Federal Income Tax Flashcards

1
Q

Role of Tax in Society

All of these reflect societal value judgments

A

Raise money
* Individual income taxes account for most of the revenue!

Indirect government spending → tax system collects revenue but also spends money
* Foregone revenue attributable to tax benefits → called “tax expenditures”
* Ex → you pay taxes and gov sends you $2000 vs. you just pay $2000 less in taxes → These are the same economics but first direct spending, second indirect, gov could have collected but did not

Redistributing wealth!
* Also indirect as well → Child tax credit for example

Influencing behavior and Advance social policy goals
* Tax benefit, exclusion, deduction, credit → Ex: Tax on cigarettes

all these affect the overall economy as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Our overall formula

A

TI = AGI – larger of (Standard Deductions or Itemized Deductions) – Sec. 199A Deduction
* AGI = Gross income – Sec. 62 deductions
* TI = Taxable income

What is our tax liability?
* Tax liability = Tax Rate x Taxable income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INCOME? → When you have an INFLOW of value

analysis for gross income and Rule for income

A

Income
* All accessions to wealth, clearly realized, over which the taxpayer has complete dominion.

Accession to wealth?
* you get richer

Complete dominion?
* you have the ability to control the use or disposition of the item

Analysis for Gross Income?
* Is it income?
* Is it excluded?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Form does NOT matter.

Imputed income?

A

If income received as property
* Income = FMV of the property

If income received as service
* Income = FMV of the service

If you provide services to yourself?
* Imputed income → NOT TAXABLE
* Imputed income = the flow of satisfactions from goods owned by the taxpayer or from goods/services arising from the taxpayer’s own efforts

But see.
* Taxpayer owns stock in a corporation which owns the building and lives in it.
* Corporations are treated as taxpayers that are separate and distinct from their owners.
* Thus income! NOT imputed income.

Employee works at employer and receives:
* 80k salary? = income
* giving the employee 2% of the company stock, which is worth $100,000? = Income –> Compensation for services –> Compensation paid other than in cash = FMV
* buying the employee’s spouse a new car worth $30,000? = income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If someone pays your obligations

Windfall? Treasure?

A

INCOME!

Employer pays taxes on behalf of an employee? INCOME
* When somebody else pays your debt, your obligation, some money that you owe, it is as if the money was paid to you → AKA income to you

If you get a windfall or find a treasure?
* (punitive damages, win a raffle/lottery)
* income

Winner of a raffle gets $200 watch
* Income. Form does not matter.

Oscar bag? 180k of items including ski trip BUT what if you never take ski trip?
* NOT income → no complete dominion = Not exercised control and dominion over it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Barter exchange? FMV?

Bargain purchase?

A

Where people swap services, in an arm’s length transaction
* We can infer what the value is because third parties are not going to swap things that are not of equal value

Fair Market Value (FMV) = the price at which an item would change hands, between a willing buyer and a willing seller
* Neither being under any compulsion to engage in the transaction and both had reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts
* What rational people would do if it were in the market

Willing buyer and seller made a deal in an arm’s length transaction but turns out to be more valuable than both the willing seller and the willing buyer thought.
* Not income because you already bought it
* The bargain element of a bargain purchase isn’t going to be treated as income → There will be basis and gain when you realize it

Buying a piano from someone for 4k but turns out to be worth 500k
* Bargain purchase! 4k basis.

Swap services without any money changing hands?
* Income to both. Barter exchange.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Some things that are not income

what about illegal? what about imputed?

A

If you buy a book for $20?
* NOT income
* There is no accession to wealth since you are exchanging $20 for another form of the $20

If you borrow money?
* No accession to wealth → you are not richer → you are obligated to pay it back

If you earn income illegally?
* Income, also gross income

Does lawyer realize any income when she fills out her own tax return?
* Imputed income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Income from cancellation of indebtedness

Case and examples

A

When you are relieved of a liability, it is treated for tax purposes as if you had received the cash needed to pay the liability
* Gross income includes income from discharge/cancellation of indebtedness

Case = Kirby Lumber
* Corp borrows 12M bonds. Paid off bonds for 100k less than owed
* Corp net worth increased by 100k = money they borrowed but not paid back = effectively canceled
* this is COI and thus GI because richer by money that no need to pay back

If you pay your debt/obligation at a discount, the “discount” is your GI
* You borrow 10k. You pay back 6k. Lender excuses 4k. You have 4k in GI
* If disposition of property + debt excused you do 2 separate analyses. (cancellation of debt GI, and disposition of property gains GI)

When you satisfy a debt with your services, you have compensation income → its like if they gave you 6k cash and you gave it right back to satisfy debt

there is an exclusion 108

T borrows 10k from Rich. What consequences to T if T pays off with:
* Settlement of $7000 cash? 3k COI income = GI

A painting with a basis and fair market value of $8000?
* 2k COI income = GI
* Also we have a disposition from the painting!
* AR = 8k | AB = 8k | gain = 0

Remodeling Services that are worth $8000?
* 2k COI income | 8k compensation income

T’s employer makes the 7k payment to Rich
* 3k COI income | 7k compensation income (old colony)

Part paid off with non-compete and rest forgiven (forbearance)
* Provide services to pay off part of debt
* So when you use your services to pay off your debt, it’s as if you provide the services = You get paid the cash, gross income for services, ordinary income = And then you take the cash and you pay off the debt = OI
* forgive rest = GI BUT NOT 108 BUT COULD BE GIFT (so exclusions could apply)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Certain damages & related receipts

Basically = taxation of damages

A

Ask, “In lieu of what were damages awarded? Why is the taxpayer receiving this recovery?”
* In lieu of compensation → treat like compensation received ==> Income, and thus GI unless exclusion
* Return of basis → treat like return of basis

basically says, hey, why are the damages being paid?
* in lieu of why the damages are being paid, then we’ll tax the damages like that thing.

Examples = P brought suit and successfully recovered (remember exclusions could apply)

Plaintiff suit was based on a recovery of an $8000 loan to D. Plaintiff recovered $8500 cash, $8000 for the loan plus $500 interest.
* 8k back will be tax-free = when he made loan, it cost 8k (8k basis in loan) and return of it = not richer => getting capital returned, in this loan context = tax free
* 500 that he is getting in damages in lieu of interest = GI
* It is in lieu of interest! And what happens if someone pays you interest on a loan you’ve made to them? That is gross income

What result if instead the debtor transferred some land worth 8500 with a basis of $2000 to plaintiff to satisfy? What is the plaintiff basis?
* 8k tax-free return of capital | 500 taxable income
* basis? 8500 - tax cost basis, everything taxed, 8k tax free, 500 he paid tax in lieu of interest
* The taxation of damage payments received doesn’t change depending on whether you get cash or whether you get property for Plaintiff
* D? diposition! AR = 8.5k | Basis = 2k | Gain = 6.5 r/r

Plaintiff suit = breach of a business contract and plaintiff recovered $8000 for lost profits and also recovered $16,000 of punitive damages
* 8k damages lost profits
* He got damages in lieu of lost profits because he lost profits – if there hadn’t been a breach, then the taxpayer would have actually not lost profits – he would have earned profits = profits are gross income!
* 16k punitive? INCOME

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gains from Dealings in Property?

Analysis steps?

included in GI? Gain or loss realized?

A
  • Sale or disposition?
  • Amount realized?
  • Adjusted basis?
  • Gain/Loss realized?
  • Gain/Loss recognized?
  • If it is a loss, is it allowed?
  • Characterization?

Gains from dealings in property is included in gross income

Gain/Loss realized?
* G = AR – AB
* L = AB – AR
* This is what we would call our gain or loss realized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sale/disposition?

what if using asset as security?

A

Sale?
* Exchange of property for cash and/or relief of liabilities

Disposition?
* If a taxpayer uses property as currency (e.g., to pay compensation, to satisfy an obligation, to purchase other property):

Taxpayer borrows money from unrelated, using asset (still owned by taxpayer) as security for the loan
* Not a disposition because you still own the asset
* Borrowing against property is not a disposition = does not trigger analysis

Worker provides services to taxpayer, and taxpayer transfers asset (20k AB, 50k FMV) to worker as compensation for those services
* Taxpayer? AR = 50; AB = 20; Gain = 30 r/r
* Worker? GI = 50k; AB? Tax-cost basis = 50k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Amount realized? = WHAT YOU GET

Barter-exchange valuation?

A

AR = money received + FMV of any non-money property received

AR = FMV ==> Arms-length transaction (unrelated parties, no collusion), rational taxpayers will give and receive the same value.
* So if A provides service to B, and B gives asset (AB 10, FMV 50) as payment to A.
* Assume that Value of services B received were equal to what he gave up (FMV 50)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When property is transferred out subject to debt?

A

Included in AR
* In other words: AR includes debts to which the transferred property is subject
* As if money was received
* Regardless of whether it is recourse or non-recourse debt

EX:
* Year 1: T bought land for 50k (40k mort1 + 10k cash)
* Year 2: T borrows 30k (= mort2) | 5k of it = vacation, rest improve land

Year 3: T transfers land to unrelated in exchange for 105k and unrelated assumed both loans
* sale/dispo? Yes
* AR? 105k cash + 40k mort 1 + 30k mort 2 = 175k
* AB? 75k (50k in year 1; 25k capital expenditure year 2)
* Gain? 100k r/r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Adjusted basis? = COST | AB = basis, as adjusted

Cost basis?

interest?

A

When you buy property with cash
* The basis of property shall be the cost of such property
* Basis includes borrowed money used to purchase property.

