Family Law - Marriage Flashcards
COMMON LAW MARRIAGE
Test:
COMMON LAW MARRIAGE
Test:
- Agreement
- Cohabitation
- Holding out
- Separation for TWO YEARS»_space;> presume NO AGREEMENT to be married
JURISDICTION
Residency requirement
Suit by non-TX resident
JURISDICTION
Residency requirement
- Domiciled in TX for 6 MONTHS
- Either party
- Don’t need PJ over BOTH spouses
- Domiciled in COUNTY for 90 DAYS
Suit by non-TX resident
- Just need to meet the TX residency requirement (6 MONTHS)
INCEPTION OF TITLE
GENERAL RULE:
Installment purchases:
Purchased on credit:
GENERAL RULE:
Purchased during marriage = CP
Installment purchases
- BEGINs during marriage = CP
Purchased on credit
- Acquired during marriage = CP
- UNLESS CR agrees to look only to SP
INCEPTION OF TITLE
Title:
- General rule
- TWO exceptions
Commingled funds:
Title
- Person’s name on the title is NOT relevant—apply inception of title rule
- EXCEPTION: SP funds used but title is taken in other spouse’s name indicates a GIFT to that spouse. But this is a presumption that can be overcome (C&C evidence).
- EXCEPTION: CP funds used but taken under W’s name “as her sole and separate property”
- But this recital works ONLY IF the other spouse PARTICIPATED IN THE TRANSACTION
- If W buys property and takes title in her name “as her sole SP” it’s meaningless if H wasn’t involved.
Commingled funds
- Apply tracing—lowest intermediate balance rule
INCEPTION OF TITLE
Trust income
Life insurance
Retirement
Trust income
- If trust was created before marriage, it’s SP
- UNTIL the spouse B gets unrestricted access to the corpus—once that happens, it’s just the B’s money, and that becomes CP
Life insurance
- Policy taken out before marriage = SP
Retirement
- Benefits for years worked BEFORE marriage = SP
- Benefits for years worked DURING marriage = CP
INCEPTION OF TITLE
Social security
Disability
Stocks
Social security
- NOT SUBJECT TO DIVISION - FED PREEMPTION
Disability
- If injury occurred DURING marriage = CP
Stocks
- Purchased during marriage = CP
- Even if the stocks were purchased as part of retirement plan
INCEPTION OF TITLE
Interest in closely held corp
Interest in partnership
Interest in closely held corp
- Acquired before marriage = SP
Interest in partnership
- Acquired before marriage = SP
SP INCOME RULES
GENERAL RULE:
Minerals:
SP INCOME RULES
GENERAL RULE:
- INCOME from SP is COMMUNITY PROPERTY
- UNLESS the property was a GIFT—income from gifts remain SP
- APPRECIATION in value of SP is SP
Minerals
- Only the DELAY RENTALS are income (CP)
- So, bonus, royalty, are SEPARATE property
SP INCOME RULES
Corporate distributions
Patents
Corporate distributions
- Cash dividends = Income (CP)
- Capital gains = Appreciation (SP)
Patents
- Royalties = Income (CP)
SP INCOME RULES
Tort recovery
Life insurance
Tort recovery
- Pain, disfigurement = SP
- Med exp, lost income = CP
- If award doesn’t specify how much is for what kind of recovery, it’s ALL CP
Life insurance
- Proceeds = NOT income (remains SP)
CLAIM FOR REIMBURSEMENT
NO reimbursement for:
- Child support
- Spousal maintenance
- Living expenses
- Nominal amounts (don’t sweat the small stuff)
- PAYMENTS ON A STUDENT LOAN
SURVIVORSHIP AGREEMENT
- NON-PROBATE transfer
Spouses can agree to survivorship rights in their CP
- Must be:
SURVIVORSHIP AGREEMENT
- NON-PROBATE transfer
Spouses can agree to survivorship rights in their CP
- Must be:
- In WRITING
- Signed by BOTH SPOUSES
- Included specific survivorship language - “with right of survivorship” etc.
SURVIVORSHIP AGREEMENT
Valid against:
- CR’s?
- BFP’s?
- Executor of deceased spouse’s estate?
NOT EFFECTIVE against CREDITORS
- CR has 2 years after death to assert rights
NOT EFFECTIVE against BFP’s
- UNLESS purchased within 6 MONTHS—from someone OTHER THAN the deceased spouse’s executor of estate
NOT EFFECTIVE against executors who don’t know about the agreement
- If deceased spouse’s PR sells the property WITHOUT KNOWING that it should have gone to the other spouse by ROS, the PR is not liable.
- A BFP who bought from the PR is also not liable
PRE-NUPS
- Need CONSIDERATION?
Which of these can a pre-nup accomplish?
- Change SP to CP
- Modify, eliminate spousal support
- Change CHILD SUPPORT
- Modify, eliminate reimbursement rights
- Say which SP will remain SP
PRE-NUPS
No consideration NEC
CAN do:
- Say which SP will remain SP
- Modify, eliminate spousal support
- Modify, eliminate reimbursement rights
- Lots of other stuff
CANNOT do:
- Change SP to CP (this has to be done during marriage, CONVERSION agreement)
- Change CHILD SUPPORT
PRE-NUPS
Challenging pre-nup:
Challenging pre-nup
- Unconscionable AND:
- Lack of disclosure (unless written waiver)
- Didn’t know about the things not disclosed
OR
- Not voluntary
- Think fraud, not duress