Facts Flashcards

1
Q

Hitler’s Rise to Power: 3 Paragraphs?

A

POINT: WSC enables Hitler to utilise his personal skills to take advantage of weak government.

Weaknesses of Government:

  • ToV - Unable to destroy opposition (Munich Putsch)
  • 15 govt. in less than 15 years. Hyperinflation as a result of the Ruhr Crisis
  • Some sign of strength with Stresemann and Dawes and Young Plan
  • Wall Street Crash

Personal Qualities and Ideology

  • Lebensraum to combat Tov - Promised employment, strong leadership, end to political instability
  • Blamed jews
  • Defeated socialists w/ reichstag fire
  • Brilliant Orator (‘A Hitler speech was superb theatre’ - EH Carr)

Mistakes of Opponents

  • KPD and SPD disunity - Stalin ordered not to unite
  • Communist insistence on class war limited appeal to middle class whereas Hitler did not address himself to any particular class
  • Muller SPD govt. could not deal w/ depression
  • Von Papen: lifted ban on SA, convinced Hindenburg to give Hitler Chancellorship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strengths and Weaknesses of Weimar, 1919-32

A

Point: International developments led to period of stability and strength however, the shaky foundations and unstable political constitutions meant the government was unable to survive the WSC.

Foundations of the Republic

  • ToV: outrage = government named ‘November Criminals’
  • Reparations = 1923 Ruhr Crisis = Hyperinflation
  • Constitution not democratic enough: Article 48 (gave president emergency powers - Ebert used 136 times)
  • Proportional Representation: no stability + let extremist partied in. Lots of coalitions - weakened government as none would agree.
  • WEAKNESS

Golden Years

  • period of stength due to Stresemann, following Ruhr Crisis
  • Introduce Rentemark to stabilise economy
  • Policy of Erfulungspolitik - fulfillment: work w/ allies to revise ToV
  • Dawes Plan (1924): loan of 800million marks
  • Young Plan (1929): extends timeline and reduces reparations
  • Politics appeared more stable. 1928: 72.6% in favour of Republican parties.
  • Only stable in period of international stability.

Impact of the Depression

  • Reality of Dawes Plan highlighted.
  • Germany on ‘borrowed prosperity’ - 1929: US withdrew German loads
  • Political weakness catalysed, 4 governments in 3 years
  • couldn’t solve problems - ‘Parliamentary system ceased to function’ - Paxton
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘Totalitarianism’ in Hitler’s Germany

A

Point: Controlled many areas, inc. army, politics and some of society but still religious opposition and failure of economic policies.

Government Legislation

  • Reichstag Fire (1933) - Emergency Decree (opposition suppressed and KPD banned)
  • Enabling Act (1933) - w/ support of Centre Party: Hitler = rule by decree for 4 years
  • Other political parties banned
  • 1934: All federal govt. brought under Ministry of Interior: centralised the state
  • Trade unions banned and replaced w/ German labour Front
  • Press Censorship
  • Totalitarian: Politics and Workers

Consolidation of Party and Gleichshaltung

  • Night of Long Knives (1934) - Opposition eliminated, SA purged.
  • Army swear oath of allegiance to Hitler.
  • Gleichshaltung: bringing people into line.
  • Creation of fear driven society, enforced by army + gestapo
  • Concentration camps opened, 1933: undesirables removed.
  • Anti-Semitic laws.
  • Army brought under control.
  • Parts of society Hitler could not control (Gypsies, homosexuals, Jews) were removed.

Education, Church, and Economy

  • Cult of Personality. Propaganda (Goebbels) key in creation of totalitarian state.
  • Indoctrination of youth. Race science taught. Youth groups compulsory 1936.
  • Concordat with Church, 1933. Kept Church out of state affairs however govt. did not have complete control over Church.
  • Weak religious opposition from Confessional Church.
  • ‘Wehrwirtschaft’ - War economy. Achieve autarky and be ready for war.
  • Failed. State did not have total control over economy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Successes and Failures of Hitler’s domestic policy

A

Point: Mixture. Successes in reduction of unemployment , indoctrination of majority of German youth, success of racial policy. Failure of economic policies and policies towards women.

Economic:

  • Unclear aims.
  • Adapted to support expansionist foreign policy while solving problem of rearmament and unemployment.
  • 1932 6m unemployed -> 1939 0.2m unemployed through public works programmes (autobahn, Volkswagen) and conscription.
  • Removed women and jews from workforce.
  • Arms spending increased from 1.9bn RM 1933 -> 17.2 bn 1938
  • Four Year Plan: autarky, preparation for war. Huge deficit of consumer goods and food. ‘guns before butter’.
  • Success of reducing unemployment. Forced labour and removing women and undesirables from workforce calls that into question.
  • Four Year Plan = failure, still dependent for consumer goods and foods.

Youth and Women (Social)

  • Aim: Imposition of Nazi ideology. Volksgemeinschaft (pure Aryan race). Remove non-Nazi influences, focus on military. Build society where individual liberty is replaced w/ loyalty to Reich.
  • Introduced racial purity (1935 Nuremburg Laws + 1938 Kristallnacht)
  • Youth: Hitler Youth: boys = militarised, girls = domesticated. Developed strong sense of loyalty, cult of personality.
  • Children spied on parents. 1939: membership compulsory. 5m members 1936.
  • Changes to education: physics (angle of bomb dropping), history (power of Germany) + eugenics taught.
  • Oath of loyalty from teachers. = strong indoctrination.
  • Success, however some opposition (Edeilweiss pirates, quickly crushed)
  • Women: Kinder, Kirche, Kuche. Women removed from workforce. Only 10% allowed state jobs -> fail, WW2 drew women into workforce.
  • 1943 conscripted into workforce.
  • Cross of Honours for Ger. mother to increase birthrate. 990,000 (1933) -> 1.27m (1937), short of 1920 level = fail.

Church

  • Wanted to co-inhabit, knew he couldn’t eradicate them
  • Concardat signed with Catholic Church, 1933: state and church would stay out of each others affairs.
  • Hitler disbanded Catholic Youth Groups
  • Pope Pius XI condemned Nazi treatment of Church and their racial policy
  • Crucifix crisis: banned crucifix, take down religious items.
  • Support of branch of Protestant Church (German Christians) but resistance from Confessional Church (weak)
  • Hitler’s policy towards the Church failed, Catholic Church openly criticised Hitler however, their resistance was limited.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Analyse the methods used to maintain power by Stalin.

A

Point: fear and elimination of opposition crucial

Terror

  • ruthless
  • Kirov murder -> show trials. Dealt with division in the party.
  • Purge of the red army, 37,000 officers purged: purified army (problem during WW2)
  • Great terror on population (NKVD): class enemies eradicated
  • Historiography: Totalitarian (Conquest) and Revisionist (Getty)
  • Consolidated power, opposition removed, society and party controlled.

Government Legislation

  • Centralised state activity by increasing Politburo influence - increased Stalin’s control
  • Banned trade unions - took power away from workers
  • Socialism in economic policies: 5 Year Plans - forced industrialisation of Magnitogorsk: wages increased for those who mined most (Stakhanovite legislation)
  • Peasants: forced into collectives. (Failure - production dropped and many peasants killed animals to prevent them entering the collectives) -
  • Increased personal power. Socialism not a success in the countryside.

Cult of Personality and Social Changes

  • Stalin seen as true leader (read Lenin’s eulogy)
  • Propaganda projected Stalin as a God-like figure
  • Changes in Art: portrayed Stalin and communism as the saviour of Russia
  • Indoctrination of the youth
  • Attach on the orthdox Church: created a new Russia
  • Not fundamental: raised platform of Stalin as undisputed leader
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stalin’s political, economic, social policies transformed Soviet Union.

