Federal Income Tax Flashcards
Role of Tax in Society
All of these reflect societal value judgments
Raise money
* Individual income taxes account for most of the revenue!
Indirect government spending → tax system collects revenue but also spends money
* Foregone revenue attributable to tax benefits → called “tax expenditures”
* Ex → you pay taxes and gov sends you $2000 vs. you just pay $2000 less in taxes → These are the same economics but first direct spending, second indirect, gov could have collected but did not
Redistributing wealth!
* Also indirect as well → Child tax credit for example
Influencing behavior and Advance social policy goals
* Tax benefit, exclusion, deduction, credit → Ex: Tax on cigarettes
all these affect the overall economy as well
Our overall formula
TI = AGI – larger of (Standard Deductions or Itemized Deductions) – Sec. 199A Deduction
* AGI = Gross income – Sec. 62 deductions
* TI = Taxable income
What is our tax liability?
* Tax liability = Tax Rate x Taxable income
INCOME? → When you have an INFLOW of value
analysis for gross income and Rule for income
Income
* All accessions to wealth, clearly realized, over which the taxpayer has complete dominion.
Accession to wealth?
* you get richer
Complete dominion?
* you have the ability to control the use or disposition of the item
Analysis for Gross Income?
* Is it income?
* Is it excluded?
Form does NOT matter.
Imputed income?
If income received as property
* Income = FMV of the property
If income received as service
* Income = FMV of the service
If you provide services to yourself?
* Imputed income → NOT TAXABLE
* Imputed income = the flow of satisfactions from goods owned by the taxpayer or from goods/services arising from the taxpayer’s own efforts
But see.
* Taxpayer owns stock in a corporation which owns the building and lives in it.
* Corporations are treated as taxpayers that are separate and distinct from their owners.
* Thus income! NOT imputed income.
Employee works at employer and receives:
* 80k salary? = income
* giving the employee 2% of the company stock, which is worth $100,000? = Income –> Compensation for services –> Compensation paid other than in cash = FMV
* buying the employee’s spouse a new car worth $30,000? = income
If someone pays your obligations
Windfall? Treasure?
INCOME!
Employer pays taxes on behalf of an employee? INCOME
* When somebody else pays your debt, your obligation, some money that you owe, it is as if the money was paid to you → AKA income to you
If you get a windfall or find a treasure?
* (punitive damages, win a raffle/lottery)
* income
Winner of a raffle gets $200 watch
* Income. Form does not matter.
Oscar bag? 180k of items including ski trip BUT what if you never take ski trip?
* NOT income → no complete dominion = Not exercised control and dominion over it
Barter exchange? FMV?
Bargain purchase?
Where people swap services, in an arm’s length transaction
* We can infer what the value is because third parties are not going to swap things that are not of equal value
Fair Market Value (FMV) = the price at which an item would change hands, between a willing buyer and a willing seller
* Neither being under any compulsion to engage in the transaction and both had reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts
* What rational people would do if it were in the market
Willing buyer and seller made a deal in an arm’s length transaction but turns out to be more valuable than both the willing seller and the willing buyer thought.
* Not income because you already bought it
* The bargain element of a bargain purchase isn’t going to be treated as income → There will be basis and gain when you realize it
Buying a piano from someone for 4k but turns out to be worth 500k
* Bargain purchase! 4k basis.
Swap services without any money changing hands?
* Income to both. Barter exchange.
Some things that are not income
what about illegal? what about imputed?
If you buy a book for $20?
* NOT income
* There is no accession to wealth since you are exchanging $20 for another form of the $20
If you borrow money?
* No accession to wealth → you are not richer → you are obligated to pay it back
If you earn income illegally?
* Income, also gross income
Does lawyer realize any income when she fills out her own tax return?
