experiments Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is an experiment ?

A

Where sientists manipulate variables in which they are interested in to see what effectd occur

  • this method allows causational relationships to be drawn
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Theroretical strengths

A
  • standardised precedure allows for replicability - **reliability **
  • detached method / no bias or influence from researcher
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Practical strengths

A
  • control of environmental influences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ethical strengths

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethical issues

A
  • lack of informed consent - can be difficult to obtain
  • deception - often considered wrong though can be justified
  • harm - ppt may be physically or psychologically harmed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Practical issues

A
  • lack of control
  • costly
  • requires funding for project and space
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

theoretical affects validity

What is the hawthorne effect ?

A
  • people acting differently as they are knowing of the aim
  • acting up to what they think the researcher would want
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MAYO - hawthorne effect study evidence

A

research into workers productivity in a plant
* working with 5 female volunteers who knew he was conducting experiement - he altered conditions such as heating and lighting

  • working input increased when condtions were better or worse

concluding that - the workers were responding to the fact they were beign studied rather than the experimenters variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

interpretivists view on expriment

A

as they belive are behavuours cannot be explained in terms of cause and effect only the meaning we give things
* believe lab is not an effetive way of studying human behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a field study?

A
  • takes place in the subjects natural setting
  • those involved not aware
  • reseacher manipulates IV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rosenhan field study example

A

researchers presented themselves at 12 mh hospitals saying they hearing voices
* each admitted and diagnosed with schizophrenia

once in hospital didnt complain and acted normally

( hospital staff still treated them as though mentally ill)

*suggests not the behaviour but in fact the label *

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluation of field studies

A

+ mroe natural and realistic/valid
- though more realistic less controll
- some aregue unethical as no consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the comparative method

A

A thought experiment that does not involve the researcher experimenting on real people at all.
Designed to discover cause and effect relationships

1) Identify two groups of people that are alike in all major respects except for the one variable we are interested in

2) Then compare the two groups to see if this one difference between them has any effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DURKHEIMS SUICIDE STUDY COMPARATIVE METHOD EXAMPLE

A

Hypothesis - Low levels of integration of individuals into social groups caused high rates of suicide.

  • Argued catholicism produces higher levels of integration
    Therefore, predicted Protestants would have a higher suicide rate that catholics
  • Tested his prediction by comparing suicide rates of catholics and protestants who were similar in all other aspects of life
  • Prediction was supported
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of comparative method - strengths

A
  • Avoids artificiality
  • Used to study past events
  • Poses no ethical problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of comparative methods limitation

A
  • Gives the researcher less control of other variables
  • Even less certain whether a thought experiment really has discovered the cause of something.