A

Point: Economically transformed (huge humanitarian cost), Politically transformed (state bound through terror), Socially initially but later reactionary

Political

  • Kirov Murder -> show trials
  • Purge of Red Army, 37,000 officers purged (loyalty to state)
  • Great Terror on population (NKVD)
  • Historiography: Totalitarian (Conquest) and Revisionist (Getty)
  • New reign of terror transformed Russia into a state bound by fear

Economic

  • The Great Turn: Mass Industrialisation.
  • Wanted to estb. self-sufficiency, increase grain supplies to feed workers.
  • 5 Year Plans: centered around state controlled forced industrialisation (Gosplan).
  • 1st FYP (1928-32): focussed on heavy industry. Magnitogorsk built. 25000 citizens. Effective in boosting industrial production - little improvement in consumer goods.
  • 2nd FYP: heavy industrial goods - by 1937, USSR virtually self-sufficient in machine making and metal works: TRANSFORMED
  • 3rd FYP: War economy. By start of WW2, Soviet economy transformed - modern industrialised state.
  • Collectivisation: solve peasant problem: Grain procurement, Dekulakisation, Mass collectivisation.
  • Mid 1929 - less than 5% collectivised. Feb 1939 - over half peasant households collectivised
  • Collective farms did not feed cities: Great humanitarian cost, peasants didn’t have enough grain to feed themselves

Social

  • Wanted equality: made improvements for women, divorce and abortion made easier.
  • 1922-37 82% of 4m new workers were women.
  • Outbreak of war led to retreat to typical values for women.
  • 1939: medals given to women who had more than 9 children (needed to stabilise state)
  • Youth: enforce Stalinism, youth groups Pioneers and Komsomol. Sent to countryside to promote socialism.
  • Movement towards equality and transformation but war effort took priority.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stalin’s last years were his most dangerous.

A

Point: Stalin’s earlier policies more dangerous but his later paranoia made later purges more unpredictable

Terror and Purges

  • Led by his paranoia
  • Purges of 1930s were not repeated on same scale - NKVD remained in the forefront
  • Returning Russian prisoners of war were often shot/sent to gulags: didn’t want knowledge of outside world penetrating USSR (~1/6 returning POW got home)
  • New labour camps built to hold ‘bandits’ (Ukraine and Baltic nationalists).
  • By 1947: more than 20m prisoners in gulags. 27 additional camps had been built.
  • Similar to before. POW: shows erratic behaviour.

Political Policies

  • Degree of continuation: Russification
  • Jewish officials purged from higher levels of party leadership
  • ‘Leningrad Affair’: purge of the Leningrad party. Leaders becoming too confident. Replaced with Stalinites.
  • Party members never knew where they stood with him and feared terror and imprisonment daily. Purges became increasingly irrational.
  • ‘Doctors Plot’ (1953): mostly Jewish doctors in the Kremlin were arrested and accused of killing their patients.
  • Irrational and paranoid.

Army and Military

  • New purge of the military, great leader Zhukov reduced to minor provincial leader
  • Malenkov (in charge of USSR Missile Programme) replaced by Andrei Hanoi
  • Wanted to maintain control in the military
  • Was not uncommon for Stalin: whether he was more dangerous is debatable
  • Fear drove his later policies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alexander II transformed Russian Society.

A

Point: In spite of reactionary policies, AII transformed Russian society earning nickname ‘The Tsar Liberator’. However, his aimes make the nickname questionable: directly contradicted being a ‘liberator’

Emancipation, 1861

  • Serfdom, feudalistic policies mirrors slavery
  • Tied to land, industrialisation couldn’t occur - holding back economic progress
  • ‘It is better to begin abolishing serfdom from above than to wait for it to abolish itself from below’ - 40 million peasants freed.
  • Could not be brought or sold, could take legal action, could own property/land.
  • Peasants unsatisfied: redemption payments over 49 yrs. The Mir distributed the land: could issue/withhold passports for those wishing to travel distances over 20miles.
  • Peasant uprisings started as they wanted more: contributed to reactionary period.
  • ‘single greatest liberating measure in the whole modern history of Europe’ - GM Anderson

Legal, Governmental, Military Reforms

  • 1864: introduced an independent judiciary, equality before the law, tried by jury, judges had to be educated + well paid: preventing bribes and leading to creation of intelligentsia
  • ‘The court room was the one place in Russia where real freedom of speech prevailed’ - Seaton-Watson
  • Army reform: needed after defeat in Crimea. Conscription for all. Reduced time serving from 25yrs to 15yrs. Barbaric punishments abolished and literacy rates increased.
  • Success shown in Turkey in 1871 however ‘one eyed beating the blind’ - Molke.
  • Still had a way to go.
  • Multi-functional Zemstva = local council. All classes could be elected in as members. No fundamental change but a symbolic change to give people a voice.

Reactionary Phase

  • Growing revolutionary opposition (assassination attempt) and peasants revolts led to reactionary phase after 1866.
  • Officials dismissed, Shuvalov and Tolstoy brought in.
  • Radicals and revolutionary opposition imprisoned. Many sent to Siberia.
  • Courts urged to interpret law in favour of the government
  • ‘the tsar liberator was a victim of unsolved conflict between social reform and the dogma of political autocracy’ - Seaton Watson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nature and extent of opposition to Lenin.

A

Point: most serious opposition came from Socialist Groups, in all cases terror was the most important for suppressing opposition.

Socialist Groups

  • Trotsky: Chairman of Petrograd Soviets, 1917.
  • Convinced Bolsheviks taking power ‘in the name of the Soviets’
  • Lenin had no intention of sharing power with socialist groups
  • Shown in closing down of Constituent Assembly and creating Sovnarkom (pred. Bolsheviks) - Treaty of Brest-Litovsk -> disappointing, lost 25% of industry
  • Opposition big among SRs as they gained majority in CA.
  • Dealt with by Cheka (Secret Police) - total power to arrest and torture. 200,000 people purged: many leaders of SRs.
  • Legal system changed to ‘revolutionary justice’ - power to arrest, trial and execute in hands of Cheka.
  • All political partied banned May 1918.
  • Press Censorship.
  • Political reforms and terror used to suppress opposition from other Socialist groups and other parties.

Whites (Civil War)

  • Nature: fighting force in the Civil War (1918-21) - Included remaining SRs, those loyal to Kerensky and Tsarist loyals.
  • Red Army under Trotsky’s control crushed Whites through unifying commitment to the cause and Trotsky’s leadership. (travelled 65000 miles during war)
  • Whites uncoordinated, no common purpose or leader. Opposition weak, desertion high.
  • While Trotsky’s Red Army was key, the Whites own weaknesses contributed more strongly to their downfall.

Political Enemies

  • Bolshevik ideals of communism created class enemies
  • Lenin encouraged ‘class warfare’ to eliminate enemies from society and promoted the use of the term ‘comrade’
  • Anyone upholding bourgeois values -> liable to arrest.
  • NEP men persecuted
  • Eliminated class opposition through suppression, people would not speak up against the regime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WW1 as a cause of 1917 Feb Revolution.

A

Point: catalyst for the fall of tsardom. yet political + social problems that resided in Russia for decades.

WW1 as a cause

  • WW1 can undoubtedly be seen as a catalyst for 1917 Feb Rev by highlighting existing problems in Rus.
  • Optimist Debate: w/o WW1,, Tsardom would have survived due to social and political reforms.
  • Brought new problems to Russia: already depleted resources are committed towards war - no consumer goods.
  • Unregulated printing of money to fund war.
  • Big military defeats in Tannaneberg and Masurea Lakes - loss of moral = rising discontent
  • Conscription for foreign war w/ internal weaknesses causes unrest w/ army + loses loyalty of army.
  • War highlights Tsars weaknesses: Tsar puts himself in charge of front line, held directly responsible for defeats they faced.
  • Tsarina left in charge - associated w/ enemy as she is German. Appointed friends as ministers.
  • Tsar rejects Duma’s proposal of Progressive Bloc: alienating Liberals.
  • War increased social + political instability in Rus. at that time.

Politics

  • Pessimistic perspective: one could argue that Russian Tsardom was always doomed to fail - long lasting political instability.
  • Lack of reform (arising from Duma’s restricted franchise and lack of popular representation)
  • Fundamental laws prevented any form of real change - alienated intelligentsia
  • Stolypin’s reforms didn’t go far enough. Some argued Stolypin’s assassination in 1911 secured failure of Tsardom.
  • Government repression w/ Okhrana
  • Weak Tsar too obstinate
  • ‘the insuperable obstacle was his dogmatic devotion to autocracy’ - Seaton-Watson

Economically and Socially

  • Economic + Social problems, existed before the war, created great discontent w/ pop. of Rus. -
  • Industrialisation - growing working class, poor living conditions, bad pay = strikes (Lena Goldfields, 1912)
  • Agriculture not growing fast enough to support demand for food
  • Growing pop.
  • more land hunger. Methods used were still inefficient.
  • Russification angers minorities as it was seen as suppressive. Vast amount of different nationalities, hard to contain under one supressive rule.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Role of Lenin + Trotsky in 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and in the foundation of new Soviet State.

