//Eyewitness testimony Flashcards
What is eyewitness testimony
- the evidence provided by people who witnessed a particular event or crime. Relies on recall from memory
- description of criminals and crime scenes
- witnesses are often inaccurate in their recollection of events and the people involved
- many cognitive psychologists focus on working out what factors affect the accuracy of eyewitness testimony, and how accuracy can be improved in interviews
Stages of EWT
- encode
- storage
- retrieval
Wells et al- lab experiment
- pps told to wait in a cubicle before the start of the experiment
- there was a calculator in the cubicle: a confederate of the experiment appeared and popped it in her bag
- only 58% correctly identified ‘the thief’ from a set of 6 photos
- when the pps were asked to testify in a mock trial, 80% were believed by the jury
- jurers fine EWT very believable
Allport and Postman (1947)
- when asked to recall details of the picture opposite, pps tended to report that it was the black man who was holding the razor
- clearly this is not correct and shows that memory is an active process and can be changed to ‘fit in’ with what we expect to happen based on our knowledge and understanding of society
Why are schemas important
- remove the need to store similar information more than once
- but we might distort them in some way- information may not be exactly the same as what we encounteretd
EWT can be affected by misleading questions- Loftus and Palmer (1974)- aim
-investigate how EWT can be distorted using leading questions, where a certain answer is implied in the question
EWT can be affected by misleading questions- Loftus and Palmer (1974)- method and results EXPERIMENT 1
EXPERIMENT 1
- pps were shown a film of a multiple car crash
- they were asked a series of questions including ‘How fast do you think the cars were going when they hit’
- in different conditions, the word ‘hit’ was replaced with ‘smashed’, ‘collieded’, ‘bumped’, ir ‘contacted’
- pps given the word ‘smashed’ estimated the highest speed (average of 41mph) and those given the word ‘contacted’ gave the lowest estimate ‘average of 32mph)
EWT can be affected by misleading questions- Loftus and Palmer (1974)- method and results EXPERIMENT 2
EXPERIMENT 2
- pps were split into three groups- one group was given the verb ‘smashed’, another ‘hit’ and the third control group wasn’t given any indication of the vehicles’ speed
- a week later the pps were asked ‘did you see any broken glass’
- although no broken glass in the film, pps were more likely to say they’d seen broken glass in the ‘smashed’ condition than any other
EWT can be affected by misleading questions- Loftus and Palmer (1974)- conclusion
-leading questions can affect the accuracy of people’s memories of any event
EWT can be affected by misleading questions- Loftus and Palmer (1974)- evaluation
- has implications for questions in police interviews
- artifical experiment- watching a video is not a real life event which potentially affects recall
- a later study found that pps who thought they’d witnessed a real robbery could give an accurate description of the robber
- experimental design might lead to demand characteristics, where the results are skewed because of pps expectations of the purposes of the experiment e.g. the leding questions might have given pps clues about the nature of the experiment and so pps might have acted accordingly- reduced reliability of experiment
Loftus and Zanni (1975)- aim
-investigated how altering the wording of a question can produce a leading question that can distort EWT
Loftus and Zanni (1975)- method
- pps were shwon a film of a car crash
- they were asked either ‘did you see a broken headlight’ or ‘did you see the broken headlight’
- there was no broken headlight
Loftus and Zanni (1975)- results
-17% of those asked about ‘the’ broken headlight claimed they saw one, compared to 7% in the group asked about ‘a’ broken headlight
Loftus and Zanni (1975)- conclusion
-the use of the word ‘the’ is enough to affect the accuracy of people’s memories of an event
Loftus and Zanni (1975)- evaluation
- has implications for EWT
- lab study so can control extraneous variables
- possible to establish cause and effect
- but artificial- pps were shown a film of a car crash, not an actual car crash, so lacks ecological validity