Explain two consequences of... 8 marks Flashcards

1
Q
A

Consequence 1:
Point - It created tension between USA and Britain
Evidence - Stalin wanted to open a second front in West Europe to draw the German troops away from the East.
Churchill wanted to open a second front in the Balkans, not in the West.
Explanation - Roosevelt sided with Stalin and Britain was forced to agree with the USA to open a second front in France may May 1944.
This caused tension between the USA and Britain as it seemed that the good relations between Stalin and Roosevelt might create a position where big three = big two.

Consequence 2:
Point - Germany had to withdraw troops from the Eastern Front.
Evidence -the USA and Britain agreed to invade France by May 1944.
They invaded France on June 6th, 1944 as promised.
Explanation - Eased pressure on the eastern front, German troops sent to France instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain two consequences of the Yalta Conference

A

Consequence 1:
Point - One consequence of the Tehran conference was the division of Germany.
Evidence - Germany was divided into 4 zones controlled by Britain, the USA, the Soviet Union, and USSR.
Each country was allowed to govern its sector as it saw fit.
Explanation - Stalin believed he’d been given the poorest sector of Germany, leading to tension between east and west, worse relations between the powers, Germany became an area of tension.

Consequence 2:
Point - Suspicion between Stalin and the USA/Britain.
Evidence - Failed to agree on how Poland should be governed. Stalin - wanted a pro-Moscow government,
The USA supported ‘London Poles” who were non-communists.
Explanation - Stalin wanted a communist gov in Poland - part of his plan to build a buffer zone, he saw the actions of the USA/Britain as an attempt to undermine soviet security. Relations worsened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain two consequences of the Postdam Conference

A

Consequence 1:
Point:
-Increased tensions between the West and USSR
Evidence:
-Stalin (USSR): communist, wanted to spread communism throughout eastern Europe.
-The West: democratic capitalism. Truman was extremely against communism and wanted to prevent Stalin’s influence.
-the day after the Tehran conference Truman tested an atomic bomb, in order to threaten USSR
Explanation:
- Western powers and the soviet union had different ideal outcomes of ww2. Tension due to this.

Consequence 2:
Point:
- End of Grand Alliance
Evidence:
- Roosevelt’s death led to Truman becoming president of the US and he was much more distrustful of the soviet union.
-separated by ideological difference (communism vs. capitalism.
-Stalin wanted to punish Germany more harshly, he was also frustrated that the USSR received the poorest part of
Germany
Explanation:
Wartime alliance turned into peacetime hostility by mutual suspicion and disagreements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain two consequences of Kennan’s long Telegram

A

In 1946
Consequence 1:
Point:
Rise in tensions between east and west, as the message worried Americans.
Evidence:
-George Kennan reported that Stalin wanted to see the destruction of capitalism.
-Reported that Stalin felt that the world outside of the SU was trying to destroy communism.
Explanation:
-Americans felt threatened by the thought of the destruction of capitalism.
-Therefore, lead to distrust between communist and capitalist.
-This led to the belief that there should be a determined policy of ‘containment’ to stop communism from spreading.

Consequence 2:
Point: Lead to the marshal plan.
Evidence:
-Telegram confirmed Trumans worst fears.
-Said that USSR wanted to spread communism through Europe.
-Many European countries were weak after the war
-In bad economic conditions, communism looked attractive.
-Meant Stalin did not need to fight a war to spread communism, just to influence the discontented.
-Truman doctrine: March 1947, economic aid package to Greece and Turkey.
-the USA provided 400 million and sent military personnel to the region.
Explanation: Long Telegram spurred America into action against the spread of communism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain two consequences of Novikov’s Telegram

A

In 1946
Consequence 1:
Point:
-Deteriorated relations between the USA and the Soviet Union further.
Evidence:
-Telegram reported that the USA wanted to use massive military power to dominate the world.
-Since the death of Roosevelt, America no longer wanted to cooperate with USSR.
Explanation:
-Causes tension as America had a very strong military, so the threat did not seem highly unlikely.