A

Point: Trotsky’s role more practical (Civil War + Revolution), Lenin more theoretical (ideology = April Thesis, planning and strategist)

Revolution

  • Both supported staging a second revolution + its timing. In face of strong opposition from party who believed Russia needed to experience a period of democracy before implementing socialism.
  • Lenin directed the October revolution from background. Made the revolution Bolshevik (April Thesis - Peace, Land, Bread)
  • Trotsky was organised the revolution
  • Lenin didn’t even know it was occurring.

Policies

  • Both supported asserting Bolshevik control after the successful revolution, inc. dismissal of Constituent Assembly.
  • Both wanted an end to Rus. participation in WW1.
  • Brest-Litovsk: Lenin wanted a quick end to the war and was happy to sign, Trotsky however wanted to negotiate having Russia demobilise but mot conclude a peace settlement. Trotsky eventually supported Lenin.
  • Both supported the idea of conscription for labour duties for those not fighting in the army.
  • Lenin was the party leader and driving foce in obtaining Bolshevik control of the CA and of Russia.
  • Lenin ordered Trotsky to negotiate peace w/ Germany even though trotsky disagreed with terms.
  • Lenin introduced NEP, Trotsky opposed it.
  • Trotsky had little say in political policies

Civil War

  • Both contributed to success of Reds in Civil War.
  • Lenin appointed Trotsky Commissar for War.
  • Lenin proposed War Communism and other measures but did not take part in fighting.
  • Trotsky built up Red Army, directed opposition, and savagely and successfully crushed the opposition. Active role in the Civil War.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causes of 1917 Revolution

A

Point: Failure of PG to solve old problems was only highlighted by the Bolsheviks support and the problems that arose through WW2.

Failure of govt. to solve old problems

  • Govt. failed to solve problems and unrest left by Tsar
  • Fundamental weakness to achieve anything due to their temporary nature
  • ‘Dual Power’ and Soviet Order no. 1 (orders of state duma to be obeyed only if they don’t contradict with Soviet decrees and orders) = no legitimate authority.
  • Didn’t touch on issues of war and land left from Feb. Revolution
  • Kept fighting war = resource deficiency just got worse
  • Land commission did too little to distribute agricultural land to peasants
  • Allowed freedom of speech
  • ‘The Bolsheviks did not seize power, they picked it up’ - Andy Ulam

Bolshevik Strengths

  • April Theses
  • Simple slogans of ‘Peace, Land, and Bread’
  • Made the revolution Bolshevik
  • took advantage of freedom of speech

Threats to PG Power

  • July Days: Uprising of workers and soldiers. Failed because of lack of leadership.
  • Kornilov Affair: Kornilov gathered troops together and marched on Petrograd. Kerensky called on Bolsheviks to help defend Petrograd.
  • Gave Bolsheviks validity.
  • WW1: Failure of government to leave the war.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reasons for success of the Bolsheviks in Oct. Revolution.

A

Point: Bolshevik’s ideology and Lenin’s personal qualities aided, ultimately weaknesses of PG.

Weakness of PG

  • Did not handle Russia’s problems handed over from Tsar making it easy for the Bolsheviks to take power
  • Cont. with war effort, against public desire.
  • Addressed inflation by punishment brigades requisitioning grain from peasants. Land reform postphoned.
  • Working conditions appalling.
  • Nature of govt. only a temporary body - not prepared to make long term decisions.
  • freedom of speech allowed opposition to mount (inc. Bolshevik promotion)
  • ‘The Bolsheviks did not seize power, they picked it up’ - Andy Ulam

Strengths of the Bolsheviks and Ideology

  • Lenin’s ideology accessible to the masses
  • April Thesis: promised the people what they wanted. Made the revolution Bolshevik.
  • Simple slogans accessible to the messes ‘All Power to the Soviets’ and ‘Peace, Land, and Bread’
  • Timing of the Revolution (before Constituent Assembly formed)
  • Role of Trotsky: Chairman of Soviet, led Red Guard to Winter Palace, executed Revolution. Captured Winter Palace in a day.

Events of 1917

  • April Thesis: Opposition to the PG made people hostile, wanted further revolution
  • June Offensive: disaster for PG
  • July Days: 500,000 rebel in Kronstadt.
  • Kornilov affair: gave Bolsheviks arms and status - Errors made by rivals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Methods used by Bolsheviks to consolidate their power.

A

Point: Terror and propaganda however, use of government legislation = important

Satisfying Demands

  • Made promises to workers and peasants. Needed to solve problems of Tsar and PG
  • Created Sovnarkom: Bolshevik council to rule and make decrees (All power not given to Soviets)
  • Workers given 8 hour day and granted control of factories to committees of workers (satisfied workers - abolished during war communism)
  • Abolished private ownership of land and legalised the peasants land seizures - fulfilled promise of ‘Land’
  • Banks, railways and land all nationalised
  • ‘Treaty of Brest-Litovsk’ fulfilled promise of peace. Harsh terms led to increased opposition -cost them 25% of industry.

Dealing with opposition

  • From Kadets and other Socialist groups
  • Creation of Cheka: unlimited power to arrest + torture. Aimed to eliminate opposition. Arrested leaders of opposition.
  • Encouragement of class warfare: ‘bourgeois’ values liable to arrest.
  • Press censorship: not making mistake of PG and allowing freedom of speech
  • Allowed CA to form (meeting pop. expectations). SRs won
  • Lenin shut down CA and prevented it from meeting again = force - Extremely effective.

Armed Forces and Propaganda

  • Set up Red Army in Jan 1918. Jan 1920 had 0.5 m members.
  • Crucial in eliminating opposition and upholding regime.
  • Also crucial in Civil War
  • Propaganda key to create Lenin’s Cult of Personality
  • Civil War neutralised opposition. Won Civil War. Trotsky’s military leadership.
  • Lenin as orator. Unified side.
  • Lit, theater, radio, and newspapers emphasise glory of revolution.
  • Winning Civil War was the last stage in neutralising opposition.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Causes and Consequences of 1905 Russian Revolution.

A

Point: Discontent and opposition led to Jan revolution. Opposition was subdued, Russia was not on its way to peaceful democracy.

Causes

  • Lack of political reform: repression of 2 reactionary Tsars increased opposition.
  • Great Spurt left dreadful working conditions as a result of rapid urbanisation. Frustration of workers.
  • Famine and redemption payments: disillusionment among peasants
  • Short term: discontent with NII - enhanced by result of Russo Japanese War. Naval Mutiny, May 1905 and Russian Baltic fleet destroyed
  • Bloody Sunday 22 Jan 1905. Asking for an 8 hour workin day and better working conditions. Peaceful Protest turned into disaster.
  • Over 100 dead or wounded.
  • Tsars failure to reform and his neglect of the needs of the people led to the outbreak of revolution.

Immediate Consequences (Optimistic)

  • Consequences support Optimistic notion that Tsardom could have survived.
  • Oct. Manifesto published bringing an end to the conflict. (Gives freedom of conscience, speech, meeting, and association) - wins back middle class
  • Absolute monarchy become constitutional - a radical change for Rus. No law can be passed w/o State Duma’s approval. Duma’s franchise made larger.
  • Opposition subdued. Redemption payments cancelled in 1907 - peasants more satisfied.
  • Army brought back on side as officer classes can now enforce the law.
  • Stolypin aided peasants by estb. a Land Bank to help them buy land and leave Mir.
  • Reforms in education and health show Rus. is on its way to a viable democracy, seen statistically by number of primary schools doubling.
  • Tsardom looked like it might survive.

Consequences (Pessimistic)

  • Pessimistic view Tsardom was doomed to fail and 1905 revolution was the beginning of the end.
  • Initial consequences showed inability of Tsardom to make effective changes
  • Trotsky exemplified this ‘ a constitution has been given but autocracy remains’
  • Fundamental Law of Empire, 1906. Laws agreed by the Tsar, the Tsar could dissolve Duma and Tsar kept control of foreign policy. Tsar gave some freedom but tightened control elsewhere.
  • Redemption payments removed too late - Duma’s loyal to the Tsar and were completely unsuccessful
  • Growing discontent - 1917 revolution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AIII: political reactionary but economic moderniser.

A

Point: agree (Manifesto on Unshakable Autocracy) = political reactionary. Modernised economy to a point however could not modernise more without social change.

