Family and Households Flashcards
explain what is meant by ‘the family’
given the range and diversity of family structures and relationships, defining the family today presents a challenge for sociologists.
In the past, the nuclear family was the basic and central family structure: two generations living together with biologically related children, headed by a heterosexual couple.
Today, this definition is challenged by the wide variety of alternative family structures that successfully exist.
A broader, more inclusive and more contemporary definition of the family might be a group of people related by kinship ties and civil relationships.
explain what is meant by ‘the household’
A household is different from a family as it can include individuals living alone/or a group of people living together without necessarily being related, married or committed to each other.
If a household consists of a group of people, a key characteristic of it, is the sharing of bills, facilities, meals and chores etc.
state the four key patterns and trends in relation to marriage
- fewer people are marrying
- remarriages are increasing
- people are marrying later
- civil ceremonies have increased
explain the key pattern and trend of fewer people marrying
Fewer people are marrying:
- The number of first-time marriages peaked in 1940 are 426,000 when 91% were first marriages for both partners. By 2012, the number of first marriages for one or both partners had fallen to 175.00.
- The long-term picture for UK marriages has been one of decline, from a peak of 480,285 marriages in 1972, with 2010 showing in the first increase since 2004. In 2017, there were 242,842 marriages (dropped to 127,000 in 2020)
- The proportion of households that contain a married couple has fallen from 74% in 1961, 58% in 1996 to 50.4% in 2019.
- In 2010, the marriage rate (expressed per 1000 unmarried people aged 16 and over) was 8.7. Marriage rates are at their lowest since the 1920s.
Explain the reasons for the trend of why fewer people are marrying
Reasons for the trend of why fewer people are marrying:
- more socially acceptable to live in alternatives to marriage e.g. cohabitation, civil partnerships, or staying single as stigma of not marrying has declined.
- having sex outside of marriage is more acceptable
- secularisation - declining influence of religion in the UK as the UK is more secularised.
- changing role of women - women are more financially independent and have security compared to the past.
- There is less expectation for women to marry as women are more career-focused.
- cost of money to get married (cost implications)
- marrying is no longer needed to have a child.
- marriage is not seen as a necessary and more viewed as a patriarchal institution.
- divorce rates are high
explain the key pattern and trend of remarriages increasing
Remarriages are increasing:
- A pattern of serial monogamy has emerged (marriage/divorce/remarriage): in 1999, 108.488 marriages were remarriages for one or both partners accounting for 41% of all marriages. However, by 2012 the number had decreased and 80,890 marriage were remarriages for one or both partners accounting for 34% of all marriages. (Remarriages for both partners accounted for 15% of all marriages, the remaining 19% accounted for those where one partner has been married previously)
- While recent figures suggest a slight decrease in the number of remarriages since the 1970s, the trend has been one of an increase more generally.
state reasons for the trend of remarriages increasing
- remarriages/divorces are less stigmatised and are socially acceptable
- declining influence of religion - the trend of secularisation in UK society.
- serial monogamy are more socially acceptable
- less expected to stay in a marriage for kids
- ageing population - people marry later and live longer
explain the key trend of people marrying later
People are marrying later:
- The average age for marriage in 1971 was 25 for men and 23 for women. In 2016, for opposite sec marriages, it was 37.9 for males and 35.5 for females and in same sex marriages it was 40.8 for males and 37.4 for females.
- For first time marriage, the average in 2016 was 32 for men and 30 for women.
state reasons for the trend for people are marrying later
- more people are career-driven/ orientated as people want to invest in their education e.g. post-graduate, good career
- people cohabit first then marry
- cost - people want to save for marriage costs
- more of norm to marry later (people follow this established norm)
- no rush to get married at a younger age as people will wait for the ‘right one’
explain the key trend of civil ceremonies have increased
Civil ceremonies have increased:
- Couple are less likely to marry in church today and there has been an increase in social rather than religious ceremonies. The proportion of civil ceremonies first exceeded the number of religious ceremonies in 1992 and since this year, civil marriages have increasingly outnumbered religious ceremonies.