Regardless of whether it is recourse or non-recourse debt

if borrow money, is the interest going to be calculated in AB? NO! Two separate transactions
* You borrow money, you use the money to buy the car or the land
* The other transaction is borrowing the money → This is where you pay interest to the bank

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tax-cost basis?

Motivating hypo
* when the land had a value of $10,000, a real estate salesperson received it from the employer as a bonus for putting together a major real estate development

A

First → 10k GI = FMV of service

Second → gains from dealings in property
* Sale/dispo? Yes from rest of hypo
* AR? 16k same^
* AB? 10k → This is called our TAX-COST BASIS

The idea being that your basis is your after tax investment in the property.
* The amount, which if you got that amount back, you shouldn’t have to pay taxes on because you already pay taxes on it.
* You paid taxes on the 10k with gross income already!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Basis of Property Acquired by Gift

Twilight zone

A

Carry-over basis
* Rule: Donee takes over the donor’s basis!

SUBJECT TO SPECIAL LOSS RULE →
* IF the basis exceeds the fair market value at the time of the gift (the property is in a loss position at the time of the gift)
* AND we are later determining loss
* THEN we’ll use the fair market value at the time of the gift as our basis.

SO
* IF the donor’s basis is > FMV at the time of gift AND you have a loss → use the FMV at time of gift

Analysis
* B>FMV @ time of gift? === WAS THIS LOSS PROPERTY AT TIME OF GIFT? NO? GREAT WE DO NOT CARE DONE
* Loss?

BUT TWILIGHT ZONE
* Not gain or loss will be realized if B>FMV and loss with B but gain with FMV

EX
* FMV @ time of gift = 20k | Donor’s AB = 30k
* AR? = 24k

AB?
* B>FMV @ time of gift? YES
* Loss? Yes if we use Donor’s AB = 30
* So → FMV @ gift = AB = 20k
* But now it is a gain!!! Uh oh infinite loop
* Twilight zone kicks in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Death/Inheritance?

Transfers between spouses?

A

Step-up basis
* FMV of the property at the date of decedent’s death
* Your basis is stepped up to the current fair market value at the time of the death. (could be stepped down if loss in value)

ANTI-ABUSE RULE:
* If you make a gift and then receive that property back from a decedent within a year, you don’t get a step-up basis.

Carry-over basis
* No special loss rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Adjustments to basis?

A

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES = any type of investment/material improvement in property
* Capital expenditure and must be capitalized (added to basis)
* No deductions
* In other words: if you pay for things that are like new or permanent improvements or betterment, you cannot take a deduction for that → Instead, it must be capitalized!

DEPRECATION
* Lowers AB

owner purchased the land by paying $1,000 for an option to purchase the land for an additional $9,000 → then exercised:
* Here, two steps → the option, then the exercise of the option
* At the end of the day, both steps had costs and went to the cost of buying the ultimate property.
* If never exercised? AB = 1000

The point here is that your basis in property includes the cost, the everything, you paid to get the property
* Here, two steps → the option, then the exercise of the option
* At the end of the day, both steps had costs and went to the cost of buying the ultimate property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Gain/Loss recognized?

difference b/w non-recognition and exclusion?

A

Recognize = Taken into account for determining gross income
* All gains/losses are recognized unless the statute provides otherwise

Non-recognition provision is not the same as an exclusion!
* Exclusion = you are never going to pay tax on that
* Non-recognition = hold on there, we see you have some gain/loss, we are not going to make you pay tax on it now → Deferral

Transfer between spouses → not recognized
* Or ex-spouses if incidental to the divorce
* Receiver of property excludes from GI, but then later when they dispose of it they use spouses AB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Exclusions

In General

Five things

A

Items that are “income” but that Congress explicitly decided to exclude from GI
* (i.e., Congress decided not to tax (even though the taxpayer is richer by the value of the item)) – legislative grace
* Form matters – Only available if the item meets all the requirements

Exclusions are worth cents on the dollar depending on your marginal rate
* If you are in the 37% bracket and have $100 that is excluded, how much is that worth? $37.
* Higher income people have more value in exclusions than lower people

incentivize taxpayers to undertake the tax-favored activities/actions

Narrow the tax base, reducing revenue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

132: Certain Fringe Benefits

No additional cost service

A

Any service provided by an employer to an employee IF:
* That is offered for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the business of the employer; AND
* Employer incurs no substantial additional cost (including foregone revenue)

What if benefit provided through a reduced price or partial/total cash rebate?
* Exclusion applies

Who is treated as an employee here:
* “Any use by the spouse or dependent child of the employee shall be treated as use by the employee.”

NON-DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENT
* If it discriminates in favor of highly compensated employees, and is not offered on substantially the same terms to all employees → not excluded
* 100% off for CEO; 60% off for everyone else? NO
* If you provide a discriminatory fringe, the highly compensated people don’t get any exclusion and Rank and file will still get their exclusion (60% off for everyone else stays)

RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS → (here only)
* Any service provided by an employer to an employee of another employer shall be treated as provided by the employer of such employee IF
* Written agreement b/w such employers; AND
* Neither of the employers incurs any substantial additional cost, including foregone revenue, in providing such service pursuant to such agreement
* The services provided to such employee is the same type of service generally provided to non-employee customers by both the lines of business in which the employee works, and the line of business in which the service is provided. Hotel room for hotel room

Remember: THIS IS A RULE FOR SERVICES

ordinary course of the business?
* EX: Hotel provides hotel rooms
* EX: Hotel chain conglomerate → but employee works in shipping company part of conglomerate → NO
* EX: conglomerate → comptroller: example of a situation where an employee performs services in more than one of the employer’s lines of business and where services provided to the hotel chain and to the shipping line are substantial services

Substantial additional cost?
* It’s not substantial additional cost if it is merely incidental to the primary service being provided
* EX: maid service is incidental to hotel room

Foregone revenue?
* Desk clerk bounces a paying guest so employee can stay rent free

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Qualified employee discount

A

Any employee discount with respect to the qualified property or service to the extent that the employee discount does not exceed:
* IF PROPERTY: you can exclude up until the gross profit percentage; or
* IF SERVICES: you can exclude a discount up to 20% off from normal price to customers

Qualified property or service?
* Any property or service offered for sale to customers in the ordinary line of business of the employee (except real property and personal property held for investment purposes)
* EX: Furniture store, employee works there, discount w.r.t furniture

Non-discrimination requirement applies

Gross profit percentage:
* (Aggregate sales price – aggregate cost price)/ aggregate sales price

Example: prior year, store had 1M in sales and 600k cost in goods sold. ((1M-600k)/1M)) = 40%.
* Employee bought a 2k couch for 1k. Cannot
* 40% of 2k is 800, so could get an exclusion up to 800.
* Paid 1k = 800 excluded, 200 is gross income.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Working condition fringe

A

Any property or service provided to an employee of the employer to the extent that had the employee paid for it would have been deducted under §162 or §167
* (if the employer pays you to do business related things)

  • Deductions §162: business expenses
  • Deductions §167: depreciation deductions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

De minimis fringe

A

Any property or service, the value of which is so small that accounting for it is unreasonable or administratively impracticable.
* (considering the frequency in which its offered)

