explanations for forgetting - Interference Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when does interference occur

A

interference occurs when 2 pieces of information conflict, resulting in forgetting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how many types of interference are there?

A

2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 2 types of interference

A

proactive interference
retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is proactive interference?

A

when older memory interferes with a newer memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is retroactive interference

A

when a newer memory interferes with an older memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did McGeoch and McDonald (1931) discover?

A

they discovered that inference id worse when memories are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the procedure to McGeoch and McDonald’s study?

A

procedure - made participants learn a set of words until they remembered them with 100% accuracy. then they had to learn another set
group 1 -synonyms (same meaning as originals)
group 2 - antonyms (opposite to meanings)
group 3 - unrelated to originals
group 4 - consonant syllables
group 5 - 3 digit numbers
group 6 - no new list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was GROUP 1 in McGeoch and McDonald’s study?

A

group 1 -synonyms (same meaning as originals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was GROUP 2 in McGeoch and McDonald’s study?

A

group 2 - antonyms (opposite to meanings of the originals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was GROUP 3 in McGeoch and McDonalds study?

A

group 3 - unrelated to originals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was GROUP 4 in McGeoch and McDonalds study?

A

group 4 - consonant syllables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was GROUP 5 in McGeoch and McDonalds study?

A

group 5 - 3 digit numbers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was GROUP 6 in McGeoch and McDonalds study?

A

group 6 - no new list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was McGeoch and McDonald’s findings of their study?

A

that recall depended on the second list.
the worst group to recall was similar words (synonyms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what does McGeoch and McDonald’s interference study show

A

it shows that interference is strongest when memories are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explanation for forgetting: interference EVALUATION - evidence from lab studies

A
  • many lab experiments such as McGeoch and McDonald’s show both types of inference are likely to be common ways we forget info from LTM
  • supports existence of separate acoustic and visual store
17
Q

explanation for forgetting: inference EVALUATION - Artificial materials

A
  • interference is more likely to be demonstrated in lab than real life situations
  • not all the tasks are everyday tasks
18
Q

explanation for forgetting: inference EVALUATION - Real-life studies

A
  • Baddeley and Hitch (1977) wanted to find out if interference or time were better explanation for forgetting.
  • they asked rugby players to recall the names of the teams they had played that season. some of the players hadn’t played in all matches
  • results showed recall depended on number of matches played, not how long ago.
    — shows interference can be applied to some everyday situations
19
Q

explanation for forgetting: inference EVALUATION - time between learning

A
  • majority of lab experiments are designed so the possibility of interference is maximised
  • but the whole learning and recall process could be over within an hour.
20
Q

explanation for forgetting: inference EVALUATION - interference effects may be overcome using cues

A
  • Tulving and Psotka (1971) found that if given cues, participants are able to recall more words, even if interference occurred previously