Education theories + policies Flashcards
What ideas functionalist theory based on?
Functionalist theory rests of the idea that society is based on social order and stability.
Durkheim and parsons use an organic analogy to explain social order by making a comparison between society and the human body as just like how the human body is composed of different organs which each have a separate function to perform to enable us to operate healthy, the same applies to society.
what do functionalists believe about society in relation to achieving social order and stability
functionalists believe that society is composed of different parts and each performs functions to enable society to achieve social order and stability.
Functionalist theory explains how each part of society such as education contributes to social solidarity, value consensus and equilibrium.
What do consensus approaches such as functionalist, new right and post modernists argue about education
Consensus approaches emphasise the positive role of education and analyse the benefits it offers for individuals and society,
These approaches regard education as having two main functions: (a) secondary socialisation and (b) providing the skills required in preparation for paid employment
consensus approaches include: functionalist, the new right and post modern
what do conflict approaches such as Marxist, feminist and neo-Marxist argue about education?
These argue that the education system reproduces inequalities within society.
They take a more critical and negative view of the education.
conflict approaches include: Marxist, feminist, neo-Marxist
functionalists believes that education performs many functions which are to the benefit of individuals and society.
state the functions that functionalists believe education performs
DURKHEIM:
- education helps to establish social solidarity through transmitting, norms, beliefs and values to all pupils.
- education helps to integrate people into society by socialising children into similar values which makes them feel they are apart of a larger social unit and community
- education regulations members of society through preparing members of society in terms of rules and standards
- education acts as a vehicle for developing the human resources of a nation as it provides an adequate supply of trained people with the skills required to perform specialist roles within the economy
Parsons:
- educations acts a vital secondary source of socialisation that acts as a bridge between the family and society as a whole as in school and society individuals are judged by universalistic standards which applied to all members and based on meritocratic principles
Davis and Moore:
- Davis and Moore argue that education acts a preparation for work as education is a proving ground for ability, a selective agency which allocates people to roles according to ability
Blau and Duncan:
modern economy depends on its ‘human capital’ - its worker skills
education is based on meritocracy which enables each person to be allocated to a job best suited to their abilities.
What functions does Durkheim argue education performs and how does education performs these functions in school
According to Durkheim, society can only survive and flourish if there is a strong degree of social solidarity. He argues that education helps establish this by transmitting norms, beliefs and values to all pupils. Education welds together a mass of individuals into a united whole by fixing into children the essential similarities that collective life demands. This helps to integrate people more closely into society by attaching them to the larger social unit. Durkheim believes that the education system achieves this via: Schools follow a standardised curriculum, therefore all pupils regardless of their gender or class or ethnic background are exposed to the same information, knowledge and cultural teachings. The effect of the transmission of the core culture via the education system is to promote a consensus on central norms and values – this ensures a fundamental level of agreement, despite a diversity of individual life experiences and helps to produce a homogeneous society. In schools, children come to see that they are part of something larger than themselves and develop a sense of commitment to the larger social group.
Closely allied to the transmission of culture, is the need for each society to regulate its members. Education achieves this via:
It prepares individuals for interaction with members of society in terms of its general rules and standards. In respecting school rules, pupils learn to respect the rules of society in general. This contributes to social order.
According to Durkheim, modern industrial economies have a complex division of labour and the education system acts a vehicle for developing the human resources of a nation. In doing so it provides an adequate supply of trained people with the skills required to perform specialist roles within the economy.
how does education bring social solidarity
According to Durkheim, society can only survive and flourish if there is a strong degree of social solidarity. He argues that education helps establish this by transmitting norms, beliefs and values to all pupils. Education welds together a mass of individuals into a united whole by fixing into children the essential similarities that collective life demands. This helps to integrate people more closely into society by attaching them to the larger social unit. Durkheim believes that the education system achieves this via: Schools follow a standardised curriculum, therefore all pupils regardless of their gender or class or ethnic background are exposed to the same information, knowledge and cultural teachings. The effect of the transmission of the core culture via the education system is to promote a consensus on central norms and values – this ensures a fundamental level of agreement, despite a diversity of individual life experiences and helps to produce a homogeneous society. In schools, children come to see that they are part of something larger than themselves and develop a sense of commitment to the larger social group.
how does the education system regulate its members according to functionalists like Durkheim
Closely allied to the transmission of culture, is the need for each society to regulate its members. Education achieves this via:
It prepares individuals for interaction with members of society in terms of its general rules and standards. In respecting school rules, pupils learn to respect the rules of society in general. This contributes to social order.
