Explanations For Forgetting Flashcards
Interference
One memory disrupts another
Proactive interference
Forgetting occurs when older memories, already stored, disrupt the recall of newer memories
Retroactive interference
Forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories already stored.
Research on the effects of similarity- McGeoch and McDonald
- Studied retroactive interference
- Participants had to learn a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy
- They then learnt a new list of view
- six groups of participants who had to learn different types of new lists
Group 1- synonyms
Group 2- antonyms
Group 3- words unrelated to original
Group 4- consonant syllables
Group 5- three digits numbers
Group 6- no new list
- The most similar list (synonyms) produced the worst recall
- Intereference is strongest when the memories are similar
Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Real world interference
STRENGTH
Rugby players remembered less if played more games over a season (Baddeley and Hitch)
Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Interference and cues
STRENGTH
Interference effects are overcome using cues (Tulving and Psotka)
Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Support from drug trails
STRENGTH
Taking diazepam after learning reduces interference and forgetting = retrograde facilitation (Coenen and van Luijelaar)
Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Validity issues
LIMITATION
Lab studies have high control but use artificial materials and unrealistic procedures
Encoding specificity principle (ESP)
That a cue (if its going to be helpful) has to be both present at encoding and present at retrieval
- use of mnemonic techniques to make it meaningful
Context-dependant forgetting
recall depends on external cues eg. weather
State-dependant forgetting
recall depends on internal cue eg. drunk or upset
Research on context dependant forgetting- Godden and Baddeley
- studied deep sea divers who work underwater to see if training on land helped or hindered their work underwater
- learned a list of words either on land or underwater
Lean on Land- Recall on Land
Learn on Land- Recall on Underwater
Learn underwater- Recall underwater
Learn underwater- Recall on Land - accurate recall was 40% lower in the non-matching conditions
Research on state dependant forgetting- Carter and Cassiday
- Antihistamine drugs
- Made participants slightly drowsy
- Participants had to learn a list of words in 4 conditions
Learn on drug- Recall on drug
Learn on drug- Recall not on drug
Learn not on drug- Recall not on drug
Learn not on drug- Recall on drug
- when cues are absent then there is more forgetting- mismatched conditions
Evaluation points for the retrieval failure due to the absence of cues- Real world application
STRENGTH
Cues are weak but worth paying attention to as strategy for improving recall
Evaluation points for the retrieval failure due to the absence of cues- Research support
STRENGTH
Wide range of support suggests this is main reason for forgetting