EX:
* Occasional cocktail parties, group meals, picnics for employees and guests, traditional birthday or holiday gifts (low FMV), flowers, fruits, books, staplers, printer paper, free coffee in the lounge, similar property….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Gifts
A gift proceeds from a **detached and disinterested generosity out of affection, respect, admiration, charity, or like impulses.** Family members? * Presumption of gift Tips? * NOT gifts → not detached and disinterested generosity **Employer gifts?** * NOT gifts | if you have multiple intents then we need know what your primary. ## Footnote Case * Duberstein, the taxpayer, was given a Cadillac by Mr. Burman. They knew each other personally and had done business together. Duberstein had given Burman some successful business leads, and that was valuable to Burman. * The most critical consideration is the transferor’s primary intention and motive. * Donor’s characterization of his action is not determinative. * Totality of the facts determination Duberstein loses – you did not get the cadillac out of detached disinterested generosity . . . He transferred the Cadillac to you because you gave him business leads. A recompense at the very least, or inducement for more leads
26
Bequest, devise, or inheritance?
weird words? * A bequest is the transfer of personal property by will * devise is the transfer of real property by will * inheritance is the receipt of something via the intestacy laws (someone dies without will) **NOT EXCLUDED:** * if its income from property received as a gift, bequest, dives, inheritance ## Footnote Case: Lyeth v. Hoey → settlement = inheritance * Inheritances gained through the contesting a will in court also excluded
27
Compensation for injuries or sickness
Amount of damages received on account of personal physical injury or sickness (not punitive damages) * On account of → due to (broad) * So if you lose wages because of your physical injury, being awarded those wages is excluded Emotional distress not excluded * but emotional distress ON ACCOUNT OF physical injury is excluded If you get medical treatment for your emotional distress, then that is excluded * (regardless if on account of physical injury or not) Punitive damages is not excluded * BUT if civil action in wrongful death, then the punitive damages apply as long as state law says only punitive damages can be awarded in a wrongful death action
28
Smaller exclusions
108: Income from discharge of indebtedness * Will be excluded IF: * Discharge occurs in bankruptcy * Discharge occurs when taxpayer is insolvent 101: Life insurance * Proceeds of life insurance payable by reason of death: Excluded 103: Interests in any State or Local Bonds * Receiving any interest on a state or local or municipal bond = excluded * Except: Private activity bonds that are not “qualified bonds”, arbitrage bonds, bonds not in registered form
29
# Deductions Generally → outlays of funds that you can use to reduce your taxable income
Analysis * Allowed? * Above the line/Below the line? * Limits? Deductions are worth cents on the dollar depending on your marginal rate * A $100 deduction does not put a $100 in your pocket * If you had to pay tax at $100, the tax would be $100 x (your marginal rate.) Remember, deductions are worth more to people in higher tax brackets. * $1,000 deduction if someone in the 37% tax bracket = Is worth $370 to them * $1,000 deduction to someone in the 12% tax bracket = is only worth 120 bucks. * same idea for exclusions ## Footnote Big picture * Business expenditures → generally many deductions allowed * Expenditures for income producing activities that do not rise to the level of being business → in between, restricted by TCJA * Personal expenditures → generally disallowed, subject to limited exceptions
30
162: Trade or business expenses | Elements
Elements * Ordinary * Necessary * Expense * Paid or incurred during the taxable year = when question * Carrying on any trade or business
31
Ordinary ## Footnote Necessary
Ordinary Rule: Common and accepted in the business circumstances; business norm standard * Does NOT need to be habitual, common, or frequent for the *taxpayer* * It just has to be the kind of thing that people do under common and acceptable business principles in this industry. Not tantamount to purchasing a long-lived asset * Is this kind of like a regular outlay or is this kind of like an investment in the enterprise? * If the taxpayer essentially makes a “capital expenditure,” the payment is NOT ordinary – overlaps with expense prong ## Footnote Rule * Appropriate and helpful for the Taxpayer’s trade or business, generally deferring to the taxpayer’s business judgment
32
# Expense in general
Rule * NOT a capital expenditure; Not tantamount to purchasing a long-lived asset Expenditure = outlay of money → Tells us nothing about tax treatment * We need to determine whether the expenditure is an expense (may be able to be deducted in the current year), or is it a capital expenditure (which must be capitalized, added to basis) * So we must be able to distinguish!
33
Capital expenditure ## Footnote At a high level, a capital expenditure is a kind of acquisition of an asset
Any amount paid for new buildings or permanent improvements or betterments to increase the value of any property Betterment * is something that ameliorates a material condition or defect existing at the time of the acquisition or that arose during a production, or * making a material addition to the property, or * expenditure that's reasonably expected to materially increase the productivity, efficiency, strength, quality or output of the property. Restoration * A restoration is something where you pay to restore property to its ordinary, efficient operating condition after deterioration to such a state of disrepair, such that it was no longer functional for its intended use. * Restoration is also like the replacement of a major component, the failure of which now means that nothing's working Adaptation of property to a new or different use ## Footnote Safe Harbor * Routine maintenance is not a capital expenditure * recurring activities that you've undertaken to keep the property in ordinary, efficient operating condition. * Ex – changing oil in your delivery trucks
34
Case and Example
Easy * Buy land → capital expenditure * Build a building on the land → capital expenditure * Buy a share of stock → capital expenditure * Pay lawyers to facilitate purchase of land → capital expenditure Hard * Repairs (deductible expense) vs. Replacement/improvement (capital expenditures that must be capitalized) Midland Empire Packing * Fixed oil seepage in basement. the court concluded that's an expense. It just kept the building in regular operating condition. * So repairs were done so that they continue to operate the plant as usual. didn't operate on a larger scale or kind of in a really changed way. Mt. Morris Drive in * Install drainage system * A whole ass system! Court concluded it was capital expenditure – significantly added to the value of the property. ## Footnote Examples * An amount paid to acquire or produce a unit of real or personal tangible property = When you buy a building, widget machine, car, buying a unit of property! * An amount paid to **improve** a unit of real or personal tangible property (betterment, restoration, adaptation) * An amount paid to acquire or create intangibles = bought a patent * An amount paid or incurred to facilitate an acquisition of a trade or business, a change in capital structure of a business entity, and certain other transactions == the facilitation costs = Lawyer fees that you paid to help you buy the building Examples = Landlord incurs the following expenses during the current year on a 10 unit apartment complex $500 for painting three rooms of one of the apartments * Repainting 3 rooms = Repair aka expense = Common thing to do to kind of keep the space in kind of regular condition * Whole apartment = Capital Expenditure = Betterment – a material improvement to the property materially increases the value of the property. $4000 for replacing the roof over one of the apartments. The roof had suffered termite damage. * Replace a couple shingles v. replace the whole roof == Shingles = expense; Whole roof = capital expenditure * The dollar amount is relevant to figuring out whether it's material, but you know, it's not determinative $3000 for adding a carport to an apartment * Making a material addition to the property (betterment) – added a permanent structure $100 for advertising for tenant to occupy an empty apartment * Expense! Does this seem like the kind of paying of regular ongoing costs, or is this like a big investment, kind of big investment? * as opposed to → kind of prepaying for five years worth of use of a billboard = This is more of a long-lived asset Delivery business and I run a bunch of trucks – replace the spark plugs in one of them v. overhauling the whole engine in one of them * Spark plugs = ordinary maintenance = expense * Overhaul engine = capital expenditure
35
Intangible property
if you're paying money to acquire, create or enhance an intangible asset = that's a capital expenditure * amounts paid to facilitate the acquisition of an intangible asset = capital expenditure Examples My business is going to do a big acquisition of another biz * So for one set of my costs is I pay the regular salaries to the people who work in the HR department = It's an ongoing cost. Regular course of business. That's an expense. * Compare that to the legal fees that I paid to outside counsel to help me do this acquisition of this other business. That's a capital expenditure because that's facilitating the acquisition of another business We pay this month's rent vs. I'm going to prepay three years worth of rent. * This month's rent, even this year's rent is an expense. That's the cost of doing my regular business. That's the current cost. * long lived = lives kind of materially beyond the end of the year * But if I prepay three years worth of rent, that is a capital expenditure. ## Footnote Pay $500 to take 4 hour baking class to improve skills * Expense = A little tricky because the learned skills could last a long time but it is a cost that is for this year and learning that happened this year * It is not like it is a class that will be taken for the next 10 years
36
# In carrying on a trade/business Two components
If it's an ongoing business, it's an existing business. * Getting ready to start a new business? No, you're not in the business yet. And it has to be a business expense as opposed to a personal expense * there may also be limits | Ongoing business examples ## Footnote Tycoon, a doctor, decided to invest a part of her fortune in the development of industrial properties and she incurred expenses in making a preliminary investigation * She's a doctor and she wants to go into the industrial properties world → These are different! Deductible under 162? NO Same, but, Tycoon, rather than having been a doctor, was a successful developer of residential and shopping center properties → now doing development activity * So now it is retail v. industrial → argue it * **The idea is that the expenditures have to be connected to the type of business that you're already in.** * If so, 162 could apply. If not, then no, try 195
37
Sec. 195. Start-up expenditures | you do not get deduction until year you finally open it ## Footnote investigate (195) ------- preopening (195) ---------open (162) Trigger? * paying for stuff before opening
