Expert Witnesses Flashcards

1
Q

What distinguishes an expert witness from a lay witness in California criminal cases?

A

An expert witness can provide opinions to the jury that are related to a subject sufficiently beyond common experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the qualifications that allow a witness to testify as an expert?

A

Particularized skill, knowledge, education, experience, and/or training.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give two common examples of expert witnesses in California criminal cases.

A
  • Experts on possession for sale of narcotics
  • Experts on criminal street gangs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a significant difference between California and Federal Rules of Evidence regarding learned treatises?

A

California does not have an explicit Learned Treatise hearsay exception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under what conditions can an expert be cross-examined about the content of a scientific publication?

A

An expert can be cross-examined if:
* They referred to, considered, or relied upon the publication in forming their opinion
* The publication has been admitted in evidence
* The publication has been established as a reliable authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False: An expert can present hearsay materials to the jury as exhibits.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is permissible when an expert’s opinion contradicts a study’s findings?

A

It is permissible to ask the expert about their familiarity with the study and its bearing on their opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of questions can experts be asked in gang cases?

A

Hypothetical questions based on the facts of the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a major issue in the California Supreme Court case People v. Sanchez?

A

The expert had never had contact with the defendant, and the officers who had contact did not testify.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must a prosecutor establish to prove a defendant’s gang membership according to Sanchez?

A

The expert must have personal knowledge of the defendant or first-hand admissions from the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What should an expert not refer to in their answers regarding gang membership?

A

Hearsay admissions by the defendant unless proven through competent evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fill in the blank: Expert witnesses are not a vehicle for an end run around the _______.

A

hearsay rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can Sanchez be used against defense experts?

A

It questions the admissibility of defense gang experts’ testimony if they lack personal knowledge of the defendant’s gang.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What must be established for hearsay to be admissible when an expert relies on it?

A

Their opinions do not render the underlying hearsay admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What should be prepared in advance when asking a hypothetical question in court?

A

Write it down well in advance in a non-argumentative fashion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is critical to proving the gang enhancement in a case?

A

The hypothetical question must closely track the facts presented in the case.