* Imputed income
Income from cancellation of indebtedness
Case and examples
When you are relieved of a liability, it is treated for tax purposes as if you had received the cash needed to pay the liability
* Gross income includes income from discharge/cancellation of indebtedness
Case = Kirby Lumber
* Corp borrows 12M bonds. Paid off bonds for 100k less than owed
* Corp net worth increased by 100k = money they borrowed but not paid back = effectively canceled
* this is COI and thus GI because richer by money that no need to pay back
If you pay your debt/obligation at a discount, the “discount” is your GI
* You borrow 10k. You pay back 6k. Lender excuses 4k. You have 4k in GI
* If disposition of property + debt excused you do 2 separate analyses. (cancellation of debt GI, and disposition of property gains GI)
When you satisfy a debt with your services, you have compensation income → its like if they gave you 6k cash and you gave it right back to satisfy debt
there is an exclusion 108
T borrows 10k from Rich. What consequences to T if T pays off with:
* Settlement of $7000 cash? 3k COI income = GI
A painting with a basis and fair market value of $8000?
* 2k COI income = GI
* Also we have a disposition from the painting!
* AR = 8k | AB = 8k | gain = 0
Remodeling Services that are worth $8000?
* 2k COI income | 8k compensation income
T’s employer makes the 7k payment to Rich
* 3k COI income | 7k compensation income (old colony)
Part paid off with non-compete and rest forgiven (forbearance)
* Provide services to pay off part of debt
* So when you use your services to pay off your debt, it’s as if you provide the services = You get paid the cash, gross income for services, ordinary income = And then you take the cash and you pay off the debt = OI
* forgive rest = GI BUT NOT 108 BUT COULD BE GIFT (so exclusions could apply)
Certain damages & related receipts
Basically = taxation of damages
Ask, “In lieu of what were damages awarded? Why is the taxpayer receiving this recovery?”
* In lieu of compensation → treat like compensation received ==> Income, and thus GI unless exclusion
* Return of basis → treat like return of basis
basically says, hey, why are the damages being paid?
* in lieu of why the damages are being paid, then we’ll tax the damages like that thing.
Examples = P brought suit and successfully recovered (remember exclusions could apply)
Plaintiff suit was based on a recovery of an $8000 loan to D. Plaintiff recovered $8500 cash, $8000 for the loan plus $500 interest.
* 8k back will be tax-free = when he made loan, it cost 8k (8k basis in loan) and return of it = not richer => getting capital returned, in this loan context = tax free
* 500 that he is getting in damages in lieu of interest = GI
* It is in lieu of interest! And what happens if someone pays you interest on a loan you’ve made to them? That is gross income
What result if instead the debtor transferred some land worth 8500 with a basis of $2000 to plaintiff to satisfy? What is the plaintiff basis?
* 8k tax-free return of capital | 500 taxable income
* basis? 8500 - tax cost basis, everything taxed, 8k tax free, 500 he paid tax in lieu of interest
* The taxation of damage payments received doesn’t change depending on whether you get cash or whether you get property for Plaintiff
* D? diposition! AR = 8.5k | Basis = 2k | Gain = 6.5 r/r
Plaintiff suit = breach of a business contract and plaintiff recovered $8000 for lost profits and also recovered $16,000 of punitive damages
* 8k damages lost profits
* He got damages in lieu of lost profits because he lost profits – if there hadn’t been a breach, then the taxpayer would have actually not lost profits – he would have earned profits = profits are gross income!
* 16k punitive? INCOME
Gains from Dealings in Property?
Analysis steps?
included in GI? Gain or loss realized?
- Sale or disposition?
- Amount realized?
- Adjusted basis?
- Gain/Loss realized?
- Gain/Loss recognized?
- If it is a loss, is it allowed?
- Characterization?
Gains from dealings in property is included in gross income
Gain/Loss realized?
* G = AR – AB
* L = AB – AR
* This is what we would call our gain or loss realized
Sale/disposition?
what if using asset as security?
Sale?
* Exchange of property for cash and/or relief of liabilities
Disposition?
* If a taxpayer uses property as currency (e.g., to pay compensation, to satisfy an obligation, to purchase other property):
Taxpayer borrows money from unrelated, using asset (still owned by taxpayer) as security for the loan
* Not a disposition because you still own the asset
* Borrowing against property is not a disposition = does not trigger analysis
Worker provides services to taxpayer, and taxpayer transfers asset (20k AB, 50k FMV) to worker as compensation for those services
* Taxpayer? AR = 50; AB = 20; Gain = 30 r/r
* Worker? GI = 50k; AB? Tax-cost basis = 50k
Amount realized? = WHAT YOU GET
Barter-exchange valuation?
AR = money received + FMV of any non-money property received
AR = FMV ==> Arms-length transaction (unrelated parties, no collusion), rational taxpayers will give and receive the same value.