Political Reactionary

  • Immediate dismissal of Loris-Melikov Reforms (implement constitutional reform and assembly)
  • 1881: ‘Manifesto on Unshakable Autocracy’
  • 1881 Statute measures for protecting state security: increased influence of Okhrana in imprisoning opposition
  • Laws passed in 1890 and 92 restricting size of voting franchise to those who supported Tsardom
  • Limited education to the higher classes (1894 University Statute)
  • Russification: persecution of national minorities
  • Undoubtedly a political reactionary who was determined to return power to autocracy

Economic Moderniser

  • Sergei Witte: Finance Minister - ‘The Great Spurt’ aimed to industrialise Russia in order to retain Great Power Status
  • Advocated policy of state capitalism where state would fund, direct, and plan industry
  • Needed money to fund, notable imposed heavy taxes and high interest rates on imports. Limited imports. Extensive loans from France. Rouble put on gold standard.
  • Industrialisation improved production. Coal production doubled between 1881-94. Trans-Siberian railway: modernises Russia as it encourages internal migration.
  • Growth of industrial sector in 1892 was 126%.
  • Peasants land bank helped peasants buy land following financial crisis of their emancipation = successful.
  • Clear statistical signs of modernising Russia’s economy.

Failures of Reform

  • Russia put into debt through heavy borrowing
  • Working conditions were awful. Long hours. No trade unions due to lack of political reform.
  • Agriculture not reformed. Harvest failures led to famine, thousands died.
  • 80% of the country were peasants highlighting the fact AIII could not reform without addressing social divisions in Russia.
17
Q

Compare and Contrast the policies of AII and AIII.

A

Point: Both ruled as autocratic monarchs. Both wanted reform. AIII was more reactionary.

Economic

  • AII overthrew serfdom. Emancipation Edict 1861. Serfdom prevented industrial revolution.
  • 40m peasants free: marry, own property, not be brought/sold.
  • Aimed to satisfy the demands of peasants in order to strengthen Tsarist autocracy.
  • AIII aim was industrial growth. Witte and ‘The Great Spurt’. Enforced the policy of state capitalism.
  • Did not return to serfdom - introduced land banks to help the peasants buy land.
  • Investors from abroad encouraged foreign industry.
  • Industrialisation improved production. Coal production doubled between 1881-94. Trans-Siberian railway: modernises Russia as it encourages internal migration.
  • Growth of industrial sector in 1892 was 126%.
  • Lack of reform in agriculture = famine - Both aimed to modernise Russia and to strengthen the autocracy.
  • Both developed the economy to an extent. AIII had more statistical improvements.

Political Reform

  • AII made greater steps to transform Russia politically.
  • AII had more political reforms in introduction of the Zemstva - local councils. Franchise for all classes, elected representatives. Peasants could take active role in politics at a local level.
  • Zemstva appeared democratic: only 43/70 areas had zemstva - effect not felt everywhere
  • AIII political reactionary: ‘set out to undo all his father has done’ - Morris
  • Ended Loris-Melikiv Reforms
  • ‘Manifesto for Unshakable Autocracy’ (1881)
  • Okhrana influence in arresting radicals.
  • Strict censorship
  • AII more liberal yet his reactionary policies of later years mirrored AIII neither willing to give up democracy but AII was more liberal.

Social Reform

  • Both strengthed autocracy: AII did through reform, AIII through reactionary policies
  • Emancipation of the serfs
  • Legal Reforms: equality before law, trialed by jury, judges well paid to prevent bribery.
  • ‘The Courtroom was the only place in Russia where true freedom of speech prevailed’ - Seaton Watson
  • AIII tightened judicial censorship in favour of government, same way AII did in reactionary phase
  • Land captains estb. in villages and towns.
  • AII gave people a voice, restricted it slightly in reactionary phase but still more than AIII implanted fear in the people and gave people back power to govt. and the Tsardom.
18
Q

Musso’s Foreign Policy

A

Point: Wanted to be ‘great, feared and respected’. Started consistent and successful but following 1929: inconsistent and unreliable.

Making his Mark (early 1920s)

  • Revenge: prove new power of Italy
  • Corfu Incident (1923): Invaded Corfu following death of Italian soldiers on border. Ordered to retreat by LoN and received compensation from Greece = success.
  • Regaining Fiume (1924): Italian land controlled by Yugoslavia. Pleased Italian people. = Success
  • Period of consistency. Aims were clear and successful through Fiume and Corfu.

Peacekeeping and International Collaboration (later 1920s)

  • Consistent w/ making Italy respected.
  • Locarno Treaty (1925) (German’s Western Borders): Co-guarantor w/ GB.
  • Kellogg-Briand Pact (1929): outlawing war in Europe. Did not fulfill fascist lust for war however made Italy respected.
  • Creation of Stresa Frona with GB and F against Germany. Success at boosting international prestige and power in international diplomacy.
  • Most successful policy of making Italy respected.
  • Defended Austria by sending troops to the Brenner Pass to warn Hitler not to invade. Hitler’s retreat highlights Hitler feared Italian army and shows inconsistency with later policy.

Aggressor

  • Musso’s descent into aggression to distract from domestic problems following Wall Street Crash: inconsistent.
  • Invasion of Abyssinia (1935-36): lst respect of GB and Fr = collapse of Stresa Front.
  • Invasion was a success but weakened Italy -> success has to be questioned.
  • Intervention in SCW: gave more aid than any other country.
  • Significantly weakened Italy: became apparent with outbreak of WW2.
  • Expensive with little political/economic benefit. - Forms a friendship w/ Hitler.
  • Distracted from domestic policies but again inconsistent = set Musso up for failure. Build up to WW2 and WW2
  • Highlights failure of Musso’s foreign policy - Friendship w/ Hitler (Rome-Berlin Axis (1936) Anti-Comintern Pact (1937) Pact of Steel)
  • Left isolated in Europe w/ Hitler as his own ally.
  • Allowed Hitler to invade Austria (inconsistent w/ earlier policy)
  • Musso unable to enter WW2 as his troops in Spain and Abyssinia = embarrassing. - Failure
19
Q

Relative success of Mussolini’s economic, religious, and social policies (1922-39)

A

Point: Policies strengthened Musso’s position through propaganda. Battles not a success, Concordat gave Musso credibility but in practice Church still had a lot of control.

Economic

  • Main aim: autarky, wanted to be self-sufficient and show greatness of Italian economy to other regimes.
  • Three battles: Grain, Lira and Land.
  • Lira: wanted ‘ a strong currency for a strong country’. Economy deflated to drive up value of Lira. Harmed exports. 1936: forced to devalue = failure
  • Grain: ‘free italy from the slavery of foreign bread’: placed high tariffs on grain imports. Success as grain imports fell 17% (1925-35) but overall damages agriculture and failed to solve rural poverty in south.
  • Land: aimed to increase land for grain and jobs. Reclaimed 3/4 of land in North. Provided jobs. South neglected. Partial success.
  • Corporate State: third way between capitalism and communism - vocational corporations in which workers and bosses are represented. ‘Corporate revolution’ to stop labour disputes. Success by 1934, 22 corporations set up, but dominated by fascists + were corrupt.

Religious

  • Catholic Church dominated Italian society. Most Italians devoted Catholics. Pope had not recognised Kingdom of Italy since unification in 1870.
  • Musso needed Church to give govt. credibility.
  • Lateran Treaties of 1929: ended conflict. Church gained compensation for unification and Pope given Vatican CIty.
  • Musso earned recognition as Italian leader. - ‘the pacts were a triumph’ - Clark
  • Success: boosted Italian prestige for Catholics worldwide, Church endorsed Musso in elections. BUT relationship deteriorated over youth groups and anti-Semitic laws in 1938

Social

  • Women: ‘in our state she does not count’ WOmen should be at home raising sons for army.
  • 1927: women taken out of ‘unnatural’ professions
  • Failed to extent: more women in higher education (6% in 1914 to 15% in 1938)
  • Battle for Births: aimed to increase popularity by 50-60% by 1950. Prizes given to women w/ large families and abortion made difficult (supported by the Catholic Church)
  • Birth-rate actually declined until 1936. Marriage rate fell.
  • Youth: wanted loyal fascist generation to secure future of the regime. 1930s - one standardised textbook, created Cult of Duce
  • Success is unclear (propaganda).
20
Q

Compare and Contrast rise to power of two single party states: weakness of previous governments

A

Point: Weakness of previous governments created the situation for a government to take power but it was their ideology that ensured it was Hitler and Lenin.

