final Flashcards
APA code of ethics
guides behavior of clinical psychologists in dealing with confidentiality, multiple relationships, informed consent, competence
aspirational APA code
-philosophy of how they expect you to each, nonenforceable
-general principles section describes an ideal level of ethical functioning or what to strive for
enforceable APA code
-ethical standards sections includes rules of conduct that can mandate minimal levels of behavior and can be specifically violated
general principles of APA
-beneficence and nonmaleficence
-fidelity and respobsibility
-integrity
-justice
-respect for peoples rights and dignity
beneficence and nonmaleficence
-benefit people and do not do harm
-strive to protect the rights and welfare of those with whom they work professionally with (clients, animals)
fidelity and responsibility
-professional and scientific responsibilities to clients and society
-psychologists have a moral responsibility to help ensure that others working in their profession uphold high ethical standards
integrity
-be honest and forthright
-never deceive or misrepresent
justice
-equality for all
-be fair and impartial, practice within competence areas
respect for peoples rights and dignity
-autonomy and confidentiality
-psychologists should respect right to dignity, privacy, and confidentiality of those they work with professionally
10 ethical standards
-resolving ethical issues
-competence
-human relations
-privacy and confidentiality
-advertising and other public health statements
-record keeping and fees
-education and training
-research and publication
-assessment
-therapy
most common violations of APA issues
-confidentiality
-multiple relationships
confidentiality
-keeping information between client and therapist private is an ethical obligation
when is it permissible that therapist breach confidentiality
-danger to self or others
-disclose of intention to commit a crime
-suspected abuse of child, elderly person, resident of institution or disabled person
-court orders therapist to make records available
expectations to confidentiality
-clerical people handling information
-therapist consults with experts/peers
-therapist is receiving supervision
-sharing information with other mental health professionals with clients consent
duty to warn
when a psychologist believes that their client may hurt or kill a particular person, it is the psychologists duty to warn the authorities, victim and victims family
duty to protect
psychologists need to protect their clients and the general public from those that can be a danger to the public
Tarasoff case
-college student told his therapist he was going to kill his girlfriend (Tarasoff)
-therapist contacted campus police who detained him but was released
-he killed her
-family sued and won saying that the therapist had duty to warn potential victim
confidentiality when client is child
-parents have right to be informed
-often make arrangements by discussing with families upfront
-some issues such as child abuse require breaking confidentiality to protect child
dual relationships
-relationships with a power differential, potential for exploitation or where a loss of objectivity is present
no romantic relationships with previous clients can happen until
2 years after therapy has ended
psychologists may be expert witnesses for
-personal injuries
-child custody
-competence
-insanity
-predicting dangerousness
-memory
spyder cystkopf
-65 yr old man who strangled wife in domestic argument
-attempted to disguise her death as suicide
-law abiding, non violent, socially conforming man
-subarachnoid cyst in frontal lobe and first time brain imaging was used for a trial
-was found not guilty as there was a dysfunction in his brain
5th amendment
protection against self incrimination
6th amendment
assistance of legal counsel, right to confront accusers, right to trial by a jury of peers
dusky standard for competence to stand trial (1960)
defendant must have:
-sufficient present ability to consult with their attorney (capacity to assist counsel) with a reasonable degree of rational understanding
-a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him/her
macaurther competence assessment tool for criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA)
-measures abilities related to dusky standard in semi-structured 22 question interview that are scored based on criteria related to:
-understanding (factual understanding)
macaurther competence assessment tool for criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA)
-measures abilities related to dusky standard in semi-structured 22 question interview that are scored based on criteria related to:
-understanding (factual understanding)
-reasoning (capacity to assist counsel)
-appreciation (rational understanding)
-scoring based on norms established in national study from adults in jails, prisons, and forensic psych hospitals
MacCAT-CA procedure
-defendant is read hypothetical vignette
-understanding: address general roles and responsibility of prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, elements of a criminal offense, responsibilities of the judge, jury, sentencing and rights (Dusky standard)
-defendant must use logical reasoning in relation to legal information
-given information and needs to decide which piece of info has greater legal relevance to hypothetical situation
-weight alternatives in risk benefit format (plea or go to trial)
appreciation of MacCAT-CA
examine expectations of the defendant regarding their own case such as disclosing info to attorney, assistant from attorney, likelihood of being convicted, severity of punishment if convicted, and expectations about being treated fairly by the court
Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised (ECST-R)
-uses semi-structured interview format with 18 items and 3 scales to asses factual and rational understanding of courtroom proceedings and ability to consult with counsel
-includes items and scared to screen for “feigned incompetence”
-developed to better address psychological abilities of Dusky v US and to provide clinicians with a standardized method of assessing feigned incompetence
4 sections of ECST-R
-nature of the attorney-client relationship (consult with counsel)
-factual understanding of courtroom proceedings
-rational understanding of courtroom proceedings
-atypical presentation (for feigned incompetence)
feigned incompetence
pretending to be incapable or insufficient at some task so that someone else will do it for you/to get out of trial?