Consequence 2:
Point: As a result of the telegram, USSR felt the need to secure a buffer zone in Eastern Europe.
Evidence:
-USSR had. already been invaded twice by Germany.
-Telegram suggested that America was prepared to use its massive military power to dominate the world
Explanation:
-Threat of America using its massive military power to dominate the world hurried the development of the satellite states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain two consequences of the ‘Iron Curtain” speech

A

March 1946
Consequence 1:
Point:
-Showed Britain’s anti-soviet views, strengthening the feeling of the west against the USSR.
Evidence:
-Speech made it plain that he thought USSR was a threat.
Explanation:
-Though he was no longer British Priminister, his views were still very influential, and so represented British attituded towards SU.
-Increased tension and mistrust.

Consequence 2:
Point:
-It Intensified the growing hostility between East and West.
Evidence:
-Increase tension and mistrust.
-led to USSR strengthening its forces.
-USSR stepped-up campaign of anti-Western propaganda.
Explanation:
-Was speaking in the USA so must have cleared their speech with Truman first, showing Truman’s support of his attitudes.
-Lead Stalin to believe that what Churchill said was reflecting American beliefs too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain two consequences of the Warsaw Uprising 1944

A

Point:
-Poland becomes a Soviet satellite state.
Evidence:
-After it was liberated, Soviet troops remained and a new government was formed in June 1945 dominated by communist-sympathizing ‘Lublin’ Poles.
-Opposition leaders were assassinated and imprisoned before a rigged vote in 1947 gave the communists 80% of the vote.
Explanation:
Now controlled by a pro-communist government.

Consequence 2:
Point: London Poles Forced to flee.
Evidence:
-After the “free” elections of 1947, London Poles were forced to flee or face imprisonment.
Explanation:
Completely USSR influenced, no influence from the west.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain two consequences of the Truman Doctrine

A

Truman Doctrine March 1947

  • Speech announcing economic aid package to Greece and Turkey.
  • the USA provided 400 million and sent military personnel to the region.

Consequence 1:
Point:
-Truman’s attitudes were made clear, which intensified mistrust and tension between East and West.
Evidence:
-Saw speech as an opportunity to make a statement about the differences between communism and democracy.
-Believed choosing democracy over communism was like choosing good over evil.
Explanation:
-Worsened relations, as it was a threat to communism and showed Truman’s feelings about the subject.

Consequence 2:
Point:
-Isolationism was replaced by a containment policy.
Evidence:
-Truman said, “communism should not be allowed to grow and that USA was prepared to send troops and economic aid to those in countries trying to resist communism.”
Explanation:
-Isolationism means not getting involved in the affairs of others.
-Containment is limiting the spread of something, which was in this case communism, so by aiding countries to do this, they were getting involved in other countries affairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain two consequences of the Marshal plan

A

In June 1947 - the USA had not suffered the same damages to industry and infrastructure, so was in a place to provide economic aid to European countries.
-Practical outcome of the Truman Doctrine.

Consequence 1:
Point: Marshal Plan successfully tied European countries to the USA.
Evidence:
-Between 1948 and 1952, the USA gave 12.7 billion dollars of aid.
-In addition to 13 billion given before the Marshal Plan.
Explanation:
-Stalin created his own economic aid: Comecon.
-Europe was now divided into 2 economic-political camps.

Consequence 2:
Point: Stalin’s suspicion of the West was reinforced.
Evidence:
-Criticised the Marshal plan, calling it ‘Dollar imperialism’.
-Thought it was undermining the role of the United Nations, by America thinking it was its job to protect the world.
-Stalin argued it was using economic might to divide Europe in two and establish an economic American empire.
Explanation:
-All lingering belief in the grand alliance was gone.
-the USA had set itself up in direct opposition to the communist USSR.
-He believed he now had evidenced that the USA was trying to crush the Soviet Union.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain two consequences of the Greek Civil War

A

Consequence 1:
Point: The Truman doctrine
Evidence:
-In 1947, the British government announces it can no longer provide military support in Greece.
-In March 1947, Truman Doctrine.
-Speech announcing economic aid package to Greece and Turkey.
-the USA provided 400 million and sent military personnel to the region.
Explanation:
-the USA had not suffered the same damages to industry and infrastructure, so was in a place to provide economic aid to European countries, where Britain no longer could.