* So if A provides service to B, and B gives asset (AB 10, FMV 50) as payment to A.
* Assume that Value of services B received were equal to what he gave up (FMV 50)
When property is transferred out subject to debt?
Included in AR
* In other words: AR includes debts to which the transferred property is subject
* As if money was received
* Regardless of whether it is recourse or non-recourse debt
EX:
* Year 1: T bought land for 50k (40k mort1 + 10k cash)
* Year 2: T borrows 30k (= mort2) | 5k of it = vacation, rest improve land
Year 3: T transfers land to unrelated in exchange for 105k and unrelated assumed both loans
* sale/dispo? Yes
* AR? 105k cash + 40k mort 1 + 30k mort 2 = 175k
* AB? 75k (50k in year 1; 25k capital expenditure year 2)
* Gain? 100k r/r
Adjusted basis? = COST | AB = basis, as adjusted
Cost basis?
interest?
When you buy property with cash
* The basis of property shall be the cost of such property
* Basis includes borrowed money used to purchase property.
Regardless of whether it is recourse or non-recourse debt
if borrow money, is the interest going to be calculated in AB? NO! Two separate transactions
* You borrow money, you use the money to buy the car or the land
* The other transaction is borrowing the money → This is where you pay interest to the bank
Tax-cost basis?
Motivating hypo
* when the land had a value of $10,000, a real estate salesperson received it from the employer as a bonus for putting together a major real estate development
First → 10k GI = FMV of service
Second → gains from dealings in property
* Sale/dispo? Yes from rest of hypo
* AR? 16k same^
* AB? 10k → This is called our TAX-COST BASIS
The idea being that your basis is your after tax investment in the property.
* The amount, which if you got that amount back, you shouldn’t have to pay taxes on because you already pay taxes on it.
* You paid taxes on the 10k with gross income already!
Basis of Property Acquired by Gift
Twilight zone
Carry-over basis
* Rule: Donee takes over the donor’s basis!
SUBJECT TO SPECIAL LOSS RULE →
* IF the basis exceeds the fair market value at the time of the gift (the property is in a loss position at the time of the gift)
* AND we are later determining loss
* THEN we’ll use the fair market value at the time of the gift as our basis.
SO
* IF the donor’s basis is > FMV at the time of gift AND you have a loss → use the FMV at time of gift
Analysis
* B>FMV @ time of gift? === WAS THIS LOSS PROPERTY AT TIME OF GIFT? NO? GREAT WE DO NOT CARE DONE
* Loss?
BUT TWILIGHT ZONE
* Not gain or loss will be realized if B>FMV and loss with B but gain with FMV
EX
* FMV @ time of gift = 20k | Donor’s AB = 30k
* AR? = 24k
AB?
* B>FMV @ time of gift? YES
* Loss? Yes if we use Donor’s AB = 30
* So → FMV @ gift = AB = 20k
* But now it is a gain!!! Uh oh infinite loop
* Twilight zone kicks in
Death/Inheritance?
Transfers between spouses?
Step-up basis
* FMV of the property at the date of decedent’s death
* Your basis is stepped up to the current fair market value at the time of the death. (could be stepped down if loss in value)
ANTI-ABUSE RULE:
* If you make a gift and then receive that property back from a decedent within a year, you don’t get a step-up basis.
Carry-over basis
* No special loss rule
Adjustments to basis?
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES = any type of investment/material improvement in property
* Capital expenditure and must be capitalized (added to basis)
* No deductions
* In other words: if you pay for things that are like new or permanent improvements or betterment, you cannot take a deduction for that → Instead, it must be capitalized!
DEPRECATION
* Lowers AB
owner purchased the land by paying $1,000 for an option to purchase the land for an additional $9,000 → then exercised:
* Here, two steps → the option, then the exercise of the option
* At the end of the day, both steps had costs and went to the cost of buying the ultimate property.
* If never exercised? AB = 1000
The point here is that your basis in property includes the cost, the everything, you paid to get the property
* Here, two steps → the option, then the exercise of the option
* At the end of the day, both steps had costs and went to the cost of buying the ultimate property.
Gain/Loss recognized?
difference b/w non-recognition and exclusion?