MUST ELECT INTO 195 → **if you never start the business you never get a deduction under section 195** Rule: Any amount paid or incurred in connection with: * investigating the creation or acquisition of an active trade or business (investigatory); * or creating an active trade or business (pre-opening); or * any activity engaged in profit before the date it actually begins If these paid or incurred would have been allowable as a deduction had the trade or business been made already, then this applies * AKA what 195 does is that if you otherwise meet all the requirements of 162 (ordinary, necessary…) but failed on the “active” trade or business part * but if you fail like expense, this won't work. MATH → How much is the deduction? * The amount of the start-up expenditure * or * 5k (but if the start-up expenditure is over 50k, reduce 5k by the amount its over 50k (not below 0) * Whichever of (a) or (b) is smaller, choose that. * If you choose (b), take whatever is left of the start-up and divide it by 15 to get your yearly (over 180-month period) * AKA you take the amount in (a) or (b) in your first year, and whatever is left-over you take over a 15-year period | Example ## Footnote Assume biz started Jan. 1 this year, with start-up expenditures 20k * So two numbers (1) amount of expenditure or (2) 5k – (extent over 50k) → Here, do not extend over 50k, so just 5k for (2) ⇒ Pick lesser of → we pick (2) [of 1 or 2] → THEN → it says the remainder of such startup expenditures → 15k (20k – 5k). Divided by 15 ⇒ 1k * So in the first year, we get 5k deduction under part A → Plus 1k deduction under part B for a total of $6,000 of a startup expenditure deduction under section 195 in the first year * Then 1k each year for subsequent 14 years What if 150k? * 150k for (1) and for (2) 5k - (extent over 50k = 100k) so just 0 = 5k * So we pick lesser of → so (2) aka 0 → so nothing in first part * Then we just do 150k/15 = 10k a year that's all What if 54k? * (1) 54k | (2) 5k - (4k) = 1k → we pick lesser of → (2) * Then we do 54k/15 = 3,533 per year | year 1 = 4,533 then do yearly 3,533 This is called a phase out; that is, as you have more startup expenditures, the benefit goes down → you’re rich! Your benefit goes down
38
Personal expenditures v. business related expenditures ## Footnote TRAVEL COSTS, LIMITS, ENTERTAINMENT
TRAVEL COSTS * Allowed as a deduction (including meals and lodging other than amounts which are lavish under the circumstances) while away from home in carrying on a trade or business * This must include sleep/rest → So if I drive to LA for work and come back home that does not count * (must be O,N,E,Pity,Cotb) * Substantiation requirement for travel expenditures: you must keep all your receipts. You must document everything (cab receipt, food receipt) LIMITS * Business meals are NOT entertainment: 50% deductions for the meal * Traveling: Food expenses while traveling only 50% ENTERTAINMENT * No deductions for facilities used for entertainment facilities or an activity generally constituting entertainment, amusement, or recreation * This is an objective test ⇒ The question is: is this the type of activity generally considered to be entertainment? Because if it is, it's not deductible. * in applying the test the taxpayer's trade or business is considered = Sports writer watching the game for example * Substantiation requirement | Example ## Footnote Businessperson incurs the following section 162 business deductions. To what extent does section 274 limit their deductibility? Business person takes client to lunch at a restaurant and then to a ball game and, to client’s dismay, discusses business most of the time * Ballgame tickets → Under 274, the cost of the ballgame tickets is a form of entertainment * Lunch? → Deductible under 274 → 50% → business meal is treated not as entertainment so it is not precluded
39
165: Certain Loss Deductions → governs use of losses ## Footnote To use a loss (i.e., to take a deduction for the amount of the loss, thereby reducing TI and thus tax liability), the loss must be allowed
Allowed to the extent not compensated by insurance or otherwise. The losses shall be limited to: * Losses incurred in a trade or business * Losses from income producing activity (buying/selling stock) * Losses from fire, storm, shipwreck, other casualty, or theft = Must be a federally declared disaster, And you itemize, And exceeds 10% of AGI Other losses generally not allowed ## Footnote T has a car used exclusively in taxpayer's business ⇒ purchased for $40,000 ⇒ depreciation deductions AB = $22,000 ⇒ When the car was worth $30,000, it was totally destroyed in an accident ⇒ T received $15k of insurance proceeds * deductible loss under section 165? * Loss? 22k AB | 15k from insurance | = 7k tax loss * Allowed? Yes → loss incurred in a trade or business * ATL or BTL? ATL
40
# Depreciation In general
Sometimes you cannot do a 162 business expense deduction because it is a capital expenditure or you are not in business yet * THUS depreciation Why depreciation deductions? Stimulates the economy * Accelerated deduction: larger deduction earlier, reduces TI by more earlier, reduces TL by more earlier, makes money in pocket earlier, makes investments cheaper/easier, incentivizes businesses to make more investments/grow their businesses, stimulates the economy Depreciation is an adjustment for basis → basis drops and capital expenditure increases basis * Lower basis means if you sell it later you’ll pay tax on more gain * But it is almost always the case that you'd rather take a deduction now and lower basis rather than have basis and get a better tax benefit later * Time value of money! A deduction now is more money in your pocket now
41
# Depreciation analysis Step 1: is it depreciable?
Tangible property * Business goodwill is not depreciable because it is intangible * Certain intangibles allowed if amortizable Wasting with an ascertainable useful life * Land + artwork NOT depreciable * Building IS depreciable, land is not Used in a trade or business or income producing activity * Personal-use assets are not depreciable (personal car) ## Footnote Yes to all 3? Depreciable
42
168(k) accelerated depreciation? Does it apply? ## Footnote §168k applies by default unless taxpayer elects out of it
Otherwise, depreciable * Real property NOT eligible for § 168k (buildings) Recovery period is 20 years or less * Certain property with recovery period over 20 years may be recoverable * Real property NOT eligible for § 168k because greater than 20 years New property * Used property eligible in limited circumstances Places in service in current taxable year ## Footnote FULL EXPENSING 100% depreciable for property placed in service 2018-2022 TY * After 2022, 80% (2023) 60% (2024), 40% (2025), 20% (2026) * If ANY adjusted basis left over, go to § 179 analysis (step 3) AB declines by 168k deduction * If any AB remains, go to next step
43
Regular (“MACRS”) Depreciation (§§ 167, § 169) ## Footnote If you have any basis left to depreciate, apply MACRS (regular depreciation rules)
Deductions spread out based on recovery period * If property has X year life, the recovery period is X = (3 year property = 3 year recovery period) * Residential Rental Property = 27.5 years * Non-residential real property = 39 years How do you divide up the deductions over the recovery period? Straight-line method * Must be opted into * Divide total adjusted basis by recovery period = annual depreciation Double Declining Balance method (accelerated schedule) * Default * Same total deductions as straight-line BUT the earlier year deductions are larger and the later year deductions are smaller * Double declining balance puts more money in my pocket earlier and I like more money in my pocket.
44
REAL Property
Go straight to last step because not depreciable under any of the other provisions → Straight-line depreciation ## Footnote Depreciator purchases a piece of new improved real property at a cost of $130,000 of which $100,000 is attributable to the building and $30,000 to the land * Just the building is depreciable! (100k) because of an ascertainable useful life! * Land is not a wasting asset * The building is an apartment building? 100k/27.5 * Office building? 100k/39 year = 2,564 year
45
197: Depreciation deductions for intangible property
Amortization = depreciation deduction for certain intangible property * What is amortizable? Things with a wasting ascertainable useful life Including * Goodwill = basically the value of your business in excess of the value of the hard assets * Going concern value * License * Covenants not to compete * Trademark BUT NOT * Stock in a corporation * Interest in partnership Must be: * Acquired: not self-created * Held in connection with the conduct of a trade or business or income-producing activity Amount of deduction? * Per month, starting with month acquired = AB/180 months ## Footnote Heather’s Gluten Free cupcake store! Becomes very well known (Goodwill). Heather’s business might be worth a lot because she has a reputation for making really delicious gluten free baked goods * That is goodwill BUT NOT AMORTIZABLE! SHE CREATED IT!!! * But then let us imagine her sister buys the business! The goodwill that she purchased is amortizable because she has purchased it.
46
163: Interest Deductions ## Footnote All interest paid or accrued within taxable year on indebtedness
163(a) → interest generally deductible Limitations on Personal Interest = Personal interest defined ⇒ any interest except: * Interest paid/accrued for debt in a trade or business * Any investment interests (from property held for investment) * Interest from passive activity (income/loss) under sec. 469 * Qualified residence interest (home mortgage interest) * Student loan interest ## Footnote If it’s on the list, then it’s deductible since it is not a personal interest. * Whatever is not on the list is not deductible because it IS a personal interest
47
164: Tax Deductions
The following taxes allowed as a deduction shall be allowed for the year in which paid or accrued * State and local, and foreign, real property taxes * State and local personal property taxes * States and local, and foreign income, war profits, and excess profits taxes = 164(a)(3) allows for state income tax to be deductible * State and local, and foreign taxes paid or accrued within the taxable year in carrying on a trade or business == in carrying on a trade/business (canon of construction) ⇒ 10k SALT Cap does not apply to business property taxes SALT CAP (state and local tax cap) * Aggregate amounts of 1, 2, 3, shall NOT exceed 10k (single; married filing jointly) * 5k if married filing separately * Not applicable to foreign taxes in 3. ATL or BTL? * ATL → if business tax (as a sole proprietor) = Not capped by the 10k SALT Cap * BTL → personal tax | NO DEDUCTIONS FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAXES ## Footnote If Taxpayer elects, can apply state and local sales tax INSTEAD of state and local income tax * Cannot have both state income and state sales tax. You have to choose * Some states do not have state income taxes, so they can get this
48
Other deduction
Home Mortgage Interest * Acquisition indebtedness * Incurred in acquiring, constructing, or substantially improving any qualified residence of the taxpayer, and * Secured by such residence * Up to 750k Qualified residence: * Principal residence, and one other residence ## Footnote Charitable Donation * Bottom line here is that you can get a deduction for a charitable donation.
49
WHERE is the deduction: ATL? BTL? ## Footnote RECALL: Gross income [GI] – sec. 62 deductions = Adjusted Gross income (AGI) * Section 62 does not allow deductions → it simply says put the deductions there or there or there or there → Up down up down up down * If you have an allowed deduction by another section, §62 tells you where it goes
