Figurative language & thought Flashcards

1
Q

main types of figurative lang>

A
  • synecdoche
  • metonymy
  • simile
    -metaphor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

synecdoche=

A

mentioning the part to mean the whole; or mentioning the whole to mean the part (“we need some new FACES around here [p>w]; “england made history [w>p]”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

metonymy=

A

referring to one thing in terms of another, where some association exists between the 2 (“i am reading shakespeare”>author for works)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

simile=

A

explicit statement of comparison between two unlike things
>makes you look for similarity between items (even if not similar before)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

metaphor=

A

talking (& potentially thinking) about one thing in terms of another, where the two ‘things’ are different but we can perceive a similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conceptual metaphor theory=

A

looking at conventional patterns of metaphorical expressions in everyday lang & implication for role of metaphor in thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

source domain=

A

what you draw from (JOURNEY); generally more concrete & sensorimotor experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

target domain=

A

what you’re talking about (LIFE); generally more abstract and/or complex experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Difference between lingustic & conceptual metaphors>

A

conceptual (LIFE IS A JOURNEY); linguistic (“im at a crossroads in my life”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

down side of framing power of metaphors>

A

metaphors can have strong effect (i.e. LIAJ>doesnt account for content moments in life; AIW>leads to competiveness, unlikely to find compromise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

L& J 4 ways of using conventional metaphors creatively

A

1> extending ccm
2>elaborating ccm
3> questioning ccm
4> combining/composing ccm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

extending conventional creative metpahors>

A

mapping a normally unused element of SOURCE domain onto the TARGET domain (LIAJ>”two roads diverged in the wood, and i took the one less travelled by”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elaborating conventional conceptual metaphors>

A

realising in an unsual way, a normally used element of the source domain (SAD IS DOWN>”i languished at the bottom of a deep hole”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

questioning conventional conceptual metaphors=

A

calling into qn the validity of conventional metaphors
>(i.e. problems with “after a long battle with cancer” & need for constant resilience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

combining/composing conventional conceptual metaphors=

A

realising more than one conceptual metaphor simultaneously within the same stretch of text in relation to the same target domain (e.g. AIW & LIAJ together)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

figurative lang & thought summary points>

A
  • in everyday lang, we use a large no of conventional metaphorical expression, which form PATTERNS
  • these patterns have been seen as evidence for existence of ‘conceptual metaphors’
  • creativity in use of metaphor can be described in both LING & CONCEPTUAL terms