Family Flashcards
Func - Murdock
Most efficient family type, so much so its universal, found in all societies
RESS =
Reproduction - biological reproduction of the next generation, nuclear family easily allows for reproduction
Economic - getting members of the family the basic needs to survive. Nuclear family efficient in providing these because the man earns the money and the woman distributes it
Socialisation - education of young family members, primary socialisation to learn the value consensus
Satisfying sex drives - the need for members of society to have sex, otherwise they would be frustrated and angry. Provides a stable relationship for them to have sex in to prevent STD’s and know who kids are
EVA - there are societies that don’t commonly have nuclear families The Nayar in south west India - women could have multiple sexual partners and children were parented by the mothers brother.
Parsons criticises him by saying the family has lost 2 functions
Func - Parsons
Functional fit - the type of family depends on the society e.g. in pre modern extended was the most typical. Nuclear family fits the industrial society. 2 reasons =
Geographical mobility - Families need to be able to move where the jobs are and uprooting extended family is cumbersome
Social mobility - people need to able to move up social classes, this can cause tension in extended families where a daughter may earn more than her father leading to tension
Loss of Functions - Education function is fufilled by society
2 key functions = Primary socialisation
Stabilisation of Adult personalities (Warm bath theory) - Argues that the family provides a comforting and relaxing experience for men so that he can relieve the stress of work, this allows them to return to work the next day - Men and Women are biologically suited to the traditional instrumental and expressive role.
EVA - Feminists argue this view is oppressive to women. Ansley - Women absorb all the anger and frustration ‘takers of shit’. Oakley - traditional roles are a social construct not biological.
Func - Fletcher
Haven’t lost functions but gained some
Education - family is still involved in education system through PTA meetings and parents evenings and motivating their children
Healthcare - families still take care of their children
Gained - Maintaining satisfying Relationships - maintain relationships as if you had a negative relationships you would be much more distracted and under-perform at work and school.
Indirect EVA of func
Outdated - Post mod - talking about a family unit that doesnt exist anymore, today your family can be whoever and whatever you choose
Overly positive - Marx & Fem - ignores harmful aspects of family life and wider society. This includes class exploitation, domestic abuse, child abuse and neglect
New Right - Murray
individual responsibility -
overgenerous welfare state has removed the individual responsibility for poorer families and allows them to have families they cant afford Causes decline in the family and wider social issues by contributing to a dependency culture and a lazy underclass. Says underclass are a drain on society and live off benefits and government protects them from consequences
EVA - Structural factors that are beyond peoples control that can affect employment. Some people need this support of the state
New Right - Dennis & Erdos
Build on murray - Single parent families lead to lack of socialisation and cause social problems like alcohol abuse, drug abuse and increased crime. Call them fatherless families as vast majority of single parents are females. Says lack of father figure means they miss out on socialisation that a male brings
EVA - There are many other people that can take on the ‘father figure’ role other than biological father.
Fem - ignores benefits of single parents families on women as they are free from oppression from males
Marx - Engels
Nuclear family emerged as a response to capitalism, as capitalist became rich they needed to ensure they passed property onto rightful heir. With nuclear family you can be far more certain who your children are.
States women are essentially prostitutes as they trade sex and children for financial security
EVA - outdated - women now work, own property, have independent incomes and less likely to marry for financial security or social necessity. Or may not be in Nuclear family at all
Marx - Zaretsky
Primary socialisation - teaches children dominant ideology e.g. learn from a young age there is always a boss above you
Safe Haven - safe haven for working men from exploitative work. Based on the exploitation of women whose unpaid domestic labour creates illusion of safe haven.
Unit of consumption - Products are aimed at families as a lot of money is spend on family related products. exploitative as most workers buy products for much more than they would get paid to make them. Media encourages this through marketing e.g. ‘keep up with the Jones’ and ‘Pester power’
EVA - Criticised with parsons
Young people don’t learn a high level of obedience from their parents
Marx - Althusser
The state as a means to maintain dominant ideology and position in society
RSA - physical control e.g. police and courts
ISA - ideological control e.g. education and family
Families socialise children into dominant ideology. ruling class maintain false class consciousness. Far less likely to challenge exploitation as its all they’ve ever known
EVA - Donzelot - Family is itself controlled by the state. Argues that reps of the state like social workers and doctors control and change families. “policing the family”
Liberal Feminism
Oakley - The way we teach our children what it is to be a man or woman is oppressive and from a young age we enforce stereotypes
also argues that housewife role has only really appeared since the industrial revolution and women became trapped at home and financially dependant on their husbands - not biological
Solution - remove gender socialisation through challenging the stereotypes through laws (equal pay act and sex discrimination act)
In wider society children’s toys are far less gendered and media more diversified - However Oakley still thinks that the housewife role is still seen as the main role
EVA - Radical and Marxist feminists think small gradual changes aren’t enough women’s oppression is too ingrained into society and revolution is needed - Parsons thinks these roles are biological
Radical Feminism
Patriarchal is the cause of the oppression - she focuses on marriage and argues it benefits men and oppresses women, researched mental health of married and unmarried peoples = Men are more happy married and women happier unmarried
Solution - separatism of men and women - need matrifocal households and some take it further saying that we need political lesbianism and avoid relations with men and baby strikes
EVA - Liberal and Marxist feminists disagree and say that men are oppressed and therefore not all men are to blame
Impractical and unrealistic expectation that all women are going to stop living with men, can women just simply turn into lesbians
Marxist Feminism
Capitalism
Ansley - 1) maintain the current workforce, men get exploited at work causing stress and frustration, capitalism needs these emotions to disappear so the women of the family have to deal with it by creating a calming restful place away from work. ‘Takers of shit’
2) Next generation of workers - raise them and teach them the dominant ideology e.g. there is always someone above them
Solution - Communism as the cause of the oppression is ultimately capitalism, a revolution would eradicate class and gender inequality
EVA - Hakim argues many women choose to be housewives and mothers because they enjoy it, so rather than being forced into the role women are making active choices
Difference Feminism
Hooks - argues that the 3 main types ignore the differences between women seeing the world from a middle class white western position. Hooks is a black feminist who argues that each women’s experience of oppression will vary as women are not the same for example black women suffer the double whammy so for black women family is actually a positive support network against racism
EVA - criticised for ignoring that there are some more universal issues that they will have in common,
Feminism as a whole
can be criticised because the all disagree with each other so they cant get rid of misogyny as they cant agree on what to fix
Postmodernism - Stacey
Argues there is increasing diversity and choice that come in the postmodern era, people no longer feel the need to follow traditional ideas about families, sex and marriage
free to choose whatever family and relationship works for them
argues women in particular take advantage of this new choice to pick a better relationship
she found evidence of a new family type - Divorce extended family in which a man would divorce his wife and remarry and the two wives would operate as extended family and corroborate on childcare issues
Postmodernism - Weeks
Whilst there is more choice and diversity there is also more chaos and uncertainty.