Recognize = Taken into account for determining gross income
* All gains/losses are recognized unless the statute provides otherwise
Non-recognition provision is not the same as an exclusion!
* Exclusion = you are never going to pay tax on that
* Non-recognition = hold on there, we see you have some gain/loss, we are not going to make you pay tax on it now → Deferral
Transfer between spouses → not recognized
* Or ex-spouses if incidental to the divorce
* Receiver of property excludes from GI, but then later when they dispose of it they use spouses AB
Exclusions
In General
Five things
Items that are “income” but that Congress explicitly decided to exclude from GI
* (i.e., Congress decided not to tax (even though the taxpayer is richer by the value of the item)) – legislative grace
* Form matters – Only available if the item meets all the requirements
Exclusions are worth cents on the dollar depending on your marginal rate
* If you are in the 37% bracket and have $100 that is excluded, how much is that worth? $37.
* Higher income people have more value in exclusions than lower people
incentivize taxpayers to undertake the tax-favored activities/actions
Narrow the tax base, reducing revenue
132: Certain Fringe Benefits
No additional cost service
Any service provided by an employer to an employee IF:
* That is offered for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the business of the employer; AND
* Employer incurs no substantial additional cost (including foregone revenue)
What if benefit provided through a reduced price or partial/total cash rebate?
* Exclusion applies
Who is treated as an employee here:
* “Any use by the spouse or dependent child of the employee shall be treated as use by the employee.”
NON-DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENT
* If it discriminates in favor of highly compensated employees, and is not offered on substantially the same terms to all employees → not excluded
* 100% off for CEO; 60% off for everyone else? NO
* If you provide a discriminatory fringe, the highly compensated people don’t get any exclusion and Rank and file will still get their exclusion (60% off for everyone else stays)
RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS → (here only)
* Any service provided by an employer to an employee of another employer shall be treated as provided by the employer of such employee IF
* Written agreement b/w such employers; AND
* Neither of the employers incurs any substantial additional cost, including foregone revenue, in providing such service pursuant to such agreement
* The services provided to such employee is the same type of service generally provided to non-employee customers by both the lines of business in which the employee works, and the line of business in which the service is provided. Hotel room for hotel room
Remember: THIS IS A RULE FOR SERVICES
ordinary course of the business?
* EX: Hotel provides hotel rooms
* EX: Hotel chain conglomerate → but employee works in shipping company part of conglomerate → NO
* EX: conglomerate → comptroller: example of a situation where an employee performs services in more than one of the employer’s lines of business and where services provided to the hotel chain and to the shipping line are substantial services
Substantial additional cost?
* It’s not substantial additional cost if it is merely incidental to the primary service being provided
* EX: maid service is incidental to hotel room
Foregone revenue?
* Desk clerk bounces a paying guest so employee can stay rent free
Qualified employee discount
Any employee discount with respect to the qualified property or service to the extent that the employee discount does not exceed:
* IF PROPERTY: you can exclude up until the gross profit percentage; or
* IF SERVICES: you can exclude a discount up to 20% off from normal price to customers
Qualified property or service?
* Any property or service offered for sale to customers in the ordinary line of business of the employee (except real property and personal property held for investment purposes)
* EX: Furniture store, employee works there, discount w.r.t furniture
Non-discrimination requirement applies
Gross profit percentage:
* (Aggregate sales price – aggregate cost price)/ aggregate sales price
Example: prior year, store had 1M in sales and 600k cost in goods sold. ((1M-600k)/1M)) = 40%.
* Employee bought a 2k couch for 1k. Cannot
* 40% of 2k is 800, so could get an exclusion up to 800.
* Paid 1k = 800 excluded, 200 is gross income.
Working condition fringe
Any property or service provided to an employee of the employer to the extent that had the employee paid for it would have been deducted under §162 or §167
* (if the employer pays you to do business related things)
- Deductions §162: business expenses
- Deductions §167: depreciation deductions
De minimis fringe
Any property or service, the value of which is so small that accounting for it is unreasonable or administratively impracticable.
* (considering the frequency in which its offered)
EX:
* Occasional cocktail parties, group meals, picnics for employees and guests, traditional birthday or holiday gifts (low FMV), flowers, fruits, books, staplers, printer paper, free coffee in the lounge, similar property….