FBS 157 Flashcards

1
Q

Know statistics discussed about wrongful convictions (lecture and reading week 1)
– How many have there been as revealed through the Innocence Project?

A

10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The National
Registry of Exonerations?

A

873

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the most common contributing causes of wrongful conviction?

A

Rape and Murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the problem (really, dual problem) of wrongful convictions?

A

-False accusation and false confession? They are receiving severe punishments
-The most common causal factors that contributed to the
underlying false convictions are perjury or false accusation (51%), mistaken
eyewitness identification (43%) and official misconduct (42%) – followed by
false or misleading forensic evidence (24%) and false confession (16%). T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the existence of wrongful convictions reveal about the criminal justice
system?

A

Failing to identify and correct them after they occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some of the common elements recommended in the guidelines?

A

Build rapport, ask open ended questions, encourage witness to contact investigators when additional info is recalled, encourage witness to avoid contact with the media, when multiple witnesses separate them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In what ways are the recommendations similar to recommendations made for the cognitive interview?

A

Building rapport, encouraging witness to report all details, avoid leading and close ended questions, ask witness to mentally recreate the circumstances, avoid interrupting the witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In what ways are they different from the Cognitive Interview?

A

The pre-interview. Reading prior info and determining the nature of the witness prior law enforcement contact. Cautioning witness to not guess
Interview Prep. Instructions
Reinstate context
Be Complete
Reverse Order
Change Persepctives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

According to research discussed throughout this section of the course, which protocol
should be followed and why?

A

Rapport getting your witness comfortable to talk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the misinformation effect?

A

-incorporating misleading information into one’s memory of an event
-Ways that people’s memory can be distorted
- Co-witness information
- Suggestive/leading questions during a police
interview
- Written Summary
- Doctored pictures
The misinformation effect occurs when a person’s recall of episodic memories becomes less accurate because of post-event information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can the wording of questions effect responses?

A

You lead them to change their memory and they state that they saw something that didn’t happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are rich false memories? What is an example from a research study (reading)

A

-Planting a false memory. Something that didn’t happen that was stressful
-Researchers in the mid-1990s devised a
number of techniques for planting whole events, or what have
been called “rich false memories.” One study used scenarios
made up by relatives of subjects, and planted false memories of
being lost for an extended time in a shopping mall at age 6 and
rescued by an elderly person (Loftus 1993; Loftus and Pickrell
1995). Other studies used similar methods to plant a false
memory that as a child the subject had had an accident at a
family wedding (Hyman Jr. et al. 1995), had been a victim of a
vicious animal attack (Porter et al. 1999), or that he or she had
nearly drowned and had to be rescued by a lifeguard (

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does memory work?

A

encoding, storage, retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Encoding?

A

Time of event; might not remember everything or remember something wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Storage?

A

Between event and interview; you might forget what occurred or might be influenced by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Retrieval?

A

Time of interview; remember things inaccurately, accurately, make up things or completely forget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What makes memory fragile?

A

Memories are reconstructive. You can go in there and change it but others can too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does memory not work?

A

Like a recording device. Record info, call it up and play it back

19
Q

What can be done to improve eyewitness testimony?

A

Making open ended questions, building rapport, active witness participation, context reinstatement, multiple retrieval attempts

20
Q

How should we treat memory evidence as compared to other types of evidence?

A

With a grain of salt since it can also be altered by other people

21
Q

How does the typical interviewing approach compare to interviewing methods recommended by researchers?

A

Close ended questions, not building rapport, after listening they would ask short answer questions, Interviewer has pre determined set of topics or questions, the interviewer generally controls the flow of information
LABORATORY STUDIES
– Experimental control
FIELD STUDIES
– Ecological validity

22
Q

What is the cognitive interview?

A

An approach to interviewing cooperative witnesses toward increasing the amount of relevant information obtained
Based on:
–scientifically derived principles of memory
–communication theory
–analysis of police interviews

23
Q

How affective is it at achieving its goals?

A

-It increases the accuracy and amount of info that is reported
-The CI elicits 35-50% more
information from witnesses
without affecting the
accuracy rate

24
Q

The CI

A
  1. Intro
  2. Open ended narration
  3. Probing memory scenes
  4. Reviewing the interview
  5. Closing the interview
25
Q

Introduction

A

Building rapport, teamwork, encourage concentration, completeness, context recreation

26
Q

Open ended narration

A

“Tell me in your own words whatever you can remember about this event. I want as much detail as possible”
›Very important skill – do not interrupt the
eyewitness during the narrative report
–Wait until eyewitness has completed the
narration, and only then, when finished, should
you ask follow-up questions
›Note the eyewitness’s scenes and images during the narrative
so that you may probe them for additional information later
›Take rough notes, with just enough information to later re-
create the scenes using the eyewitness’s key words and
phrases