- In 1981, 60% of weddings were conducted with religious ceremonies but by 2016 this had fallen to fewer than 24%
- In 2014, only 61 same sex marriages were religious ceremonies
state reasons for the trend of civil ceremonies have increased
reasons for civil ceremonies increasing:
- greater openness as people from same-sex relationships prefer civil ceremonies when marrying
- there are more available venues/ locations for civil ceremonies
- secularisation growing trend in the UK which means there is a decrease of religious ceremonies and increase in civil ceremonies
explain the trend of cohabitation and why it has increased over the years
COHABITATION:
As marriage decreases the trend towards cohabitation has increased (a couple who live together but are not married). In 2019, the ONS (office of national statistics) stated that about 3.4 million heterosexual couples were cohabiting in the UK, this has increased by 25.8 in a decade which made cohabitation the fastest growing family trend in the UK. Data from 2015, shows that there were approximately 90,000 same sex couples cohabiting. Cohabitation is more common among younger age groups; 69.2% of those aged 16-29 years who were living as a couple were cohabiting compared to 4.5% of those aged 70 and above.
Some see cohabitation as a permanent alternative to marriage and therefore this trend has been interpreted as evidence of the declining popularity and social significance of marriage, however for the majority, cohabitation is but a stepping stone to marriage (temporary phrase to prepare for marriage).
explain cohabitation as a permanent alternative to marriage
Cohabitation as a permanent alternative to marriage:
For some cohabitation has become marriage by another name. Drawing on data from the British and European Attitudes Survey (2000) BARLOW et all (2001) found that the marriage had become more a lifestyle choice than an expected part of life.
CHANDLER (1993) suggests that cohabitation has increasingly become accepted as a long-term permanent alternative to marriage and this is reflected in the increasing proportion of children born outside of marriage in cohabiting relationships.
Although CHANDLER sees cohabitation as a increasingly popular she points out this is nothing new as many as a quarter to a third of couples lived in a consensual union in the 18th.
This supports the works of GILLIS (1985) who found that the period 1850-1960 was historically exceptional for the high rates for marriage. Long term cohabitation is clearly not a new phenomenon.
explain cohabitation as a prelude to marriage
Cohabitation as a prelude to marriage:
However, most evidence suggests that cohabitation is seen as part of the process of getting married, rather than a permanent substitute for it. It is a short term premarital relationship.
Reflecting this CHESTER (1985) argued that in most cases cohabitation is a transient, temporary phase before marriage – a stepping stone to it.
COAST (2006) found that 75% of cohabiting couples expect to marry each other if their cohabitation is successful. Without question, since the late 1980s it has become the norm to cohabit before marriage, it has become a majority practice with approximately 80% of marriages being preceded by cohabitation. Indeed, marriage without first living together is now as unusual as premarital cohabitation was in the past.
BEAUJOUAN and NI BHROLCHAIN (2011) believe that the rise of cohabitation in the UK is probably the reason for the the decrease in divorce rates in the recent years - this is because it trends to screen/filter out weaker relationships as couples have the opportunity to test their relationship though a trial period before committing to marriage.
patterns and trends in relation to divorce increasing
Throughout the twentieth century there was a sustained increase in the divorce rate in all modern societies. In England and Wales, the divorce rate steadily increased until it stabilised in 1994 (at a historically high level). Latest statistics (published December 2012) estimate that 42% of marriages in England and Wales end in divorce.
1911 - 859 petitions were filed for divorce.
