Explanations For Forgetting Flashcards

1
Q

Interference

A

One memory disrupts another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proactive interference

A

Forgetting occurs when older memories, already stored, disrupt the recall of newer memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Retroactive interference

A

Forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories already stored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Research on the effects of similarity- McGeoch and McDonald

A
  • Studied retroactive interference
  • Participants had to learn a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy
  • They then learnt a new list of view
  • six groups of participants who had to learn different types of new lists

Group 1- synonyms
Group 2- antonyms
Group 3- words unrelated to original
Group 4- consonant syllables
Group 5- three digits numbers
Group 6- no new list

  • The most similar list (synonyms) produced the worst recall
  • Intereference is strongest when the memories are similar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Real world interference

A

STRENGTH

Rugby players remembered less if played more games over a season (Baddeley and Hitch)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Interference and cues

A

STRENGTH

Interference effects are overcome using cues (Tulving and Psotka)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Support from drug trails

A

STRENGTH

Taking diazepam after learning reduces interference and forgetting = retrograde facilitation (Coenen and van Luijelaar)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation points for the explanations of forgetting: interference- Validity issues

A

LIMITATION

Lab studies have high control but use artificial materials and unrealistic procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Encoding specificity principle (ESP)

A

That a cue (if its going to be helpful) has to be both present at encoding and present at retrieval
- use of mnemonic techniques to make it meaningful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Context-dependant forgetting

A

recall depends on external cues eg. weather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State-dependant forgetting

A

recall depends on internal cue eg. drunk or upset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Research on context dependant forgetting- Godden and Baddeley

A
  • studied deep sea divers who work underwater to see if training on land helped or hindered their work underwater
  • learned a list of words either on land or underwater
    Lean on Land- Recall on Land
    Learn on Land- Recall on Underwater
    Learn underwater- Recall underwater
    Learn underwater- Recall on Land
  • accurate recall was 40% lower in the non-matching conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Research on state dependant forgetting- Carter and Cassiday

A
  • Antihistamine drugs
  • Made participants slightly drowsy
  • Participants had to learn a list of words in 4 conditions

Learn on drug- Recall on drug
Learn on drug- Recall not on drug
Learn not on drug- Recall not on drug
Learn not on drug- Recall on drug

  • when cues are absent then there is more forgetting- mismatched conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation points for the retrieval failure due to the absence of cues- Real world application

A

STRENGTH

Cues are weak but worth paying attention to as strategy for improving recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation points for the retrieval failure due to the absence of cues- Research support

A

STRENGTH

Wide range of support suggests this is main reason for forgetting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation points for the retrieval failure due to the absence of cues- Recall vs Recognition

A

LIMITATION

No context effects when memory assessed used recognition test (Godden and Baddeley)

17
Q

Evaluation points for the retrieval failure due to the absence of cues- Problems with the ESP

A

LIMITATION

Research support for the principle but no interdependent measure of cue encoding