How does it work? * SO you have an ATL deduction if it is listed in section 62 = Which means it affects AGI * All other deductions (aside from the standard deduction) are referred to as BTL (i.e., itemized deductions) * So anything not listed in 62 goes BELOW THE LINE (BTL) 62 above the line → **listed** and thus ATL **Trade or business deductions:** deductions above the line in carrying on a trade or business * if your performance is **not based on your role as an employee** Certain employee deductions: * If an employee and reimbursed = ATL * Expenses paid or incurred in the taxable year in connection with the performance of him of services as an employee → **If reimbursed by employers** (or some other arrangement the employer allowing the expense) * Performance/artist → expenses paid or incurred by a qualified performing artist in connection with the performance by him of services in the performing arts as an employee * Expenses paid or incurred with respect to services performed by an official as an employee of a State or a political subdivision thereof Losses from sale or exchange of property * As allowed in part VI of the code (trade or business expenses) * E.g. loss from buying stock. Income producing activity and loss is allowed under §162, and therefore above the line under §62(a)(3) since loss from sale/exchange in property as allowed in §162 Depreciation deductions are ATL IF not in taxpayers capacity as an employee * (needs to be sole proprietor or employer) * Basically anything in §162, depreciation deductions, amortization depreciations Interest on Student Loan deductions ## Footnote Example of second certain employee deductions * The benefit you get that was reimbursed → working condition fringe (so if you go to a training at no cost, it is a working condition fringe since the deduction is otherwise allowable) * If you pay $200 and your employer reimburses you $200, then it’s just a wash no GI * Employer would get a § 162 deduction (above the line)
50
ITEMIZED? ## Footnote SO, if it is not ATL, standard deduction, nor 199A QBI so it must be itemized
What happens if you do not itemize? What if you just take the standard deduction? * Does he get a deduction? No. **Itemized deductions are only available to people who itemize**. Section 67 imposes a limitation on miscellaneous itemized deductions * BUT (g) say **no miscellaneous itemized deductions allowed AT ALL** through the end of 2025 * So if you have an itemized deduction, you always must ask, is my itemized deduction a miscellaneous itemized deduction? How do I know if something is a miscellaneous itemized deduction? * Here it says miscellaneous itemized deductions are itemized deductions other than these. * If it's any of the following, you can take an itemized deduction * (if not on the list → MID and NO DEDUCTION at all) ## Footnote Dan is an employee. Employer did not reimburse Dan for the $200 registration fee for the conference. * Allowed per 162 → BTL: incurred in capacity as employee and not defined in 67 → MID and no deduction at all Same as above except reimbursed $200 by the employer. * LISTED IN 62 → ATL * So 200 GI plus 200 deduction = 0 * Those cancel out. Which makes sense → If you've ever gotten a reimbursement from an employer, you've never thought, oh, I have to pay tax on that, right?
51
Why do we care about ATL (before AGI) or BTL (after AGI)
First → ATL deductions **get taken into account when determining AGI** * BTL do not **AGI floors** * Like if you have a big section 62 deduction – imagine 20k → if it is ATL, it will take AGI down → it might make your AGI 80k rather than 100k → which means the AGI floor is lower → which means you can take more of your deduction Some **benefits that phase out based on AGI** (there will be exam question on phase out language) * Lower AGI → more you will be under the point where the benefit goes away affects your **eligibility for several non-tax benefits**. * Medicaid, Fed student aid, etc * AGI too high, you do not get it **ATL available to everyone** regardless of whether you itemize * BTL you have itemized and you have a choice of whether itemized or standard There are **extra limits imposed on itemized deductions** that aren't imposed on above the line deductions. * Section 67: Does not apply to ATL because it applies to itemized deductions ## Footnote T has 1000 deduction → what would T prefer? * Make the deduction ATL! == going to get it regardless of whether I itemize, because it is going to reduce my AGI and get all those benefits * NOT BTL == itemized deductions that MID suspended and standard deduction might be higher * Treat the deduction as capital expenditure? NO === Cap ex must be capitalized and added to basis == meaning I don't get any tax benefit for that expenditure this year. I got more basis, but more basis doesn’t lower my tax bill === More basis will put more money in my pocket whenever in the future I sell that thing because i’ll have higher basis, meaning lower gain to pay tax on === Whereas a deduction is today and it reduces my taxable income So if you see a problem where employer pays for employees work conference travel → a lot of tax issues there * For the employee, the question is, do they have gross income because they got something of value == Remember, gross income is the question when you get something * For the employer, the question is → is there a deduction? === Deduction is the question when you pay that money out
52
199A: Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction (NOT ITEMIZED) ## Footnote The idea: * we're just trying to give a rate cut to taxpayers who operate businesses, not as employees, not as corps. We just want to give them a rate cut on their business income, and we are doing it through this crazy mechanism
Section 199A deduction = 20% times QBI * Tax rate cut for people who operate businesses as sole proprietors/partnerships (not corporations) * Employees cannot take the QBI deduction for earnings as an employee. * Providing services as an employee is not a QTB * Domestic businesses only Qualified Business Income? * Net income (gain, deduction, and loss) from a qualified trade or business (QTB) QTB does NOT include: * capital gains, dividends, interests, and certain other investment-type income * Being an employee NOT a QTB * Certain other compensation/exceptions
53
Limits on QBI
Limit: QBI deduction limited to 20% of Taxable Income * Applies to **ALL TAXPAYERS** * QBI deduction is limited to 20% of: Taxable income: * Reduced by net capital gain (including qualified dividends) and with TI determined without regard to any potential 199A deduction Two Limits for **High-Income Taxpayers ONLY** Limit #1: Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB) * if you're a high income taxpayer, then If you operate a specified service, trade or business, we're not going to treat that as a qualified trade or business = = their QBI deduction phases out and can end up at being zero * We want to help businesses that CREATE jobs, but if i am being a lawyer, investment advisor, I am not really creating other jobs, I am just doing my service Limit #2: W-2 Wages & Unadjusted Basis in Qualified Property * Same policy as above → So we have a limit that kind of takes into account the wages that you pay to employees. ## Footnote High-income taxpayer? High-income taxpayer limits are phased in for * TI above a certain threshold * So we have a phase in/out range == Whereas → if X goes up, the benefit goes down. High-income taxpayers are limited in full * TI above a certain threshold Do not have to memorize but I want you to know that high income taxpayers are subject to these limits, low income taxpayers not subject to these limits, and that there's a phase in * So, for example, if you encounter a taxpayer who makes $1 million, they're going to be a high income taxpayer. * it doesn't matter what the exact numbers are, right? If your taxpayer makes $100,000 → You know that they're not a high income taxpayer. T is an employee and earns 100k. T has a side business and is the sole proprietor. She earned a net of 30k (40k gross income, less 10k deductions) from side business. T only person who worked in the side-business and the only asset was her car * No 199A deduction for 100k cause she is an employee * 199A deduction on the 30k cause sole proprietor == 20% x 30k=6k * Limitation that applies to everyone = cannot be more than 20% of her taxable income * Other two limitations do not apply because not a high-income taxpayer
54
213: Medical, dental…expense deductions (personal deductions)
Deduction allowed for expenses paid or incurred in the taxable year for medical care of the taxpayer, spouse, or dependent **to the extent such expenses exceed 7.5% of AGI** * Below the line * NOT a MID. So when we talk about medical care * Co-pays, Insulin, Prescriptions * Things that are not compensated for by insurance. Gerard case = Something that is a capital expenditure (addition to home) but also a medical expense * The portion that exceeded the increase in value to the home = the medical expense ## Footnote In a taxable year, T has AGI = 100k and medical expenses of $10.5k. Assuming T itemizes, how much of T’s medical expense can T deduct? * You only get the deduction to the extent these costs exceed 7.5% of your AGI. * So if your AGI is $100,000 → 7.5% of that is ⇒ $7,500 * So if your medical expenses for the year are 10.5k → You get to deduct 3k This is a floor
55
Standard Deduction
Fixed flat amount * 2024 → 14,600: single, 29,200: MFJ Default unless taxpayers elect to itemize ## Footnote Policy? * Simplicity * Ensures taxpayer have some amount of income that is not taxed
56
Additional limits on deductions/losses ## Footnote Questions to ask and limitations so far * So when you see a loss, you say oh are there limits?
Questions to ask * Does the limit apply? = A limitation is only relevant if a deduction might otherwise be allowed * What is the limit? = (how much of the deduction/loss can be used?) * What happens to the remaining deductions/losses? = (forever barred? deferred for possible future use? With the limitations so far → they're permanently disallowed → It's not like they get to hang around and you can use them next year when something else is true * Section 67 → deductions for MiDs completely disallowed through 2025 * Section 274 → limit on deductions for entertainment & travel expenses * Section 164 SALT Cap is also a limit (if not in trade/business) * Section 163 Interest deductions → personal interest deductions not allowed
57
Section 280E → Expenditures in connection with illegal drug sales
Does the limit apply? * The deduction is **normally allowed** if in carrying on a trade or business, but the limit applies → meets elements 162 What is the limit? (how much of the deduction/loss can be used?) * **NO deduction or credit allowed** for any amount paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on a trade or business if it consists of trafficking controlled substances What happens to the remaining deductions/losses? (forever barred? Differed for possible future use? * They disappear forever This is for deductions (e.g salary…) * But if you have a sale or disposition event, you buy and sell marijuana, you have gross income (from the gain), there are no deductions in that scenario * You can distinguish between deductions of costs of doing business and the basis you have in the product ## Footnote Example = Sole Proprietor where T sells Weed in compliance with state law. T pays salary. What is true? * 162 allows the deduction for salary, but 280E says no and prohibits * NOTICE = We figured out a deduction could be allowed, and then a limit applied to take the deduction away. Example = Sole Proprietor where T sells Weed in compliance with state law. T purchased Weed for $100 and sold it for $125. * T has 25 GI, and 280E limitation is not relevant * Bases and deductions are different! * 162 doesn't provide a deduction for your basis, it doesn't provide a deduction for the cost of inventory that you buy → you have basis in your inventory so here when you sell for 125 → that's a gains from dealings in property question * Now if we had a catastrophic loss of the inventory and we tried to take a business loss under 165, that would be a deduction * property is property Also you can segregate/bifurcate businesses * Hospice that sold CBD on the side