How does the education system act as a vehicle for developing the human resources of nation by preparing workers with the specialist skills
According to Durkheim, modern industrial economies have a complex division of labour and the education system acts a vehicle for developing the human resources of a nation. In doing so it provides an adequate supply of trained people with the skills required to perform specialist roles within the economy.
explain how educations acts as a vital secondary source of socialisation according to Parsons
Parsons (1961) draws on many of Durkheim’s ideas. He sees schools as vital secondary source of socialisation that acts as a bridge between the family and society as a whole. After primary socialisation, the school becomes the focal socialising agency preparing young people for their adult roles and encourages them to be a highly motivated and achievement orientated workforce.
According to Parsons, within the family children are judged by particularistic standards, not by a formal standard. However, in wider society, individuals are judged by universalistic standards which applied to all members. Status is achieved, not ascribed. Therefore, school prepares individuals as success is achieved by meritocratic principles – which reflect how society as a whole operates. This is because school is a meritocracy which is based on the meritocratic principles of society and the workplace
Like Durkheim, Parsons argues that the school represents a miniature society. By reflecting the operation of society as a whole, the school prepares individuals for their adult roles
explain how educations acts as preparation for work according to davis and moore
Davis and Moore (1967) also see education as preparation for work, but link it more directly to the stratification system. They view education as a proving ground for ability – a selective agency allocating people to roles according to ability. They link education to social inequality and argue that inequality is necessary to ensure that the most important roles in society are filled by the most talented people. Not everyone is equally talented, so society has to offer higher rewards for these jobs.
This encourages everyone to compete and then society can select the most talented individuals to fill these positions.
Education plays a key part in this process as it:
Sifts, sorts and grades individuals in terms of their talents and abilities and allocates them to different sets/streams/bands and provides them with a curriculum which will ensure they fulfil their potential. By enabling the most talented to gain more educational qualifications they can be selected for the most highly rewarded positions in society.
what do blau and duncan argue in relation to education allocating people roles based on their ability
Similarly, BLAU and DUNCAN (1978) argue that a modern economy depends for its prosperity on using its ‘human capital’ – its workers’ skills. They argue that a meritocratic education system does this best, since it enables each person to be allocated to the job best suited to their abilities. This will make the most effective use of their talents and skills and maximise their productivity.
evaluate the functionalist perspective on education
- gaps in education reveals the unmeritocratic nature of education with a prominent example being between 2015-2018 where 8 private schools sent 1,310 pupils to Oxbridge while 2,900 state schools sent 1,220 pupils to Oxbridge
- critics of the functional perspective would argue that schools do not always promote social solidarity, unity and integration as many pupils may be bullied, do not like school, do not have many friends or suffer from problems such as bullying or discrimination etc
- there is a vast array of evidence that equal opportunities does not exist in exist in education e.g achievement is greatly influenced by class background which undermines the functionalist view that education is a meritocracy and that qualifications and success is based on achieved status
- interactionist (Wrong) argues that functionalists have an ‘over-socialised view’ of people as puppets of society - pupils do not passively accept all that they are taught, many reject the school values and rebel against school rules or be apart of anti-school subcultures which gives evidence against the idea of stability in school
- Marxists critique the functionalist idea that education instils the shared values of society as a whole, arguing that it transmits the ruling class ideology
- critics argue that the education system does not teach specialised skills adequately. The wolf review (2011) found that up to a third of 16-19 year olds are on courses that do not lead to high education or good jobs
- the new right argue that state education fails to adequately prepare young people for work
- ethnocentric nature of the curriculum devalues the experiences of BAME pupils and contradicts the idea of social solidarity
- functionalists see education as a process that instils the shared values of society as a whole, but Marxists would argue that education in a capitalistic society only transmits the ideology of the ruling class
what is neoliberalism
neoliberalism is an economic philosophy that has had a major influence on education policy. Neoliberals believe that the state should not provide services such as education, health and welfare.
It is based on the idea that the state must not dictate to individuals and should not try to regulate a free-market economy. So governments should encourage competition, privatise state-run businesses and deregulate markets
how has neo-liberal ideas influenced governments?
