Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Red Herring

A

speaker skips to a new and irrelevant topic in order to avoid the topic of discussion in an attempt to distract or confuse the audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ad hominem

A

switching the argument from the issue at hand to the character of the other speaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Faulty analogy

A

an analogy in which the things being compared aren’t equal or comparable; saying if two things are alike in one regard, they must be alike in other ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ad populum (bandwagon

A

based on the assumption that something must be good and/or true because it’s in accordance with the beliefs/actions of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Straw man

A

-speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an opponent’s viewpoint (sets up a different issue that’s easier to argue)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Slippery slope

A

-the fallacy of dire consequences; it assumes that one choice will necessarily lead to a cascading series of bad choices/outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Post hoc ergo/”false cause”

A

link between the premises and conclusion depends on some imagine casual connection that probably does not exist (correlation does not imply causation; coincidences)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Appeal to ignorance

A

a claim that something must be true because it hasn’t been proven false, can also be a claim that something must be false because it hasn’t been proven true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

either/or

A

speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices (ultimatum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reductio ad absurdum

A

reducing an argument to absurdity, involves characterizing an opposing argument in such a way that it seems to be ridiculous, or the consequences of the position seem ridiculous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hasty generalization

A

not enough evidence to support a particular conclusion (stereotypes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circular reasoning

A

epeating the claim as a way to provide evidence, resulting in no evidence at all (comes back to beginning without having proven anything)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Appeal to flattery

A

flattering the reader or audience to make yourself and your argument more appealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Appeal to pity-(pathos)

A

someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting one’s opponent’s feelings of pity or guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly