Exam Flashcards
Pros & Cons of compulsory annuitisation (PROS)
Pros:
- Pooled longevity risk makes cost of offering the annuity cheaper for all
- Provides longevity hedge for individuals
- Certainty of income, peace of mind
Pros & Cons of compulsory annuitisation (CONS)
- Women / higher socio economic live longer. Would poor / men subsidising the rich.
- Guaranteed rate of income may be lower due to low prevailing interest rates
- Early death -> will not get full benefit
- give up some upside of being exposed to markets
Two approaches to portfolio rebalancing; TAA and SAA. Pros & Cons?
SAA: main risk control tool. Designed to achieve objective. Keep control of risk/return tradeoff. Countercyclical discipline. Rebalance as risky asset classes outperform and increase as a proportion. WATCH: costs of trading/tax.
If SAA was right for the client at the start, why would you deviate.
4 Conflicts of Interest
- Different trails between internal & external products. Mitigate: review for client suitability, ensure adequate product review to justify. Manage: still need firm revenue. Manage fees different. eg fee for service. Improve efficiencies, stay abreast of industry best practice
- Entertainment: mitigate by maintaining entertainment register and set guidelines on what is acceptable.
- Brokerage: review portfolios for excessive turnover
- Volume bonuses” peer review of product allocation processes and system monitoring
Pros / Cons of including alternative assets (client perspective)
+ perception of being smart money
+ perceived diversification (though in reality, correlations, risk/return can vary markedly)
+ access to investments not available in other formats
- liquidity
- cost (of external managers)
- incorporating from risk / return perspective, alt assets have unique characteristics, so how should they be modelled
Pros / Cons of including alternative assets (firm perspective)
\+ fees / revenue generally high \+ perception of being on cutting edge \+ placement fees - hard to model/hard to incorporate into SAA. incorporating from risk / return perspective, alt assets have unique characteristics - costly to review & monitor - low transparency
Possible services for UHNW from US IB
- ascertain client needs first
- standard offering: tax, super, estate planning, insurance, investments, managing longevity risk)
- other offerings that may suit: tax specific advice for company, financial structuring of business, trusts,
- access to exclusive entertainment, etc (eg art), philanthropic desires, trust set up.
Discuss challenges of managing advisers
Key: business drivers, power of advisers, management techniques
Challenge; reputational risk; revenue stream dependent advisers and their relationships (may take clients when leave).
Keep PWMs engaged with firm: titles, bonuses, need to be heard etc
Need to build brand loyalty to engender loyalty
Get advisers to work in teams.
Is behavioural finance relevant?
- BF is based on the idea that people are not rational
- PWM recognise individuals are more important than the aggregate when creating IP
- PWM need to protect clients from themselves - use BF
- List examples of BF (heuristics etc)
Pros & Cons of life cycle (aka target date funds) (PROS)
+ age cohorts are a good starting point
+ useful for managing longevity risk in the absence of a deep annuities market
+ even if not perfectly suited to client, may be good enough
Pros & Cons of life cycle (aka target date funds) (CONS)
- being prescriptive on date of AA change can be detrimental if market has just fallen materially
- Different firms offer different fund allocations - which is correct?
- Later in life funds may be too conservative, giving up growth
What is Human Capital
- HC is a person’s skills, training etc used to generate wealth and income.
- Not generally tradeable.
- The ability to earn a salary
- Major proportion of wealth for most
Human Capital: How can you value it?
HC can be modelled as the NPV of future income payments discounted at appropriate rate.
What is the relationship between HC and FC
HC declines over time as individuals approach retirement.
FC increases over time as assets build up in prep for retirement.
HC falls because there are less future pay packets to be discounted by the discount rate
How would you increase the value of HC
education
training
ability to work harder