//Explanations for conformity Flashcards
Deutsch and Gerard (1955)
- distinguished between ISI and NSI
- they believed this distinction was crucial to understanding majority group influence
What is informational social influence
- when someone conforms because they do not know what to do, and is based on a need to be right
- they seek information to reduce uncertainty
- look to others for guidance
- tends to involve internalisation
What is normative social influence
- altering behaviour to fit the expectations of others
- need to be liked or accepted
- person may conform publically but at a private level may disagree
- tends to involve compliance
Research for NSI?
Asch study
Research for ISI?
Sherif study
Evaluation of explanation of conformity
- some factors that increase or decrease ISI/NSI have been indentified
- it is not clear whether the effects of any given factor are due to NSI, ISI or a combination of both-no way of telling which is present. We often look to others because we do not want to be different
- assumes that NSI would be extremely common as it occurs whenever individuals seek social acceptance
- William and Sogans (1984) found much more conformity when the other group members were friends that strangers
What factors affect conformity
Situational and dispositional factors-situational are due to the social situation a person is in, whereas dispositional factors are due to the person’s internal characteristics. Asch investigated three situational factors
Situational factors investigated by Asch-group size
- the bigger the majority is, the more influential it will be
- to test this, Asch (1956) conducted his conformity experiemtn with different numbers of confederates as the majority
- with only 2 confederates, the real pp conformed on only 14% of the critical trials
- with 3 confederates, conformity was 32%
- very small majorities are easier to resist than alrger ones-however influence doesn’t keep increasing with the size of the majority
Situational factors investigated by Asch-unanimity/social support
- Asch ran another version of his experiment to test the effect of having a supporter in the group
- rather than the confederates forming a unanimous majority, one of the confederated agreed with the participant
- having a fellow dissenter broke the unanimity of the group, which made it easier for the pp to resist the pressure to conform-conformity rate fell to 5.5%
Situational factors investigated by Asch-task difficulty
- when Asch made the task more difficult by making the lines more similar, conformity levels increased
- people are more likely to conform if they’re less confident that they’re correct
Dispositional factors affecting conformity-confidence and expertise
- Asch debreifed his pps-found that confidence was a factor in the people who hadn’t conformed
- if someone felt confident in their judgements, they were more able to resist group pressure
- Wisenthal et al (1976) found that if people felt competent in a task, they were less likely to conform
Dispositional factors affecting conformity-gender
-Eagly (1987) argued that men and women’s different social roles explain the difference in conformity-women more concerend with group harmoney and are nmore likely to agree with others