants to avoid a monopoly on ideas in order to promote innovation)
How? Ideas receive legal protection through creation or registration and then you can benefit financially from your protected ideas and prevent others from taking your ideas
Why is this legal protection necessary? Innovation and investment? Would Tesla invest in new technologies or Pfizer in new drugs unless they could be assured that it is worthwhile to invest in creating these ideas?
But for how long should law protect ideas/IP? There are time limits on how long you can benefit from your idea or creation (eg length of a patent is 20 years) Why? Should there be any limit?
Explain value in ideas (3 main strategies)
idea entrepreneurship and business innovation rely on intellectual property rights and protections in order to create value and profit, typically through 3 main strategies:
(1) licensing: using your copyright, trademark ( eg franchising) and patents to lend to others for a fee (royalties) which are the fees you get when someone uses your ideas (eg the fees a creator gets for writing book, or from the distribution and sale of music, or using a patent)
(2) selling patents and other forms of IP
(3) using your IP to make things and make profits (with the protection of IP laws)
Strategy: investors and shareholders expect you to protect these important business assets otherwise they may not invest or even worse, investors and shareholders may hold you liable (eg negligence) for failing to protect these assets
How do you protect your ideas (Process)
Creation: in some cases, the law will protect your idea as soon as you create it (eg music or writing through copyright)
Mandatory Registration: in some cases you are required to register your idea (patents)
Voluntary (or strategic) Registration: you may not be required to register but registration provides additional protection, particularly internationally ( e.g. copyright and trademark)
Confidentiality: sometimes the only way to protect your idea is by not sharing it ( e.g. trade secrets) or by protecting it through contract ( e.g. NDA which is a non-disclosure agreement)
What are the types of IP
copyright
trademark
patent
industrial designs
trade secrets
privacy (is this property?)
What can you protect
my company name or logo?
training and business strategy manuals?
software I write?
things I invent or modify?
my privacy?
things I post to Facebook or Instagram (Have you looked at Facebook’s Terms and how to deal with copyright issues?)(Licence to post?)
a tattoo (who has protection)? or the word “face”