Explanations Of Attatchment: Learning Theory And Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory Flashcards
learning theory intro
The learning theory emphasises the importance of food in the formation of attachment and is known as the ‘cupboard love’ theory, is it suggests infants learn to attach to whoever feeds them.
Feeding before conditioning
Food (unconditioned stimulus) = pleasure (unconditioned response)
Feeding during conditioning
Feeder (neutral stimulus) + food (unconditioned stimulus) = pleasure (unconditioned response)
After conditioning
Feeder (conditioned stimulus) = pleasure (conditioned response)
Operant conditioning positive reinforcement
When an infant is hungry and cries, this leeds to the response of feeding from caregiver which is positive reinforcement so crying behaviour is reinforced.
Operant conditioning negative reinforcement
When the caregiver feeds infant, crying stops, this is negative reinforcement for the caregiver as negative stimulus of crying is removed and feeding behaviour is reinforced.
Research to contradict learning theory
Harlow found that monkeys spent more time with the surrogate mother who provided them with comfort rather than the one that provided them with food.
Research to contradict learning theory
Schaffer and Emerson- found that infants tended to form attachments to their mother regardless of whether she wad the one who usually fed them, attachment was more due to who responds to the infants signals and interacting with them.
Bowlby’s monotropic theory intro
Theres different parts of the theory, not stages.
ASCMI
adaptive, social releasers, critical period and monotropy.
Research to support bowlby’s monotropic theory
Lorenz - found critical period of 12-17 hrs which supports bowlbys concept of a critical period
Research to contradict bowlby’s monotropic theory
Shaffer and Emerson - found evidence to support the view that children had multiple attachments. Found multiple attatchments may help children develop socially, emotionally and cognitively. However they also found that children form specific attachments before multiple ones, which was with the mother 65% of the time.
Another criticism of bowlby’s monotropic theory
An alternative explanation is learning theory which proposes we learn to attatch via stimulus, response and associations.