Long-term issues w. govt.

  • Both had weak existing political regimes
  • Weimar Republic: ‘born in defeat, lived in turmoil, died in disaster’ - Gay
  • Despised by public after signing ToV - November Criminals. Nazi’s used stab in the back myth for propaganda.
  • Weakness in constitution: proportional representation ‘made for inherent instability’ - Craig. Extremist parties (Nazis) could gain seats.
  • Tsarist Russia = backwards. Unlike Weimar did not want to change. ‘a constitution has been given but autocracy remains’ - Trotsky.
  • 1906 Fundamental Laws ensured autocratic power.
  • Working conditions appalling, disregard for human rights. Land/agriculture reform desperately needed. Growing proletariat opposition.
  • Feb Revolution: replaced by a weak government that failed to solve these problems.

Failure of Weimar and Provisional Government

  • Despite Golden Years under Stresemann. Weimar still unstable.
  • 6 successive governments Nov 1923-June 1928. Great Depression proved weakness.
  • Bankruptcy rates increased dramatically. industry reduced 50% following WSC. Unemployment = 6m.
  • German people looked to strong government. Nazis were largest party in Reichstag. Hindenburg wanted to avoid Hitler in power but ‘backstairs intrigue’ meant 1933 Hitler = chancellor.
  • Weakness of PG after feb. revolution. Would not make long term decisions as waiting for constitutional assembly.
  • Did not address issues from tsar (continued war, working conditions). Failed summer offensive = humiliating.
  • Legislation for free speech allowed Lenin to openly criticise. Ideology and Cult of Personality - Both significant in winning over the people, more so Hitler.
  • Nazi ideology appealed to Nationalists, middle class and proletariat. Aim to rip up ToV and provide stability and jobs.
  • Propaganda by Goebbels essential. ‘Fuhrur’ ‘A Hitler speech was superb theatre’
  • Lenin’s April Thesis appealed to the masses. Simple promises : ‘Peace, Land, and Bread’ and ‘All Power to the Soviets’
  • Timing of the revolution ‘The Bolsheviks did not seize power, they picked it up’
21
Q

Domestic Policies of Mussolini and Hitler.

A

Point: Similarities: autarky, traditional view of family, and Cult of Personality. Main Contrast: economic policies and level of power.

Economic

  • Both leaders aimed to achieve autarky, methods differed.
  • Hitler’s policy of Wehrwirtschaft’: creating a war economy. Needed to address unemployment (6m). Created work schemes which reduced unemployment to 300,000 in 1936.
  • Four Year Plans under Goring: increased agriculture, controlled exports and imports. Under centralised government. Cost was huge. Autarky not achieved by 1939.
  • Three battles: Grain, Lira and Land.
  • Lira: wanted ‘ a strong currency for a strong country’. Economy deflated to drive up value of Lira. Harmed exports. 1936: forced to devalue = failure
  • Grain: ‘free italy from the slavery of foreign bread’: placed high tariffs on grain imports. Success as grain imports fell 17% (1925-35) but overall damages agriculture and failed to solve rural poverty in south.
  • Land: aimed to increase land for grain and jobs. Reclaimed 3/4 of land in North. Provided jobs. South neglected. Partial success.
  • Contrast: Corporate State: third way between capitalism and communism
  • vocational corporations in which workers and bosses are represented. ‘Corporate revolution’ to stop labour disputes. Success by 1934, 22 corporations set up, but dominated by fascists + were corrupt.
  • Both failed in their aim of autarky.

Social and Anti-Semitism

  • ‘Volksgemeinschaft’ - People’s community.
  • Policies on women = similar: traditional role within family, bearing children for future army.
  • Hitler: ‘Kinder, Kirche, Kuche’: reduced women in employment, employers encouraged to choose men, newly-weds offered marriage loans.
  • Musso: ‘In our state she does not count’. 10% limit on women in state jobs 1933.
  • ‘Battle for Births’ - prizes for women who had more than 9 children.
  • Failed: birth-rate decreased.
  • Youth: important for future of fascism.
  • Hitler, 1934: centralled controlled system. ‘Race science’ taught as well as militarism and the greatness of Hitler. Youth groups made compulsory 1936.
  • Mussolini: indoctrination. Youth groups: ONB, Cult of Duce, one standardised textbook.
  • Anti-Semitism key to Volksgemeinschaft’. Nuremberg Laws of 1935, Kristalnacht 1938.
  • Musso, anti-Semitism not present until alliance with Hitler. 1938: Mainfesto of Race (restriced Civil rights of jews)

Military and Church

  • Both military dictators but power depended on role of Church contrasting between two states.
  • Both made pacts: Hitler Concordat, July 1933 - Catholic Church not involved in state affairs if Catholic youth groups allowed. Protestant Church divided: weak opposition from Confessional Church, crushed through terror.
  • Musso: Lateran Treaties, 1929. Although ‘the pacts were a triumph’ according to Clark (Musso recognised by Church) Church still controlled many people. Relationship deteriorated over youth groups and anti-Semitic laws, 1938.
  • Both undisputed leaders through propaganda _ terror. Church involvement and presence of a monarch in Italy contrasts absolute power of Hitler.
22
Q

Why did CCP and and not the GMD win the Chinese Civil War?

A

Point: Since 1927, atmosphere of Civil War. GMD in power but in 1949 it was CCP who were victorious. Mao’s leadership and CCP policies were the most important.

Contrasting Leadership

  • Chiang government = corrupt. Foreign aid from the US got lost in the system: did not aid them.
  • Chiang was out of touch with public, obsessed with beating CCP. Chiang had no full support of GMD in his decisions.
  • Mao earned prestige through the Long March, was clearly a man of the people.
  • Edgar Snow – Mao’s dedication and preaching of equality made him a successful leader.
  • Strong ideological unity.
  • Rectification Campaigns, by 1945, Mao had eliminated opposition from within the party: clear leader. The party was unified.

Party Policies

  • Argued that the ‘struggle for the hearts and minds of the people’ was effectively over by 1946
  • Soviet in Jiangx and Yan’an, Mao gained sympathy from the masses. Successes of land reform in 1932 got peasants on side.
  • CCP were closer to fulfilling nationalist ‘3 Principles of the People’ than the GMD (Socialism, Nationalism, Democracy).
  • GMD had 10 years in power to prove validity of claims. Neglected people and economy. Lost main support base through inflation. Communist policy better overall.
  • The Communists could show their support of the people during the Long March, connected with the people and when they were in Yan’an: could be seen as the main fighting force against the Japanese.

Tactics and Technology

  • 1946: appeared GMD should win based on fire power and outnumbering opponents 4:1. Technological advantage, more arms.
  • CCP’s Guerrilla tactics undoing of GMD ‘When enemy advances, we retreat, when they tire, we attack’
  • Support and united belief of troops more important than firepower.
  • Manchuria lost 1947, CCP seized Japanese arms, cut communication lines between cities held by nationalists.
  • Sep. 1948 ‘beginning of the end’ when CCP turn towards S. China after consolidation power in the North.
  • GMD support from US did not give military aid as Chiang had depended on = little impact.
23
Q

Nationalists won the Spanish Civil War due to Republican Weakness.

A

Point: Republican weaknesses were a contributing factor but Nationalist strengths impacted the outcome of the war more.

Political Unity and Leadership

  • Republican weakness: not a unified force.
  • Made up of diverse groups – communists, socialists, left-wing republicans, anarchists, POUM – whose aims differed. Communists and socialists believed revolution should be postponed until the war was won whereas the anarchists argued war could only be won through revolutionary policies.
  • Exemplified in 4 day street fighting in Barcelona in May 1937.
  • ‘the Spanish Civil War was not one but many wars’ – Preston
  • Whereas, the Nationalists managed to combine many parties under Franco’s successful leadership. Falange, Carlists, CEDA, Alfonsists, right-wing republicans were all part of the Nationalist brigade.
  • Franco unified the Falange and the Carlists under his sole command to create the FET.
  • Conclude: in terms of political unity, the republicans disunity allowed Franco’s unified force to take advantage of the weakness of their opposition.