Consequence 2:
Point: The Marshal's plan
Evidence:
-In June 1947
-Between 1948 and 1952, the USA gave 12.7 billion dollars of aid to Europe to help countries like Greece or in the same position.
Explanation:
-Greek Civil war caused concern in America about communism spreading through Europe.
-Pushed them to release aid plans.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain two consequences of the formation of Cominform

A

1947
Consequence 1:
Point:
-Gave Stalin a new way of directing and controlling the governments of the Satellite states.
Evidence:
-Members of the communist parties of France, Italy, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, and Yugoslavia.
Explanation:
-Stalin, therefore, had lots of influence.

Consequence 2:
Point:
-Further tensions between west and East, as East isolates itself from the west even more.
Evidence:
-Encouraged to trade with other coniform members.
-discouraged all contact with non-communist countries.
-1st meeting, rejected Marshal Plan and began to spread propaganda accusing America of being no different from the Nazis.
Explanation:
-Propaganda was provoking for America and set people’s views against them.
-The cut-off from the non-communist basically meant cut-off from the west, so this caused tension.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain two consequences of the formation of Comecon

A

1949 - Replacement for Marshal Plan for Eastern European countries.

Consequence 1:
Point:
-Further isolated trade and contact with the West.
Evidence:
-Trade with the USA and Western Europe was discouraged.
-Trade with Comecon members encouraged.
-Bulgaria’s trade with Comecon countries increased from 10% in the 1930s to over 90% in 1951.
Explanation:
Not very reliant on the West so increased mistrust.

Consequence 2:
point:
-Increase tension and played a significant part in a new military alliance between the USA and Western Europe.
Evidence:
-NATO was formed in April 1949.
-USA, France, Britain, and 9 other Western countries.
Explanation:
-Felt threatened by the growing strength of the Soviet Union, felt the need to form a Military alliance to protect themselves.
-Increased tension hugely, America had a formal military alliance with Western Europe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain two consequences of the Berlin Blockade

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Formation of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Evidence:
-3 days after the end of the blockade, USA, France, and Britain permitted their zones to come together as a state know as the federal republic of Germany.
-The new country was much bigger than east Germany.
-Had a democratically elected chancellor.
-The western-controlled zone of Berlin became known as West Berlin.
Explanation:
-After the Berlin blockade, it was clear the division of Germany would continue.
-West allies hurried to create a separate West Germany.

Consequence 2:
Point:
-Caused the Formation of the german democratic republic.
Evidence:
-Stalin too created the ‘German Democratic Republic’ in 1949.
Explanation:
-After the Berlin blockade, it was clear the division of Germany would continue.
-Stalin responded by creating the democratic republic of Germany.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain two consequences of Operation Vittles

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Increased appreciation for the West.
Evidence:
-People of West Berlin and Western troops in berlin joined forces to build new runways for supplies to land.
-Ordinary citizens helped to unload plains.
-America and Britain were able to fly in 1000 tonnes of supplies each, every day.
Explanation:
-Made West look like Heroes, Pilots risking their lives to bring food.
-The joining of the people of West Berling and the Western troops showed their support for the West.
-Increase the popularity of the West.

Consequence 2:
Point: Made Stalin look unwise and aggressive, increasing tension.
Evidence:
-Soviets lifted the Blockade on 9 May 1949.
-No allied casualties.
Explanation:
-The lift of the Blockade meant Stalin’s attempt to win a propaganda victory over Britain, France, and the USA had backfired. The West had won, and come out Heroes.
-The west responding peacefully made Stalin’s actions look aggressive and unwise.
-Stalin lost face, increasing tensions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain two consequences of the formation of the federal republic of Germany

A

Consequence 1:
Point: The formation of the German Democratic Republic.
Evidence:
-Stalin responded by creating the Democratic Republic of Germany in 1949.
Explanation:
-Faced with the Federal Republic of Germany, Stalin felt he had no choice but to create his own state.

Consequence 2:
Point: Played role in the formation of the Warsaw Pact.
Evidence:
-the Federal Republic of Germany was allowed to join NATO in May 1955.
-Within a week of West Germany joining NATO, the Soviet Union had an equivalent communist defensive military alliance.
Explanation:
-Stalin felt there was now a real danger of an armed and powerful Germany on the borders of Soviet-controlled Eastern Europe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain two consequences of the formation of the German Democratic Republic

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Intensified tension between the East and West.
Evidence:
-Formed in October 1949
-Only 5 months after West Germany formed
Explanation:
-Resistance against the Western world.
-Stalin felt that the Western World was ganging up against communism and the Soviet Union.
-Showed a true divide in the two worlds and increased the tension of the cold war.

