Fallacies of Content Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three groups of fallacies under this category?

A
  1. Linguistic Manipulation
  2. Psychological Warfare
  3. Logical Maneuvers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The objective meaning of a word (what it signifies)

A

Denotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The subjective meaning, implying attributes or emotions

A

Connotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fallacies in this group take advantage of the flexibility of connotations to mislead, impress, seduce, or secure sympathies

A

Exploitation of connotative fluidity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

While language conveys truth, it can also conceal it, depending on how it is used

A

Language as a double-edged sword

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Refers to using jargon to intimidate a non-expert audience, making the speaker seem more knowledgeable. It also refers to using jargon to obscure meaning and prevent others from counter-arguing due to confusion

A

Prestige Jargon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The use of emotionally charged words or images to secure sympathy or support

A

Emotional Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The use of words with positive connotations to mask or soften unpleasant truths. Often used to mislead or soften the impact of negative information by framing it in a more pleasant way.

A

Double Talking (Euphemism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fallacies that fall under this exploit the non-rational aspects of human beings

A

Psychological Warfare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

This fallacy occurs when products or ideas are advertised alongside unrelated things to create false associations. The intent is to make the audience connect the quality or image of one thing with the advertised product, even though the two are logically unrelated.

A

Meaning from Association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone cites an authority on a topic that falls outside their field of expertise

A

Misuse of Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

This fallacy works by repeating the same assertion numerous times, with the intent that people will eventually accept it as true, even if it’s a lie. The psychological principle behind this is that familiar information, even if false, is easier to accept than unfamiliar truth

A

Repeated Assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

This fallacy involves tailoring messages to align with pre-existing attitudes of the audience. It inserts people, ideas, or imagery that are either positively or negatively regarded by the audience to manipulate their perception.

A

Attitude Fitting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Occurs when a small or insignificant gesture is presented as substantial action. This is often used to distract from the fact that real meaningful action is lacking

A

Tokenism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone discredits their opponent’s argument or evidence before it is even presented. By dismissing the validity of the argument beforehand, the opponent is effectively prevented from making a fair case.

A

Poisoning the well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

This involves creating false, yet pleasant, expectations to justify or cope with an undesirable situation. When faced with failure or disappointment, people may alter their perspective by convincing themselves that the outcome is actually favorable

A

Rationalizing

17
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone uses force or the threat of force to coerce others into accepting an argument or following a directive, instead of providing a logical reason

A

Argumentum ad Baculum

18
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone attacks the character or personal traits of their opponent instead of addressing the argument being made. The assumption is that discrediting the person automatically discredits their argument, which is logically flawed.

A

Ad Hominem

19
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone uses confident gestures, tone, or language to create the illusion of having a strong argument, even if their reasoning is weak or nonexistent. The appearance of confidence misleads others into believing the argument has merit.

A

Confident Manner

20
Q

This set of fallacies focuses on deceiving the cognitive, logical mind. It often requires rhetorical skill and an understanding of logical processes.

A

Logical Maneuvers

21
Q

This fallacy occurs when one assumes that what is true for individual members of a group must also be true for the group as a whole

A

Fallacy of Composition

22
Q

This fallacy occurs when one assumes that what is true for the whole group must also be true for each individual member of that group

A

Fallacy of Division

23
Q

This fallacy occurs when only two extreme alternatives are presented, ignoring any middle ground or other possible options

A

Fallacy of Dilemma

24
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone uses a continuous spectrum of minor differences to argue that there is no meaningful distinction between two extremes

A

Argument of the Beard

25
Q

This fallacy involves misrepresenting or exaggerating an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack or refute

A

Fallacy of Strawman

26
Q

This fallacy occurs when an argument asserts that a particular action will inevitably lead to a series of undesirable consequences, without demonstrating a direct causal link

A

Fallacy of Slippery Slope

27
Q

This fallacy involves changing the subject to divert attention away from the main issue, often by discussing irrelevant but related topics

A

Fallacy of Diversion

28
Q

This fallacy occurs when an argument assumes the truth of what it is supposed to prove, essentially using the conclusion as a premise.

A

Begging the question

29
Q

This fallacy occurs when a lack of evidence for one side of an argument is used to affirm the opposite side. It falsely assumes that if something has not been proven false, it must be true

A

Appeal to Ignorance

30
Q

This fallacy arises when an argument relies on two mutually exclusive assumptions, making it logically impossible for both to be true

A

Contradictory Assumption

31
Q

This fallacy occurs when someone justifies their own wrongdoing by pointing out similar wrongdoing by others

A

Two Wrongs Make a Right