Economic Factors

  • Thesis. In terms of economically, the Nationalists had a far superior economic situation implying it was their strengths that impacted the outcome of the war.
  • Rep weaknesses: lost gold reserves paying for Stalin’s international aid. Communist collectives failed to provide. Inflation was at 300% yet wages had only gone up 15%. Effect on non-intervention: GB and F prevented the Republicans from trading.
  • On the other hand, Nat controlled key industrial and grain growing areas by 1937. Support of big business community.
  • Conclude: Nationalist’s strong economic position allowed them to win the support of the people who the Republicans had irritated.

Foreign Intervention

  • Republicans foreign aid was of a lesser quality than that of the Nationalists, both in quantity and timing.
  • Rep: USSR but only until 1937 and at a price. Not integrated into Rep army. Sent no troops only aircraft, tanks and advisors. Poor quality of aid that was withdrawn before the war was over.
  • Non-interventionist of GB and F.
  • However, Nat had the support of Germany, Italy, and Portugal. Consistent and effective support, unified under Franco.
  • Gave nationalists control of the air.
  • Support of international business community.

Conclusion

  • The republican weaknesses allowed the Nationalist strengths to be utilised to their full effect.
24
Q

Causes of Spanish Civil War

A

Point: - Political instability exaggerated social problems to increase the polarization of Spain and consequently, the nation was divided ideologically and socially. The consequent tensions that arose from this made political unrest evident, and the failed military coup ensured the beginning of the catastrophic Spanish Civil War. Political - Unstable politics after collapse of weak monarchy (alfonso 13) - coup d’état by Primo de Reviera 2923= right-wing govt. and no long lasting solutions (left budget deficit): 7 years of dictatorship, unpopular, reinforced social divisions instead of healing them. - Seperatism and wish for autonomy = encourage instability and weak govt. for split - large divide between right (traditional) and left (working class/reform/replace) Manuel Azana’s govt (left-wing) - From right-wing to left-wing: reversed all right-wing beliefs - took large landed estates from land owners, prevented land owners from leaving land uncultivated -> aggravated landowners but protected jobs of agricultural workers - Laws against army and church: army democratised, separation of church from state, church property nationalised, church teachers and schools removed: further exacerbated social differences - tried to focus on structural reform BUT too slow (left opposition), intense right opposition- resigned 1933 Governments until 1936 - Reversed most former reforms: unproductive, interfered w/ catalonia govt., wouldn’t grant any to basques = growing left support, further aggravation - Inefficient, disordered therefore many strikes, protests, and bombings - assessment: game of tennis, not looking for resolve: growth of extremist parties, falange 500-500,000 in 6 months - 1936 election: 48%: Popular Front Govt. to 46% Nationalistic Bloc Social - Spain on low: loss of empire - church mobilised everyone to vote against republicans – Church resented by many. especially in urban areas - large gap between aristocracy and peasants - Most peasants lived in poverty: inspired by Bolshevism to rise against Monarchy. - Second Republic could not solve social problems Economic: - Extreme poverty amongst peasantry – Origins of war lay in deep-routed class conflicts, hunger for land= desire for change - ‘latifundia’ – rich ‘braciaros’ – poor - Basque and Catalonia = economically superior, wanted autonomy - loss of empire in 1898 = loss of protected markets, suffered from WWI (even though neutral) - No eco. development + modernisations: exacerbated by 1929 crisis; -75% in exports from 1930-1934 = developed DESPERATION

25
Q

Reasons for German defeat in WW1

A

Point: Allies’ economic advantages secured their victory. Notable through the USA joining their side. German’s resources were stretched. Failed military strategies of Germany only enhanced economic advantage of Allies. Economic Advantages - German Eco. Decline: War SHOULD’VE been over by Christmas, prolonged war taking effect on GER eco. - High inflation due to unbacked printing of mon., Huge national debt, millions of deaths from influenza epidemic == tired and wearisome - Men at war, short of workers, materials and money → soldiers had to come back to work in Factories - Naval blockade stopped influx of foreign trade = no food! Agriculture fell 70%, 1000cal per day, workers = no strength - ‘Auxiliary labour law’ passed to maximise worker output BUT caused tension – eyes on Revolution - Deaths x6 more than Fr. “They no longer wanted to win. They only wanted to end the war” AJP Taylor - Economic Advantages of Allies: After 3 years of gruelling war, countries = eco. drained. - America = economic superpower (biggest in World) gave billions of $ of loans to GB and FR. - Combined with huge colonial powerbases of GB and FR. = strong resources supply – Allies had 25% of world production for material production even before America joined. Failed Military Strategies - Germany: Failure of the Schlieffen Plan forced Germany to fight a two-front war (Plan for war was calculated to defeat France in 6 weeks before Russia could mobilise and then att. Russia to prevent war on 2 fronts. Nearly successful, but FAILED = split resources, prolonged warfare. Economic problems because prolonged warfare means more resources used: munitions manufacturers not catered for lengthy conflict.) - Unrestricted submarine warfare Jan 1917 failed to knock out GB and helped bring in the USA on the allied side - Ludenorff Offensive March 1918 - Failure of Spring Offensive: last chance “before the Americans can throw forces into scale” –Ludendorff, failed. 800,000 deaths hard to replace, black day 8th Aug. ’18 German artillery captured, loss of morale from defeat, catalysed surrender - Allies: stronger tactics. Encircled Germany. GB, F and later USA can aid each other. - Superior military technology: U boat campaigns defeated by convoy system and the use of depth chargers. Use of tanks from 1917 onwards and use of creeping barrage offensives by 1918. - British Naval Blockade: shortages of crucial raw materials such as rubber, nitrates for fertiliser and explosives. Civilian population starving by 1917. Weakness of German Allies - German troops had to be diverted to help against Russia and Italy. - Russia’s failed Brusilov Offensive (1916) meant Russia was totally reliant on German aid. - Ottoman Empire weak: British conquer most of its territory in the middle East by 1918 - By 1918 all allies suing for peace. - Italy joined the Allies in 1915. USA joined Allies April 1917: unrestricted submarine warfare, January, Zimmerman Telegram March offered German aid to Mexico to reconquer territories lost to the USA.

26
Q

Causes of WW1

A

Point: Complex assortment of causes. German foreign policy is most to blame. Mixture of Fischer and Faye. Imperialism and Militarism - Selfishness of GB with the rise of Germany. Changing balance of power in World, German becomes worlds 2nd biggest eco. power. Need resources. Kaiser Wilhelm II instigates policy of Weltpolitik 1896: wants colonies, to become rival of GB navy. BUT - 90% of Africa already colonised, Post Imperial nations don’t want to share. - Therefore! tensions between GB, FR, GER. → e.g. Moroccan Crisis 1906 and 1911 - Tensions between GER and FR w/ loss of Alsace Lorraine, want to increase industrial output - Anglo-German Naval race. - EASTERN FRONT: Russia= economic growth. Sergei Witte, Desire to expand into Balkans, partly to give access to med. Port - Oppositely; AH empire weakening, scared of Serbia and nationalistic revolution therefore needs to show force. - as countries economically grew, investment of money into weapons. Anglo-Ger Naval race, Ger. tried to scare GB into alliance. - Did not work, launch of dreadnaught 1906. Tension w/ GB and GER Schlieffen Plan - Russia –defeat in Russo-Jap war. wanted to prove its strength, new ambitions in the Balkans FIRST TO MOBILISE Alliance systems - As tensions arose through imperialism and militarism, European countries sought security in treaties. - GER called for triple alliance between Gr, It, AH→ isolate France and prevent war on two fronts + encirclement - Triple entente → reaction GB, FR, RUS: created split of two blocs in Europe - London Treaty 1839 → brings UK into war, (alterior reason, not afraid to use weapons, excuse to confront GER before too late) Economic pressures to supress GER - BIGGEST CAUSE, two big alliance systems. BUT not because they dragged countries in (Italy changed sides in the war, FR. did not immediately fight) but because it cast a safety façade over Europe which allowed tensions to rise to the point of world war. Nationalism - First and Second Balkan War. (1908-1909) Balkan League trying to gain autonomy from Ottoman Empire. - Pan Slavism, and the collapse of the Ottoman empire. Pan Germanism, GER and AH protect each other→ blank cheque - Serbian nationalism: terrorist groups, Black hand who assassinated Franz Ferdinand = Sarajevo crisis and trigger for WW1 - Falling apart of RUS, AH, Ottomans = distract through war, and desperation to use force to prevent loss of empires Trigger - Assassination of Duke Ferdinand: “50 years were spent in the process of making Europe explosive. 5 days were enough to detonate it” – Hart - Ultimatum- severely harsh, GER give blank cheque (eagerness to go to war) - Russia mobilised=war! - important ideological point “honour and self-interest, meant that, fatally no Great Power could back down” –Bridge - Crisis gave all nations an excuse for war. - FR wanted revenge, GB to cull GER power, Russia, distract internal affairs ALL COUNTRIES TO BLAME

