family diversity Flashcards
trends in divorce
divorce has doubled since 1961, 1969 and 1972 - this means 40% of marriage end in divorce
65% of divorce petitions come from women
couples who marry young, have a child before marriage or where one or both partners have already been married are at greater risk of divorce
6 reasons for increase in divorce
changes in the law
decline in stigma
secularisation
rising expectations of marriage
changing positions of women
modernity and individualisation
increase in divorce - changes in the law
divorce was previously difficult to obtain in the uk, however law changes have made it easier to access
1969 - divorce reform act allows for a divorce if separated for 2 or 5 years, or if there was a irretrievable breakdown
1984 - couples married for one year can apply for a divorce
2014 - marriage act allowed for same sex marriage
increase in divorce - ao3 for changes in the law
it doesn’t explain why more people take advantage of the freedom of getting a divorce
increase in divorce - decline in stigma (mitchell and goody)
the stigma on divorce has decreased making it socially acceptable - couples are more likely to resort to divorce to deal with their martial problems
the normalisation of divorce means it is seen simply as a misfortune now
general ao3 for decline in stigma
family patterns tend to still be traditional - many are still live in a family, brought up by couples, couples marry and divorcees remarry
increase in divorce - secularisation
since there has been a decline in religious influence, people are less likely to be influenced by religious teachings while seeking a divorce
some churches have soften their views on divorce, perhaps due to fear of losing credibility with the public and their members
general ao3 for secularisation
many first time marriages take place in a religious context, suggesting religion is still relevant to people’s lives
there is still a demand for religious weddings, showing that religion is still relevant
increase in divorce - rising expectations of marriage (fletcher)
couples are less willing to tolerate an unhappy marriage influenced by a ideology of romantic love - marriage should be based on mutual love and satisfaction
in the past, couples had low expectations so felt less dissatisfied by the absence of intimacy, but now individuals seek personal commitment and are willing to divorce if they do not find it
increase in divorce - ao3 for rising expectations of marriage
fail to explain why women are more likely to seek a divorce than men - could be argued it is due to the oppression of women in marriage e.g. taking the man’s last name, triple shift
increase in divorce - changing positions of women
improvements in women’s economic position means there are less reliant on their husband for financial security, so there are free to end an unsatisfactory marriage
more women are working - 53% in 1971 vs 67% in 2013
girls overachieve in education, the gender pay gap has narrowed due to changes in the law and welfare benefits allow for women to depend on the government rather than their husbands
general ao3 for changing positions of women
women being wage earners and home makers has created a new conflict of the triple shift - this is actually causing more divorces
many women put off marriage for later rather than avoiding it completely
increase in divorce - modernity and individualisation (beck and giddens)
modern society results in traditional norms disappearing, leaving individuals to pursue their own self interest
relationships are more fragile as people seek ‘pure relationships’ meaning they are more likely to divorce if their interests are not met
this shows that people marriage for personal fulfilment, and are more likely to divorce if they are not fulfilled
increase in divorce - ao3 for modernity and individualisation
functionalists argue pure relationships break down the norms and values that hold society together as the family is all about carrying out the 4 functions
feminists arguments for the increase in divorce
married women now have a dual burden of paid and house work, or a triple shift where they also deal with emotional work
women are more valued at work whereas at home there are segregated conjugal roles which can lead to frustration - since women are more dissatisfied with patriarchal marriage they are more confident to accept feminist ideologies and reject patriarchal marriage
positive sociological views of high divorce rates
feminists - view high divorce rates as women breaking from the oppressive patriarchal nuclear family
postmodernists - individuals now have the freedom to end a marriage, causing family diversity
neutral/negative sociological views of high divorce rates
functionalists - high divorce rates don’t prove marriage is under threat, it is rather the result of high expectations of marriage, the high rate of remarriage suggests people still have faith in marriage
personal life perspective - high divorce rates can cause problems e.g. financial difficulties, lack of contact but the family can adapt, suggesting divorce is just a transition in the life course
new right - high divorce rates undermine the traditional nuclear family and creates an underclass of welfare-dependent lone mothers and is the cause of high crime rates
trends in marriage
first marriage has significantly declined from 480000 in 1972 to 85770 in 2020 while remarriages have risen
average marriage age has risen to 35.4 for men and 33.2 for women
only 15% of marriages were in a religious context in 2020
4 reasons for decrease in marriage
secularisation
decline in stigma
changing positions of women
