Explanations for conformity Flashcards
two explanations for conformity
- normative social influence
- informational social influence
normative social influence
- fundamental need for social approval + acceptance
- we avoid any behaviour that will make others reject/ ridicule us
- lead us to copy others’ behaviour to ‘fit in’
- normative SI likely to lead to compliance
informational social influence
- fundamental need to be right + have accurate perception of reality
- if it’s not possible to check the facts, we will rely on the opinions of others to check if they’re correct = then use as evidence about reality
- more likely to occur in ambiguous situations or when others are EXPERTS
- informational SI leads to internalisation
ads of explanations for conformity
- Asch’s study (test lines)
- Jenness’ study (beans in a jar)
- Sherif’s study (autokinetic effect)
disads of explanations for conformity
- ingrational conformity
- dispositional factors
Asch’s study (test lines) - ads of explanations for conformity
procedure:
- placed a naiive part in a group w/ several confederates
- group asked to look at ‘standard line’ + decide individually which of the other ‘test lines’ was the same length as the ‘standard line’ = w/out discussion
- then gave answers one by one, out loud
- answer was obvious BUT confederates gave wrong answer 12/18 trials
- In 33% of trials = parts conformed (chance of making a mistake - 1%)
= conformed due to NORMATIVE SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Jenness’ study (beans in a jar) - ads of explanations for conformity
- asked parts to estimate how many beans they thought were in a jar
- each part made an individual estimate first + then as a group
- found that when the task was carried out in a group, parts estimates were roughly the same value (individual guesses were different)
= conformed due to INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE)
= parts were uncertain about the actual number of beans in the jar
Sherif’s study (autokinetic effect) - ads of explanations for conformity
- used the autokinetic effect:
- a visual illusion of a small spot of light in a dark room will appear to move, even though it hasn’t
- when parts guessed individually of how far the light actually moved = varied (20-80cm)
- parts then tested in groups of 3 (2 parts w/ similar guesses + 1 different)
= found that group decided on a common estimate (very different part conformed to other 2 = INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE = ambiguous task)
ingrational conformity - disads of explanations for conformity
- suggested that there is a third explanation for conformity = ingrational conformity
- similar to normative SI
- BUT motivated by the need to impress or gain favour, rather than fear of rejection = conformity
dispositional factors - disads of explanations for conformity
- dispositional factors (i.e. personality traits) may also impact whether a person chooses to conform or not
- people w/ an internal locus of control = less likely to conform
= believe what happens in their life is a result of their own behaviour - people w/ an external locus of control = more likely to conform
= believe that what happens in their lives is outside of their control