27
Q

Causes of WW1 and WW2: compare

A

Point: WW1 was more probably caused by increasing militarism in Europe whereas WW2 seems more related to the failure to solve the tensions remaining since WW1, which ultimately contributed to the German foreign policy and the policy of appeasement. Militarism and Aggressive Foreign Policy - Both WW1 and WW2 could be strongly linked to rising militarism in the European region and aggressive foreign policies, most closely linked to Germany. - WW1: Militarism. All nations’ obsession with expanding the armed forces. All countries had massive standing armies. - Launch of dreadnaught 1906. Tension w/ GB and GER Schlieffen Plan - Russia –defeat in Russo-Jap war. wanted to prove its strength, new ambitions in the Balkans FIRST TO MOBILISE - WW2: Militarism. Hitler had an obsession with expanding the armed forces. Conscription was introduced and the Anglo-German Naval agreement (1935), which allows Germany’s navy to expand. - WW1. German Foreign policy. Weitpolitik – expansion. - WW2. Hitler’s foreign policy was about expansionism and nationalism. E.g. The 1938 Anchluss. Austria is incorporated into Russia: political and military victory for Germany. GB and F only protested → increased H’s confidence that they would not object if he went further, highlighting the failure in GB and F’s foreign policy. - Hitler set his sights on the Sudetenland, in Czechoslovakia. Hitler demands land which GB, I, and F give to him. Czech had no say. Highlights failure of appeasement and aggressive nature of German foreign policy → increased tensions Alliances and Peace-making - Shared agreements of peace and defence, and perhaps more importantly their failure, contributed to the start of both WW1 and WW2. - WW1: As tensions arose through imperialism and militarism, European countries sought security in treaties. - GER called for triple alliance between Gr, It, AH→ isolate France and prevent war on two fronts + encirclement. Triple entente → reaction GB, FR, RUS: created split of two blocs in Europe. - London Treaty 1839 → brings UK into war, (alterior reason, not afraid to use weapons, excuse to confront GER before too late) Economic pressures to supress GER. - BIGGEST CAUSE, two big alliance systems. BUT not because they dragged countries in (Italy changed sides in the war, FR. did not immediately fight) but because it cast a safety façade over Europe which allowed tensions to rise to the point of world war. - WW2: Lack of international unity. The failure of the League of Nations, seen notably in Manchuria (1931) and Abyssinia (1936): Proved to Germany that they could push around smaller countries and regions w/o the interference of the League. Therefore German foreign policy was unafraid to promote an expansionist agenda, which in the end, led to World War 2. Appeasement by Britain and France, allowed Hitler to gain confidence - It could be stated that the failure to resolve WW1 effectively meant the war was simply paused to allow tensions to rebuild again: supported by “it is an armistice for 20 years” –Foch Nationalism - Nationalism played a part in the outbreak of both wars however in WW1 it was nationalism in the form of demanding independence for states in the Balkans, whereas in WW2 it was Germany’s expansionist nationalism and consequent need for expansion that dramatically increased tensions in Europe. - WW1: First and Second Balkan Wars: collapse of ottoman empire. - Serbia wanted independence from AH empire, which contributed to rebel groups such as The Black Hand Gang who were responsible for the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand: catalyst for the outbreak of the war. - Falling apart of RUS, AH, Ottomans = distract through war, and desperation to use force to prevent loss of empires - WW2: Germany – nationalism had increased dramatically following Germany’s surrender in WW1, and the embarrassment of the ToV. Hitler wanted to make Germany great again and wanted to reunite all Germans and expand the German master race. - The failure of the peace-making following WW1 made it easy for Germany to want revenge, and to want to return to Great Power Status.

28
Q

Successes and Failures of Mao’s domestic policies.

A

Point: deluded by vision of communist utopia, dream to achieve such goals removed him from realms of reality; Unsuccessful w/ social and economic policies; However, politically, a genius. Economic - Mao’s Aim: Develop backward China from agriculturally dominant eco. into industrial eco. capable with competing vs. west.  means through communist ideology, state controlled. NEEDED stronger eco. to achieve independence from foreign powers, a promise made by him to the people. - Early years: success. aim: 1. create solid foundation to eco. by rooting all corruption and inefficiencies that hinder development. - 2. Build capital. 3.Get workforce for industrialisation - purged corrupted officials, private enterprises, landowners who allegedly pocketed profits of prol.  attacked industrial sabotage, tax evasion, bribery, fraud, theft of govt. property. e.g. agrarian reform law 1950, seizure of any surplus from landlords to be distributed amongst peasants. - raise tax to 60% from businesses - 5 year plan: followed Stalin; promoted urbanisation + large production of coal, steel, auto. - SUCCESS: 20% exceeding target BUT –official figure (reliable?) increase in pop. by 43 million - 1000% inflation down to 15% by 1951. Industrial output doubled, 300 modern indust. plants planned *even w/ Korean war - Great Leap Forward: Aim: “Catch the sun and the stars”, challenge US and overtake Britain in 15 years, destalinisation - Collectivisation to feed proletariat and people, backyard furnaces to compete w/ US and UK - Consequence: FAILED: too much food taken by officials = biggest manmade famine in history, 30m dead. No food= no energy = low output  drop in grain output by 30m tonnes. Useless steel because no education or supplies, wasted resources, labour forces wasted in labour intensive steel production. Heavy industry output fell 55% 59-62 “The record of the GLF is largely a study of failure” -Lynch - Defeat = Mao steps down as Head of state and taken over by Deng and Liu, saves economy. - GPCR: Purge of intelligentsia and education system to purge imperial culture and create new proletariat culture. Consequences: loss of generation of skilled workers. Forgotten techniques for heavy industry TOTAL FAILURE! Social - Aim: empower prol. make them most important in soc. - Early years; agranian reform, used force to eliminate elite class and distribute wealth amongst the poor. - SUCCESS BUT GLF = deaths of millions, cannibalism, 8 year old daughter eaten. - GPCR: Red guard and purge of teachers and schools ruin youth potential of entire generation. non educated yobs. - Was life better for majority of china by 1976? No. regressed. Political - Aim: Undisputed/uncontested leader w/ everyone sharing his ideology. - 5 antis/3 antis campaign  target waste, corruption and business affairs, bribery. - Encouraged spying. Jan. 1952, <200,000 letters of complaint, self-criticisms: copper company owner originally confessed to embezzling 50m yuan under pressure confessed to 2b yuan. - Tens of thousands = concentration camps Hundred flowers Campain. - GLF slight hiccup, GPCR: little red book, considered a god, embalmed and still worshipped today in T square. SUCCESS Conclusion - Social and Political Success was hindered by the devastation that was the Great Leap Forward.

29
Q

Impact of WW1 on Europe.

A

Introduction - Terrible destruction, population of Europe was facing starvation, displacement and a flu epidemic. - Against this peacemakers tried to create a peace settlement. - Disaster = World War 2. - Complete destruction which was attempted to be solved. Political Consequences - GB and Fr. did not suffer major political change. - Map of Central Europe was completely redrawn. - Paris Peace settlements: reparations, limited army, absence from League of Nations. - Creation of League of Nations - Fall of Tsar in Russia, rise of Bolshevism - Germany: abdication of Kaiser. - Austrian-Hungarian Empire destroyed. Economic Consequences - Devastating - Cost GB £34 billion. - By 1918: USA had lent $2000 million to GB and Fr. - U-boats had sunk 40% of British merchant shipping. - GB never regained pre-war international financial predominance. - Land and industry had been destroyed on fighting grounds. - France suffered particularly badly, with farm land, factories and railway lines along the Western Front totally ruined. - Dramatic decline in manufacturing output. - Combined with loss of trade and foreign investments, it is clear that Europe faced an acute economic crisis in 1919. The Human Cost of War - Death toll appalling. 9 million soldiers killed (15% of all fighters). - Millions were permanently disabled. - ‘lost generation’ used in GB. - 20% of those between ages 20-40 were killed. - Populations were targeted (not on the same scale as WW2). Millions died from famine and disease at the end of the war. - 20 million died as a result of Spanish Flu Epidemic.