27
Q

Probing memory scenes

A

Going to be asking more detailed questions.
Probing the scene —-> open ended questions, request elaborate detail, keep in present tense, multiple retrieval attempts
›Now let the interviewee know that you are going to be asking
more detailed and probing questions about the incident
›Remind the eyewitness that it’s a difficult task and requires
intense concentration
–Block out distractions, encourage to close eyes

28
Q

Reviewing the interview

A

Allows you to check the accuracy of your understanding
›The purpose of the review is to…
–allow you to check the accuracy of your notes and understanding, and allow the eyewitness to search through memory one more time
for new information
›If new information is provided, probe for details as usual

29
Q

Closing the interview

A

“You will remember things later so I’ll give you a call in two days”
There are two main goals for the close of the interview:
(1) to create a positive, lasting impression
(2) to extend the functional life of the interview
–ex. “You will remember things later, so I’ll
call you in two days to follow up”

30
Q

Open ended questions

A

Describe to me the man you saw

31
Q

Close ended questions

A

Did the man walk to this house?

32
Q

Multiple choice

A

Was the car blue or black?
Ex. Was he white, black, or Hispanic?

33
Q

Yes/No

A

Was the car green?

34
Q

Suggestive

A

You saw the man leaving that apartment building?

35
Q

Leading question

A

-force the witness into an assumption that may not be true
– Ex. Was he white?
The man was wearing a black hoodie right?

36
Q

Types of questions that SHOULD be used?

A

›Open-ended questions encourage the eyewitness to provide a
lengthy response; a closed-ended question usually requires a short,
even one-word answer
› Funnel approach
– Start with your open-ended question(s)
– Next probing memory scenes (still with
open-ended questions)
– Finally, if needed, you can ask closed
questions (ex. What color was the car?)
■ Yes/no questions should be avoided (ex.
Did the robber have a gun?)
› **Whenever possible, ask open-ended
questions

37
Q

Types of questions that should NOT be used?

A

› Leading – force the witness into an assumption that may not be true
– Ex. Was he white?
■ How could you ask this in a better way?
› Multiple choice
– Ex. Was he white, black, or Hispanic?
› Double-barreled – asking 2 questions simultaneously, often only allowing for one answer
– Ex. He had a gun with him? Did he have any other weapons?
› Negative wording – using negative word/wording
– Ex. a course in statistics should not be required for the major
› Double negative – two instances of negation
– Ex. Does it seem possible or impossible that the moon landing never took place?

38
Q

What is meant by the “funnel approach”? Why is this approach recommended?

A

A way of ordering questions in a questionnaire so that general questions are asked before specific questions

39
Q

Why are interruptions detrimental to witness interviewing?

A

It discordances the e/w from taking an active role and can cause info to be lost
›Interrupting in the middle of a response discourages the
eyewitness from taking an active role
›Interrupting could cause some information to be lost
›Allow a pause after each response

40
Q

Why is varied and multiple retrieval recommended for this interviewing protocol? What are
the different ways to have witnesses engage in varied and multiple retrieval?

A

A search process that can lead to more finds. Reverse order and another perspective
›Memory retrieval is a search process and more searches can
lead to more finds
›In other words, can result in recalling more information that
wasn’t originally reported
›Also helps strengthen memory
›Encourage the eyewitness to conduct multiple retrieval
attempts, and here are two reliable techniques
(1) Ask the eyewitness to describe the events in backward
(reverse) order, or by starting with the part that impressed
him/her the most and work backward
(2) Consider requesting the eyewitness to adopt someone else’s
perspective, but remind the eyewitness to only report those
things that he/she actually witnessed and to not make
anything up
- Also, consider different physical perspectives

41
Q

Why are people resistant to using CI

A

Post-training follow up evaluation of detectives in the
UK and Canada (and now the US) –
›None used all basic components of the CI protocol
in any interview
›One-half to two-thirds used several CI components
in over half their interviews
›It is difficult to change old habits

42
Q

Importance of closing the interview

A

Leave a lasting impression and extend the functional life of interview
There are two main goals for the close of the interview:
(1) to create a positive, lasting impression
(2) to extend the functional life of the
interview
–ex. “You will remember things later, so I’ll
call you in two days to follow up”

43
Q

Why is the CI better than the standard police interview?

A

›Reliably increases the amount of information obtained
›Preserves the rate of accuracy, and typically without increasing
the number of errors
›Effective for a variety of witnesses
›Part of law enforcement interviewing in many countries
(England, Scotland, Norway, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand)
›Reduces misleading question effects
›Relatively simple to train and to implement
›CI interviews are rated by mock jurors as being less manipulative and just as credible as standard interviews