Exam 3- Chapters 6 & 8: Social Influence and Group Process Flashcards
Conformity
A change in behavior or belief as the result of real or imagined group pressure. Three varieties: compliance, obedience, and acceptance.
Compliance vs Acceptance
Compliance: conformity that involves publicly acting in accord with an implied or explicit request while privately disagreeing.
Acceptance: conformity that involves both acting and believing in accord with social pressure (sometimes follows compliance).
Obedience
Compliance/acting in accord with a direct order or command.
Sherif (1937) “Autokinetic Effect”
Autokinetic effect: The apparent movement of a stationary point of light in the dark.
Sherif asked students to estimate movement of light, an ambiguous stimulus. Students gave different answers when alone than when sitting with other students. In the end, they all came to one answer.
Study showed pluralistic ignorance and conformity to be correct (informational influence).
Asch (1956) “Visual Acuity”
Disagreed with Sherif’s results because he used an ambiguous stimulus.
Used comparison of sizes of lines (not ambiguous). Six confederates and one subject all sitting together. All give wrong answer, subject also gives wrong answer.
When asked alone, subject gives right answer and said they gave the wrong one in the group in fear of being ridiculed.
Study showed normative influence.
Milgram (1965, 1974) Obedience Experiment
Tested what happens when the demands of authority clash with the demands of conscience.
When experimenter asked subjects in “teacher” position to continue to shock confederates in “learner” position with progressively higher shocks, confederates screamed and ask subject to stop.
Even when subject wanted to stop, the experimenter used 4 different prods to have them continue (prod 4: you have no choice, you must go on.)
Subjects listened to the experimenter (perceived as an authority figure), and continued to administer shocks 65% of the time.
Showed obedience and that people are naturally compelled to obey authority.
Commitment (Public vs Private)
If people commit, orally or in writing, to an idea or goal, they are more likely to honor that commitment because of establishing that idea or goal as being congruent with their self-image.
Even if the original incentive or motivation is removed after they have already agreed, they will continue to honor the agreement.
Group size and Conformity
More people acting one way in a group will elicit more conformity than a small group or individual. The agreement of independent small groups makes positions more credible (oppossed to one large group).
Cohesiveness
A “we feeling”; the extent which members of a group are bound together, such as by attraction to one another. The more cohesive a group is, the more power it gains over its members, i.e. in college sororities.
Asserting Uniqueness
People feel better when they assert themselves as moderately unique. Those who are more unique in their surroundings tend to be conscious of its distinctiveness and how those around relate.
Normative vs Informational Influence
- Normative: conformity based on a persons desire to fulfill others’ expectations, often to gain acceptance.
- Informational: Conformity when people accept evidence about reality provided by other people.
Schacter (1959)
A set of experiments by Schachter (1959) demonstrated that, given the opportunity, people confronting a stress-inducing experience will usually tend to seek out the informal social support of other people–even strangers if necessary. Experimental subjects who thought they
were going to experience a series of painful electric shocks, and subjects who anticipated experiencing only very mild electrical stimuli were given a choice between (1) waiting alone, and (2) waiting with other subjects for a brief period while final preparations were made for the experiment.
Found that the greater the anticipated pain, the greater the tendency was for subjects to choose to wait amid the com-panionship of other people. Study showed heightened needs for reassurance, distraction, information, and social comparison, among subjects experiencing greater stress.
Deutsch & Gerard (1955)
- The genuine participant gave their judgments anonymously in an isolated cubicle by pressing a button, believing there were 3 other participants
- The 3 participants were in a isolated group, believing they were in competition with other groups and the experimenter promising a reward to the groups making the most accurate decisions
- Found conformity greatest in the third condition - though it is impossible to separate out normative from informational influence in that condition. They found conformity at its least in the second.
Social Loafing
The bigger the group of people working on a task, the less work each individual will do (since they expect someone else will make up for it).
Social Facilitation
The strengthening of dominant (prevalent and likely) responses in the presence of others.
The tendency for people to perform simple or well-learned tasks in the presence of others.