exam II Flashcards
pros of field work
natural behaviors, no husbandry costs, free? of ethical concerns
cons of field work
site selection, landowner permission, proximity vs data frequency, sample size concerns
pros of lab work
controls and experiments, often close/more detail, model species+huge knowledge base
cons of lab work
$$$ for husbandry, adaptation to captivity, ethics for wild species
observer effect
disrupting natural behaviors
3 ways to combat observer effect
habituation, hide, video
4 sampling rules
ad lib, focal, scan, behavior
3 recording rules
continuous + time sampling (instantaneous + one-zero)
ad lib sampling
no set rule, get as much info on as many individuals as you can
ad lib sampling pros
little prep required, preliminary observations
ad lib sampling cons
miss brief or inconspicuous behaviors
focal animal sampling
focus on a predetermined individual (or dyad or group), note OOV
focal sampling pros
best for group interactions, documenting variation, good in-depth behavioral info
focal sampling cons
difficult if OOV > in view, may misrepresent OOV behaviors
scan sampling
whole group scanned at intervals, proportions + times of behaviors
scan sampling pro
broad sweep of data for comparison between groups or across seasons
scan sampling cons
restricted to “simple” behaviors, may misrepresent rare behaviors
behavior sampling
group observed and instances of behaviors recorded along w participants, good for mating/aggression
behavior sampling pro
collect data on rare behaviors
behavior sampling con
biased towards conspicuous behaviors
continuous recording
recording all behaviors w time/duration, exact record of behavior
instantaneous recording (state v event?)
record behaviors “on the beep” (good for state behaviors)
one-zero recording (state v event?)
record whether behaviors occurred (1) or not (0) during a sample interval (works well for event behaviors)
bird identification methods
leg bands, neck bands, wing tags, radio-tracking, PIT tags
mammal identification methods
fur dye, ear tags, PIT tags, radio-transmitter
fish identification methods
fin clip/notch, floy tags, marine radio-transmitter, PIT tags w monitoring stations
reptile/amphibian identification methods
epoxied labels, shell notch/engrave, toe clipping, visible implant
4 study needs
permanence of mark, alteration of behavior/invasiveness, cost, distance of observation
5 marking methods
natural features, mutilations, dyes/inks, adornments, active/passive transmitters
“gambit of the group”
individuals repeatedly observed in same group have a social
affiliation
node vs edge
node = individual, edge = social connection
dominant vs subordinate
mostly wins vs loses aggressive interactions
reliability
PRECISION, sensitivity, consistency - how “good”
validity
ACCURACY, specificity, scientific validity - how “right”