FIELDWORK : Dawlish Warren Flashcards
What primary data was used ?
- beach profiling
- sediment shape
- questionnaire
- warden interview
What secondary data was used ?
- geology map
- OS map
What quantitative data was used ?
- beach profile
- sediment shape
What qualitative data was used ?
- questionnaire
- warden interview
How and why was the beach profiling used ?
- used a clinometer and ranging pole
- measured the gradient of the beach each time the profile changes
- expected to see steeper profile on the west side of each groyne (LSD)
What were the weaknesses to the beach profiling ?
- some people didn’t know how to use the clinometer = inaccurate readings
How and why was sediment shape used ?
- pebble is selected on each side of groyne
- shape is judged using scale of roundness to see if groynes have an effect on LSD
What were the weaknesses to the sediment shape ?
- subjective, one person may disagree about the roundness of a pebble
How and why was the questionnaire used ?
- asked people about coastal management, which one is more successful
What were the weaknesses to the questionnaire ?
- answers are subjective
- difficult to get good results as not many people were around
How and why was the warden interview used ?
- interviewed him about coastal defences
- asked his opinion about which was better
What were the weaknesses with the warden interview ?
- probably biased
- subjective
How and why was the geology map used ?
- shows rock type
- helps us understand erosion rate
- helps choose range of sites
What were the weaknesses with the geology map ?
- no human activity can be seen
How and why was the OS map used ?
- hows human and physical features
- helps choose range of sites e.g. some with and without coastal defences
What were the weaknesses with the OS map ?
- might be outdated and not show recent changes
How did we choose our sites ?
- used geology map
- used OS map
- made sure sites were close enough so we could collect data on the same day
- did a risk assessment to make sure we would be safe and able to collect data
What 4 ways did we present our data ?
- beach profile = line graph
- sediment shape = stacked column graph
- questionnaire = wordle
- interview = table of :) & :(
Conclude your results
- data = groynes have prevented LSD to some extent
- map of DW = several groynes on spit to prevent erosion
- beach profiles = build up of sand on the west side of each groyne
- sediment shape supports statement as pebble shape is distributed
- data = communties have been affected positively and negatively
- photos = beach was closed, groynes were being fixed, beach replenishment
- makes are look unattractive and put tourists off affecting businesses
- questionnaire backs this up as people said DW didnt need coastal management meaning they didnt like it
- 4 people + groynes - it makes the beach bigger = more attractive
- 3 people + the sea wall - protected the railway line
How accurate were your results for beach profiling
- somewhat accurate
- some human errors
- weren’t able to visit many places
- beach closed for maintenance
- accurate enough to show LSD
How accurate was your overall conclusion ?
- somewhat accurate
- asked people + warden
- didnt know if they were local or tourists
- warden may be biased
How reliable were your results ?
- warden +
- secondary data +
- photos +
- could reach different conclusion…
- different weather
- management strategies