30
Q

Causes of WW2.

A

Introduction - WW2 out broke in 1939, following rising tensions in the European region. - Failure of the peace settlements triggered international turmoil and Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy. Failure of International Diplomacy - ToV: punishment on Germany may have been too harsh. Suffered strongly under WSC. Had no chance to politically recover under a democratic govt. - Rising nationalism and resentment as a result. - 1929: Europe dependent on America loans – led to collapse of Europe politically and economically. - WW2: Lack of international unity. The failure of the League of Nations, seen notably in Manchuria (1931) and Abyssinia (1936): Proved to Germany that they could push around smaller countries and regions w/o the interference of the League. - Therefore German foreign policy was unafraid to promote an expansionist agenda, which in the end, led to World War 2. German Foreign Policy - WW1. German Foreign policy. Weitpolitik – expansion. - WW2. Hitler’s foreign policy was about expansionism and nationalism. (Fischer argues that that was a continuation of previous German Foreign Policy) E.g. The 1938 Anchluss. Austria is incorporated into Germany: political and military victory for Germany. GB and F only protested → increased H’s confidence that they would not object if he went further, highlighting the failure in GB and F’s foreign policy. - Hitler set his sights on the Sudetenland, in Czechoslovakia. Hitler demands land which GB, I, and F give to him. Czech had no say. Highlights failure of appeasement and aggressive nature of German foreign policy → increased tensions - When he invades Poland (expected to retaliation in-keeping with GB and F’s policy of appeasement) – faces opposition = war. - War is a result of Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy and the inconsistency of the policy of appeasement. Short-term Causes - Appeasement by Britain and France, allowed Hitler to gain confidence (his invasion of the Rhineland in 1936 and faced no opposition: saw no reason why he should be stopped – explains his following foreign policy) – allowed GB and Fr. to remilitarize. - May 1939: Pact of Steel (Germany and Italy) - April 1939: Chamberlain made a guarantee to Poland to protect it in case of attack – Turning Point, Failure of Appeasement has been recognised. - 23rd August 1939: Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact. - Sep 1939: Hitler invades Poland -. GB and Fr. – withdraw from Poland or War. -

31
Q

Modernisation of Russia from 1850-1900

A

Context: 1855, Russia = backwards, Crimean War loss Social - 1855: serfdom = slaves (self-explanatory) - AII change: abolition of serfdom  most important step for all modernisations within the country - Could not be sold or bought. –right to marry w/o 3rd party consent - Living situation did not really get better. - AIII: conditions did not get better, repression. –percentage of poor working class increasing - Assessment: emancipation of serfs did not improve situation/living condition until redemption payment were reduced – comparison w/ other European countries = backwards Economic - 1855: backwards. 94% population lived in villages, no workers in cities, few factories, weak financial system, no railway. - AII change: beginning of industrial transformation, freedom of serfs = freedom of labour force, centralisation due to emancipation (but redemption payments), building of railways, increase mining of raw materials - AIII change: building of railways stimulated exports and foreign trade, landbanks, gold standard 1887, “rapid and forceful industrialisation”, Witte protected home industry through high import taxes - Assessment: Large transformation: all industries started to develop, increase in railway, labour force and trade BUT agriculture lacking. Military - 1855: poorly equipped and organised, therefore, lost Crimean war - AII Change: military service reduced, decrease in size of army  better training, literacy campaigns, reduction of punishment - AIII Change: Military profited from industrial boom. Railways = mobility, industry = better weaps. No wars so military can improve. - Assessment: still lost jap-russo war and WW1 so failed BUT improved slightly since Crimean war. Political - 1855: Absolute monarchy. - AII change:Introduction of Zemstvo in 1864, Russia became more democratic  one of first steps to modernisation, gentry and peasants represented. Consultative assembly in 1881 but died before. - AIII change: Backstep in modernisation, Zemstvo was nominated by landowners/gentry. AII reforms reversed Conclusion - Russia did not improve, AII and AIII cancelled each other out.

32
Q

Why did Alexander II’s reform encounter so much opposition>

A

Introduction - Reigned from 1855-1881. - His regime was the most liberal of any Tsar yet its aim was still to streamline the autocracy. - It was his liberal tendencies and aims that opened him up to so much opposition which ultimately resulted in his assassination. - His aims contrasted with those of the liberals who wanted a constitutional monarchy. - Creation of Land and Liberty to criticise the Tsardom. Emancipation - Most famous reform: the Emancipation of the serfs, 1861. - Serfs granted freedom to marry; freedom not to be bought and sold and freedom to own land. - But still under control of Mir: had to get passports to travel over 20 miles. Mir decided land allocation. Some peasants saw it as the new serfdom. - Also redemption payments for 49 years: peasants believed they were the rightful owners of the land and so were bitter about having to pay for it. - Led to peasant uprisings. - “single greatest liberating measure in the whole modern history of Europe” –GM Anderson - Peasants were dissatisfied with the nature of their freedom. Further Reform - Emancipating the Serfs led the way to further reform. - The most important of these in inciting further opposition were the legal reforms. - These introduced open courts, jury and judges who were well educated and well paid. These new courts provided a platform in which critics of the regime could openly criticise. Also well-educated judges led to creation of intelligentsia who wanted constitutional reform. - Furthermore, reforms in local administration. Creation of Duma and Zemstva. Multi-functional Zemstva introduced as a local council (military conscription, public health etc.). All classes could be elected in as members. No fundamental change but a symbolic change to give the people a voice. - Liberals were dissatisfied with the rate of reform: wanted political parties and a constitutional monarchy and they openly criticised the regime in court. Reactionary Phase - The majority of AII reign is reactionary (1866-1880). - Following an assassination attempt: he became reactionary in his reforms. - Brings in reactionary ministers: Dmitri Tolstoy took immediate action to halt educational reform (blamed for student radicalism). Reduced power of Zemstvas over education and made it so only students from traditional Russian schools could go to university. - Repressive policies: Brings back censorship and courts are encouraged to interpret the law in favour of the government. - Led to many attempts of assassination: in 1881: one was successful. People wanted reform.

33
Q

Stolypin’s Reforms

A

Introduction - Stolypin: President of the Council of Ministers, 1906-1911 - His guiding principle was ‘suppression first and then, only then, reform’ Reform should be introduced as a way of reducing social bitterness. - Rural Crisis: Russia had suffered from a problem of land shortages and an overpopulation in the country: discontent was highlighted with 1905 revolution. De-revolutionising the peasantry - Agricultural land was too expensive and this led to heavy mortgage repayments, known as redemption payments. Left from the emancipation of the serfs. The peasants feared that their land was going to be confiscated as they could not pay the heavy mortgage repayments. - Stolypin cancelled redemption payments in 1907. - Was successful to a large extent as it managed to de-revolutionise the peasantry. The Wager on the Strong - 1906-1907: Stolypin cancelled inefficient strip farming system (stifles innovation) and replaced with fenced fields. - He created a special Land Bank that loaned peasants’ money to be able to buy more land. Stolypin’s goal was to create a layer of prosperous peasants who would support the Tsar as a result of their new wealth. - New laws abolished compulsory communal land-tenure and turned the land into private property. - Stolypin said that he needed 20 years for his wager on the strong to bring results. He was assassinated in 1911 (only 5 years) - By 1914, the strip system was still widespread. Only 10% of the land had been consolidated into fence field farms: Failure. - Most peasants did not want to leave the security of the communes for the uncertainty of individual farming. The peasants’ conservationism made them object change. - By 1915: only 30% of all peasant households requested individual ownership, while only 22% received it. - The policy had great potential and given the 20 years to be put into action it may have succeeded in not only modernising the countryside but saving the Tsardom. - WW1 and the Russian Revolution hindered this policy’s ability to succeed, Resettlement - Stolypin attempted to create large scale voluntary resettlement of the peasants in order to populate remote areas of Russia such as Siberia. Opened Siberia for farming. - His resettlement policy was effective as over 1.5million Russias moved to Serbia between 1907 and 1909. Conclude - Attempts to solve Russia’s rural crisis - Successfully populated remoter areas and depopulated the countryside. - He successfully de-revolutionized the peasantry. However, he did not have enough time to make his major reform ‘wager on the strong’ succeed due to the shortage of time and due to the peasants’ conservatism.