Consequence 2:
Point: Set the foundations for the Berlin Wall.
Evidence:
-in 1961, the Berlin Wall was built.
Explanation:
-German was now separate, governed by the communists and the Trizonian government.
-Meeting where communism and capitalism could be compared side by side.
-The bad conditions in the communist East German eventually led to the Berlin Wall being put in place to stop people from crossing from one to the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain two consequences of the formation of NATO

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Resulted in ongoing American military presence in Europe throughout the cold war.
Evidence:
-NATO agreed that if any member were attacked, all members would come to its assistance.
Explanation:
-Truman’s doctrine said that the USA would offer assistance, but it was not inevitable that America would get involved directly in the defense of Western Europe after the 2nd world war.
-Nato meant that the USA now had a formal military alliance which was a major step beyond the Truman doctrine.

Consequence 2:
Point: caused the formation of the Warsaw Pact.
Evidence:
-Warsaw Pact was formed in 1955
-Within a week of West Germany joining NATO, the Soviet Union had an equivalent communist defensive military alliance.
Explanation:
-NATO made west Germany a danger to the Soviet Union.
-Stalin felt there was now a real danger of an armed and powerful Germany on the borders of Soviet-controlled Eastern Europe.

18
Q

Explain two consequences of the formation of the Warsaw pact

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Formed the ‘Eastern Bloc’
Evidence:
-The members of the Warsaw Pact were: the Soviet Union, the Democratic Republic of Germany, Czechoslovakia, Albania, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, and Romania.
Explanation:
-Although the Warsaw Pact had many member states, the leadership was entirely Soviet, and the alliance was under the command of the USSR.
-Countries formed a ‘bloc’ between the Eastern and Western world, protecting the USSR.

Consequence 2:
Point: The creation of two armed camps.
Evidence:
-NATO was formed in 1949.
-Warsaw was formed in 1955.
Explanation:
-One Europe was under the protection of the USA, working to defeat communism.
-The other was led by the Soviet Union, working to spread and extend communist control.
-The confrontation and hostility between these two armed camps would drive international relations for the next 35 years.

19
Q

Explain two consequences of the 1945 development of the atomic bomb by the USA

A
Consequence 1:
Point: Started the arms race.
Evidence:
-USA atom bomb in 1945.
-Russia atom bomb in 1949.
Explanation:
-the USA secure knowing it was the only country in the world that had atomic bombs.
-Russia felt threatened so began working on its own bomb.

Consequence 2:
Point: Gave USA security.
Evidence:
-The USA was the only country with atomic bombs up until 1949.
Explanation:
-Meant the USA was more powerful than Russia without needing the vast amount of conventional weapons Russia had.
-Made them impossible to wage war against.

20
Q

Explain two consequences of the 1949 USSR development of the atomic bomb

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Put arms race into full swing
Evidence:
1949: Soviet bomb.
1952: the USA tested a hydrogen bomb
1953: the Soviet Union tests a hydrogen bomb.
1957: the USA tested an intercontinental ballistic missile.
1957: SU makes 1st successful ICBM launch.
Explanation:
-Amr race became at it’s full intensity now that the USSR had an atomic bomb too, which meant America was no longer in a more powerful position.

Consequence 2:
Point: Created a new perspective of war.
Evidence:
-From 1949, both had very lethal weapons that could destroy the world many times over.
Explanation:
-Previously, weapons were developed to win wars.
-Arms race Led to nuclear weaponry being seen as a deterrent to stop another side from going to war at all.
-Both sides knew the risk of nuclear weapons, and neither was prepared to use them against another nuclear state.

21
Q

Explain two consequences of the 1950s arms race.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Huge amounts of money were spent on it.
Evidence:
-the USA spent $5.5 trillion on maintaining and developing its nuclear weapons and weapon programs during the arms race.
Explanation:
-Money could have gone into other parts of society, but in order to maintain powerful status, the US felt that it was dangerous to be less powerful than Russia.