Found that under 35’s had much larger acceptance of people chooing whatever family type they wanted but also found that most people follow the traditional route as kids are brought up by a couple, most couples marry and most divorcees re marry
Indirect EVA of Postmodernism
Weeks and Stacey criticises each other
Chester - Very little has changed with the family, mostly nuclear however the main difference now is that women now do paid work other than that most couples are heterosexual monogamous couple with children he calls this neo-conventional family
Rapoport’s - first to argue that there was widespread family diversity and it is now normal
Cultural - globalisation and increased migration e.g. asian families extended, black families matrifocal
Life-stage - at different stages of life different family types
Organisational - the way each family is organised is different in different family
Generational - Older = more traditional beliefs
Social class - class difference e.g. middle class may not have kids
Giddens - Late modernism
Rise of individualism - people choose whats best for them rather than society or others e.g. leave rather than stay for the kids
From romantic love (until death do us part) but now Confluent love (until someone better comes along)
this is because the typical relationship nowadays and the one most people want is what he calls a pure relationship - your partner meets all of your individual needs - argues we are completely free to leave a relationship that is not meeting our needs and “engage in an endless cycle of hoping regretting and trying again”
Beck - Late Modernism
Tradition no longer tells us exactly how to live, we have entered a risk society, much more aware of the choices we make and its risk
When applied to the family this means we are far more aware that many marriages end in divorce so we choose not to take the risk
This has ultimately increased family diversity as people will choose less traditional and less risky family types
Also argues we have a negotiated family, people are now starting relationships with a discussion or negotiation about the type of relationship it will be and how it will meet both partners wishes and expectations. These negotiated families wont meet the traditional family norms and therefore increase family diversity
Indirect EVA of Late modernism
As both argue there has been increased family diversity due to individualisation, you can criticises either of them with Weeks and Chester or support with Stacey and Rapoport’s
Criticised by Smart - people don’t have a completely free choice to pick what is best for them
Interactionism
see people as agents with free will who can freely think and choose how to interpret world around them
Smart - criticises structural theories, argues that sociology has mainly focused on ties of ‘blood and marriage’ but Smart believe there are many important relations beyond that
There are many relations that go beyond blood and marriage that can significantly shape your life - Friends, Fictive kin (close friends treated as family), Chosen family (supportive network of friends), Dead relative, Pets
Smart proposes the connectedness thesis which states that our past relationships don’t just end as we are still connected to people in some way. “where lives have become interwoven and embedded it becomes impossible for relationships to simply end”
Separated Parents are still connected through kids
Find a Web of relationships that influence choices in particular women are far more likely to have custody of the children following a divorce so are not as free as men to simply start a new relationship
EVA - unlikely to use other than criticise Giddens
Ignores what is special about ‘blood and marriage’ These relations are special and distinct from other relationships
Domestic Division of Labour - Willmott & Young
Argue family has become symmetrical
Carried out structured interviews with about 1000 working class families in Bethnal green once in the 50s and again in the 70s and found that 72% of men helped around the house other than washing up at least once a week
Argue an emergence of the new man, a sensitive, nuturing man who is in touch with his feminine side and is involved with the expressive role
EVA - Oakley criticises their evidence and says that helping partner out could mean anything e.g. tucking the kids into the bed occasionally or making their own breakfasts, the vague statement doesnt reflect equal division of labour
Domestic Division of Labour - Oakley
Unstructured interview with 40 women half W/C half Middle class, all aged between 20-30, lived in London and had one or more under 5 child
Found that 25% of husbands had a high level of Participation in housework, 25% had a high level in childcare
little evidence of Symettry but that women suffer dual burden
Duncombe and Marsden agree and say that its even worse than that, women have a triple shift where they also manage the emotions of the family as well
EVA - Research can be criticised for being too subjective, what counts as a high level of housework and only 40 people is unrepresentative
Domestic Division of Labour - Commercialisation of Housework
New tech and services have made housework far easier to do e.g. robot hoovers, washing machines and hello fresh
Silver argues this mean men are more likely to do housework as it is easier and less time consuming and women spend less time doing housework
Gershuny argues that there is lagged adaption where men are slowly adjusting to cultural and technological changes
However growing rise in weaponised incompetence whereby men are deliberately bad at household jobs so women can take over and do it for them
this disproportionally helps middle class as they have the money to these devices