1961 - 32,000
1971 - 111,000
1981 - 170,000
1991 - 179,000
1993 - 180,000
2001 - 157,000
2011 - 118,000
The 1960s-1980s witnessed the largest increase in divorce. The divorce rate per 1000 married people in England and Wales rose from:
- 1 - in 1961
- 9 - in 1981
- 1 - in 1995
state reasons for an increase in divorce
reasons for an increase in divorce
- fewer people cohabitated than now as they could not check if they were compatible with their partners
- more socially acceptable to divorce as less stigmatised
- secularism as society is now less religious
- felt a pressure to marry at a younger together for religion
- women are more financially independent compared to the past
- law/legislation makes it easier to divorce
explain why the divorce rate fell
However, the number of divorces peaked in 1993 and since then there has been a general decline. Reflecting this, divorce rate fell to:
- 9 in 2001
- 8 in 2011
- 9 in 2019
The divorce rate may not seem very high but by 1996 there were nearly as many divorces as first marriages. Reflecting this, in 2011 the divorce rates was 10.8 and the marriage rate was 8.7. These figures are often used to suggest that the institution of marriage is in decline and that it is no longer valued.
However, divorce statistics should be treated with caution and assessed against legal, financial and social circumstances so that misleading conclusions about the declining importance of marriage are avoided. An increase in divorce may simply reflect a decline in the stigma attached to divorce and easier and cheaper divorce proceedings enabling the legal termination of already unhappy marriages – rather than an increase in the number of marital breakdowns. We will never know how many unhappy and dysfunctional relationships and empty-shell marriages existed before divorce was made easier. Therefore although statistics show an increase in divorce, this is not necessarily indicative of an increase in the number of marital breakdowns.
Furthermore, in 1996 although there were nearly as many divorces as first marriages, there were nearly as many remarriages as divorces! In 1961, 15% of all marriages in the UK were remarriages for one or both partners. In 1999 this figure had increased to 41% (more recently, there has been a decline in the number of remarriages and in 2009 it had fallen to 35%). Nevertheless, conclusions regarding the state of marriage cannot only be made with reference to divorce alone. To gain a comprehensive picture reference to remarriages must also be made
divorce factors
In 2011 the number of divorces in England and Wales decreased by 1.7% to 117,558 compared with 119,589 in 2010. This continues the general decline in divorces since 2003 when there were 153,065. The fall in divorces is consistent with a decline in the number of marriages to 2009. The decrease in marriages to 2009 may be due to the increasing number of couples choosing to cohabit rather than enter into marriage. However, while 42% of all marriages are estimated to end eventually in divorce other factors are likely to influence the likelihood of divorce for individuals, including:
(a) year of marriage
(b) age at marriage
(c) whether married before
explain divorce trends (a) year of marriage
(a) The percentage of marriages ending in divorce has generally increased for those marrying between the early 1970s and the early 1990s. For example, 22% of marriages in 1970 had ended by the 15th wedding anniversary, whereas 33% of marriages in 1995 had ended after the same period of time. However, for those marrying in the most recent years, since 2000, the percentage of marriages ending in divorce appears to be falling. This recent decrease may be related to the following two factors:
- Cohabitation has increased in recent years. Research in Population Trends has shown that people often live together before getting married, and this may act to filter out weaker relationships from progressing to marriage.
explain divorce trends (b) age of marriage
(b) The age at which people first marry has been increasing, and previous research also in Population Trends has shown that those marrying when they are older have a lower risk of divorce.
explain divorce trends (c) whether married before
(c) In 2011, 70% of divorces were to couples where both parties were in their first marriage, while the remaining 30% were to couples where at least one of the parties had been divorced or widowed previously. The percentage of couples divorcing where the marriage was the first for both parties has generally declined from the early 1970s to 2011. Over the same period however, the percentage of divorces where one or both parties were previously divorced has gradually increased.
explain the meaning of high divorce rates according the new right
THE NEW RIGHT:
They see a high divorce rate as undesirable because it undermines the traditional nuclear family. In their view, divorce creates an underclass of welfare-dependent female lone parents and deprives males of the adult male role model that they need.
explain the meaning of high divorce rates according to feminists
FEMINIST:
They disagree! They see a high divorce rate as desirable because it shows that women are breaking free from the oppression of the patriarchal nuclear family.
explain the meaning of high divorce rates according to postmodernists
POSTMODERNISTS:
They see a high divorce rate as giving individuals the freedom to choose to end a relationship when it no longer meets their needs. They see it as a cause of greater family diversity.