social/educational background of dr denburg client
-intact household in midwest
-graduated highschool, got a BA and a masters
-single, only had girlfriend during graduate school
-no criminal history or substance abuse history
occupational background of dr denburg client
-military for 5 years in Afghanistan (honorable discharge), worked in construction not combat but was part of gun fire, friendly fire, etc
-returned to civilian life, worked in carpentry bit had to stop due to physical sensations such as eye, depression, feeling emotionally numb
dr denburg trial referral
-went to the west coast and was paranoid of west coast and the police
-late onset schizophrenia disorder
-“not the same after college”-mother (flat affect)
-arrested with pipe bomb/bomb
IQ scores of dr denburg trial client
-bright guy
-high scores except in processing speed, he was slow
-also bad at psychomotor speed tests(trail making test)
MMPI clinical scale for dr denburg trial client
-he was over reporting symptoms and had a spike in scale 6 (paranoia)
competency findings of dr denburg trial client
-MacCAT-CA: incompetent (felt harassed and followed by law enforcement, thought current lawyer is better and old, jury will realize the pipes were for invention and will receive lower sentence because it was for betterment of people’s lives)m
-ECST-R: competent (little evidence of psychotic behavior, no feigned incompetence, moderate impairment
DSM-5 diagnosis and determination of dr denburg trial client
-schizophrenia
-PTSD
found to be incompetent
old age statistics
-65 years +
-35 million in US
-12% of the population is 65+
projected rise of older aged americans by 2030
20% of population in US
fastest growing population
85 and older
sex ratio for older adults
W:M –> 3:2
Jeanne Calment
-lived to be oldest person 122 years old
-outlived daughter and grandson (both lived to be 36)
-last known person to meet van gogh
-lawyer gave her $1000/month for her apartment when she was 90 but she outlived him and he died (wife and kids had to keep paying)
-moved into nursing home at 110
-never worked, maybe low life stress
Jeanne Calment lifestyle
-smoked from 21 years old to 117 (2 cigarettes/day)
-poured olive oil all over food and skin
-drank 2 glasses of port per week
-ate one kilo of chocolate per week
changes in graphs for older ages (japan)
shift from pyramid (lots of young little older) to a rectangle (pretty much all equal)
-called rectangularization
iowa older adult demographics
-iowa has 3rd highest population in nation of 65+
-highest 80+ population
cognitive changes in normal aging
-changes are mild
-slowed speed of processing
-novel tasks may be more difficult
-recalling names can be particularly difficult
-often referred to as benign senescent forgetfulness or age associated memory impairment
highest decline of cognitive changes
executive functioning (affects gray matter and frontal lobe)
paradox of aging big takeaway
well being increases with age
paradox of aging video
-changes in aging population are due to culture
-older adults experience more mixed emotions (happy & sad)
-older adults are able to accept sadness better
-direct more cognitive power to more positive images
-realizing that they won’t live forever changes outlook in positive way
-as people’s bodies age/more morbidity, they are more content with life and themselves
Hartshorne and Germine (2015)
-used wexler memory and intelligence scales
-there is some decline at 30 years old
-everything begins to decline at 60
-vocab improves and then at 50 decreases
socioemotional selectivity theory (carstensen)
-motivational theory: suggests that secondary to an understanding of constraints on life longevity, older adults alter their strategies for emotional regulation
-do not focus/get as upset over things because they see time as short
-older adults focus on and demonstrate a bias towards positively valenced material
-data from several cognitive domains support this theory
positivity bias: emotional memory (denburg et al)
-correctly recalled items
-interaction effect where older adults remember positive items better than negative
-they recalled neutral items the worst
Denburg, Derksen (2014): older adults catch up to younger adults on