Consequence 2:
Point: Created a new perspective of war.
Evidence:
-From 1949, both had very lethal weapons that could destroy the world many times over.
Explanation:
-Previously, weapons were developed to win wars.
-Arms race Led to nuclear weaponry being seen as a deterrent to stop another side from going to war at all.
-Both sides knew the risk of nuclear weapons, and neither was prepared to use them against another nuclear state.

22
Q

Explain two consequences of the rise of Khrushchev as the USSR leader in the mid-1950s.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Better relations between the USA and the Soviet Union for a short period of time.
Evidence:
-Agreement in 1955, on how Austria should be governed.
-Summit meeting in Geneva in July 1955, which had an atmosphere of cooperation.
-Khrushchev openly criticized Stalin’s policies and suggested that there should be a peaceful co-existence between the East and the West.
Explanation:
-change in leadership made people on both sides hope that the tension between the USA and the soviet union would be reduced.

Consequence 2:
Point: A violent Soviet response to the Hungarian uprising.
Evidence:
-3 November Nagy announces Hungary is leaving the Warsaw pact.
-4 November, Soviet troops return, and after a bloody street battle, the Soviets regain control.
-1,000 tanks rolled into Budapest.
-20,000 Hungarians were killed.
Explanation:
-Krushchev would not allow Hungary to leave the Warsaw pact.
-If Hungary broke away from the Warsaw pact, other countries might follow.

23
Q

Explain two consequences of the Hungarian uprising in 1956.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Khrushchev’s position in the soviet union became more secure.
Evidence:
-He had successfully put down the Hungarian uprising.
-Had set up a new pro-communist government in Hungary, under Janos Kadar.
Explanation:
-Gave him a stronger position in the Warsaw pact, members knew they must do as they were told.
-Members also knew that if they rebelled they could expect no support from the USA military.
-Khrushchev became more confident in dealing with the USA, he now knew they were unlikely to risk military action.

Consequence 2:
Point: Increased tensions between the USA and the USSR.
Evidence:
-the USA had not taken military action, but still strongly opposed the Soviet invasion of Hungary.
Explanation:
-Soured relationships between two superpowers once more.
-Friendlier relations at the Geneva Summit had looked like a thaw in the colder war.
-This was short-lived, as the Hungarian uprising made the Cold War even cooler.

24
Q

Explain two consequences of Khrushchev’s Berlin Ultimatum of 1958.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Major impact on international relations.
Evidence:
-Khrushchev issued Ultimatum: Berlin should be demilitarised and Western troops withdrawn and the Berlin should become a free city.
Explanation:
-West was outraged by Krushchevs demand
-Saw his actions as the Soviet Union trying to spread communism.
-Kruschev saw his demands as necessary, to stop the flood of skilled citizens from Germany.

Consequence 2:
Point: Geneva Summit.
Evidence:
-Geneva, held May 1959
-discussed Berlin.
Explanation:
-it was a direct consequence, the purpose of the meeting was to discuss what would happen to Berlin.
-Meeting reduced some tension between East and West, as there was an atmosphere of co-operation.
25
Q

Explain two consequences of the Geneva Summit of 1959.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: reduced some of the tension between the east and the West.
Evidence:
-Geneva, May 1959
-Both sides put forward proposals on how Berlin should be governed.
-Met in Switzerland, which was neutral.
Explanation:
-Meeting reduced some tension between East and West, as there was an atmosphere of co-operation.

Consequence 2:
Point: Led to further talks at Camp David.
Evidence:
-Both sides put forward proposals on how Berlin should be governed.
-No agreement was reached.
Explanation:
-No agreement meant that further talks would be necessary.
-Therefore, Camp David needed to happen.

26
Q

Explain two consequences of the Camp David Summit of 1959.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Better relations between Eisenhower and Krushchev.
Evidence:
-Soviets agree to withdraw from the Berlin Ultinatum.
-Met at the presidential ranch, camp David.
Explanation:
-Appeared to establish better relations between the leaders.
-Personal, coming to the ranch.

Consequence 2:
Point: led to further talks.
Evidence:
-No agreement about the way forward for Berlin, despite the agreement to withdraw the Berlin Ultimatum.
Explanation:
-Without an agreement, it was necessary for more talks.
-Agreed that further talks would be held in Paris the following summer.

