Fallacies Flashcards
affirming the consequence
even if both premises are true, they do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion
petitio principii
begging the question, tactic of assuming what you need to prove
ad hominem
instead of criticising claim, criticise person making it
equivocation
same term is used variably in different parts of the argument
post hoc, ergo propter hoc
‘correlation does not imply causation’, inferring that something is responsible for something else because the former precedes the latter
retrodiction
reasoning from the present to the past
direct inference
reasoning from populations to samples
induction-to-causes
reasoning from effects to causes
induction-to-unobservables
reasoning from observables to unobservables
instance-to-the-next-instance
reasoning from one or more observed instances to the next instance
enumerative induction
reasoning from one or more particular instances to all instances
disjunction introduction
A, therefore A or B
conjunction elimination
A and B, therefore A
disjunction elimination
A or B, not A therefore B
what do truth tables show?
validity and consistency
a posteriori
knowledge based on facts/past events
modus tollens
if A then B, not B therefore not A
modus ponens
if A then B, A therefore B
reductio ad absurdum
proposition disproved by following implications to logically absurd conlusion
negation elimination
removes double negatives
contraposition
if A then B, not A therefore not B
necessary condition
something which must be present for another condition to occur
sufficient condition
something which produces said condition