58
Other limits we did not study
Limits arising from public policy * bribes, kickbacks etc * lobbying and political expenditures * fines, penalitie * sexual misconduct expenditures At risk limitation * Taxpayers should not be able to take deductions on expenditures made with other people’s money if the taxpayer may never be on hook for those amounts * non-recourse
59
Section 469: Passive Activity Limitation
Taxpayer can only use passive losses to the extent of their passive gains * Passive activity = activity in which the taxpayer does not “materially participate” Materially participation * “regular, continuous, AND substantial” involvement in the operations of the activity Safe Harbor: if you meet this bright line rule, not passive * Participate over 500 hours/year in an activity = materially participate = If you do not participate 500 hours, you can still materially participate if it is regular, continuous, and substantial * Participate over 100 hours/year + that participation is not less than the participation of anyone else * Participation is substantially all of the participation (no one else is doing more) * The activity requires significant participation and individual participation in all significant participation activities exceeds 500 hours * Materially participated in the 10 tax years immediately preceding * Personal service activity and materially participated in the 3 preceding years PRESUMPTION: Limited partners DO NOT materially participate in the activity * Limited partnerships = passive Certain income treated as NOT passive activity income * Portfolio income = Gross income from future interests, dividends, annuities, or royalties from things that are NOT in the ordinary course of a trade or business * Gain or loss derived from things that are NOT in the ordinary course of a trade or business from the disposition of property that produces income (portfolio income) or held for investment When you sell your interest, you exit the activity that frees your suspended loss. * Now you can use your suspended loss because we know the loss is real → So if you sell your interest at a gain then you can use your loss against that gain * If the loss is bigger than that gain, then we know you've had a real loss and then the rules that say you can use that loss against other income as well ## Footnote You can use passive losses to offset passive income. * If no passive income, you cannot use the losses (this year) * Can carry them forward and use them in the future if you have passive income * If you sell it, then you can use all the loss WHY this rule? To curtail deferral * You get the time value of money in year 1 if there was no this provision and you do not know when they would pay the tax (and it would be an interest free loan from the government)
60
# Who is Taxable Who is the proper taxpayer? ## Footnote Tax parlance and analytical approach
**Assignment of income (AOI)** * The reason they're called assignment of income questions is because the most common situation in which this issue comes up is when somebody is earning income of some sort and they're trying to have it get taxed to someone else. * Why would someone try to do that? Being in a lower tax bracket! **Analytical approach** Attempted assignment of income from services * Earned income – e.g., wages, tips, bonuses, etc. Attempted assignment of income from property * Income from investments – e.g, rent (income from owning a building); interest (income from owning debt/bond); dividend (income owning stock)
61
Attempted assignment of income from SERVICES
Income from services is taxed to the service provider. * The party that **earned** the income E.g. Ali works for Shayan. Ali asks Shayan to pay income Ali earns to Tristan. * Ali still pays tax on that income even though he did not receive it, he earned the income Result? Tax the income to the service provider (Ali), make a deemed transfer from the service provider (Ali) to ultimate recipient (Tristan) and **tax the recipient in accordance to the nature of the transfer (ask why was the money given)** * If Ali deemed transfer to Tristan as a gift, Tristan has income, but it is excluded as a gift. * If no exclusions apply, Tristan has Income which is GI and Tristan has to pay tax on that | Example ## Footnote Executive has a salaried position with a corporation under which she earns $80,000 each calendar year. Who is taxed if the executive, at the beginning of the year, directs $20,000 of her salary be paid to her aged parents? * Executive will be taxed on the 60k because they are the one who earned it but the 20k will also get taxed from the executive (80k overall) How does the money get to the parents? * based off of all the facts we have, it seems like it would be regarded as a gift from the executive So deemed transfer from parents (use these words) * So parents have income but it is excluded as gift and thus no gross income
62
Attempted assignment of income from PROPERTY
Key: identify which taxpayer owns the income-producing property * If you own the property & attempt to assign/transfer away the income from the property, the income is still taxed to you * E.g. Ali owns income-producing rental property and Ali assigns the rent to Shayan. Ali still pays tax on that income even though he did not receive it, he owns the property Result? Tax the income to the owner of the income-producing property (Ali), make a deemed transfer from the owner (Ali) to ultimate recipient (Shayan) and tax the recipient in accordance to the nature of the transfer (ask why was the money given) * If Ali deemed transfer to Shayan as a gift, Shayan has income, but it is excluded as a gift. * If no exclusions apply, Shayan has Income which is GI and Shayan has to pay tax on that If X transfers half of property to Z. both taxed on half * If X transfers the full property to Z halfway through the pay period. Both taxed on half for the next pay period **Sham gift** * Income from sale is generally taxed to the proper owner, but if Ali transfers to Shayan and Shayan sells soon after, likely taxed to Ali (and Shayan AoI fail) because too close * The form of a transaction cannot be permitted to prevail over its substance (Salvatore) * Whether something is a bonafide gift or not → facts and circumstances determination
63
# When is the Tax Imposed Two things we need to know ## Footnote Why does the timing of an inclusion or deduction matter?
What is the taxpayer’s taxable year? * Majority use: Calendar year = Jan 1 – 12/31 * Can use any 1-year period. Ends on the last day of the year = E.g.: 9/1-8/31 What is the taxpayer’s accounting method? * Cash method = income is included when received; deductions are taken when paid * Accrual method = Income is included when earned; deductions are taken, when they're incurred (When the liability arises) Why does the timing of an inclusion or deduction matter? * Time value of money = income side (people prefer to delay taxation of those dollars) | Deduction side (we want to take those deductions for those dollars, asap) * Substantive tax law may change from year to year * Tax rates may change * Taxpayer’s filing status may change * Affects when the statute of limitations will expire * Bunching together of deductions = Into a single year to exceed standard deduction for example
64
Cash method ## Footnote Income
Income is included when it is **received** * Received = **form** of payment (cash/property) does not matter * Check = generally treated as receipt of cash in the year you got the check even if not cashed until later **UNLESS** the check is subject to substantial restrictions Actual or Constructive receipt * Constructive receipt = When the amounts are credited to T’s account or otherwise made available and **can draw upon them at any time without substantial limitations or restrictions** * If it is available to you = constructively received income then **Prepayment:** entire prepaid amount is included in the taxable year received * Irrelevant when you were to provide the service **Late payment:** included in the taxable year received (amounts not included until year you actually or constructively received the payment) * Due date is irrelevant * If someone pays you late → no income until you actually get it ## Footnote Example of constructive receipt * E.g. A offers a check to B in Y1, but B says hold on to it and give it to me in Y2. A does so * Even though B did not actually receive actual payment until Y2, he had constrictive payment in Y1 since it was offered to him and he was allowed to draw on them whenever he wished
65
Cash Method ## Footnote Deductions
Deductions are taken when they are paid * Expenditures are to be deducted in the taxable year actually paid * ACTUAL payment. **No constructive payment**. Must actually pay in order to take the deduction * Form of payment (cash/property) does not matter Payment by check → deductible **upon delivery** * Once you send the check, you paid and can take the deduction (regardless of if it was actually received or cashed later) * unless check is subject to substantial restrictions **Late payment:** amounts NOT deductible until actually paid * Due date of payment is irrelevant **Prepayment:** * material prepayments are treated as capital expenditures → assets with a useful life extending (substantially) beyond the close of the taxable year = Deducted ratably over the period which the prepayment applies * AKA prepayment must be capitalized to get the deduction = You can take the deduction when the thing you prepaid for comes to life ## Footnote Why the cash method? Administratively easier * All you need is W-2 form and checkbook/CC statement * Maybe a mismatch but tolerable for individuals (less so for business taxpayers) E.g. A provides a service to B in year 1 and incurs deductible payments for that service in Y 1 but does not get paid till Y 2. So, you include in Y 1 but deduct in Y 2. * There is a mismatch * Income earned and the cost of earning that income should be reported together but here it is not.
66
Accrual Method ## Footnote Income
Income is included when it is earned * Earned = when you provided the service/did the thing that allowed you to get paid. * Earned = when is the right to receive income established 2-prong test: Income earned in the taxable year when: * 1. All events have occurred that fix the right to receive the item = Income in TY you deserve it cause you did what you were asked * 2. The amount of the item can be determined with reasonable accuracy. ALSO need to do this for it to be in the TY Prepayment: Include in the year RECEIVED * Not earned. * In order to clearly reflect income Late payments: irrelevant. * Include the income in the year you earn it, not the year you receive payment * time of receipt does not matter
67
Accrual Method ## Footnote Deductions
Deductions are taken when liability arises (when they are incurred) * When you incur the obligation to pay = When did you purchase the thing/service that you can take a deduction on * Only get a deduction for the amounts if you’ve gotten what you are supposed to be paying for * Incurred: when is the obligation to pay established? 3 prong test to incurred * 1. All events have occurred that established the fact of liability giving rise to the deduction = You did the thing that allows you to get the deduction = Be confident that the taxpayer really is obligated to pay * 2. the amount of liability must be established with reasonable accuracy = We have to know how much the obligation is to really deduct it * 3. Economic performance has occurred with respect to the liability Prepayment: if you prepay you can only take a deduction for the current year’s liability * Because generally, all events test not satisfied, and economic performance not satisfied = If future has not happened yet, you have not gotten your future entitlement yet * Can generally deduct only this year’s liability * Remainder of the amount’s deductible in later years when all events have occurred that establishes liability arises and economic performance has been satisfied. Late payments: irrelevant * Once liability has been incurred according to 3 prong test, the amount is deductible * Irrelevant when taxpayer pays ## Footnote Economic performance: if you have gotten what you bought * Only give a deduction once you’ve gotten what your actual money has entitled you to * Services are in fact provided to the taxpayer * If property, then economic performance form when the property is actually provided to the taxpayer
68
# How Much is the Tax? Classify all income gains/losses and losses/deductions as either:
Default: Ordinary income/Ordinary loss * Income from services (wages, tips, bonuses), income from sales of inventory, discharge of indebtedness, found money ⇒ OI * Business expense deductions, depreciation deductions, interest expense deductions, deductions for taxes, 199A deductions ⇒ Ordinary deductions (offsets OI) * Taxed under progressive rate structure Capital Gain/Capital Loss * LTCG/LTCL * STCG/STCL * Mostly dispositions of property, sometimes business casualty events or conversions of business property
69
Rate preference for LONG TERM CAPITAL GAIN
Not progressive rate structure * Individuals only Rate structure * Generally: 15% * High income taxpayers: 20% (+3.8% on net investment income) * Collectibles: 28% = collectible watches and wines and stamps and antiques * Low-income taxpayers: 0% = Collectibles taxed at marginal rate * STCG: no rate preference and will be taxed at ordinary income rates
70
Limits on usability of capital loss
CL can be used without limits to offset CG → But **net within Holding Period category first** Example * 40K LTCG | 10K LTCL = That nets out to $30,000 of net long term capital gain = Taxed at rate preference * 40K LTCG | 10K LTCL & 2K STCG | 20K STCL = First nets out 30K net LTCG = Second nets out 18k net STCL = Now → CL can be used without limits to offset CG = So I can use this entire $18,000 capital loss to offset this capital gain, which leaves me with $12,000 of net LTCG subject to the rate preference However many capital losses you have can offset however many gains you have. BUT if you have excess CLs (beyond CGs)? OI = ordinary income * Corp? Cannot offset OI at all. * Individuals? Can use excess CL to offset up to 3K OI. Remaining CL is carried forward * the remaining capital losses get carried forward and can be used in the future to offset capital gain when you have it * and $3,000 of ordinary income each year. | Example ## Footnote 10k LTCG | 30k STCL * I can use the short term capital loss to offset the $10,000 of long term capital gain, which leaves 20k of net STCL → So what can I do with that? * Well, I can use $3,000 of it to offset ordinary income and the rest is carried forward (17k) into the next year For the next year? * First you have to say, do I have any capital gain? And if you have any capital gain ⇒ you apply the capital losses to the capital gain. * If you still have excess capital losses then you can use 3k against ordinary income and carry the rest forward
71
Characterization general rule ## Footnote Rational taxpayers generally prefer?
**Sale/exchange** of a **capital asset** → CG/CL * LT/ST depends on **holding period** Special rule * Recapture * Section 1231 ## Footnote Characterization is the last step of Gains from dealings in property analysis Rational taxpayers generally prefer? * Gains to be capital and losses to be ordinary rational taxpayers prefer their gains to be capital → lower rates * Short term is taxed by ordinary income rates BUT it’s better than ordinary because it can be offset to an unlimited extent by capital loss → LTCG is the best though They want their losses to be ordinary → because capital losses are limited, you can only have capital losses to the extent of your capital gain + 3k * if you have $100,000 of capital losses and no capital gains, you can only use $3,000 of those losses this year.
72
1221: Capital asset defined ## Footnote Can we have a car/property go from being a capital asset to a non capital asset, or from a non capital asset to a capital asset?
Capital asset is any property held by the taxpayer but DOES NOT INCLUDE: * Stock (inventory) in trade of the taxpayer or other property of a kind which would properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer if on hand at the close of the taxable year, or property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business; * Property, used in his trade or business, of a character which is subject to the allowance for depreciation provided in section 167, or real property used in his trade or business; * Accounts or notes receivable acquired in the ordinary course of trade or business for services rendered or from the sale of property described in paragraph (1); * Supplies of a type regularly used or consumed by the taxpayer in the ordinary course of a trade or business of the taxpayer. A patent, invention, model, or design (whether or not patented), a secret formula or process, a copyright, a literary, musical, or artistic composition, a letter or memorandum, or similar property, held by— * A taxpayer whose personal efforts created such property, * In the case of a letter, memorandum, or similar property, a taxpayer for whom such property was prepared or produced, or * A taxpayer in whose hands the basis of such property is determined, for purposes of determining gain from a sale or exchange, in whole or part by reference to the basis of such property in the hands of a taxpayer described in subparagraph (A) or (B); ## Footnote YES = Factors * Amount of time = The longer time that has passed since you were in the business → The more likely it's going to be a capital asset rather than an inventory item * What else is he doing = Does he look like he's trying to continue to be a car dealer just for someone else so he doesn't have to worry about all the administrative nonsense of owning his own business = **What kind of other activities that the taxpayer is undertaking that kind of indicate whether the sale is in furtherance of the taxpayer's occupation?** = How do you appear to an outsider? So keep in mind * So what was the purpose of the acquisition? * What's been the continuity and frequency of sales? * how is the individual treating the asset → Are they treating it like a dealer or not? Are they advertising soliciting sales? How much effort are they putting into selling activities?
73
Sale/Exchange
Sale: * Transfer for cash or cash equivalent * If property is transferred subject to a liability, the amount of the liability transferred is included in your amount realized = It is as if you got cash equal to the amount of the liability transferred away with the property → that is a sale. Exchange: * Transfer for another piece of property | Example ## Footnote Taxpayer’s property is subject to a recourse mortgage. T transfers the encumbered property to A. A pays no cash but does assume the mortgage. * because it is a transfer of property in exchange for assumption of liability. * It is not a cancellation, it is an assumption → The debt is being transferred * So it's as if our taxpayer received cash in an amount equal to the liability that was transferred to the acquirer. So when we're talking here about the general rule → sales or exchanges of capital assets, we're only talking about sales or exchanges → **not gifts, not casualties, not condemnation, not eminent domain** * when a storm or a fire burns down your house or destroys your house and you get insurance money, that's not a sale or you're not taking your property and transporting to someone in a **consensual transaction**
74
Holding period ## Footnote So here, a year, ONE YEAR EXACTLY, runs from: * 1/16/yr 1 —----------------------------1/15/yr 2 * 1/16/yr 2 = to one year and one day
Rule * Long term: MORE THAN 1 year * Short term: 1 year or less * HP begins the DAY AFTER acquisition T bought 100 shares of stock on January 15 of year one at a cost of $50 per share. T sold them on January 16th of year 2 at $60.00 per share = **Holding period?** * If you buy on Jan 15 year 1 and sell on Jan 16 year 2 * If I buy on January 15th of year one, when does my holding period start? **JAN 16 of year one** SO, we have exactly one year THUS * **Note → The year begins on January 1st. When does it end? December 31st → The next january 1 is more than 1 year (one day more)** if our holding period starts on January 16th year 1 and we sell on January 16th of year two, is that exactly one year or more than one year? * MORE THAN 1 YEAR THUS, this will be a long term holding period. So we have long term capital gain. * These questions are about when does your holding period start. And **basically that same day, the next year, is a year and a day.** ## Footnote T bought 100 shares at $50 per share on February 10 of year one and another 100 shares at $50 per share on March 10 of year 1. T sold 100 shares on February 15th of year 2 for $60.00 per share * So we bought some: On 2/10 AND 3/10 of year 1 and Sell on → 2/15 year 2 * If only selling what we bought on 2/10? LT * If only selling what we bought on 3/10? ST The problem doesn't tell us which ones are selling, what do we do? * if you're selling from a tranche of shares and it's not specified which ones you're selling from, we assume that you're selling from the earliest purchased set. * FIFO approach → first in first out * So here we get the LT T’s father bought 100 shares of stock on January 10th of year one at $30 per share. On March 10 of year one when they were worth $40.00 per share he gave them to T who sold them on January 15 of the year 2 for $60.00 per share. **Tacking period.** * If X has property and then gave them to Z and X and Z have the same basis (gift) –? then you can tack the holding period. * Aka you can add X holding period + Z holding period Taxpayer’s father purchased 1000 shares of stock for $10 per share several years ago. The stock was worth $50 per share on March 1 of year one, the date of father's death.The stock was distributed to taxpayer by the executor on January 5 of year two and taxpayer sold it for $60 per share on January 15 of year two * If you inherit a capital asset (form a decedent) you get step up basis (FMV at time of death) and if you sell it before you have it for a year then you are deemed to have held it for a year
75
RECAPTURE ## Footnote Depreciable property (capital expenditures) are fully depreciable in the year they are bought. However, if you sell before the life period is over, it did not actually decline in value to the extent you got that depreciation of * When you sell the depreciable asset at a gain, it is not real gain * The excess depreciation deductions from that gain will be treated as ordinary income