27
Q

Explain two consequences of the Paris Summit of 1960.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Increased tensions
Evidence:
-On 1st May, USA American spy plane was shot down
-Gary Powers, pilot, is interrogated and admits it was a spy mission.
-Khrushchev walked out of the meeting.
Explanation:
-Relations icy
-Trust gained in Camp David and Geneva lost
-Eisenhower refuses to apologize.

Consequence 2:
Point: led to further talks.
Evidence:
-Khrushchev walked out of the meeting.
-Still, no decisions were made.
Explanation:
-As the problem had not been solved, further talks are needed.
-In Jan 1961, Kennedy becomes president of USA.
-Khrushchev see him as inexperienced
-So Vienna talks took place, June 1961
28
Q

Explain two consequences of the Vienna Summit of 1961

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Krushchev took advantage of Kennedy’s inexperience in foreign relations to renew the Berlin Ultimatum 1958.
Evidence:
-Renwed the Berlin Ultimatum 1958.
Explanation:
-Krushchev saw Kennedy as inexperienced and thought he could get the better of him.

Consequence 2:
Point: Strained relations.
Evidence:
-No decisions
-Renewed Ultimatum
-America invests 2 billion in the American armed forces.
Explanation:
-Kennedy was very concerned about the renewed ultimatum.
-Did not give away Berlin, so as to not appear weak.
-No decisions were made, once again.
- The money invested in armed forces increased to protect the USA if war broke out, this showed that the USA was prepared to fight over Berlin.
-Cold war gets icy.

29
Q

Explain two consequences of the ‘Bay of Pigs’ invasion.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Humiliating for the USA.
Evidence:
-20,000 soldiers fought off 1,400 anti-castro invadors.
-Prdinary people would not support them.
Explanation:
-USA had not been supported by locals, seemed as though locals liked communist governmnet.
-USA preciously accused USSR of trying to build an empire in Eastern EUrope.
-Now looked like USA was trying to do the same.
-Krushchev also pointed out that the people of Cuba not supporting America was aclear indication of the popularity of communism.

Consequence 2:
Point: Stronger relations between Cuba and USSR.
Evidence:
-After deafeating invasion, Castro declares himself communist.
-Asked Krushchev to help him defend against any future attack fromt the USA.
-September 1961, Krushchev announces he would provide arms to cuba.
Explanation:
-Castro felt Krushchev could support him.
-Krushchev encouraged this communism.
-Made communism look good.
-mased capatalism look bad.

30
Q

Explain two consequences of the American U-2 spy plane capture in 1960.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Increased tensions
Evidence:
-On 1st May, USA American spy plane was shot down
-Gary Powers, pilot, is interrogated and admits it was a spy mission.
-Khrushchev walked out of the meeting.
Explanation:
-Relations icy
-Trust gained in Camp David and Geneva lost
-Eisenhower refuses to apologize.

Consequence 2:
Point: Ended Paris talks of May 1960.
Evidence:
-Krushchev walked out of the Paris talks.
-No decisions on Berlin were made.
Explanation:
-With no Krushchev and no decisions the Paris talks were over and had been very unsuccessful.

31
Q

Explain two consequences of the Berlin Wall

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Stopped refugees leaving Berlin.
Evidence:
-2 walls, one facing east, one facing west.
-separated by no man’s land.
- it was Full of booby-traps, barbed wire, minefields, and car barriers.
-Guarded by hundreds of lookout towers.
Explanation:
-Stopped East Berlin from losing all its educated people.
-Meant it was nearly impossible to cross.
-130 people died trying.

Consequence 2:
Point: Increased tension.
Evidence:
-Soviet Union had closed its border without consulting the USA.
Explanation:
-Wall sent a message that communism would survive in Berlin and that any attempt to reunite Germany under Western control would fail.
-America felt threatened.

32
Q

Explain two consequences of the Cuban Revolution.