learning and memory task that involved collaborative social interaction, used a barrier task with pictures that approximates real world communication and encourages participants to problem solve collaboratively, shows that older adults are capable of learning and retaining new information, on par with younger adults when the task involves collaborative, social interaction
starting at age 65, prevalence of dementia ___ in each decade
doubles (5%–>10%)
prevalence of dementia by 85 years old
17%
“normal” aging is associated with
-variable degrees of cognitive weakness, cortical atrophy, accumulation of Alzheimer type pathology, and reduced cerebral blood flow
civil commitment laws
legal proceedings that determines a person is mentally disordered and may be hospitalized, even involuntarily (depends on each state)
Mrs E. P. W. Packard
in 1800s, crusaded for better civil commitment laws after being involuntarily confined to psych hospital for 3 years because her husband felt her religious views were dangerous to spiritual interests of his children and the community
conditions for civil commitment
- the person has a “mental illness” and is in need to treatment
- the person is dangerous to him/herself or others
- the person is unable to care for himself, a situation called “grave disability”
police power
government takes responsibility for protecting the public health, safety, welfare and can create laws and regulations to ensure this protection
parens patriae power
state applies this when citizens are not likely to act in their pwn best interest (mental health commitment, grave disability, do not recognize need for treatment)
general process of civil commitment
- petition by a relative or mental health professional submitted to judge
- court may request examination to assess psychological status, ability for self care, need for treatment, and potential hard
- judge takes information and decides if commitment necessary
rights of person in civil commitment
-similar to any case
-can request just hear evidence and make determination
-must be present during trial
-must have representation
-can examine witnesses and request an independent evaluation
court-ordered assisted outpatient treatment
a person with severe mental illness agrees to receive treatment as a condition for continuing to live in the community
mental illness
legal concept, severe emotional or thought disturbances that negatively affect an individual’s health and safety
mental illness is not synonymous with
psychological order (receiving a diagnosis according to DSM does not necessarily mean that a person’s condition fits the legal definition of mental illness)
dangerousness
tendency to violence that, contrary to popular opinion, is not more likely among mental patients
black males and violence/commitments
-black males are perceived as dangerous even when they don’t exhibit any violent behavior
-may explain why black individuals are over represented among those who are involuntarily committed to state psych institutions
Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R)
risk assessment tool used to identify person with psychopathy, best for identifying those at low risk of being violent but only marginally successful at accurately detecting who will be violent at later point
O’Connor v Donaldson, 1975 Supreme Court
-Kenneth Donaldson’s parents committed him to Florida State Hospital for paranoid schizophrenia (not considered dangerous)
-Dr O’Connor refused to release him for almost 15 years in which he received no treatment
-Donaldson sued and won $48,500
-Supreme Court found that a State cannot constitutionally confine a non-dangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in the freedom of himself or with help of willing and responsible family and friends
Addington v Texas (1979)
supreme court ruled that more than just a promise of improving quality of life is required to commit someone involuntarily
-if non-dangerous people with mental illness can survive in the community with help of others they should not be detained against will
-limited government’s ability to commit individuals unless they were dangerous
criminalization
-restrictions on commitments tightened
-many who would normally have been committed to mental health facility were being handled in criminal justice system
-they were not receiving mental health services
deinstitutionalization
systematic removal of people with severe mental illness or intellectual disability from institutions like psych hospitals
in 1980s, there was an increase in
number of people who were homeless