Neoliberals ideas have influenced all governments since 1979 - whether conservative, labour or coalition but particularly conservative
neoliberals believe that the value of education lies in how well it enables the country to compete in the global marketplace
they argue that this can only be achieved if schools become more like businesses, empowering parents and pupils as consumers and using competition between schools to drive up standards
what is the new right?
the new right is a conservative political view that totally incorporates neoliberal economic ideas
A central principle of new right thinking is the belief that the state cannot meet people’s needs and that people are best left to meet their own needs through the free market
the new right emphasises the importance of market forces in education and believe that there are only TWO important roles of the state.
explain these roles
- the state imposes a framework on schools within which they have to compete, e.g. publishing Ofsted reports and league tables of schools’ results ensure that the state provides parents with information with which to make an informed choice between schools
- the state ensures that a shared culture is transmitted. By imposing a standardised national curriculum it ensures that schools socialise pupils into single cultural heritage
outline features central to the new right view on education which are similar to functionalists
- They believe that some people are naturally more talented than others
- They favour an education system run on meritocratic principles of open competition
- They believe that education should serve the needs of the economy by preparing people for work
- They maintain that education should socialise pupils into shared collective values such as competition and instil a sense of national identity and citizenship.
what is a key difference between the new right and functionalist view on education
a key difference between the NR and functionalism is that when the Conservatives gained power in 1979, they did not believe that the education system was achieving these goals
explain why the new right was critical of state education and explain new vocationalism
First of all, the NR were critical of state education, seeing it as inefficient because it failed to produce pupils with the skills needed for the economy. To address this problem, they introduced a policy in the 1980s that became known as New Vocationalism: this is where a range of vocational education courses were introduced by the Conservative government. These included: (a) GNVQ courses (General National Vocational Qualification) which were taught in schools as an alternative to academic courses. They aimed to prepare students for work by teaching job-specific skills in the classroom and placing students into the workplace for work experience placements. (b) The YTS (Youth Training Scheme) was introduced. This was a one-year training scheme that combined work experience with education for unemployed school leavers - to provide skills and help them become more employable.
explain why the new right critical of state education and how do they reflect this idea in policies
The NR were critical of education because it was run by the state. They believed that private schools delivered higher quality education because, unlike state schools, they are answerable to paying consumers – the parents. A central idea guiding NR thinking is the belief that the state cannot meet people’s needs and that people are best left to meet their own needs through the free market. This is reflected in the notion of:
(a) Marketisation: this creates an ‘education market’ where the NR believed that competition should be created between schools to make education more business-like. They believed that the marketisation of education would force schools to become more responsive to parents’ wishes and like private businesses; schools would have to compete to attract ‘customers’ by improving their ‘product’ which would lead to an increase in educational standards.
(b) Parentocracy: by empowering them as the consumers of education, parents were transformed into customers/clients of the education marketplace. Parents were granted greater power to shape their children’s educational future by giving them the right to choose which school to send their children to (previously, children were allocated to schools in their catchment area by their LEA (local education authority)). The NR believed that this would bring greater diversity, choice and efficiency to schools increasing their ability to meet the needs of pupils, parents and employers.
explain marketisation in relation to new right
Marketisation: this creates an ‘education market’ where the NR believed that competition should be created between schools to make education more business-like. They believed that the marketisation of education would force schools to become more responsive to parents’ wishes and like private businesses; schools would have to compete to attract ‘customers’ by improving their ‘product’ which would lead to an increase in educational standards.
explain parentocracy in relation to new right
Parentocracy: by empowering them as the consumers of education, parents were transformed into customers/clients of the education marketplace. Parents were granted greater power to shape their children’s educational future by giving them the right to choose which school to send their children to (previously, children were allocated to schools in their catchment area by their LEA (local education authority)). The NR believed that this would bring greater diversity, choice and efficiency to schools increasing their ability to meet the needs of pupils, parents and employers.
evaluate the new right perspective on education
- critics of the new right argue that problems in education are not a result of state controlled education but a lack of state funding of it;
Ball (1994) and Gerwitz (1995) both argue that competition between schools is more likely to benefit the middle class who can use their cultural and economic capital to ensure that their children gain access to the most desirable of school;
Marxists argue that education does not impose a shared culture but the culture of the dominant class and devalues the culture of the working class and ethnic minorities.
critics would argue that the real cause of low educational standards is not state control but social inequality and inadequate funding of state schools.
There is a contradiction between the new right support for parental choice on the other hand the state imposing a compulsory national curriculum on all its schools on the other