A

Consequence 1:
Point: The damaged relationship between USA and Cuba.
Evidence:
-America recognized Fidel Castro’s new government but refused to provide economic aid unless Cuba followed guidelines set out by the International Monetary Fund.
-USA important investor in Cubas’s main export, sugar.
-USA owned a lot of lands and invested heavily in Cuba.
-Fidel Castro, a nationalist, did not want Ciba reliant on America.
-In May 1959, the Cuban gov took over all land in Cuba owned by foreign nationals.
Explanation:
-USA was concerned about the break of these close links between the USA and Cuba.
-Increased tensions.

Consequence 2:
Point: Strengthened relationship between Cuba and the Soviet Union.
Evidence:
-Castro appointed many communists to his government.
-In Feb 1960, in agreement with the Soviet Union, Krushchev agreed to buy Cuban sugar and provide economic aid.
-Secret clause, saying Cuba would receive arms from the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
-Communist links brought them close together.
-Mutual dislike of America.

33
Q

Explain two consequences of the Cuban Missile Crisis

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Made Kennedy looks strong.
Evidence:
-Hawks in the US government demanded military action, but Kennedy refused.
-Removing Missiles from Turkey was not known about,
Explanation:
-it looked like Kennedy had made the USSR retreat because the removal of the Turkish Missiles was not known.
-He had stood up to Krushchev and confronted the Hawks in his own government.

Consequence 2:
Point: Made nuclear war much less likely.
Evidence:
-1963, direct communication line between Moscow and US, ‘hotline’.
-1963, Test Ban Treaty, signed by the USA, USSR, and GB, prohibited testing of nuclear weapons in outer space, underwater, or in the atmosphere.
-1968, Nuclear Non-Proliferation, countries agreed to share info on nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
-All this made Nuclear war much more unlikely.

34
Q

Explain two consequences of the Prague Spring

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Led to greater Soviet control of members of the Warsaw Pact.
Evidence:
-Brezhnev Doctrine said: that the actions of any individual communist country affect all the communist countries. So if one country’s actions threaten other countries, then it is those countries’ duty to take steps to stop those actions.
-Soviet invasion ended the Prague spring.
Explanation:
-Suppression of Prague spring + reinforced by the Brezhnev Doctrine emphasized that members of the Warsaw pact were under close soviet control.

Consequence 2:
Point: Worsened US-Soviet relations.
Evidence:
-Attempts to pass a formal resolution condemning the invasion in the United Nations - were vetoed by the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
-Western Gov outraged
-Showed that the USA was keen to criticize, but did not do much to stop it.

35
Q

Explain two consequences of the Brezhnev Doctrine

A

Consequence 1:
Point: Led to greater Soviet control of members of the Warsaw Pact.
Evidence:
-Brezhnev Doctrine said: that the actions of any individual communist country affect all the communist countries. So if one country’s actions threaten other countries, then it is those countries’ duty to take steps to stop those actions.
Explanation:
-Doctrine was really saying: that all communist countries would be prevented from introducing reforms to make their countries more liberal.

Consequence 2:
Point: Made some soviet governments more secure.
Evidence:
-Brezhnev Doctrine
Explanation:
-Secure that they would not be challenged by reformers in their own countries.

36
Q

Explain two consequences of the election of Alexander Dubcek a First Secretary of the Czech Communist Party in January 1968

A
Consequence 1:
Point: Prague spring
Evidence:
-Relaxed censorship, aloud criticism of gov actions.
-wider powers are given to trade unions.
-trade with West increased.
-greater freedom to travel abroad.
Explanation:
Duneck's leadership lead to lots of new reforms.

Consequence 2:
Point: Soviet Invasion
Evidence:
-Brezhnev did not like Dubcek’s reforms.
-Sent in 500,000 troops to end Prague spring
-Little opposition, the army ordered to remain in barraks.
Explanation:
-Dubcek’s reforms angered Brezhnev and led to the Soviet invasion to end the Prague spring.

37
Q

Explain two consequences of the detente of the 1970s.

A

Consequence 1:

Consequence 2:

38
Q

Explain two consequences of the election of Nixon as president of the US.

A

Consequence 1:

Consequence 2:

39
Q

Explain two consequences of SALT 1

A

Consequence 1:

Consequence 2:

40
Q

Explain two consequences of the election of Brandt as Chancellor of West Germany.

A

Consequence 1:

Consequence 2:

41
Q

Explain two consequences of the Helsinki Accord.

A

Consequence 1:

Consequence 2: