Federal Jurisdiction Flashcards
Personal jurisdiction
Assessed in fed court the same way as in NY (see NY Practice)
Due process considerations: CONTACTS (“minimum contacts with the forum such that the exercise of jurisdiction would be fair and reasonable” –> purposeful availment; foreseeable could be haled into court there, RELATEDNESS (more likely to have jur if claim is related to contacts; unless systematic + continuous activity such that D is “essentially at home” there –> general jur, at least some physical presence is required), AND FAIRNESS (“traditional notice of fair play and substantial justice”
Jur also authorized over 3PDs and parties required to be joined under compulsory joinder rules if the party is served within 100 miles from the place where the summons was issued
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
- Diversity/alienage;
2. Federal Q
Diversity Jur
Suits between (1) citizens of different states; or (2) citizen of a state and citizen of a foreign country; PLUS amount in controversy >$75,000
Class Action –> citizenship = named representative
Aliens may appear on either side as add’l parties as long as there are citizens on both sides of the controversy.
Must be met at the time case is filed.
Citizenship: People
PEOPLE: place of domicile (phys presence + intent to remain permanently). People can only have one domicile; DC is a state for these purposes.
A person who is a U.S. citizen but does not reside in any U.S. state cannot obtain diversity jur.
A RESIDENT ALIEN is not an alien for the purposes of this test, so a New York resident alien cannot be sued under diversity by a New York citizen.
Citizenship: Business Associations
Can be citizens of more than one state.
Corps: place of incorporation AND principle place of business (“nerve center” where corporate control is located).
Other ass’ns,like partnerships: use citizenship of ALL members. Where the business was formed; principal place of business is irrelevant for these purposes.
Citizenship: decedents, minors, incompetents
Citizenship is THEIR citizenship not that of their representative
Amount in Controversy
Must EXCEED $75,000 excluding the interest and litigation costs. A claim made in good faith will meet this requirement unless “CLEAR TO A LEGAL CERTAINTY” that P cannot recover more than $75,000.
P can aggregate claims against ONE D to meet the $75,000 requirement but cannot aggregate claims against separate defendants, unless they are being sued as joint tortfeasors.
Failure to Obtain a Judgment of $75,000
Does not defeat jurisdiction but P may have to pay D’s litigation costs
Amount in Controversy Where P Seeks Equitable Relief
Satisfied if P can show either: (1) encroachment by D decreases value of P’s property by more than $75,000; or (2) D’s removing or preventing the encroachment would cost more than $75,000
Absolute Bars on Diversity Jurisdiction (Types of Claims)
Probate of will
Divorce action
Alimony
Child custody decrees
Federal Question Jurisdiction
Claim based on a right or interest founded substantially on federal law. Citizenship + amount in controversy are irrelevant for this purpose.
Note: federal DEFENSES of otherwise state law claim do NOT suffice for Fed Q jur
Exclusive Federal Jur
Patents
Bankruptcy
Some federal securities and anti-trust cases
Well-pleaded complaint rule
Just stating P’s claim without any extraneous material, would it be federal?
Supplemental Jurisdiction
If at least one claim asserted satisfies federal Q or diversity jur, additional claims not meeting these reqs may come in under supplemental jurisdiction if the case is already in federal court, where:
1) The claim shares a “common nucleus of operative fact” with the case that invoked federal SMJ (arises from same transaction/occurrence);
2) IF the original claim is based on diversity, the supplemental claim is not asserted by P against a citizen of the same state as P. If P’s additional claim would defeat diversity, no supplemental jur.
Discretion to dismiss supplemental claims
Court has discretion NOT to hear the supplemental claim, (1) if the federal Q is dismissed early in the proceedings; or (2) if the state law claim is complex; or (3) state law issues would predominate. The first of these is the most common.
Removal to Federal Court:
A DEFENDANT ONLY can remove a state-court case that could have originated in federal court to federal court (subject to certain diversity limitations). Removal must occur within 30 days after service of the first paper making the case removable. D must prove SMJ in federal court (federal DEFENSE insufficient). If removal was improper, can remand. All defendants then in the action must move to remove; P has no right of removal.
Permissive counterclaims filed in state court probably waive right of removal. Compulsory counterclaims in state court probably do not.
Diversity Limitations of Removal Power
There is NO removal allowed where there is no federal Q basis for jur and: (1) any D is a citizen of the forum state where the action was brought; or (2) more than 1 year has passed since the case was filed, unless judge finds that P acted in bad faith to prevent removal (as where P intentionally joins a P to defeat federal diversity removal and dismisses after 1 year).
Place of Removal
A case that is are removed goes to the federal district court embracing the state court where the action was filed.
Erie Doctrine: Conflicts of Law
A federal judge sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law but applies federal PROCEDURAL law when:
(1) there is a federal rule or statute directly on point, as long as valid (they are all valid); or
(2) where there is no directly on point fed rule, federal judge can ignore the state procedural rule unless: (a) outcome determinative; (b) balance of interest favors state courts; or (c) forum shopping risk.
State law rules always apply for: elements of claim or defense; SOL; tolling rules for SOL; and conflict/choice of law rules.
Venue
P may file in any district where ALL Ds RESIDE or a SUBSTANTIAL PART OF CLAIM AROSE. (Residence = domicile; for corps, any district where the corp could be subject to PJ - diff than for diversity). If Ds reside in different districts of the SAME STATE, P can lay venue in the district in which ANY of them resides. An alien or non-resident citizen an be sued anywhere.