fear of divorce
decrease in marriage - secularisation
the decline of religious influence means less people are likely to get married for religious reasons
people are freer to choose what type of relationship to enter e.g. cohabitation
3% of young people with no religion were married compared to 17% of those with a religion, suggesting marriage isn’t as essential to those without a religion
decrease in marriage - decline in stigma
cohabitation, having a child outside of marriage and staying single has become more acceptable
in 1989, 70% of people believed couples who want children should get married compared to 42% in 2012
decrease in marriage - changing position of women
women are now financially independent from men due to better careers and education - breaking the glass ceiling
this means women have the freedom to not get married and instead focus on their career, which could be influenced by feminist views that marriage is a oppressive patriarchal institution
sue sharp’s study would support this view - girls in the 70s were most interested in marriage but in the 90s girls focused on a career and independence
decrease in marriage - fear of divorce
people may fear divorce due to the emotional difficulties, financial costs, the impacts on children and outward perception
as a result they will avoid marriage all together to avoid these issues
decrease in marriage - ao3 for fear of divorce
people who get divorced eventually get remarried, suggesting divorce isn’t a big enough reason to not get married
2012 - 1/3 of marriages were remarriages from divorcees
trends in cohabitation
there were 3.5 million cohabitating couples in 2022 with 20% of all unmarried adults cohabitating
these numbers are most prominent in 16-29 year olds and 45-60 year olds
3 reasons for increase in cohabitation
decline in stigma
changing positions of women
secularisation
increase in cohabitation - decline in stigma
sex outside marriage is more acceptable - in 1989 44% believed sex outside marriage was okay and this increased to 65% in 2012 showing a change in attitudes
young people are more likely to accept cohabitation - 88% of 18-24 year olds thought cohabitation was okay compared to 40% of those over 65
increase in cohabitation - changing positions of women
women have broken the glass ceiling and have access to the top jobs meanings they have less need for financial security that comes with marriage
liberal feminists would support this view as it shows there has been a march of progress due to legal changes e.g. equal pay act
increase in cohabitation - secularisation
young people with no religion are more likely to cohabit than those with as they are not influenced by religious teachings
religion places high emphasis on marriage so non religious young people don’t see marriage as an important life stage
arguments for cohabitation being a stepping stone to marriage (chester)
75% of couples who cohabit intended to marry each other, showing that cohabitation is part of the process of getting married
many see cohabitation as a trial marriage to see if they are compatible
arguments for cohabitation being an alternative to marriage (chandler)
cohabitation is a permanent alternative to marriage as it represents young people’s conscious attempt to create a personally negotiated and equal relationship - women who cohabit tend to do less housework
trends in same sex relationships
approximately 3.3% of uk population identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual and more are identifying with these labels - increasing since 2014
since the legalisation of same sex marriage in 2014, more same sex couples are getting married
3 reasons for the increase of same sex relationships
legal changes
decline in stigma
secularisation
increase in same sex relationships - legal changes
homosexual acts were decriminalised in 1967 for adults over 21, and this decreased to 18 to be equal with heterosexual people
since 2002, gay couples have the same adoption rights as married couples
civil partnerships act 2004 - gave same sex couples the same legal rights as married couples regarding pensions, inheritance and property
marriage act 2013 - first gay marriages took part in 2014
increase in same sex relationships - ao3 for legal changes
the new right criticise these changes as they go against the four functions of the family and provide inadequate socialisation
increase in same sex relationships - decline in stigma
there has been an increase in tolerance of homosexuality overtime
increase in same sex relationships - secularisation
many believe it isn’t a sin to be homosexual contrary to religious scriptures since there has been a decline in religious influence
arguments for homosexual relationships being similar to heterosexual relationships (weeks and weston)
homosexual people create family based on ‘friendship as kinship’ where they choose their family that offer the same security and stability as heterosexual families
same sex cohabitation can be seen as a quasi marriage where they cohabit as stable partners, contrasting with the 1970s which favoured casual relationships
arguments against homosexual relationships being similar to heterosexual relationships (allan and crow, einasdottir)
due to an absence of a legal framework, same sex couples have to negotiate their commitments and responsibilities more, making their relationships more flexible and less stable
though same sex couples welcomed their relationships to be legally recognised, they don’t want it to limit the negotiability of their relationship, suggesting they want their relationships to differ from heterosexual ones