Eyewitness Reliability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Leading contributing cause for wrongful convictions?

A

77% are eyewitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When does acquisition or encoding take place in an investigation for an eyewitness?

A

during the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When does storage take place

A

up until testifying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does retrieval occur?

A

Recall; during police interview, recognition; lineup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acquisition

A

the process by which people notice and pay attention to information in the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Encoding

A

driven by attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

own race bias

A

people are more likely to recognise people from their own race

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

storage

A

the process by which people store in memory information that they have acquired from the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Retention interval

A
  • ebbinghaus forgetting curve, immediately after receiving info memory degrades quickly and then levels off. (30% in first day)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Misinformation Effect

A

The tendency for false post-event information to become integrated into people’s memory of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Loftus et al. 1987 classic misinformation study

A
  • post - slide presentation interview; plant misinformation about event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sources of contamination

A

Police - leading questions, suggestive questions. Other witnesses- discussing the events etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ways to avoid misinformation?

A
  • Isolate witnesses as soon as possible

- Ask open-ended, non-leading questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Factors that influence memory

A

estimator variables, system variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Estimator variables

A

Factors that the criminal justice system has no control over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

System variables

A

can be controlled by criminal justice system

17
Q

Estimator variables (examples)

A
  • presence of weapon
  • length of exposure
  • viewing conditions
  • race of victim & perp
  • Age of witness
  • Presence of disguise/ Change of appearance
18
Q

System variables (examples)

A
  • Who administers the lineup
  • lineup presentation
  • selection of foils
  • instructions to witness
  • feedback to witness
19
Q

Target

A

perp

20
Q

Single-blind administration of line-up

A
  • police officer involved in case
  • may influence eyewitness
  • observers rated administrator as more biased (Greathouse & Kovera, 2009)
21
Q

Double-blind Administration of line-up

A
  • Independent investigator or computer
  • Cannot influence eyewitness
  • inform eyewitness to prevent search for cues
22
Q

Simultaneous lineup false ID rate (Steblay, Dysart & Wells, 2011)

A

28 %

23
Q

Simultaneous correct ID rate (Steblay, Dysart & Wells, 2011)

A

52 %

24
Q

Sequential false ID rate (Steblay, Dysart & Wells, 2011)

A

15 %

25
Q

Sequential correct ID rate (Steblay, Dysart & Wells, 2011)

A

44 %

26
Q

For a fair lineup, what is required?

A

Foils should resemble/match description of suspect

27
Q

How does confidence impact jurors belief in witness?

A

Jurors are more likely to believe witnesses who are 100% confident than witnesses who are 80 % confident

28
Q

Neil vs Biggers (1972) case changed eye-witness cases

A

Even if suggestive procedures used as long as criteria fit: - opportunity to view - attention paid by eyewitnesses - Accuracy of description - Certainty - Time between event & ID

29
Q

NJ vs Henderson (2011) shift in procedures

A
  • Special Master Review of 2,000 pages of scientific findings - rewrote judicial instructions to address system variables - system variables looked at also :)
30
Q

Oregon vs Lawson (2013)

A
  • Revised Judgement Process - Onus shifted from defense to prosecutor to demonstrate not a suggestive procedur - Focus on system variables
31
Q

Common eye-witness safe guards

A
  • Suppression hearings (evidence thrown out of court) - Judicial Instructions - Expert Testimony (expensive)
32
Q

Novel eye-witness safe guards

A
  • Juror training - Presentation of ID video