Face Threatening Acts and Discourse Flashcards
What’s an Illocutionary Act
Illocutionary acts are linguistic acts in which one can be said to do something - like stating, denying or asking.
The concept of politeness is important in interpreting why people choose to say things in a particular way in spoken or written discourse and why they choose to:
1) Flout a maxim.
2) Expresses an illocutionary act indirectly, rather than directly.
What’s Negative Face?
Negative face: The person’s desire to be:
1. Autonomous (self-governing)
2. Free
3. Not imposed on by others
4. Respected by others in terms of time, privacy, and possession.
What’s Positive Face?
Positive face: The person’s desire to be:
1. Accepted and liked by others.
2. Treated as a member of their group.
Why are Politeness Strategies Used?
Politeness strategies are developed in order to save/maintain the hearer’s face. This is done by maintaining a balance in protecting the positive and the negative faces of each other and acting appropriately in social interactions.
Face Threatening Acts:
Acts that infringe on the hearer’s need to maintain their face.
Who proposed the 5 super strategies that I will now go on to discuss?
Brown and Levinson
What are the 5 super strategies?
- Off-record (Least direct- Most polite)
- Negative politeness
- Positive politeness
- On record baldly (Most direct- Least polite)
- Do nothing (technically always doable and was mentioned by Brown and Levinson same as the others)
How does the extent of option-giving influence the degree of politeness?
The greater option you give to your hearer to say ‘no’, the more polite your utterance is.
Appropriate contexts for each politeness strategy: Off-Record
- The speaker is not that familiar with hearer.
a. So the speaker gives the hearer the option of not taking the hint, and pretending she/he did not understand.
b. By hinting the need, the speaker is being very respectful of your hearer’s autonomy, i.e. negative face. - There is social distance between speaker and hearer.
a. Including differences in age, status, role, [gender]…etc. - Imposition is large.
Appropriate contexts for each politeness strategy: Negative politeness
- The speaker still wants to maintain distance from the hearer.
- The speaker may be more familiar with the hearer but still NOT that close.
Appropriate contexts for each politeness strategy: Positive politeness
- The speaker and the hearer are close friends.
- Imposition is small.
Appropriate contexts for each politeness strategy: On-Record Baldly
- The speaker has authority over the hearer either by being higher in status or has a more dominant role.
- The speaker is in a hurry.
- It is an emergency situation.
- Imposition is small.
At the time of writing this, what would I have said was the defining feature of the “off the record” strategy?
Never actually explicitly states what they are saying.
At the time of writing this, what would I have said was the defining feature of the “negative politeness” strategy?
Technique is more oriented to negative rather than positive politeness.