This rule characterizes gain from dispositions of depreciable assets as **ordinary income** to the extent of prior depreciation deductions * **Only applies to gains** * **Only applies to depreciable personal property (Section 1245 property)** Portion of gain treated as ordinary income = (lower of RB or AR) – AB * RB = recomputed basis in the property * Adjusted basis recomputed by adding all adjustments on basis of deductions for depreciation or amortization * RB = Basis + all your depreciation deductions AR = amount realized (for sale exchange or involuntary conversion) OR FMV if any other disposition * AB = adjusted basis (lower of RB or AR) – AB = Characterized as ordinary income. * Whatever is left over from the Ordinary income and the amount realized → §1231 ## Footnote depreciable personal property (Section 1245 property)? * PERSONAL PROPERTY (not land & buildings) * With an ascertainable useful life Recap, a calendar year taxpayer, owns a piece of equipment that recap uses in business. The equipment was purchased in year 1 for $100,000, and is five year property, within the meaning of section 168c. In year 1, recap deducted 100% of the cost of the property under 168k. * (e) What result if as a result of a scarcity of equipment, recap is able to sell the equipment to desperate for $110,000? * Sale/disposition? Yes * AR? 110k | AB? 0 * Gain/loss? 110k gain realized and recognized * Characterize? No capital asset so no general rule Recapure * Depreciable personal property so 1245 applies * Portion of gain treated as OI = (lower of RB or AR) - AB * RB = AB + depreciation = 0 + 100k = 100k * AR = 110K | Lower of = RB = 100k * SO → Portion of gain treated as OI = 100k - 0 = 100k * BUT there is more gain!!! Remember our AR = 110k = SO ⇒ 100k OI * 10k which will be characterized under 1231 → this captures the real economic gain that is not subsidized by depreciation deductions
76
1231 Characterization | Mechanics ⇒ To apply section 1231, make two key inquiries ## Footnote It provides taxpayer favorable characterization * More § 1231 gains → generally LTCG/LTCL | Preferential rates for LTCG * More § 1231 losses → generally all ordinary | Ordinary losses usable against OI without limits
What type of EVENT occurred? Conversions (2 types) * Involuntary casualty conversion (e.g., fire, storm, shipwreck, theft) (Step 1 → Congress had special concern for casualty) * Other compulsory or involuntary conversion (e.g., condemnation, gov exercise eminent domain) (Step 2) Certain sales or exchanges * (only for section 1231(b) property) * Step 2 What type of PROPERTY is involved 2 categories Section 1231(b) property – generally * Depreciable property used in a trade/biz held for >1 year * Real property used in a trade/biz for >1 year * Subject to some familiar exceptions * NOT CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets held for >1 year in a trade/business or in transaction entered into profit * (only if the asset is subject to a conversion) * If a capital asset was sold/exchanged. Falls under general rule. But if no sale or exchange then you can still apply it here
77
Compare the gains and losses
If there is a step 1 event. Only compare gains and losses from step 1 * If there is only 1 step 1 “event” then the g/l will be from that transaction and the other g/l to compare will be 0 If there is a step 2 event. Only compare gains and losses from step 1 * If there is only 1 step 2 “event” then the g/l will be from that transaction and the other g/l to compare will be 0 Compare Step 1 gains against Step 1 losses * If L>G, gain is OI AND Loss is OL * One does not offset the other. You have both OI and OL * If G>=L gains AND losses get included in the step 2 calculations Compare step 2 gains against step 2 losses * If G>L, Gains are LTCG AND losses are LTCL * One does not offset the other. You have both LTCG and LTCL * If L>=G Gains are ordinary gains AND losses are OL ## Footnote Master the graph!
78
Like-Kind exchanges → NOT RECOGNIZED
Not recognized if: * Exchange * Of Real property held for a productive use in a trade or business or investment * Solely for * Real property of like kind (held for productive use in a T/B or for investment) Deferral. You do not recognize when you do the like-kind exchange, however that realization will be preserved for when you do sell the land * If solely = full G/L * If not solely = Take the G/L – recognized = what’s left unrealized How to determine the basis for deferral purposes? Step 1: What is the total basis of everything received? * Total basis in the property surrendered + amount of money paid – amount of money received + gain recognized – loss recognized = TOTAL BASIS IN THE NON-MONETARY PROPERTY RECEIVED * You will always know the basis of the cash received cause that’s just the cash * This is the total basis of everything received except for the cash Step 2: allocate the total non-cash basis to first the boot, then the LKE * First look at the boot received. = What is the FMV of the boot received? = Basis in boot is FMV of the boot * Next, look to the LK property received = Whatever is left over from the total basis that did not already cover the boot becomes the basis of the property received Technical way: for basis of the property * Gain realized – Gain recognized = amount of gain you are preserving * FMV of the property = AR * If you know the AR, and you know the Gain, what must the basis in the property be? ## Footnote IF IT IS NOT SOLELY FOR: * You recognize gain to the extent of boot * Boot = all the other stuff you got (cash + fmv of other property received in exchange) * In other words, you do recognize, but that is capped at the boot amount
79
Computing Tax Liability
Step 1: what is taxable income? (combine OI and Capital gains into GI) * GI - § 62 deductions – (std/itemized deductions) – 199A deductions = TI * Taxable Income x Tax rate = Tax liability (before credits) Step 2: separate TI subject to preferential rates * Net LTCG = TI – LTCG | Taxed at 15% (20% for high income) * Qualified Dividends = Taxed at LTCG rates = To be qualified, recipient of the dividend must hold the stock for at least 60 days Step 3: Take whatever is left of the TI (after you remove net LTCG and qualified dividends) * Taxed at the progressive rates * Brackets depend on filing status (e.g., single, MFJ) Step 4: Credits ## Footnote How much federal income tax would a married couple filing a joint return owe if they had a total of $100,000 of taxable income for the taxable year in which the tax rates in section 1a applied? * So we have a married couple filing jointly. Use the chart 100k, so what rate bracket? * 31% rate bracket Do they pay 31% tax on all 100k of their income? * NO, they only pay tax at 31% on the portion of their income above $89,150 How do we calculate this? * The chart says “$20,165, plus 31% of the excess over $89,150” * 20,165 + .31(100k-89,150) = $23,528.50 = That is our tax
80
There is something called the effective tax rate or average tax rate as well ## Footnote She wants us to know the range of tax rates kinda * OI = 0 - 37% * high income closer to 37; low closer to zero
Tax liability divided by taxable income * In a progressive system, your marginal tax rate will always be higher than your effective tax rate. * Why? Because your marginal tax rate only applies to a little piece of your taxable income ## Footnote How much federal income tax would a married couple filing a joint return owe if they had a total of $100,000 of taxable income for the taxable year in which the tax rates in section 1a applied? * “$20,165, plus 31% of the excess over $89,150” * 20,165 + .31(100k-89,150) = $23,528.50 23,528.50/100k = .235 = 23.5% average rate
81
Credits ## Footnote In general
So tax credits apply after you get to taxable income, after you apply rates and then calculated tax liability and then you apply credits * TI x Tax rate = Tax Liability – Tax credits = Tax due * It's hey I would have otherwise owed $14,000 in taxes, but I have a $1,000 tax credit = So actually I only owed $13,000 in tax. They reduce tax liability! Meaning? * A dollars worth of tax credit is worth a dollar to you. * But credits are after the rate multiplication THUS Credits, on the other hand, are worth dollar for dollar regardless of your marginal rate. * Does not depend on which tax bracket you are in Credits can be refundable or nonrefundable * Refundable – if credit exceeds your tax liability, excess is paid to the taxpayer * so if you would have otherwise owed a hundred bucks in taxes and you have $1,000 tax credit, you're going to get a check for 900 bucks * Non-refundable – if credit exceeds your tax liability your tax liability is 0 * can't give you money back so if you otherwise owed a $100 in tax liability, you're entitled to a $1,000 nonrefundable tax credit. Well, now you owe nothing. But you're not getting anything either Non-refundable credits gets applied before refundable credits ## Footnote Examples of credits Refundable * Credits on withholding wages * Earned income tax credit (for low income tax payers) = Generally refundable, but phases out as income increases * Pandemic recovery rebates Non-refundable * Child-tax credit
82
Child-tax Credits
Credits allowed for each qualifying child equal to $2,000 per kid * Qualifying child = dependents, under 17 The amount of the credit will phase out * Amount of the credit allowed will be reduced (but not below zero) by $50 for each $1,000 by which your AGI exceeds the threshold amount * $400,000 for joint return and $200,000 for other types of returns ## Footnote 2017 and before = 1000 bucks ; 2017 - 2025 = 2000; 2021 (pandemic rules) = 3k for qualifying child; 3.6 child under 6
83
# Rational Taxpayer OVERALL If you are allowed a $1,000 deduction
Prefer above the line deduction → reduces AGI * You are guaranteed cause everyone gets ATL * If it were BTL you might not get it if you chose to standardize Do not want capital expenditure * You have to wait until it is capitalized (meaning added to basis) meaning you cannot use that money to reduce your tax bill since you can only add it when you have a realization event (sale or disposition)
84
Assume you are a rational taxpayer that is an employee of employer, you are going to a work-related conference, and the flight/hotel will cost 1k. What do you prefer?
I pay out of pocket + no reimbursement because I will get deduction * WRONG. If you are employee and do it in T/B and no reimbursement MID and NO DEDUCTIONS Pay out of pocket + get a deduction, but only if law is changed and allows MIDS in the same manner as before * WRONG. It would be BTL, so not guaranteed (unless you itemize) AND you can only get a deduction to the amount that exceeds 2% of your AGI, so if 2% of your AGI or less than that, you get no deduction Employer pays for my travel costs, but no deduction * YES. You do not need a deduction since you did not pay for it. * Employer gets a deduction * And the benefit of going to the conference is excluded (so you don’t pay tax on that) since it would have been allowable as a deduction if applied
85
ATL deduction > capital expenditure
You have to wait for it to be capitalized (added to basis, so when you sell or disposition) to get the capital expenditure. But you want money now
86
If you choose to itemize, why do you still care/prefer deductions ATL over BTL ## Footnote Why do you care that AGI is lower?
AGI is used in other places (determining phase-outs. If your AGI is above a certain threshold you only get part of the benefit, and if your AGI is above the second threshold, you get none of the benefit) High AGI, likely to be phased out, lower AGI less likely to be phased out * E.g. can only take certain medical expenses to the amount that exceeds 7.5% of your AGI. If your AGI is lower, the more likely you are to get that BTL deductions AGI is used to measure your eligibility for other benefits (food stamps…)
87
Rational taxpayers prefer? ## Footnote Characterization context
Gains to be capital and losses to be ordinary * CG ⇒ tax rate preference * Ordinary ⇒ you can get full loss (no limitation)
88
Timing for rational taxpayers ## Footnote Cash method vs accrual method
Defer income inclusion and accelerate deduction ## Footnote Cash method may cause a mismatch (you take a deduction in Y1 for a service you got paid for in Y 2). * Administratively easy for individuals. Business taxpayers however want to avoid this mismatch and have the deduction in the same year of the income so they use accrual
89
Do rational taxpayers prefer a 4k deduction or 1k credit
Taxpayers with marginal rates above 25% prefer 4k deduction * Taxpayers with marginal rates below 25% prefer 1k credit