Exam Teckers Flashcards
Cold War Question 1 - Explain two consequences of …….. (8 marks)
- 12 minutes
- 2 PEELs (Point, Evidence, Explanation, link)
- Use specific information about the topic to support your explanation.
- Make sure you clearly state your point/comsequnce and FULLY develop it.
- 2 pieces pieces of evidence is key to higher marks.
Cold War Question 2 - Write a narrative account analysing…. (8 marks)
- 12 minutes
- 3 shorter paragraphs
- You will be given TWO bullet points but you don’t have to use them.
- You MUST include an event of your own.
- It MUST be organised into a clear sequence of events leading to an outcome (chronological order).
- Make sure you link your paragraphs together using phrases like (this led to, this meant that, etc)
Cold War Question 3 - Explain the importance of two…… (2 x 8marks so 16 marks total)
- 25 minutes
- You will be given THREE questions that you must answer TWO from - the ones you choose should be based on the two you feel provides greater oppurtunity for you to focus on importance.
- 2 PEEL paragraphs for each (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link).
- How to answer the importance Q in a few simple steps:
> Step 1: for the first of your choices, jot down examples of its importance.
> Step 2: use the words within the question to begin your answer and start by introducing one example of its significance. (1st paragraph)
> Step 3: fully explain this using precise evidence. You will gain higher marks with more accurate information.
> Step 4: now introduce another example of it’s importance. (2nd paragraph)
> Step 5: fully explain the importance of this second example using accurate and precise evidence.
> Step 6: explain your other choice using steps 1-5.
Elizabeth Question 1 - Describe two key features of…… (4 marks)
- 5 minutes
- Two points supported by precise and specific knowledge.
- Mark scheme says that: One mark for a valid feature identified x2, one mark should be awarded for relevant supporting information x2.
Elizabeth Question 2 - Explain why (12 marks)
- 20 minutes
- 3 PEEL paragraphs (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link).
- This question asks you to explain the reasons why something happened.
- You are given TWO stimulus points as prompts to help you but you don’t need to use.
- You NEED to use your own evidence.
Elizabeth Question 3 - How far do you agree? (16 marks)
- 30 minutes
- Like R.E Q5, it doesn’t have to be your true opinion but the opinion you have the best evidence for.
- You have a choice of two statements which you need to ONLY WRITE ABOUT ONE.
- You will be given 2 bullet points of information that can be included, your own knowledge must be included.
- Before you decide which statement to write, be clear what ‘concept’ they’re about and what topic information you need to respond to it.
- The concepts can be about: cause, significance, consequence, change, continuity, similarity or difference.
- You should include and consider both sides of the argument even if you clearly think one way or the other (it’s about how you explain your opinion).
- Introduction: Say what you think but not in detail (I ___ agree/disagree with the statement that______) and the points you might write about but not in detail.
- Middle section: At least one paragraph for and at least one against (depending on timings, 2 for and 1 against or vice versa is alright, but it is better to have 4 paragraphs)
- Conclusion: You must clearly state your judgement and explain why you think that one cause is more important than another one.
USA Question 1 - Give two things you can infer from Source A about… (4 marks)
- 6 minutes
- You will need to make 2 inference from a source.
- 1 mark will be awarded for each valid inference up to a mamimum of two inferences.
- A second mark for each will be awarded for supporting detail from the source.
- You could answer the question like this: ‘One inference I can make from Source A is ___. This is because in the source it says that / in the source I can see that___. Another inference I can make from Source A is……………..’
USA Question 2 - Explain why…… (12 marks)
- 20 minutes
- This question is like the Elizabeth 12 marker but for USA.
- 3 PEEL paragraphs (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link).
- This question asks you to explain the reasons why something happened.
- You are given TWO stimulus points as prompts to help you but you don’t need to use.
- You NEED to use your own evidence.
USA Question 3a - How useful are sources B and C for an equiry into….. (8 marks)
- 12 minutes
- 2 paragraphs (one for each source)
- Explain how useful/not useful two sources are for an equiry into an aspect of the USA during this period.
- Use these pointers to explain why or why not the source might be useful/not useful:
>who made the source (person who said, wrote, produced it)
>when the source was made
>why the source was made
>what is the source (interview, propaganda)
>if the source is similar to your own knowledge (if it’s actually true or not)
USA Question 3b: Study Interpretations 1 and 2. They give different views about….. What is the main difference between interpretations 1 and 2? (4 marks)
- 6 minutes
- Explain the main difference between the views given in 2 different interpretations.
- Use evidence from both interpretations to support your answer.
- Possible template:
>The main difference between interpretation 1 and 2 is that____. In interpretation 1, Historian A says that______. However, in interpretation 2, Historian B says that_____.
USA Question 3c: Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about…. (4 marks)
- 6 minutes
- Explain why the interpretations are different.
- Your explanation should be supported using evidence from the interpretations and your own knowledge.
- Reasons why the interpretations could be different:
>who made the source (person who said, wrote, produced it)
>when the source was made
>why the source was made
>what the source is (interview, propaganda)
USA Question 3d: How far do you agree with Interpretation 2 about….? (16 marks + 4 for SPAG)
- 25 minutes
- Like R.E Q5, it doesn’t have to be your true opinion but the opinion you have the best evidence for.
- Structure: Intro, 3/4 PEEL paragraphs, conclusion where you give your overall judgement.
- If you’re stuggling for a negative, you could always write about what the interpretation DOESN’T include.
- Introduction: Say what you think but not in detail (I ___ agree/disagree with the interpretation that______) and the points you might write about but not in detail.
- Middle section: At least one paragraph for and at least one against (depending on timings, 2 for and 1 against or vice versa is alright, but it is better to have 4 paragraphs)
- Conclusion: You must clearly state your judgement and explain why you think this.